Trigeminal neuralgia in multiple sclerosis: Association with demyelination and progression.

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a well-recognized symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS), yet its clinical characteristics related to MS subtype is poorly studied. Our aim was to evaluate whether development and clinical outcome of TN are influenced by MS phenotype. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, our database from 2007 to 2022 was reviewed to identify patients who had both the diagnosis of MS and TN, whether TN was an initial symptom of MS or developed later in diagnosis. A detailed medical history and treatment outcome was obtained. Pain status was assessed retrospectively using the Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Scale (BNI-PS), with BNI-PS I-III considered as good pain control and BNI-PS IV-V as poor pain control. RESULTS: 58 patients had MS-related TN. 44 patients had relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) at the time of TN diagnosis, 11 had secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) at the time of TN diagnosis, and type of MS was not clear in 3 patients at the time of TN diagnosis (either RRMS or SPMS). Over a mean follow up of 18.8 (SD=10.9) years, 30 transitioned to SPMS. TN was refractory to medical management in 9 RRMS and 22 SPMS patients (p = 0.001). TN patients with RRMS required lower median number of pain medications compared to SPMS (p = 0.014). Brain MRI was available in 41 of the entire cohort. Of these, 27 patients had demyelinating lesions in the trigeminal sensory pathway and 14 did not. Patients with existing lesions had a higher chance of failure of medical management (74% versus 36%, p = 0.017) and required surgical intervention (55% versus 7%, p = 0.003). DISCUSSION: TN was not seen in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). In patients who transitioned to SPMS, TN was more likely to be refractory to medical management. TN was more refractory in the presence of demyelinating plaque involving trigeminal sensory pathway.

Safety of Ocrelizumab in Patients With Relapsing and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To report safety of ocrelizumab (OCR) up to 7 years in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) enrolled in clinical trials or treated in real-world postmarketing settings. METHODS: Safety analyses are based on integrated clinical and laboratory data for all patients who received OCR in 11 clinical trials, including the controlled treatment and open-label extension (OLE) periods of the phase 2 and 3 trials, plus the phase 3b trials VELOCE, CHORDS, CASTING, OBOE, ENSEMBLE, CONSONANCE, and LIBERTO. For selected adverse events (AEs), additional postmarketing data were used. Incidence rates of serious infections (SIs) and malignancies were contextualized using multiple epidemiologic sources. RESULTS: At data cutoff (January 2020), 5,680 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) received OCR (18,218 patient-years [PY] of exposure) in clinical trials. Rates per 100 PY (95% confidence interval) of AEs (248; 246-251), serious AEs (7.3; 7.0-7.7), infusion-related reactions (25.9; 25.1-26.6), and infections (76.2; 74.9-77.4) were similar to those within the controlled treatment period of the phase 3 trials. Rates of the most common serious AEs, including SIs (2.01; 1.81-2.23) and malignancies (0.46; 0.37-0.57), were consistent with the ranges reported in epidemiologic data. DISCUSSION: Continuous administration of OCR for up to 7 years in clinical trials, as well as its broader use for more than 3 years in the real-world setting, are associated with a favorable and manageable safety profile, without emerging safety concerns, in a heterogeneous MS population. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This analysis provides Class III evidence that long-term, continuous treatment with OCR has a consistent and favorable safety profile in patients with RMS and PPMS. This study is rated Class III because of the use of OLE data and historical controls.

Long-term safety and efficacy of teriflunomide in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: Results from the TOWER extension study.

BACKGROUND: In the phase 3 TOWER core study (NCT00751881), the efficacy and safety of teriflunomide compared with placebo were demonstrated in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS). Here, the long-term safety and efficacy outcomes from the TOWER extension study (NCT00751881) are reported. METHODS: All patients who entered the extension (N = 751) were assigned to teriflunomide 14 mg and assessed for long-term safety and efficacy. RESULTS: Of 751 patients in the TOWER extension study, 253, 265, and 233 patients received placebo/teriflunomide 14 mg, teriflunomide 7 mg/14 mg, and teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg, respectively. Median teriflunomide exposure was 4.25 years (maximum 6.3 years). The overall frequency of adverse events (AEs) was comparable across treatment groups, but a higher proportion of patients in the teriflunomide 7 mg/14 mg (12.4%) and 14 mg/14 mg (12.4%) groups had serious AEs compared with the placebo/teriflunomide 14 mg group (6.4%). Alanine aminotransferase increase and hair thinning occurred at a higher frequency in the placebo/teriflunomide 14 mg group (11.2% and 14.3%, respectively) compared with the teriflunomide 7 mg/14 mg (3.0% and 4.5%, respectively) and 14 mg/14 mg groups (5.2% and 4.3%, respectively). The incidences of AEs of interest (hematologic and hepatic effects, peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, and malignancy) were low and comparable across treatment arms. Disability worsening and adjusted annualized relapse rates were low and stable over time, and mean Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were unchanged over time, for all treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In the TOWER extension study, the efficacy of teriflunomide 14 mg was maintained in patients with RMS. No new or unexpected AEs were observed with teriflunomide treatment, supporting a safety profile in the extension that was consistent with the core trial. These findings support the positive benefit:risk profile of teriflunomide as a long-term immunomodulatory therapy.

Exploring the relationship between Endothelin-1 and peripheral inflammation in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Identifying pathways linking neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration is essential to help prevent disability progression in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictor thought to contribute to cerebral hypoperfusion and tissue damage in MS. Its link with the neuroinflammatory process remains poorly investigated. OBJECTIVES: To determine plasma ET-1 levels in treatment-naïve people with MS and controls, and the relationship between ET-1 and other peripheral immune mediator levels as potential markers of the disease process. METHODS: This is a retrospective study that included specimens previously collected from 35 treatment-naïve patients with clinically isolated syndrome highly suggestive of MS or definite MS and 35 sex- and age-matched controls. ET-1 plasma levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and plasma cytokine levels [interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12(p70), IL-13, interferon (IFN)-γ and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α] were simultaneously measured by Multiplex assay. RESULTS: ET-1 levels were significantly increased in MS patients compared to controls. No significant difference in cytokine levels between the groups were found. However, a significant increase in IFN-γ/IL-4 ratio was observed in patients with MS in comparison with controls, suggestive of Th1 skewed response. Binary logistic regression was performed to ascertain the effects of age, sex, ET-1 and cytokine levels on the likelihood of MS diagnosis. In the final model, ET-1, IL-4 and IFN-γ levels remained as predictors of MS. There was no significant correlation between ET-1 and cytokine levels. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MS presented increased levels of ET-1 and an immune response biased towards a Th1 profile. Although both ET-1 and Th1 cytokine profile were predictors of MS diagnosis, ET-1 levels were not associated with peripheral immune markers, suggesting that these changes may occur independently.

Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: B cells influence the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes CD20+ B cells. METHODS: In two identical phase 3 trials, we randomly assigned 821 and 835 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis to receive intravenous ocrelizumab at a dose of 600 mg every 24 weeks or subcutaneous interferon beta-1a at a dose of 44 µg three times weekly for 96 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. RESULTS: The annualized relapse rate was lower with ocrelizumab than with interferon beta-1a in trial 1 (0.16 vs. 0.29; 46% lower rate with ocrelizumab; P<0.001) and in trial 2 (0.16 vs. 0.29; 47% lower rate; P<0.001). In prespecified pooled analyses, the percentage of patients with disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks was significantly lower with ocrelizumab than with interferon beta-1a (9.1% vs. 13.6%; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.81; P<0.001), as was the percentage of patients with disability progression confirmed at 24 weeks (6.9% vs. 10.5%; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.84; P=0.003). The mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions per T1-weighted magnetic resonance scan was 0.02 with ocrelizumab versus 0.29 with interferon beta-1a in trial 1 (94% lower number of lesions with ocrelizumab, P<0.001) and 0.02 versus 0.42 in trial 2 (95% lower number of lesions, P<0.001). The change in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite score (a composite measure of walking speed, upper-limb movements, and cognition; for this z score, negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement) significantly favored ocrelizumab over interferon beta-1a in trial 2 (0.28 vs. 0.17, P=0.004) but not in trial 1 (0.21 vs. 0.17, P=0.33). Infusion-related reactions occurred in 34.3% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab. Serious infection occurred in 1.3% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab and in 2.9% of those treated with interferon beta-1a. Neoplasms occurred in 0.5% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab and in 0.2% of those treated with interferon beta-1a. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis, ocrelizumab was associated with lower rates of disease activity and progression than interferon beta-1a over a period of 96 weeks. Larger and longer studies of the safety of ocrelizumab are required. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; OPERA I and II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01247324 and NCT01412333 , respectively.).

Ocrelizumab versus Placebo in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: An evolving understanding of the immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis suggests that depleting B cells could be useful for treatment. We studied ocrelizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes CD20-expressing B cells, in the primary progressive form of the disease. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 732 patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in a 2:1 ratio to receive intravenous ocrelizumab (600 mg) or placebo every 24 weeks for at least 120 weeks and until a prespecified number of confirmed disability progression events had occurred. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks in a time-to-event analysis. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with 12-week confirmed disability progression was 32.9% with ocrelizumab versus 39.3% with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.98; P=0.03). The percentage of patients with 24-week confirmed disability progression was 29.6% with ocrelizumab versus 35.7% with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.98; P=0.04). By week 120, performance on the timed 25-foot walk worsened by 38.9% with ocrelizumab versus 55.1% with placebo (P=0.04); the total volume of brain lesions on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) decreased by 3.4% with ocrelizumab and increased by 7.4% with placebo (P<0.001); and the percentage of brain-volume loss was 0.90% with ocrelizumab versus 1.09% with placebo (P=0.02). There was no significant difference in the change in the Physical Component Summary score of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Infusion-related reactions, upper respiratory tract infections, and oral herpes infections were more frequent with ocrelizumab than with placebo. Neoplasms occurred in 2.3% of patients who received ocrelizumab and in 0.8% of patients who received placebo; there was no clinically significant difference between groups in the rates of serious adverse events and serious infections. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis, ocrelizumab was associated with lower rates of clinical and MRI progression than placebo. Extended observation is required to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ORATORIO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01194570 .).

Oral fingolimod in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (INFORMS): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: No treatments have been approved for primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Fingolimod, an oral sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator, is effective in relapse-onset multiple sclerosis, but has not been assessed in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. We assessed the safety and efficacy of fingolimod in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis. METHODS: In INFORMS, a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study, patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis recruited across 148 centres in 18 countries were randomly allocated (1:1) with computer-generated blocks to receive oral fingolimod or placebo for at least 36 months and a maximum of 5 years. Patients were initially assigned to fingolimod 1·25 mg per day or placebo (cohort 1); however, after a protocol amendment on Nov 19, 2009, patients were switched in a masked manner to fingolimod 0·5 mg, whereas those on placebo continued on matching placebo. From then onwards, patients were assigned to receive fingolimod 0·5 mg/day or placebo (cohort 2). Key inclusion criteria were age 25-65 years, clinical diagnosis of primary progressive multiple sclerosis, 1 year or more of disease progression, and two of the following criteria: positive brain MRI; positive spinal cord MRI; or positive cerebrospinal fluid. Additional eligibility criteria included disease duration of 2-10 years and objective evidence of disability progression in the previous 2 years. Patients and study investigators were masked to group assignment. We used a novel primary composite endpoint based on change from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), 25' Timed-Walk Test, or Nine-Hole Peg Test to assess time to 3-month confirmed disability progression in study participants treated for at least 3 years. All randomised patients took at least one dose of study drug. The primary efficacy analysis included all patients in cohort 2 and those assigned to placebo in cohort 1. The safety analysis included all patients in cohorts 1 and 2. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00731692. The study is now closed. FINDINGS: 970 patients were randomly assigned between Sept 3, 2008, and Aug 30, 2011 (147 to fingolimod 1·25 mg and 133 to placebo in cohort 1; 336 to fingolimod 0·5 mg and 354 to placebo in cohort 2). The efficacy analysis set (n=823) consisted of 336 patients randomly allocated to fingolimod 0·5 mg and 487 to placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar across groups and representative of a primary progressive multiple sclerosis population (48% women, mean age 48·5 years [SD 8·4], mean EDSS 4·67 [SD 1·03], 87% free of gadolinium-enhancing lesions). By end of study, 3-month confirmed disability progression had occurred in 232 and 338 patients in the fingolimod and placebo groups, respectively, resulting in Kaplan-Meier estimates of 77·2% (95% CI 71·87-82·51) of patients in the fingolimod group versus 80·3% (73·31-87·25) of patients in the placebo group (risk reduction 5·05%; hazard ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·80-1·12; p=0·544). Safety results were generally consistent with those of studies of fingolimod in patients with relapse-onset multiple sclerosis. Lymphopenia occurred in 19 (6%) patients in the fingolimod group versus none in the placebo group, bradycardia in five (1%) versus one (<1%), and first-degree atrioventricular block in three (1%) versus six (1%). Serious adverse events occurred in 84 (25%) patients in the fingolimod group and 117 (24%) in the placebo group, including macular oedema in six (2%) versus six (1%), and basal-cell carcinoma in 14 (4%) versus nine (2%). INTERPRETATION: The anti-inflammatory effects of fingolimod did not slow disease progression in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Therapeutic strategies for primary progressive multiple sclerosis might need different approaches to those used for relapse-onset multiple sclerosis. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma AG.

Recruitment of participants to a multiple sclerosis trial: the CombiRx experience.

BACKGROUND: and purpose Participant recruitment is central to all clinical trials. Any delay in recruitment affects the completion and ultimate success of the trial. We report our experience with patient screening and randomization in CombiRx, which may inform the design of other trials. CombiRx was a multicenter, phase III, double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing the combined use of interferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate to either agent alone in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). This trial was launched in January 2005 in 69 centers in the United States and Canada under a co-operative agreement with the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). The goal was to recruit 1000 patients over 1.5 years after a 6-month start-up period. Instead, the investigators required 4.25 years to enroll 1008 patients. METHODS: During this trial, we assessed the effectiveness of various recruitment strategies, utility of rescreening prior screen failures, and potential factors and strategies used in study conduct, research, and infrastructure, all of which affected recruitment of participants and ultimately time to completion of CombiRx. We particularly were interested in the variability in time to site initiation between academic centers and private practice sites. RESULTS: Physicians who were directly involved in the medical care of patients with RRMS were the primary source of patients recruited to CombiRx. A flexible study design that allowed for rescreening of the initial screen failures after a period of time was useful due to the relapsing/remitting course of the disease. Academic centers took longer to implement the trial than the private practice centers, but once sites were approved for enrollment, there was no important difference in the number of participants enrolled. LIMITATIONS: The CombiRx trial was conducted during a period when multiple new medications were being tested, thus affecting the pace of recruitment and limiting ability to generalize our experiences. However, the lessons we learned about process are relevant. CONCLUSION: Participants can be enrolled successfully in a clinical trial for RRMS, but factors affecting the time to achieve the requirements needed to start screening can be unpredictable and problematic. Prospective planning by the sponsors and investigators, use of central institutional review boards (IRBs), master trial agreements and secure remote desktop access to the trial database may expedite trial implementation and participant recruitment. A good scientific research question with flexible study design and active involvement of the clinicians are important factors driving recruitment. Clinical trials can be implemented successfully both in private practices and at academic centers, a consideration when selecting sites.

Randomized study combining interferon and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study was undertaken to determine whether combined use of interferon ß-1a (IFN) 30 µg intramuscularly weekly and glatiramer acetate (GA) 20 mg daily is more efficacious than either agent alone in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS: A total of 1,008 participants were randomized and followed until the last participant enrolled completed 3 years. The primary endpoint was reduction in annualized relapse rate utilizing a strict definition of relapse. Secondary outcomes included time to confirmed disability, Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) score, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics. RESULTS: Combination IFN+GA was not superior to the better of the single agents (GA) in risk of relapse. Both the combination therapy and GA were significantly better than IFN in reducing the risk of relapse. The combination was not better than either agent alone in lessening confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale progression or change in MSFC over 36 months. The combination was superior to either agent alone in reducing new lesion activity and accumulation of total lesion volumes. In a post hoc analysis, combination therapy resulted in a higher proportion of participants attaining disease activity-free status (DAFS) compared to either single arm, driven by the MRI results. INTERPRETATION: Combining the 2 most commonly prescribed therapies for multiple sclerosis did not produce a significant clinical benefit over 3 years. An effect was seen on some MRI metrics. In a test of comparative efficacy, GA was superior to IFN in reducing the risk of exacerbation. The extension phase for CombiRx will address whether the observed differences in MRI and DAFS findings predict later clinical differences.

Glatiramer acetate treatment in PPMS: why males appear to respond favorably.

In a large multicenter randomized, and double blind placebo controlled trial of glatiramer acetate (GA) in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), an originally unplanned post hoc analysis suggested that males assigned to GA therapy experienced less progression of disability than their counterparts assigned to placebo; no similar potential treatment differences were seen among the females in this study. In this report we further explore the data from that trial in an attempt to determine if this outcome could have been the expression of a gender dependant treatment effect. The analyses conducted do not support a treatment by gender interaction for GA in either PPMS or relapsing forms of MS. Nor could we find consistent precedence in the literature for important effects of gender on outcome, recognizing that such effects have not always been carefully sought. It remains reasonable to consider that there exist differences in the rates of clinical disease progression between men and women with MS that should be better studied.

Glatiramer acetate in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: results of a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether glatiramer acetate (GA) slows accumulation of disability in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. METHODS: A total of 943 patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis were randomized to GA or placebo (PBO) in this 3-year, double-blind trial. The primary end point was an intention-to-treat analysis of time to 1- (entry expanded disability status scale, 3.0-5.0) or 0.5-point expanded disability status scale change (entry expanded disability status scale, 5.5-6.5) sustained for 3 months. The trial was stopped after an interim analysis by an independent data safety monitoring board indicated no discernible treatment effect on the primary outcome. Intention-to-treat analyses of disability and magnetic resonance imaging end points were performed. RESULTS: There was a nonsignificant delay in time to sustained accumulated disability in GA- versus PBO-treated patients (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.07]; p = 0.1753), with significant decreases in enhancing lesions in year 1 and smaller increases in T2 lesion volumes in years 2 and 3 versus PBO. Post hoc analysis showed that survival curves for GA-treated male patients diverged early from PBO-treated male subjects (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.95]; p = 0.0193). INTERPRETATION: The trial failed to demonstrate a treatment effect of GA on primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Both the unanticipated low event rate and premature discontinuation of study medication decreased the power to detect a treatment effect. Post hoc analysis suggests GA may have slowed clinical progression in male patients who showed more rapid progression when untreated.

Effects of oral glatiramer acetate on clinical and MRI-monitored disease activity in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Parenterally administered glatiramer acetate reduces the frequency of relapses and the formation of active brain lesions seen with MRI in multiple sclerosis. This study assessed whether two doses of glatiramer acetate given orally could improve clinical and MRI measures of inflammation and neurodegeneration in a large cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS: 1912 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were screened and 1651 were randomised to receive 50 mg or 5 mg of glatiramer acetate or placebo by daily oral administration over 14 months. The intention-to-treat cohort consisted of 1644 patients who took at least one dose of study medication (50 mg glatiramer acetate [n=543], 5 mg glatiramer acetate [n=553], placebo [n=548]). After baseline investigation, clinical assessments were done every 2 months and MRI was obtained for all patients at baseline and at study exit. Additionally, MRI was undertaken every 2 months for a cohort of 486 patients. The primary outcome was the total number of confirmed relapses observed during the study period. Several prespecified clinical and MRI secondary and tertiary outcomes assessed treatment efficacy on inflammation and neurodegeneration due to multiple sclerosis. FINDINGS: The cumulative number of confirmed relapses did not differ between the two active treatment groups and the placebo group. Relative to placebo, the rate ratio for the 50 mg glatiramer acetate treated group was 0.92 (95% CI 0.77-1.08, p=0.30) and for the 5 mg glatiramer acetate treated group was 0.98 (0.83-1.15, p=0.76). No drug effect was seen for any of the secondary and tertiary endpoints. The study drug was safe and well tolerated. INTERPRETATION: 5 mg and 50 mg glatiramer acetate administered orally on a daily basis do not affect relapse rate or other clinical and MRI parameters of disease activity and burden in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Treatment with oral formulations of glatiramer acetate at the doses tested cannot be recommended.

The use of glatiramer acetate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Glatiramer acetate is a collection of synthetic polypeptides indicated as therapy for relapsing a remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Current understanding of the immunological and neuroprotective mechanisms of action of GA makes it unique among current MS therapies. The clinical efficacy of GA appears similar to that of the recombinant beta interferons. GA has a favorable side effect profile with excellent patient compliance and long-term acceptance. The results of pivotal controlled clinical trials and long-term data derived from organized extension studies are reviewed. Supportive data from open-label comparison, combination treatment and therapeutic switch studies are also provided to enable informed decisions on the appropriate place for GA among other immunomodulatory treatments for relapsing MS.

The PROMiSe trial: baseline data review and progress report.

The PROMiSe trial is a multinational, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effects of glatiramer acetate treatment over 3 years in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). A total of 943 patients were enrolled, and all those remaining on-study had completed at least 24 months as of October 2002. Baseline clinical and MRI characteristics and select correlations are reported here. A total of 3.9% of patients exhibited confirmed relapse over 1904 patient-years of exposure, indicating success of efforts to exclude relapsing MS types. Of the 26.3% of patients who have prematurely withdrawn from the study, only 36% discontinued after meeting the study primary endpoint of disease progression. The progression rate in patients in the low Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) stratum (3.0-5.0) observed thus far is markedly lower than the 50% annual progression rate estimate used for determining size and statistical power of the trial; progression was observed in 16.1% of patients with 12 months of study exposure. These early findings raise some concern about the ability of the trial to demonstrate a significant treatment effect, and suggest that the short-term natural history of PPMS may not be as aggressive as previously assumed.

Glatiramer acetate for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone, Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd) is a collection of immunomodulatory, synthetic polypeptides indicated for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR MS). Preclinical and clinical studies provide an evolving understanding of the mechanisms by which glatiramer acetate exerts both immunological and potential neuroprotective effects that account for its clinical efficacy. The results of pivotal controlled clinical trials and long-term data, derived from organised extension studies, are evaluated in detail and supportive data from open-label comparison, combination treatment and therapeutic switch studies are considered in order to determine the place of glatiramer acetate among other approved therapies for RR MS. The efficacy of glatiramer acetate is stable or may increase over time and the drug has a favourable side effect profile. Glatiramer acetate is an appropriate first-line immunomodulatory therapy for RR MS.

Effects of glatiramer acetate on relapse rate and accumulated disability in multiple sclerosis: meta-analysis of three double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have shown that glatiramer acetate (GA) is effective in reducing relapse rate in patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS). Using raw data pooled from 540 patients, we performed a meta-analysis of these three trials, to investigate whether the extent of GA efficacy varies according to disease-related variables at study entry. Three regression models were developed to assess the efficacy of GA on the annualized relapse rate (primary outcome measure), on the total number of on-trial relapses and on the time to first relapse. We also explored the efficacy of GA on accumulated disability and the potential role of baseline clinical variables as predictors of relapse-rate variables and treatment efficacy. The mean adjusted annualized relapse rate on study was 1.14 in the pooled placebo-treated subjects and 0.82 in the pooled GA group (P = 0.004), indicating an average reduction in annualized relapse rate of 28%. About a one third reduction of the total number of on-trial relapses was also observed in patients receiving GA (P < 0.0001), who had a median time to the first relapse of 322 days versus a median time to the first relapse of 219 days seen in those receiving placebo (P = 0.01). A beneficial effect on accumulated disability was also found (risk ratio of 0.6; 95%; CI = 0.4-0.9; P = 0.02). The drug assignment (P = 0.004), baseline EDSS score (P = 0.02) and number of relapses during the two years prior to study entry (P = 0.002) were significant predictors of on-trial annualized relapse rate. No other demographic or clinical variable at baseline significantly influenced the treatment effect. This meta-analysis reaffirms the effectiveness of GA in reducing relapse rate and disability accumulation in RRMS, at a magnitude comparable to that of other available immunomodulating treatments. It also suggests that GA efficacy is not significantly influenced by the patients' clinical characteristics at the time of treatment initiation.

Short-term correlations between clinical and MR imaging findings in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite extensive use of MR imaging to provide markers of multiple sclerosis (MS) activity and accumulated disease burden, the magnitude of the relationship between clinical and MR findings is still debated. Using data from the European/Canadian glatiramer acetate (GA) trial, we investigated short-term correlations between clinical and MR measures of disease activity in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). METHODS: In a 9-month, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, 239 patients with RRMS were randomly assigned to receive 20 mg GA (n = 119) or placebo (n = 120). Clinical assessment included monthly neurologic examinations with Expanded Disability Status Scale scoring and visits for symptoms suggestive of relapse. Dual-echo T2-weighted and pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted brain MR images were obtained at baseline and monthly during follow-up. Contrast-enhancing and new T2-hyperintense lesions were counted, and total T2-hyperintense and T1-hypointense lesion volumes were measured. RESULTS: Significant univariate correlations were found between the number of relapses during the study period and the number of enhancing lesions at baseline (r = 0.25) and during follow-up (r = 0.30) in the study population as a whole. Multivariable analysis showed that two independent factors were more strongly correlated with relapse frequency: the number of relapses during the 2 years before entry and the number of on-trial enhancing lesions, in the whole study population and in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: In RRMS, MR imaging measures of inflammatory activity are modestly but significantly correlated with the occurrence of clinical attacks over the short term. Clinical and MR imaging assessment can provide complementary outcome measures for RRMS trials.