Evaluation of Patient Demographics in Clinical Cancer Genomic Testing.

BACKGROUND: Inequitable use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing for cancer risk and treatment can contribute to heath disparity. Consequently, it is important to assess the population receiving this testing. In this article, we characterize the population receiving both germline and somatic NGS testing for cancer predisposition and precision oncology at the Genetics and Solid Tumors Laboratory of the University of Washington Medical Center. METHODS: The general demographics, including ancestry, of patients receiving somatic testing to identify genes related to cancer treatment or prognosis, diagnosis, or germline testing for heritable cancer risk from January 2015 to July 2017 were characterized. Ancestry was determined using single nucleotide variant data and documented pedigree. The demographics of the patient population receiving testing were compared with a reference population comprising patients receiving care from the University of Washington Medical Center with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of breast, ovary, colon, rectum, or prostate between January 2015 and May 2018. RESULTS: A total of 2210 unique patients were included in this study. Women composed 66% of our total tested population. Patients of European ancestry composed 78% of the tested cohort. The percentages of American Indian/Alaskan Native and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander in the cohort receiving NGS testing were significantly different than their respective distributions in the reference cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Characterizing the demographics of patients receiving NGS testing for cancer predisposition and precision oncology using single nucleotide variant data and documented pedigree may help identify potential health disparities.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of FICZ analogues as agonists of aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand activated transcription factor involved in multiple biological processes including immune cell differentiation, intestinal function and inflammation. Based on the scaffold of naturally occurring AhR ligand 6-formylindolo (3,2-b) carbazole (FICZ, 2), a series of analogues has been designed, synthesized and evaluated by cell-based assays. The structure-activity relationships study has successfully led to the discovery of compound 11e with extremely potent activity.

Discovery of 2,3'-diindolylmethanes as a novel class of PCSK9 modulators.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) promotes the degradation of low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR). Anti-PCSK9 agents have been approved for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. We recently discovered a series of small-molecule PCSK9 modulators that contains a relatively small pharmacophore of 2,3'-diindolylmethane with molecular weights around only 250. These molecules can significantly lower the amount of PCSK9 protein in a cell-based phenotypic assay. Our SAR studies yielded compound 16 with a IC50-value of 200 nM. No obvious cytotoxicity was observed at concentrations below 50 µM.

Interassay Comparison of the Tumor Markers CA125, CA15.3, and CA27.29.

BACKGROUND: Cancer antigens 125, 27.29, and 15-3 (CA125, CA27.29, and CA15-3) are markers of ovarian and breast cancer. Comparing tumor marker results across methods is challenging because of the lack of harmonization. Documenting comparability of results is important. METHODS: Siemens Advia Centaur CA125 and CA27.29 assays were compared to their corresponding Beckman Coulter DxI CA125 and CA15-3 assays. The interassay bias was determined and the manufacturer-recommended reference intervals were evaluated. RESULTS: The DxI CA125 assay demonstrated an overall positive 29% bias relative to the Centaur CA125 assay. The DxI CA15-3 assay demonstrated an overall negative 65% bias relative to the Centaur CA27.29 assay. For patients with multiple comparisons during the study period, the trend of results over time was similar across both sets of assays. Implementing the manufacturer-recommended reference interval for the DxI CA125 assay increased the abnormal flagging rate by 4.5%. In contrast, implementing the manufacturer-recommended reference interval for the DxI CA15-3 assay decreased the abnormal flagging rate by 13.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The overall trends for the majority of patients were similar. Therefore, despite the overall biases, transitioning tumor marker assays should not affect clinical interpretation of results.