Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 73(11): 1577-1582, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32741060

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Cachexia is a disorder characterized by involuntary weight loss in addition to loss of homeostatic control of both energy and protein balance. Despite an abundance of data from other inflammatory diseases, cachexia in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains a largely undescribed syndrome. The present study was undertaken to define the prevalence of cachexia in SLE and to identify the main factors that place patients at risk of developing cachexia. METHODS: A total of 2,452 patients in a prospective SLE cohort had their weight assessed at each visit. Patients were categorized into 5 predetermined groups based on weight. Cachexia was defined based on modified Fearon criteria (5% stable weight loss in 6 months without starvation relative to the average weight in all prior visits and/or a weight loss of >2% without starvation relative to the average weight in all prior cohort visits and a body mass index [BMI] of <20 kg/m2 ). Risk of cachexia within 5 years of cohort entry was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. The association of prior disease manifestations with risk of cachexia adjusted by current steroid use was determined using Cox regression. An analysis of variance test was used to determine whether Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) scores varied based on cachexia status. RESULTS: Within 5 years of cohort entry, 56% of patients developed cachexia, 18% of which never recovered their weight during follow-up. The risk factors for cachexia development were a BMI of <20 kg/m2 , current steroid use, vasculitis, lupus nephritis, serositis, hematologic lupus manifestations, positive anti-double-stranded DNA, anti-Sm, and anti-RNP. Patients with intermittent cachexia had significantly higher SDI scores compared to those with continuous cachexia or without cachexia. CONCLUSION: Cachexia is an underrecognized syndrome in patients with SLE. SLE patients with intermittent cachexia have the highest risk of future organ damage.


Assuntos
Caquexia/epidemiologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/epidemiologia , Adulto , Composição Corporal , Índice de Massa Corporal , Caquexia/diagnóstico , Caquexia/fisiopatologia , Metabolismo Energético , Feminino , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Redução de Peso
2.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 28(11): 1538-1542, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31730425

RESUMO

Introduction: Our aim was to investigate whether cervical conization and/or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) increases the risk of preterm delivery. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of singleton deliveries at our institution from 2010 to 2015. Women aged 16-49 years were included in our study. Univariate and logistic regression were used for statistical analyses. An interaction test was used to assess whether maternal human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity within the 3 years before delivery (referred to as maternal HPV status in this study) is an effect modifier. Results: Of 3933 women who delivered at our institution, 19.8% (n = 792) delivered prematurely. Of these women, 9.1% (n = 362) had a history of cervical surgery, including cervical conization and/or LEEP. Notably, a history of cervical surgery was not associated with current HPV status based on the most recent Pap smear results (p > 0.05). In univariate analysis, a history of cervical surgery was associated with preterm delivery (odds ratio [OR] = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-1.88). This effect was the same among mothers positive (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.16-3.28) and negative (OR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.10-3.30) for HPV. Pregnancy-induced hypertension, preterm premature rupture of membranes, bacterial vaginosis infection, HPV infection, placenta previa, placental abruption, ethnicity, maternal body mass index, nulliparity, and smoking or drug use were also associated with preterm delivery (p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, history of cervical surgery remained associated with preterm delivery (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.31-2.33). There was no interaction (p = 0.91) between maternal HPV status and history of cervical conization or LEEP. Discussion and Conclusions: Maternal history of cervical conization and/or LEEP increases the risk of preterm delivery irrespective of concurrent maternal HPV positivity within the 3 years preceding delivery. Maternal HPV status does not modify the effect of history of cervical conization and/or LEEP on preterm delivery.


Assuntos
Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Conização/estatística & dados numéricos , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Eletrocirurgia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA