RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recently, diagnostic criteria including a standardized MRI criterion were presented to identify patients suffering from idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) proposing that IIH might be defined by two out of three objective findings (papilledema, ≥ 25 cm cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure (CSF-OP) and ≥ 3/4 neuroimaging signs). METHODS: To provide independent external validation, we retrospectively applied the proposed diagnostic criteria to our cohort of patients with clinical suspicion of IIH from the Vienna IIH database. Neuroimaging was reevaluated for IIH signs according to standardized definitions by a blinded expert neuroradiologist. We determined isolated diagnostic accuracy of the neuroimaging criterion (≥ 3/4 signs) as well as overall accuracy of the new proposed criteria. RESULTS: We included patients with IIH (n = 102) and patients without IIH (no-IIH, n = 23). Baseline characteristics were balanced between IIH and no-IIH groups, but papilledema and CSF-OP were significantly higher in IIH. For the presence of ≥ 3/4 MRI signs, sensitivity was 39.2% and specificity was 91.3% with positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.2% and negative predictive value (NPV) 25.3%. Reclassifying our cohort according to the 2/3 IIH definition correctly identified 100% of patients without IIH, with definite IIH and suggested to have IIH without papilledema by Friedman criteria, respectively. CONCLUSION: The standardized neuroimaging criteria are easily applicable in clinical routine and provide moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity to identify patients with IIH. Defining IIH by 2/3 criteria significantly simplifies diagnosis without compromising accuracy.
Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Pseudotumor Cerebral , Humanos , Feminino , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/normas , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Adulto , Pseudotumor Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Pseudotumor Cerebral/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papiledema/diagnóstico por imagem , Papiledema/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Patients suffering from a chronic condition such as coeliac disease (CD) need to develop coping strategies in order to preserve emotional balance and psychosocial functioning while adhering to their obligatory life-long gluten free diet (GFD). However, this can be particularly challenging for adolescents and may lead to dietary transgressions. Little is currently known about the influence of coping strategies and personality factors on dietary compliance. This study aims to explore these factors for the first time in adolescents with biopsy-proven CD. STUDY DESIGN: We included 281 adolescents with CD and 95 healthy controls. We classified patients according to their GFD adherence status (adherent vs. non-adherent) and assessed coping strategies using the KIDCOPE and personality traits using the Junior-Temperament and Character Inventory (J-TCI). RESULTS: Adolescents with CD adherent to GFD used less emotional regulation and distraction as coping strategies than non-adherent patients. In terms of personality traits, adherent patients differed from non-adherent patients with respect to temperament, but not with respect to character, showing lower scores in novelty seeking, impulsivity and rule transgressions and higher scores in eagerness with work and perfectionism compared to non-adherent patients. No differences were found between healthy controls and adherent CD patients across these personality traits. CONCLUSIONS: Coping strategies and personality traits differ in adolescent patients with CD adherent to GFD from those not adherent, and may therefore relate to risk or protective factors in adherence. Targeting coping and temperament using psychological interventions may therefore be beneficial to support adolescents with CD and optimise their adherence to GFD.