Practice Readiness? Trends in Chief Resident Case Logs vs Subsequent Case Log Data in Clinical Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Limited information exists regarding the association between resident surgical case experience and subsequent case mix in practice. We compare the case log distribution residents completed during their chief year to those completed by these graduates in their first 2 years in independent practice. METHODS: Resident chief year case logs from 10 institutions were analyzed across 4 categories of index procedures: (1) general urology, (2) endourology, (3) reconstructive urology, and (4) urologic oncology. Current Procedural Terminology codes for associated index procedures were used to query case log data during their first 2 years in practice collected by the American Board of Urology. Interactions were tested between the trends of chief year case logs relative to trends in practice case logs. RESULTS: Amongst 292 residents, a total of 104,827 cases were logged during chief year and 77,976 cases in the first 2 years as an attending. Most cases completed during chief year were in oncology followed by general urology, endourology, and reconstructive urology. As attendings, most cases completed were in general urology, followed by endourology, reconstructive urology, and oncology. Chief year case logs showed decreasing trends in the median number of case logs in reconstructive urology, endourology, and general urology, while case logs in independent practice noted increasing trends in all index procedure categories over time. CONCLUSIONS: Urology residents perform more cases during their chief year compared to their first 2 years of independent practice. Case types completed as chief residents vs subsequent clinical practice also differ significantly. These observations may have implications for residency training, particularly regarding curriculum design.

Decreased Opioid Use and Equivalent Pain Score Outcomes After Robotic Urologic Surgery Using a Simplified Opioid Minimization Protocol: A Safety-Net Hospital Experience.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to implement a simplified opioid minimization (OM) protocol after robotic urologic surgery in a safety-net hospital to decrease opioid consumption without compromising patient-reported pain or satisfaction. METHODS: Robotic urologic surgery was performed in 103 consecutive patients at a safety-net hospital. An opioid control (OC) cohort was established from January to May 2021, and the OM protocol was implemented from June to October 2021. On postoperative day (POD) 2 and POD7, a validated survey was used to assess pain and satisfaction. Opioid dispensation records were queried from the Prescription Monitoring Program. Outcomes were compared by univariate methods. RESULTS: There were no demographic differences between the OM (n = 45) and OC (n = 35) cohorts. Total opioids received within 30 days of surgery decreased by 68% in the OM vs OC cohort (median [IQR] 32.5 [7.5-65] vs 100 [30-173] morphine milligram equivalents, P < .001). The median amount of opioids prescribed at discharge for the OM cohort was 0 (IQR:0-0) vs 75 morphine milligram equivalents (IQR:0-112.5) for the OC cohort (P < .001). Pain severity did not differ between cohorts on POD2 (median [IQR]: OM=3/10 [2-5], OC=3.5/10 [2-6]; P = .5) or POD7 (median [IQR]: OM=2/10 [0-3], OC=1/10 [0-3]; P = .8), and POD7 satisfaction with pain management remained high for both cohorts (P = .8). CONCLUSIONS: Our simplified OM protocol decreased total opioid use after robotic urologic surgery by 68% without compromising pain or satisfaction.

Urethral Injuries: Diagnostic and Management Strategies for Critical Care and Trauma Clinicians.

Urologic trauma is a well-known cause of urethral injury with a range of management recommendations. Retrograde urethrogram remains the preferred initial diagnostic modality to evaluate a suspected urethral injury. The management thereafter varies based on mechanism of injury. Iatrogenic urethral injury is often caused by traumatic catheterization and is best managed by an attempted catheterization performed by an experienced clinician or suprapubic catheter to maximize urinary drainage. Penetrating trauma, most commonly associated with gunshot wounds, can cause either an anterior and/or posterior urethral injury and is best treated with early operative repair. Blunt trauma, most commonly associated with straddle injuries and pelvic fractures, can be treated with either early primary endoscopic realignment or delayed urethroplasty after suprapubic cystostomy. With any of the above injury patterns and treatment options, a well thought out and regimented follow-up with a urologist is of utmost importance for accurate assessment of outcomes and appropriate management of complications.

Appropriateness Criteria for Ureteral Stent Omission following Ureteroscopy for Urinary Stone Disease.

Objective: To bridge the gap between evidence and clinical judgement, we defined scenarios appropriate for ureteral stent omission after uncomplicated ureteroscopy (URS) using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM). We retrospectively assessed rates of appropriate stent omission, with the goal to implement these criteria in clinical practice. Methods: A panel of 15 urologists from the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) met to define uncomplicated URS and the variables that influence stent omission decision-making. Over two rounds, they scored clinical scenarios for Appropriateness Criteria (AC) for stent omission based on a combination of variables. AC were defined by median scores: 1 to 3 (inappropriate), 4 to 6 (uncertain), and 7 to 9 (appropriate). Multivariable analysis determined the association of each variable with AC scores. Uncomplicated URS cases in the MUSIC registry were assigned AC scores and stenting rates assessed. Results: Seven variables affecting stent decision-making were identified. Of the 144 scenarios, 26 (18%) were appropriate, 88 (61%) inappropriate, and 30 (21%) uncertain for stent omission. Most scenarios appropriate for omission were pre-stented (81%). Scenarios with ureteral access sheath or stones >10mm were only appropriate if pre-stented. Stenting rates of 5,181 URS cases correlated with AC scores. Stents were placed in 61% of cases appropriate for omission (practice range, 25% to 98%). Conclusion: We defined objective variables and AC for stent omission following uncomplicated URS. AC scores correlated with stenting rates but there was substantial practice variation. Our findings demonstrate that the appropriate use of stent omission is underutilized.

The Impact of a Multimodal Sport Science-Based Prehabilitation Program on Clinical Outcomes in Abdominal Cancer Patients: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The potential for prehabilitation programs to impact clinical outcomes is uncertain in abdominal cancer patients due to the short window of time to intervene and the weakened state of the patients. To improve the effectiveness of prehabilitation intervention, a multimodal sports science approach was implemented. METHODS: Prior to cancer-related surgery, 21 patients participated in a 4-week exercise and nutrition prehabilitation program comprised of blood flow restriction exercise (BFR) and a sports nutrition supplement. Retrospective data of 71 abdominal cancer patients who underwent usual preoperative care was used as a comparator control group (CON). At 90 days post-surgery, clinical outcomes were quantified. RESULTS: Prehabilitation was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (P = .02) with 5.5 fewer days (4.7 ± 2.1 vs 10.2 ± 1.2 days in CON) and decreased incidence of any complications (P = .03). Prehabilitation was not related to incidence of serious complications (P = .17) or readmission rate (P = .59). The prehabilitation group recorded 58% more steps on day 5 after surgery (P = .043). DISCUSSION: A 4-week home-based prehabilitation program composed of BFR training and sports nutrition supplementation was effective in reducing postoperative complications and length of hospital stay in older patients with abdominal cancer.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04073381.

A Mobile App With Multimodality Prehabilitation Programs for Patients Awaiting Elective Surgery: Development and Usability Study.

BACKGROUND: Complying with a prehabilitation program is difficult for patients who will undergo surgery, owing to transportation challenges and a limited intervention time window. Mobile health (mHealth) using smartphone apps has the potential to remove barriers and improve the effectiveness of prehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a mobile app as a tool for facilitating a multidisciplinary prehabilitation protocol involving blood flow restriction training and sport nutrition supplementation. METHODS: The app was developed using "Appy Pie," a noncoding app development platform. The development process included three stages: (1) determination of principles and requirements of the app through prehabilitation research team meetings; (2) app prototype design using the Appy Pie platform; and (3) app evaluation by clinicians and exercise and fitness specialists, technical professionals from Appy Pie, and non-team-member users. RESULTS: We developed a prototype of the app with the core focus on a multidisciplinary prehabilitation program with accessory features to improve engagement and adherence to the mHealth intervention as well as research-focused features to evaluate the effects of the program on frailty status, health-related quality of life, and anxiety level among patients awaiting elective surgery. Evaluations by research members and random users (n=8) were consistently positive. CONCLUSIONS: This mobile app has great potential for improving and evaluating the effectiveness of the multidisciplinary prehabilitation intervention in the format of mHealth in future.

Prehabilitation program composed of blood flow restriction training and sports nutrition improves physical functions in abdominal cancer patients awaiting surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of prehabilitation remains controversial due to a short presurgical waiting period and the diminished capacity of the patient population. A strategy to augment and optimize the effectiveness of prehabilitations for abdominal cancer patients may be found in the unlikely field of sport science. We investigated the use of blood flow restriction training and sport nutrition supplementation to augment functional capacity and increase muscle strength in twenty-four abdominal cancer patients awaiting surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sport science-based program was comprised of blood flow restriction exercise 5 to 6 times per week and a daily sports nutrition supplement containing l-citrulline, creatine monohydrate, and whey protein. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of prehabilitation, 6-min walk test, timed up and go, short physical performance battery, 5-chair stand test and physical component score of quality of life were significantly improved (all p < 0.05). Total body and appendicular lean mass as assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry increased by 0.73 ± 1.04 kg (p = 0.004) and 0.42 ± 0.64 kg (p = 0.006), respectively. Total body fat mass and trunk fat mass decreased (p = 0.004 and p = 0.021). There were no significant changes in hand grip strength, fear of falling, the mental component summary of quality of life, or fasting serum concentrations of myostatin, follistatin, and growth hormone. CONCLUSION: A multimodal prehabilitation program, which encompasses blood flow restriction training and sports nutrition supplements, is both feasible and effective in improving lean mass and physical function in abdominal cancer patients prior to surgery.

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Elements that Most Greatly Impact Length of Stay and Readmission.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been shown to decrease length of stay (LOS) and improve patient outcomes in a wide variety of surgical fields; however, barriers exist preventing the implementation of all elements. We hypothesize that a subset of ERAS elements are most influential on LOS and readmission following colorectal surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 840 patients was performed and their compliance with 24 ERAS components evaluated. Two independent machine-learning statistical algorithms were employed to determine which subset of ERAS elements was most impactful on LOS <3 days and hospital readmission. RESULTS: Increasing compliance with ERAS elements had an inverse linear relationship with LOS. Open (vs minimally invasive) surgery was associated with increased LOS. Early mobilization and multimodal pain management are the elements most protective against increased LOS. Readmissions increase with the number of morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day. The subset of patients who underwent minimally invasive procedures, had multimodal pain control, and less than 16 MME per day were least likely (23%) to have >3-day LOS. Those patients who underwent an open procedure with less than 15 ERAS elements completed were most likely (84%) to have >3-day LOS. CONCLUSION: While increasing compliance with ERAS protocols and minimally invasive procedures decrease LOS and readmission overall, a subset of components-multimodal pain control, limited opioid use, and early mobilization-was most associated with decreased LOS and readmission. This study provides guidance on which ERAS elements should be emphasized.

Biopsy Cell Cycle Proliferation Score Predicts Adverse Surgical Pathology in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Active surveillance (AS) is an accepted management strategy for some patients with renal cell carcinoma, but limited tools are available to identify optimal AS candidates. While renal mass biopsy provides diagnostic information, risk stratification based on biopsy is limited. In a retrospective, multi-institutional cohort that underwent renal mass biopsy followed by surgery, we assessed the ability of the cell cycle proliferation (CCP) score from clinical biopsy specimens to predict adverse surgical pathology (ie, grade 3-4, pT stage ≥3, metastasis at surgery, or papillary type II). Of 202 patients, 98 (49%) had adverse surgical pathology. When added to a baseline model including age, sex, race, lesion size, biopsy grade, and histology, CCP score was significantly associated with adverse pathology when modeled as a binary (odds ratio [OR]: 2.44 for CCP score >0, p = 0.02) and a continuous (OR: 1.72 per one unit increase, p = 0.04) variable. Discriminative performance measured by the area under the curve (AUC) improved from 0.73 in the baseline model to 0.75 and 0.76 in models including the CCP score. In the subgroup of patients with nephrectomy CCP score available (n = 67), the biopsy-based model outperformed the nephrectomy-based model (AUC 0.78 vs 0.75). These data support prospective assessment of biopsy CCP score to confirm clinical validity and assess potential utility in AS-eligible patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: In patients with localized renal cell carcinoma who underwent renal mass biopsy followed by surgery, the cell cycle proliferation score from clinical biopsy specimens could predict adverse surgical pathology.

Value-based care for the treatment and evaluation of benign prostatic hyperplasia: an analysis of a metropolitan service area claims database.

PURPOSE: With an aging population, cost containment and improved outcomes will be crucial for a sustainable healthcare ecosystem. Current data demonstrate great variation in payments for procedures and diagnostic workup of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). To help determine the best financial value in BPH care, we sought to analyze the major drivers of total payments in BPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Commercial and Medicare claims from the Truven Health Analytics Markestscan® database for the Austin, Texas Metropolitan Service Area from 2012 to 2014 were queried for encounters with diagnosis and procedural codes related to BPH. Linear regression was utilized to assess factors related to BPH-related payments. Payments were then compared between surgical patients and patients managed with medication alone. RESULTS: Major drivers of total payments in BPH care were operative, namely transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) [$2778, 95% CI ($2385-$3171), p < 0.001) and photoselective vaporization (PVP) ($3315, 95% CI ($2781-$3849) p < 0.001). Most office procedures were also associated with significantly higher payments, including cystoscopy [$708, 95% CI ($417-$999), p < 0.001], uroflometry [$446, 95% CI ($225-668), p < 0.001], urinalysis [$167, 95% CI ($32-$302), p = 0.02], postvoid residual (PVR) [$245, 95% CI ($83-$407), p < 0.001], and urodynamics [$1251, 95% CI ($405-2097), p < 0.001]. Patients who had surgery had lower payments for their medications compared to patients who had no surgery [$120 (IQR: $0, $550) vs. $532 (IQR: $231, $1852), respectively, p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Surgery and office-based procedures are associated with increased payments for BPH treatment. Although payments for surgery were more in total, surgical patients paid significantly less for BPH medications.

International and Multi-institutional Assessment of Factors Associated With Performance and Quality of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with performance and quality of lymph node dissection during radical nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an International Data Registry, we performed multilevel logistic regression to determine the association of surgical approach (open surgery vs minimally invasive surgery), institutional experience (low, moderate, and high tertiles), and institutional preference (minimally invasive surgery, balanced, and open surgery tertiles) with the performance of lymph node dissection in subgroups by clinical stage and nodal status. RESULTS: Among 1,742 patients undergoing radical nephrectomy, 312 (18%) underwent lymph node dissection, which was associated with stage (28% for ≥cT2 vs 9.3% for cT1), and nodal status (68% for ≥cN1 vs 13% for cN0). Open surgery was significantly associated with performing lymph node dissection in all subgroups. Institutional experience and institutional preference had no association with performing lymph node dissection in the ≥cN1 group. The number of nodes removed was greater for open surgery (mean 5.9) vs minimally invasive surgery (mean 3.4); this held true even when stratified by stage and nodal status. CONCLUSION: In this large dataset, open surgical radical nephrectomy is associated with more frequent performance and higher quality of lymph node dissection, which may owe to selection bias but also could reflect technical concerns. In the patient population in whom lymph node dissection is recommended (≥cN1), this is not explained by institutional experience or preference. Lymph node dissection may be under-utilized for ≥cN1 disease and over-utilized for cN0 disease, at least according to practice guidelines.

American Urological Association, American College of Emergency Physicians and American College of Radiology Quality Improvement Summit 2017: Challenges and Opportunities for Stewardship of Urological Imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2014 the AUA (American Urological Association) has convened several Quality Improvement Summits to provide education and promote dialogue around issues of quality improvement and patient safety. The 2017 Summit, Challenges and Opportunities for Stewardship of Urological Imaging, organized in partnership with the American College of Radiology and the American College of Emergency Physicians, highlighted opportunities for collaborative improvement in the value, safety and quality of imaging for patients with urological conditions. METHODS: The Summit was held at AUA headquarters in Linthicum, Maryland on October 21, 2017. Each talk, panel and working group held during the summit highlighted gaps in care being addressed by physician led stewardship initiatives in imaging, in general, as well as multiple specific examples related to prostate cancer and urinary stone disease. RESULTS: Presentations facilitated information exchange on quality efforts between clinicians across disciplines and care settings and served to educate urology practitioners, primary care physicians, and specialists about existing patient centered quality improvement programs. CONCLUSIONS: This exchange serves to accelerate adoption of evidence-based practices and brings together stakeholder organizations to form partnerships that facilitate the further development of research and policy agendas to advance physician led stewardship of advanced imaging across emergency medicine, radiology and urology. In parallel, this meeting established a consortium to develop and disseminate tools for facilitating organizational improvement activities needed to enhance the quality and safety of medical care.

Current management of pelvic fracture urethral injuries: to realign or not?

The acute management of pelvic fracture urethral injuries (PFUIs) remains a controversial topic. Currently, suprapubic tube (SPT) placement with delayed repair or primary realignment (PR) represents the strategies used to treat patients. While many will advocate the use of one technique over the other, the 2014 American Urological Association (AUA) Guidelines give providers the option for the management PFUI. Current literature evaluates these two interventions, focusing on the incidence of re-stricture formation, erectile dysfunction, and urinary incontinence. Here we perform a comprehensive review of the current management for PFUI, as well as, discuss the limitations of the studies and need for more prospective studies on this debated topic.

Outcomes of Ureteroscopic Stone Treatment in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of clinical factors on outcomes in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) undergoing ureteroscopy. Immobility, recurrent urinary tract infection, and lower urinary tract dysfunction contribute to renal stone formation in patients with SCI. Ureteroscopy is a commonly utilized treatment modality; however, surgical complication rates and outcomes have been poorly defined. Evidence guiding safe and effective treatment of stones in this cohort remains scarce. METHODS: Records were retrospectively reviewed for patients with SCI who underwent ureteroscopy for kidney stones from 1996 to 2014 at a single institution. Multivariate relationships were evaluated using a general estimating equation model. RESULTS: Forty-six patients with SCI underwent a total of 95 ureteroscopic procedures. After treatment, stone-free rate was 17% and 20% with <2-mm fragments. The complication rate was 21%. On multivariate analysis, SCI in cervical (C) levels was associated with higher risk of complications (C3: odds ratio [OR] 3.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-6.98; C6: OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.08-13.53). American Spinal Injury Association Scale A classification was associated with a lower probability of stone-free status (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.82). Patients averaged 2.2 procedures yet more procedures were associated with lower stone-free status (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.03-0.32). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bladder management modality were not associated with stone-free status or complications. CONCLUSION: In patients with SCI, higher injury level and complete SCI were associated with worse stone clearance and more complications. Stone-free rate was 17%. Overall, flexible ureteroscopy is a relatively safe procedure in this population. Alternative strategies should be considered after failed ureteroscopy.

A Multigene Signature Based on Cell Cycle Proliferation Improves Prediction of Mortality Within 5 Yr of Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: There is a critical need for improved prognostic discrimination in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) given the increasing awareness that some patients may be managed with active surveillance, while others with higher-risk disease might benefit from adjuvant therapy following surgery. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a multigene proliferation signature predicts long-term oncologic outcomes in surgically resected RCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The cell cycle proliferation (CCP) score was determined after radical nephrectomy for localized clear cell, papillary, or chromophobe RCC in 565 patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary end point was disease-specific mortality (DSM), and disease recurrence was a secondary end point. Association with outcomes was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards survival analysis. The CCP score was compared with the Karakiewicz nomogram, and a composite (R-CCP) score was developed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 68 patients (12%) recurred and 32 (6%) died of disease within 5 yr of nephrectomy. The CCP score was an independent predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-2.09) and DSM (HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.53-4.04) after adjusting for clinical variables using the baseline nomogram. The composite R-CCP score gave a Harrell's concordance index of 0.87 and stratified patients into low- (n=338) and high-risk (n=202) categories with 99% and 84% cancer-specific survival probabilities, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The CCP score is a significant, independent predictor of long-term oncologic outcomes in patients who have undergone nephrectomy for RCC. Combining the molecular classifier with baseline clinical variables allows for accurate, patient-specific risk assessment for use in guiding clinical management. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we sought to understand how well gene expression information from individual kidney tumors can predict cancer recurrence and death following surgical removal. We found that the combination of the gene expression test and clinical characteristics provides an accurate prognostic assessment to help inform clinical decisions.

Matched comparison of primary versus salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

PURPOSE: To compare our experience with salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty, using a matched control set of primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty from 1996 to 2014 by a single surgeon. At least 12 months of follow-up was required. Salvage patients were matched 1:3 with primary patients. Matching was based on age ±5 years, body mass index (BMI) ±5, and type of pyeloplasty (dismembered vs. non-dismembered). Primary outcome was failure as defined as re-intervention following laparoscopic pyeloplasty (does not include temporary stenting without definitive retreatment). RESULTS: Of 128 laparoscopic pyeloplasty procedures, ten were salvage. These patients were matched to 26 patients who underwent a primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a 1:3 manner. One salvage pyeloplasty failed to match due to BMI, and the closest matches were made. Four salvage patients had one overlapping match, reducing the primary group to 26 patients. There were no differences in pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables between groups, except for operative time (salvage 247 min, primary 175 min, p = 0.03). With similar duration of radiologic and symptomatic follow-up, there was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from intervention. CONCLUSION: When matching for factors that could affect success, salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed as well as primary pyeloplasty except for a longer operative time. In experienced hands, salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction recurrence after prior pyeloplasty is a safe and effective procedure, and should be considered an excellent alternative to the more commonly recommended endopyelotomy.

The AUA Quality Registry: Engaging Stakeholders to Improve the Quality of Care for Patients with Prostate Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Determining the most effective treatments for complex medical conditions requires robust clinical data. Clinical registries comprise real-world observational data, which allow rapid assessment of the effectiveness of treatments and care processes. In 2014 the AUA (American Urological Association) launched the AQUA (AUA Quality) Registry, a national urological disease registry intended to measure and report health care quality and patient outcomes, and support health services and comparative effectiveness research. The initial focus of the registry is newly diagnosed prostate cancer. In July 2014 the AUA convened a Stakeholder Forum with more than 20 organizations interested in improving the quality of care provided to patients with prostate cancer. METHODS: We discuss the rationale and need for the AQUA Registry, define quality of care for prostate cancer, prioritize data and information needs, and identify potential future uses for AQUA data beyond quality improvement. RESULTS: AQUA data will provide high quality data on effective treatments. Good quality of care for prostate cancer focuses on patient centered outcomes based on current evidence. The highest priority data collection needs are patient characteristics, evaluation and intervention utilization data, clinical and patient reported outcomes, and cost and resource use. In the future the registry data may be used to fulfill urologist quality reporting requirements. The AQUA Registry will also allow for a range of local and national quality improvement, and health services research efforts driven by urologists. CONCLUSION: The AQUA Registry will provide an essential platform to improve health care quality and support the next generation of clinical urology research and policy initiatives.

Variation in the Use of Open Pyeloplasty, Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty, and Endopyelotomy for the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adults.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction is a common condition that can be treated with open pyeloplasty, minimally invasive pyeloplasty, and endopyelotomy. While all these treatments are effective, the extent to which they are used is unclear. We sought to examine the dissemination of these treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the MarketScan® database, we identified adults 18 to 64 years old who underwent treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction between 2002 and 2010. Our primary outcome was ureteropelvic junction obstruction treatment (i.e., open pyeloplasty, minimally invasive pyeloplasty, endopyelotomy). We fit a multilevel multinomial logistic regression model accounting for patients nested within providers to examine several factors associated with treatment. RESULTS: Rates of minimally invasive pyeloplasty increased 10-fold, while rates of open pyeloplasty decreased by over 40%, and rates of endopyelotomy were relatively stable. Factors associated with receiving an open vs a minimally invasive pyeloplasty were largely similar. Compared with endopyelotomy, patients receiving minimally invasive pyeloplasty were less likely to be older (odds ratio [OR] 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95, 0.97) and live in the south (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33, 0.81) and west regions (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.33, 0.98) compared with the northeast and were more likely to live in metropolitan statistical areas (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.08, 2.13). CONCLUSIONS: Over this 9-year period, the landscape of ureteropelvic junction obstruction treatment has changed dramatically. Further research is needed to understand why geographic factors were associated with receiving a minimally invasive pyeloplasty or an endopyelotomy.