Daclizumab Versus Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin in High-Risk Renal Transplants: Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Study.

We previously reported a randomized controlled trial in which 227 de novo deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients were randomized to rabbit antithymocyte (rATG, Thymoglobulin) or daclizumab if they were considered to be at high immunological risk, defined as high panel reactive antibodies (PRA), loss of a first kidney graft through rejection within 2 years of transplantation, or third or fourth transplantation. Patients treated with rATG had lower incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and steroid-resistant rejection at 1 year. Patients were followed to 5 years posttransplant in an observational study; findings are described here. Treatment with rATG was associated with a lower rate of BPAR at 5 years (14.2% vs. 26.0% with daclizumab; p = 0.035). Only one rATG-treated patient (0.9%) and one daclizumab-treated patient (1.0%) developed BPAR after 1 year. Five-year graft and patient survival rates, and renal function, were similar between the two groups. Overall graft survival at 5 years was significantly higher in patients without BPAR (81.0% vs. 54.8%; p < 0.001). In conclusion, rATG is superior to daclizumab for the prevention of BPAR among high-immunological-risk renal transplant recipients. Overall graft survival at 5 years was approximately 70% with either induction therapy, which compares favorably to low-risk cohorts.

The ORION study: comparison of two sirolimus-based regimens versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients.

Safety and efficacy of two sirolimus (SRL)-based regimens were compared with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Renal transplantation recipients were randomized to Group 1 (SRL+TAC; week 13 TAC elimination [n = 152]), Group 2 (SRL + MMF [n = 152]) or Group 3 (TAC + MMF [n = 139]). Group 2, with higher-than-expected biopsy-confirmed acute rejections (BCARs), was sponsor-terminated; therefore, Group 2 two-year data were limited. At 1 and 2 years, respectively, graft (Group 1: 92.8%, 88.5%; Group 2: 90.6%, 89.9%; Group 3: 96.2%, 95.4%) and patient (Group 1: 97.3%, 94.4%; Group 2: 95.2%, 94.5%; Group 3: 97.0%, 97.0%) survival rates were similar. One- and 2-year BCAR incidence was: Group 1, 15.2%, 17.4%; Group 2, 31.3%, 32.8%; Group 3, 8.2%, 12.3% (Group 2 vs. 3, p < 0.001). Mean 1- and 2-year modified intent-to-treat glomerular filtration rates (mL/min) were similar. Primary reason for discontinuation was adverse events (Group 1, 34.2%; Group 2, 33.6%; Group 3, 22.3%; p < 0.05). In Groups 1 and 2, delayed wound healing and hyperlipidemia were more frequent. One-year post hoc analysis of new-onset diabetes posttransplantation was greater in TAC recipients (Groups 1 and 3 vs. 2, 17% vs. 6%; p = 0.004). Between-group malignancy rates were similar. The SRL-based regimens were not associated with improved outcomes for kidney transplantation patients.

Sotrastaurin, a novel small molecule inhibiting protein-kinase C: randomized phase II study in renal transplant recipients.

Sotrastaurin, a selective protein-kinase-C inhibitor, blocks early T-cell activation through a calcineurin-independent mechanism. In this study, de novo renal transplant recipients with immediate graft function were randomized 1:2 to tacrolimus (control, n = 44) or sotrastaurin (300 mg b.i.d.; n = 81). All patients received basiliximab, mycophenolic acid (MPA) and steroids. The primary endpoint was the composite of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or lost to follow-up at month 3. The main safety assessment was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) at month 3. Composite efficacy failure at month 3 was higher for the sotrastaurin versus control regimen (25.7% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.001), driven by higher BPAR rates (23.6% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.003), which led to early study termination. Median (± standard deviation [SD]) eGFR was higher for sotrastaurin versus control at all timepoints from day 7 (month 3: 59.0 ± 22.3 vs. 49.5 ± 17.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , p = 0.006). The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (control: 63.6%; sotrastaurin: 88.9%) which led to study-medication discontinuation in two sotrastaurin patients. This study demonstrated a lower degree of efficacy but better renal function with the calcineurin-inhibitor-free regimen of sotrastaurin+MPA versus the tacrolimus-based control. Ongoing studies are evaluating alternative sotrastaurin regimens.

Early prognostic factors of infants with chronic renal failure caused by renal dysplasia.

Renal dysplasia (RD) is a common cause of chronic renal failure (CRF) in children. The evolution towards end-stage renal failure is unpredictable due to the paucity of early prognostic factors. In order to identify early prognostic clinical criteria, we have retrospectively analyzed renal function and growth in 11 infants with RD and CRF from birth up to 4 years of age. Children with obstructive RD were not included. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated from Schwartz formula. In infants with a GFR below 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at 6 months of age (group A, n=5), kidney function did not further improve; 4 reached end-stage renal failure between 8 months and 6 years of age. In contrast, infants with a GFR above 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at 6 months of age (group B, n=6) experienced a significant improvement in renal function during follow-up, and none required renal replacement therapy. During the first 3 months of life all infants with RD and CRF developed severe growth retardation. Between 6 months and 4 years of age, children from group B grew significantly better than those from group A. In conclusion, our experience suggests that GFR, estimated from Schwartz formula at 6 months of age, is a useful prognostic factor in infants with RD and CRF. Infants with a GFR below 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2 are at risk of severe growth delay and the need for early renal replacement therapy, whereas those with a GFR above 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2 have a relatively favorable long-term prognosis.

A pilot trial of recombinant human interleukin-10 in kidney transplant recipients receiving OKT3 induction therapy.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, rising single-dose study to investigate the effects of recombinant human (rh) interleukin (IL) 10 in renal transplant patients who received OKT3 as induction therapy. METHODS: Patients received 0.1 (n=6), 1 (n=6), or 10 microg/kg (n=3) rhIL-10 or placebo (n=6) intravenously 30 min before the first injection of 5 mg of OKT3. We monitored IL-10 serum levels, the effect of rhIL-10 on OKT3-induced cytokine production, clinical toxicity, and the incidence of immunization against OKT3. RESULTS: Serum IL-10 levels in the three experimental groups reached 0.8+/-0.2, 7.9+/-1.3, and 118.6+/-7.3 ng/ml (mean+/-SEM), respectively, 30 min after rhIL-10 injection. Peak plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were reduced from 2953+/-1599 pg/ml in patients injected with OKT3 and placebo to 447+/-155, 703+/-246, and 459+/-246 pg/ml in patients injected with 0.1, 1, and 10 microg/kg rhIL-10, respectively. Values for 24-hr TNF-alpha area under the curve decreased from 8988+/-3551 pg x hr/ml in control patients to 2284+/-494, 3950+/-955, and 2420+/-931 pg x hr/ml for the 0.1, 1, and 10 microg/kg rhIL-10 dose groups, respectively (P=0.045). There was also a trend toward reduced plasma levels of IL-2, IL-8, and interferon-gamma in rhIL-10-pretreated patients. Although none of the patients who received placebo or 0.1 or 1 microg/kg rhIL-10 developed an IgM antibody response directed against OKT3 during the first 10 days, this occurred in all three patients who received the highest rhIL-10 dose. In two of these patients, neutralization of OKT3 was associated with a reversible acute rejection episode. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with doses of up to 1 microg/kg rhIL-10 is safe and reduces the release of TNF-alpha induced by OKT3. However, higher doses might promote early sensitization to OKT3.