Maintenance of an Intraoperative External Fixator Is Associated With Decreased Postoperative Stiffness After Definitive Management of High-Energy Tibial Plateau Fractures.

Introduction Postoperative stiffness is a common complication after high-energy tibial plateau fractures. Investigation into reported surgical techniques for the prevention of postoperative stiffness is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of postoperative stiffness after second-stage definitive surgery for high-energy tibial plateau fractures between groups of patients who had the external fixator prepped into the surgical field and those who did not. Methods Two hundred forty-four patients met the inclusion criteria between the two academic Level I trauma centers, representing the retrospective observational cohort. Patients were separated based on prepping of the external fixator into the surgical field during second-stage definitive open reduction and internal fixation. One hundred sixty-two patients were in the prepped group and 82 were in the non-prepped group. Post-operative stiffness was determined by the need to return to the operating room for subsequent procedures. Results At the final follow-up (mean = 14.6 months), patients in the non-prepped group had an increased rate of stiffness post-operatively (18.3% non-prepped versus 6.8% prepped; p = 0.006). No other investigated variables were associated with increased post-operative stiffness, including the number of days spent in the fixator and operative time. The relative risk for post-operative stiffness associated with complete fixator removal was 2.54 (95% CI 1.26-4.41; p = 0.008 on binary logistic regression; absolute risk reduction 11.5%). Conclusion At the final follow-up, maintenance of an intraoperative external fixator as a reduction aid was associated with a clinically significant decrease in post-operative stiffness after definitive management of high-energy tibial plateau fractures, when compared with complete removal prior to prepping.

Perioperative allogenic blood transfusions are associated with increased fracture related infection rates, but not nonunion in operatively treated distal femur fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Distal femur fractures are common injuries that remain difficult for orthopedic surgeons to treat. High complication rates, including nonunion rates as high as 24% and infection rates of 8%, can lead to increased morbidity for these patients. Allogenic blood transfusions have previously been identified as risk factors for infection in total joint arthroplasty and spinal fusion surgeries. No studies have explored the relationship between blood transfusions and fracture related infection (FRI) or nonunion in distal femur fractures. METHODS: 418 patients with operatively treated distal femur fractures at two level I trauma centers were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics were collected including age, gender, BMI, medical comorbidities, and smoking. Injury and treatment information was also collected including open fracture, polytrauma status, implant, perioperative transfusions, FRI, and nonunion. Patients with less than three months of follow up were excluded. RESULTS: 366 patients were included in final analysis. One hundred thirty-nine (38%) patients received a perioperative blood transfusion. Forty-seven (13%) nonunions and 30 (8%) FRI were identified. Allogenic blood transfusion was not associated with nonunion (13% vs 12%, P = 0.87), but was associated with FRI (15% vs 4%, P<0.001). Binary logistic regression analysis identified a dose dependent relationship between number of perioperative blood transfusions and FRI: total transfusion ≥2 U PRBC RR= 3.47(1.29, 8.10, P = 0.02), ≥3 RR= 6.99 (3.01, 12.40, P<0.001), and ≥4 RR= 8.94 (4.03, 14.42, P<0.001). DISCUSSION: In patients undergoing operative treatment of distal femur fractures, perioperative blood transfusions are associated with increased risk of fracture related infection, but not the development of a nonunion. This risk association increases in a dose-dependent relationship with increasing total blood transfusions received.

Teaching of Cost-Effective Care in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Training: A Survey of Residency Programs in the US.

Costs of healthcare in the US continue to rise at rates that are unsustainable. Prior studies, most of which come from non-surgical specialties, indicate that a variety of strategies to teach this material are utilized but without consensus on best practices. No studies exist regarding the teaching of cost-effective care in orthopaedic residency training programs. The goal of this study was to assess the landscape in this area from the perspective of program leadership. Methods: A survey was developed that was sent to orthopaedic residency program leadership via email through their interaction with the COERG. Additional programs were included to enhance diversity of responding programs. The survey, based on those published from other areas of medicine, included questions about the experiences of the respondents in learning about cost-effective care, as well as how faculty and residents learned about this topic. Results: Seventy one percent (30) of respondents noted that their faculty did not receive formal training in cost-effective care, and education in this area was likely to come from the department, especially review of practice data (12, 44%). Only 19% (8) of respondents agreed with the statement that "the majority of teaching faculty in our program consistently model cost-effective healthcare to residents". Few of the programs (10, 24%) had formal curricula for residents regarding cost-effective care, and the primary mode of education in cost-effective care was through informal discussions with faculty (17, 43%). Few residents (3, 13%) were able to easily find the costs of tests or procedures. Discussion: There is not consistent education in cost-effective care for orthopaedic surgery program leadership, faculty, or trainees. The results of this survey demonstrate a need for discussion of best practices, including increasing access to cost data at a local level, and engaging with the AOA, CORD, and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons more broadly in the development of standard education modules for faculty and residents, to improve the current and future delivery of cost-effective musculoskeletal care.

Do number and location of plates impact infection rates after definitive fixation of high energy tibial plateau fractures?

PURPOSE: Surgical trauma may confer additional infectious risk after operative fixation for high energy tibial plateau fractures. This study aims to determine the impact of plate number and location on infection rates after these injuries. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study completed at two level one trauma centers included patients who underwent staged fixation for a tibial plateau fracture between 2015 and 2019. Plate number and location (lateral, medial, posteromedial, and anterior quadrants) used in the definitive fixation construct were collected from post-operative radiographs. Deep infection rate was primary the outcome. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients met inclusion criteria. The overall infection rate was 13.9% (34/244). Infection rates increased with each additional quadrant utilized (8.0% one quadrant, 13.0% two quadrants, 27.3% three quadrants, 100% four quadrants; p < 0.001), independent of plate number, fracture severity, operative time, number of incisions, external fixator pin and plate construct overlap, and days in the external fixator on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Infection risk increases with each quadrant utilized in the fixation of high energy tibial plateau fractures. Providers should attempt to limit the dissection of soft tissue for hardware placement in the fixation of these injuries to limit infection risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective therapeutic study.

External fixator pin placement during initial management of tibial plateau fractures: are there parameters to minimize pin-plate overlap?

PURPOSE: External fixator pin site overlap with definitive fixation implants (pin-plate overlap) has been identified as a risk factor for surgical site infection in tibial plateau fractures. Despite this, pin-plate overlap occurs in 24-38% of patients. This study sought to identify radiographic characteristics associated with pin-plate overlap to help minimize occurrences. METHODS: 283 patients at two Level I trauma centers were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic measurements were recorded including fracture length, distance from fracture to proximal tibial pin site, and pin site distance-to-fracture (PSF) ratio. RESULTS: 70 (24.7%) cases of pin-plate overlap were identified. Pin-plate overlap was associated with increased fracture length (81.5 ± 32.1 mm vs 56.9 ± 26.1 mm, p < 0.001) and decreased distance from fracture to proximal tibial pin site (84.5 ± 37.1 mm vs 126.9 ± 35.8 mm). Pins placed greater than 100 mm and 150 mm from the fracture eliminated 36/70 (51%) and 67/70 (96%) pin-plate overlaps, respectively. Pins placed with a PSF ratio greater than 1.5 and 2.0 eliminated 47/70 (67%), and 57/70 (81%) of pin-plate overlaps, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Longer fractures, pins closer to the fracture, and decreased PSF ratio were associated with overlap. Placing proximal tibial pins more than 100 mm from the fracture eliminated most pin-plate overlaps.

Are Infection Rates Increased After Sterilization of the External Fixator During Staged Internal Fixation of High-Energy Tibial Plateau Fractures?

OBJECTIVES: To compare infection rates after second-stage definitive surgery for high-energy tibial plateau fractures between groups of patients who had the external fixator prepped into the surgical field and those who did not. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two academic Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-four patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria between the 2 institutions. INTERVENTION: Prepping of the external fixator into the surgical field during second-stage definitive open reduction and internal fixation. 162 patients were in the prepped group, and 82 patients were in the nonprepped group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the rate of deep infection after definitive fixation. Secondary outcome was operative time. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in infection rates between prepped (11.7%) and nonprepped (18.3%) groups ( P = 0.162). Patients in the prepped groups had significantly decreased operative time (168.2 minutes vs. 221.9 minutes, P < 0.001) even after controlling for confounders in regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is no increased risk of infection associated with prepping and maintenance of the external fixator during definitive internal fixation for high-energy tibial plateau fractures. These data suggest that this practice may lead to shorter operative times as well. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Are deep infections that present before and after 90 days from orthopaedic trauma different? An analysis of the validity of the recent change in CDC criteria for infections.

BACKGROUND: In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) changed the time frame for their definition of deep surgical site infection (SSI) from within 1 year to within 90 days of surgery. We hypothesized that a substantial number of infections in patients who have undergone fracture fixation present beyond 90 days and that there are patient or injury factors that can predict who is more likely to present with SSI after 90 days. METHODS: A retrospective review yielded 452 deep SSI after fracture fixation. These patients were divided into two groups-those infected within 90 days of surgery and those infected beyond 90 days . Data were collected on risk factors for infection. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the two groups. A randomly selected control group was used to build infection prediction models for both outcomes. The two outcomes were then modelled against each other to determine whether differences in predictors for early versus late infection exist. RESULTS: Of the 452 infections, 144 occurred beyond 90 days (32% [95% CI, 28%-36%]). No statistically significant patient factors were found in multivariable analysis between the early and late infection groups. The need for flap coverage was the only injury characteristic that differed significantly between groups, with patients in the late infection group more likely to have needed a flap. When modelled against the control group and directly comparing the two models, predictors for early infection include male sex and fractures of the pelvis, acetabulum, or hip, whereas predictors of late infection include hepatitis C and/or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). CONCLUSION: Use of the recent CDC definition will underestimate the rate of actual postoperative infections when applied to orthopaedic trauma patients. Hepatitis C and/or HIV and ICU admission are predictors of late infection, whereas male sex and pelvis, acetabulum, or hip fractures are predictors of early infection. Patients who receive flap coverage may be more likely to present with late infection.

Admission Hyperglycemia Is a Risk Factor for Deep Surgical-Site Infection in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association of admission blood glucose ≥200 mg/dL and surgical site infection in orthopaedic trauma surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective, case control study. SETTING: Academic trauma center. PATIENTS: Four hundred sixty-five nondiabetic, noncritically ill orthopaedic trauma patients with an extremity, pelvic, or acetabular fracture and requiring open reduction and internal fixation or intramedullary nailing. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Ninety-day deep surgical site infection. RESULTS: Admission blood glucose ≥200 mg/dL was significantly associated with the primary outcome (8/128, 6.3% vs. 35/337, 1.8%; P = 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression modeling demonstrated that admission blood glucose ≥200 mg/dL was a significant risk factor for deep surgical site infections [odds ratio (OR): 4.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-15.7], after controlling for male gender (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-3.1), prior drug or alcohol abuse (OR: 1.9, 95% CI 0.9-4.0), open fracture (OR: 6.4, 95% CI 3.7-11.0), and fracture region (upper extremity OR: reference; pelvis/hip OR: 3.9, 95% CI 1.6-9.7; femur OR: 2.0, 95% CI 0.88-4.8; tibia/ankle OR: 3.3, 95% CI 1.7-6.2; and foot OR: 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6.3). CONCLUSIONS: Admission glucose ≥200 mg/dL was a significant independent risk factor for 90-day deep surgical site infections in orthopaedic trauma patients and may serve as an important marker for infection risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Surgeons Cannot Predict Pilon Fracture Outcomes Based on Initial Radiographs.

This study sought to determine (1) whether surgeons can accurately predict functional outcomes of operative fixation of pilon fractures based on injury and initial postoperative radiographs, (2) whether the surgeon's level of experience is associated with the ability to successfully predict outcome, and (3) the association between patients' demographic and clinical characteristics and surgeons' prediction scores. A blinded, randomized provider survey was conducted at a level I trauma center. Seven fellowship-trained orthopedic traumatologists and 4 orthopedic trauma fellows who were blinded to outcome reviewed data regarding 95 pilon fractures in random order. Injury ankle radiographs, initial postoperative fixation radiographs, and brief patient histories were assessed. Midterm follow-up functional outcome scores obtained a mean 4.9 years after surgery were available for all patients. Main outcome measures were Pearson correlation coefficient-assessed functional outcomes and surgeon-predicted outcomes. A mixed-effect model determined the association between patients' characteristics and surgeons' prediction scores. Minimal positive correlation was observed between functional outcomes and prediction scores. No difference was noted between the attending and fellow groups in prediction ability. When surgeons' prediction confidence level was greater than 1 SD above the mean confidence level, correlation between functional outcome and prediction improved, although poor correlation was still observed. AO/OTA type 43C fractures, high-energy mechanisms, and older patient age were characteristics associated with lower prediction scores. Surgeons had poor ability to predict functional outcomes of patients with pilon fractures based on injury and initial postoperative radiographs, and level of experience was not associated with ability to predict outcome. [Orthopedics. 2020; 43(1): e43-e46.].

A Predictive Score for Determining Risk of Surgical Site Infection After Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To determine factors predictive of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) after fracture fixation and create a prediction score for risk of infection at time of initial treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Study group, 311 patients with deep SSI; control group, 608 patients. INTERVENTION: We evaluated 27 factors theorized to be associated with postoperative infection. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to build a prediction model. A composite score reflecting risk of SSI was then created. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk of postoperative infection. RESULTS: The final model consisted of 8 independent predictors: (1) male sex, (2) obesity (body mass index ≥ 30) (3) diabetes, (4) alcohol abuse, (5) fracture region, (6) Gustilo-Anderson type III open fracture, (7) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal swab testing (not tested or positive result), and (8) American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. Risk strata were well correlated with observed proportion of SSI and resulted in a percent risk of infection of 1% for ≤3 points, 6% for 4-5 points, 11% for 6 to 8-9 points, and 41% for ≥10 points. CONCLUSION: The proposed postoperative infection prediction model might be able to determine which patients have fractures at higher risk of infection and provides an estimate of the percent risk of infection before fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk Factors for Knee Stiffness Surgery After Tibial Plateau Fracture Fixation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk factors for knee stiffness surgery after tibial plateau fixation. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Academic Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A study group of 110 patients who underwent knee stiffness surgery (manipulation while under anesthesia, arthroscopic lysis of adhesion, or quadricepsplasty) at a time remote from open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures and a control group of 319 patients with tibial plateau fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation who did not undergo knee stiffness surgery and who had either a minimum of 1 year of follow-up or clearly documented range of motion ≥110 degrees with a minimum of 90 days of follow-up. INTERVENTION: Each case was assessed from the time of index admission through study event, end of minimum follow-up, or achievement of ≥110 degrees range of motion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Knee stiffness surgery. RESULTS: Total number of weeks in an external fixator (odds ratio, 1.5 per week; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.7; P < 0.001) and the presence of bilateral tibial plateau fractures (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-9.1; P = 0.02) were significant predictors of knee stiffness intervention. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware that the time spent in external fixation and the presence of bilateral tibial plateau injuries are strong risk factors for requiring subsequent surgery to treat knee stiffness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Long-term results of extensor mechanism reconstruction using Achilles tendon allograft after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Disruption of the extensor mechanism after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an infrequent but devastating complication. Presently, limited data exists regarding the optimal treatment and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent reconstruction of their knee extensor mechanism using Achilles tendon allograft following TKA between January 2003 and January 2012 were identified. Sixteen patients with 17 reconstructions (10 patellar tendons, 7 quadriceps tendons) were studied. All patients underwent evaluation at an average of 45.7 months. Ten of the patients were followed to an average of 65.4 months. RESULTS: After reconstruction, the average extensor lag was 6.6° and average knee flexion was 105.1°. Of the patients with a minimum follow-up of two years and an average follow-up of 65.4 months, the average extensor lag and knee flexion was 8.4° and 107.9°, respectively, with quadriceps strength maintained at an average of 4/5. The quadriceps tendon reconstructions had an average extensor lag and flexion of 2.9° and 103°, respectively. The patellar tendon reconstructions, excluding one re-rupture, had an average extensor lag and flexion of 9.6° and 105.1°, respectively. Four patients died during the follow-up period. All but one of the patients were below the mean for age-matched controls on the SF-36. CONCLUSION: Achilles tendon allograft reconstruction is a reliable and durable treatment for patients who sustain not only patellar tendon ruptures, but also quadriceps tendon ruptures following TKA. Despite the success of this technique, the injury and procedure have a profound impact on overall function.

Risk Factors for Failure of Bone Grafting of Tibia Nonunions and Segmental Bone Defects: A New Preoperative Risk Assessment Score.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinically useful prediction model of success at the time of surgery to promote bone healing for established tibial nonunion or traumatic bone defects. DESIGN: Retrospective case controlled. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Adult patients treated with surgery for established tibia fracture nonunion or traumatic bone defects from 2007 to 2016. Two hundred three patients met the inclusion criteria and were available for final analysis. INTERVENTION: Surgery to promote bone healing of established tibia fracture nonunion or segmental defect with plate and screw construct, intramedullary nail fixation, or multiplanar external fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure of the surgery to promote bone healing that was defined as unplanned revision surgery for lack of bone healing or deep infection. No patients were excluded who had a primary outcome event. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic modeling identified 5 significant (P < 0.05) risk factors for failure of the surgery to promote bone healing: (1) mechanism of injury, (2) Increasing body mass index, (3) cortical defect size (mm), (4) flap size (cm), and (5) insurance status. A prediction model was created based on these factors and awarded 0 points for fall, 17 points for high energy blunt trauma (OR = 17; 95% CI, 1-286, P = 0.05), 22 points for industrial/other (OR = 22; 95% CI, 1-4, P = 0.04), and 28 points for ballistic injuries (OR = 28; 95% CI, 1-605, P = 0.04). One point is given for every 10 cm of flap size (OR = 1; 95% CI, 1-1.1, P < 0.001), 10 mm of mean cortical gap distance (OR = 1; 95% CI, 1-2, P = 0.004), and 10 units BMI, respectively (OR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1-3, P = 0.16). Two points are awarded for Medicaid or no insurance (OR = 2; 95% CI, 1-5, P = 0.035) and 3 points for Medicare (3; 95% CI, 1-9, P = 0.033). Each 1-point increase in risk score was associated with a 6% increased chance of requiring at least 1 revision surgery (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a clinical score that predicts the likelihood of success after surgery for tibia fracture nonunions or traumatic bone defects and may help clinicians better determine which patients are likely to fail these procedures and require further surgery.

Epiphysiolysis of the femoral neck due to closed reduction of an adolescent hip dislocation with a 4-year follow-up: a case report and review of the literature.

This case study discusses a 13-year-old girl diagnosed with a displaced Salter Harris II fracture of the proximal femoral epiphysis post reduction of a dislocated hip. Radiographs before reduction revealed a small fracture of the inferomedial femoral head. This, however, did not induce concern before reduction. The patient underwent reparative surgery of the epiphysis only to develop a collapsed femoral head, which was remedied through total hip arthroplasty. A decrease in blood flow, the delicacy in reduction, and unknown predispositions might have been contributing factors toward the unique development in this case.

Antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria infecting total joint arthroplasty sites.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no consensus regarding the principles of empiric antibiotic treatment of suspected periprosthetic infection following total knee and hip arthroplasties. This study was undertaken to attempt to establish such principles. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 146 patients who had had a total of 194 positive cultures of specimens obtained at the time of a reoperation following a total knee or total hip arthroplasty at one of two institutions. Patient demographic data, comorbid conditions, bacterial species, the antibiotic sensitivity profile, and the postoperative day on which the culture tested positive were recorded. RESULTS: Specimens from 110 hips and eighty-four knees were positive on culture. Seventy percent of the infections were classified as chronic; 17%, as acute postoperative; and 13%, as acute hematogenous. The mean time between the operation and the positive culture results was three days. Gram-positive organisms caused the majority of the infections. In the series as a whole, 88% of the bacteria were sensitive to gentamicin; 96%, to vancomycin; and 61%, to cefazolin. The most antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains were from patients for whom prior antibiotic treatment had failed. Acute postoperative infections had a greater resistance profile than did chronic or hematogenous infections. Bacteria isolated from patients with a hematogenous infection had a high sensitivity to both cefazolin and gentamicin. CONCLUSIONS: Empiric antibiotic treatment for suspected periprosthetic infection should be guided by the class of the infection and the findings of Gram staining. We believe that, until the final culture results are available, acute hematogenous infections should initially be treated by a combination of cefazolin and gentamicin therapy. All chronic and acute postoperative infections with Gram-positive bacteria and all cases in which a Gram stain fails to identify bacteria should be managed with vancomycin. Infections with Gram-negative bacteria should be managed with a third or fourth-generation cephalosporin. Infections with mixed Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria should be managed with a combination of vancomycin and a third or fourth-generation cephalosporin. Furthermore, we believe that if culture results and other confirmatory tests are not positive by the fourth postoperative day, termination of empiric antibiotic therapy should be considered.