Discoidin Domain Receptor 1 Expression in Colon Cancer: Roles and Prognosis Impact.

Extracellular matrix components such as collagens are deposited within the tumor microenvironment at primary and metastatic sites and are recognized to be critical during tumor progression and metastasis development. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and prognostic impact of Discoidin Domain Receptor 1 (DDR1) expression in colon cancers and its association with a particular molecular and/or morphological profile and to evaluate its potential role as a prognosis biomarker. Immunohistochemical expression of DDR1 was evaluated on 292 colonic adenocarcinomas. DDR1 was highly expressed in 240 (82.2%) adenocarcinomas. High DDR1 immunostaining score was significantly associated, on univariate analysis, with male sex, left tumor location, BRAF wild type status, KRAS mutated status, and Annexin A10 negativity. High DDR1 immunohistochemical expression was associated with shorter event free survival only. Laser capture microdissection analyses revealed that DDR1 mRNA expression was mainly attributable to adenocarcinoma compared to stromal cells. The impact of DDR1 expression on cell invasion was then evaluated by modified Boyden chamber assay using cell types with distinct mutational profiles. The invasion capacity of colon adenocarcinoma is supported by DDR1 expression. Thus, our results showed that DDR1 was highly expressed in most colon adenocarcinomas and appears as an indicator of worse event free survival.

Evolution of macroprolactinomas during pregnancy: A cohort study of 85 pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: Pregnancy in patients with macroprolactinomas has been associated with a higher risk of pituitary tumour growth. However, the incidence and risk factors remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the evolution of macroprolactinomas during pregnancy and to identify potential risk factors. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: This is a two-centre, retrospective, observational study. All patients with macroprolactinomas, treated with a dopamine receptor agonist (DA), and who had at least one pregnancy were included. RESULTS: There were a total of 85 viable pregnancies in 46 patients with macroprolactinomas. At diagnosis, mean size of pituitary adenomas was 17.9 ± 8.2 mm (10-43 mm) and mean plasma prolactin level was 1012.2 ± 1606.1 µg/L (60-7804 µg/L). Tumour growth-related symptoms were identified 12 times in 9 patients (19.6%) including 3 cases of apoplexy. Restarting, changing and/or increasing DA treatment was effective in 10 cases. Emergency surgery had to be performed twice (due to pituitary apoplexy). Patients with tumour progression tended to present with larger tumours after initial treatment and before pregnancy (9.9 vs 5.9 mm; P = .0504 and 11.5 vs 7.3 mm; P = .0671, respectively), whereas adenoma size at diagnosis did not seem to be a significant factor. The obstetrical outcomes were comparable to the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic growth of macroprolactinoma during pregnancy occurred in 19.6% of medically treated patients. This risk seems higher for patients with poor initial tumour response to the DA treatment. Tumour progression is generally well controlled with medical treatment during pregnancy.

Factors associated with quality of life in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is necessary to ensure optimal management. Several scales for assessing HRQoL of patients with AD exist, in particular the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD), which includes an evaluation by the caregiver of the patient's HRQoL. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with patient, caregiver and overall HRQoL as assessed by the QoL-AD. METHODS: Cross-sectional multicenter study in subjects aged 65 years and older, with mild to moderate AD. HRQoL scores from the QoL-AD were recorded (3 scores, corresponding to patient, caregiver and overall), as well as sociodemographic variables for the patient and the caregiver, and data from the geriatric cognitive assessment (cognitive, psycho-behavioral, functional evaluations). Caregiver burden was evaluated using the Zarit caregiver burden scale. Factors associated with each QoL-AD score were identified by multivariate linear regression using t-tests and ß estimations. Study was registered in Clinical Trial.gov (NCT02814773). RESULTS: In total, 123 patients with AD were included. For the patient QoL-AD evaluation, depression was significantly associated with lower HRQoL (ß = - 2.56 ± 1.28, p = 0.04), while polypharmacy (ß = - 1.80 ± 0.99, p = 0.07) and anxiety (ß = - 1.70 ± 1.01, p = 0.09) tended to be associated with lower HRQoL scores. In terms of caregiver evaluations, depression (ß = - 3.46 ± 1.09, p = 0.002), polypharmacy (ß = - 1.91 ± 0.92, p = 0.04) and the presence of caregiver burden (ß = - 3.50 ± 0.91, p = 0.0002) were associated with lower HRQoL. For the overall evaluation, depression (ß = - 3.26 ± 1.02, p = 0.002) and polypharmacy (ß = - 1.85 ± 0.81, p = 0.03) were significantly related to lower HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Depression and polypharmacy were two factors influencing HRQoL in patients with AD, both by patient self-report and on the caregiver report. Thus, despite the discrepancies between HRQoL as assessed by patients with AD and HRQoL as assessed by their caregiver, the caregiver's assessment may be used to guide patient management when the patient can no longer complete QoL evaluations. Moreover, the association between caregiver burden and the caregiver's QoL-AD score underlines the need to take caregivers into consideration in the overall management of the AD patient.

Rapid Eating is Linked to Emotional Eating in Obese Women Relieving from Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Eating rate is associated with BMI and weight gain in various populations, and is a factor modulating the risk of complications after bariatric surgery. The aim of the present study is to determine whether common difficulties to change eating rate in subjects with obesity candidate to bariatric surgery, could be due to more extensive abnormalities in eating behavior. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 116 consecutive female patients attending a nutrition consultation for obesity in a specialized center in France. This questionnaire explored eating rate (on an analog 10-point analog scale; a score ≥ 7 defines rapid eating), degree of chewing, signs of prandial overeating and scores of emotionality, externality, and restrained eating. RESULTS: Average age of the study population was 38.4 ± 12.7 years. Mean BMI was 45.5 ± 6.7, and eating rate was 6.3 ± 1.8. Rapid eating was present in 50.0% of the population. There was an inverse relationship between eating rate and degree of chewing (r = -0.59, p < 0.0001). The proportion of "rapid eating" patients was significantly higher among those who responded "all the time", "very often" or "often" (63.1%), as compared to "sometimes" or "never" (25.0%) to the question "Do you feel like you eat too much?" (p < 0.0001). There was a significant positive correlation between eating rate and emotional eating score (r = 0.30, p = 0.001) and external eating score (r = 0.30, p = 0.001), but not with restrained eating score. CONCLUSION: These data show that rapid eating, by being potentially associated to emotional eating, must be considered as an important issue in bariatric surgery.