European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2015 update.

BACKGROUND: Since the publication of the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 2012, new evidence and new therapeutic agents have emerged. The objective was to update these recommendations. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed regarding pharmacological treatment in PsA. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated based on the evidence and the expert opinion of the 34 Task Force members. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were allocated. RESULTS: The updated recommendations comprise 5 overarching principles and 10 recommendations, covering pharmacological therapies for PsA from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), to conventional synthetic (csDMARD) and biological (bDMARD) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, whatever their mode of action, taking articular and extra-articular manifestations of PsA into account, but focusing on musculoskeletal involvement. The overarching principles address the need for shared decision-making and treatment objectives. The recommendations address csDMARDs as an initial therapy after failure of NSAIDs and local therapy for active disease, followed, if necessary, by a bDMARD or a targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD). The first bDMARD would usually be a tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. bDMARDs targeting interleukin (IL)12/23 (ustekinumab) or IL-17 pathways (secukinumab) may be used in patients for whom TNF inhibitors are inappropriate and a tsDMARD such as a phosphodiesterase 4-inhibitor (apremilast) if bDMARDs are inappropriate. If the first bDMARD strategy fails, any other bDMARD or tsDMARD may be used. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations provide stakeholders with an updated consensus on the pharmacological treatment of PsA and strategies to reach optimal outcomes in PsA, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion.

Effect of certolizumab pegol over 96†weeks in patients with psoriatic arthritis with and without prior antitumour necrosis factor exposure.

OBJECTIVE: Previous reports of RAPID-PsA (NCT01087788) demonstrated efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) over 24 weeks in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), including patients with prior antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. We report efficacy and safety data from a 96-week data cut of RAPID-PsA. METHODS: RAPID-PsA was placebo-controlled to week 24, dose-blind to week 48 and open-label to week 216. We present efficacy data including American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responses, HAQ-DI, pain, minimal disease activity (MDA), modified total Sharp score (mTSS) and ACR responses in patients with/without prior anti-TNF exposure, in addition to safety data. RESULTS: Of 409 patients randomised, 273 received CZP from week 0. 54 (19.8%) CZP patients had prior anti-TNF exposure. Of patients randomised to CZP, 91% completed week 24, 87% week 48 and 80% week 96. ACR responses were maintained to week 96: 60% of patients achieved ACR20 at week 24, and 64% at week 96. Improvements were observed with both CZP dose regimens. ACR20 responses were similar in patients with (week 24: 59%; week 96: 63%) and without (week 24: 60%; week 96: 64%) prior anti-TNF exposure. Placebo patients switching to CZP displayed rapid clinical improvements, maintained to week 96. In patients with ≥3% baseline skin involvement (60.8% week 0 CZP patients), PASI responses were maintained to week 96. No progression of structural damage was observed over the 96-week period. In the Safety Set (n=393), adverse events occurred in 345 patients (87.8%) and serious adverse events in 67 (17.0%), including 6 fatal events. CONCLUSIONS: CZP efficacy was maintained to week 96 with both dose regimens and in patients with/without prior anti-TNF exposure. The safety profile was in line with that previously reported from RAPID-PsA, with no new safety signals observed with increased exposure. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01087788.

[Septic arthritis in adults]. / Septische Arthritis des Erwachsenen.

Septic arthritis is a true rheumatological emergency requiring immediate and thoughtful effort for rapid diagnosis establishment and treatment initiation. Children and elderly persons as well as immunocompromised individuals, patients with pre-existing joint damage and with inflammatory rheumatic joint diseases are preferentially affected. Bacteremia, joint surgery and intra-articular injections pose risk situations for the development of joint infections. The most frequent causative organism is Staphylococcus aureus but other relevant pathogens include coagulase-negative staphylococci, streptococci and mycobacteria. Synovial fluid analysis (e.g. appearance, cell count and microbiological examination) is the most important step to establish the diagnosis. The two main components of therapy consist of joint drainage and antibiotic treatment. The approach to periprosthetic joint infections depends on the duration of symptoms, causative organism and individual factors.

Effect of certolizumab pegol on signs and symptoms in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results of a Phase 3 double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study (RAPID-PsA).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) after 24 weeks in RAPID-PsA (NCT01087788), an ongoing Phase 3 trial in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients were randomised 1:1:1 to placebo, 200 mg CZP every 2 weeks (Q2W) or 400 mg CZP every 4 weeks (Q4W). Patients could have had exposure to one previous tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor therapy. Primary endpoints were American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 12 and modified Total Sharp Score change from baseline at week 24. Secondary endpoints included; Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) score, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Leeds Enthesitis Index, Leeds Dactylitis Index, and Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index. RESULTS: Of 409 patients randomised, 368 completed 24 weeks of treatment. ACR20 response was significantly greater in CZP 200 mg Q2W and 400 mg Q4W-treated patients than placebo (58.0% and 51.9% vs 24.3% (p<0.001)) at week 12, with improvements observed by week 1. There was a statistically significant improvement in physical function from baseline, measured by HAQ-DI in CZP patients compared with placebo (-0.50 vs -0.19, p<0.001) and more patients treated with CZP 200 mg Q2W and CZP 400 mg achieved an improvement in PsARC at week 24 than placebo (78.3% and 77.0% vs 33.1% (p<0.001)). Sustained improvements were observed in psoriatic skin involvement, enthesitis, dactylitis and nail disease. Higher ACR20 response with CZP was independent of prior TNF inhibitor exposure. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid improvements in the signs and symptoms of PsA, including joints, skin, enthesitis, dactylitis and nail disease were observed across both CZP dosing regimens.

Effect of different imputation approaches on the evaluation of radiographic progression in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results of the RAPID-PsA 24-week phase III double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study of certolizumab pegol.

OBJECTIVES: To report the effect of different imputation methodologies on the assessment of radiographic progression in clinical trials. METHODS: The 216-week RAPID-psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (NCT01087788) trial of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in patients with active PsA was double-blind and placebo-controlled until week 24. A primary end point was change from baseline in modified Total Sharp Score(s) (mTSS). Prespecified imputation methodology in patients with fewer than two analysable mTSS used minimum observed baseline score for missing baseline values and maximum observed week 24 score for missing week 24 values. Post hoc analyses used alternative methods of imputation in patients with fewer than two analysable mTSS. mTSS non-progressors were defined as patients with ≤0 (predefined) or ≤0.5 (post hoc) change in mTSS from baseline to week 24. Baseline mTSS and C-reactive protein levels as predictors of radiographic progression were investigated. RESULTS: 409 patients were randomised. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Prespecified imputation analysis inappropriately overestimated radiographic progression (least squares mean placebo, 28.9; CZP, 18.3; p≥0.05). Multiple post hoc analyses demonstrated that CZP inhibited radiographic progression compared with placebo, particularly in patients with high baseline mTSS and C-reactive protein levels. mTSS non-progression rate was higher in CZP than placebo groups in all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate prespecified imputation methodology resulted in an unrealistic assessment of progression in all arms. Methodologies for imputing missing radiographic data can greatly affect assessment and reporting of mTSS progression.

[Strategies for improved healthcare of people with the endemic disease rheumatism exemplified by rheumatoid arthritis]. / Strategien zur verbesserten Versorgung von Menschen mit der Volkskrankheit "Rheuma" am Beispiel der rheumatoiden Arthritis.

New therapeutic principles and considerable diagnostic advances have made it possible to define different rheumatic diseases and especially rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at an early stage and by starting an early and aggressive medication a considerable proportion of patients with RA will reach the status of low disease activity or even remission. With the additional development of composite measures to estimate the disease activity of RA, it was the goal of an international working group consisting of rheumatologists and patients to develop recommendations for treating rheumatoid arthritis in a similar way as for patients with hypertension or diabetes, with the aim to achieve remission as often as possible. This treat-to-target initiative has taken off in quite a number of different countries including Germany leading to discussions on how this initiative can be integrated into the specific national healthcare systems and what possibilities would exist for its implementation. To develop strategies for an improved healthcare of people suffering from rheumatic diseases and using RA as an example, action elements and postulates were developed which will be discussed in more detail in the present manuscript.

[Further education: a core responsibility of the German Society for Rheumatology and the Rheuma Academy]. / Weiterbildung - eine zentrale Aufgabe für DGRh und Rheumaakademie.

The first further education training program of the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) was an important milestone in further training in rheumatology. The workshop presented approaches on how to interest and gain students and young physicians for rheumatology and presented the possibilities planned by the DGRh in cooperation with partner organizations and the Rheuma Academy for improvement of further training in rheumatology and the potential to benefit inpatient further training. Many of the projects are dependent on financial support especially by industry. In this article the most important theses and arguments from the individual lectures will be presented.

Sustained disease remission and inhibition of radiographic progression in methotrexate-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis and poor prognostic factors treated with abatacept: 2-year outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of abatacept plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone in early erosive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The AGREE was a 2-year phase IIIb multinational study in early (≤ 2 years) RA. During the double-blind period (year 1), patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive abatacept+methotrexate or methotrexate alone; all patients received open-label abatacept+methotrexate during year 2. Clinical outcomes assessed included 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) defined remission, low disease activity score (LDAS), American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses and physical function. Radiographic outcomes were assessed using the Genant-modified Sharp total score (TS). Safety was monitored throughout. RESULTS: Of the 459 patients completing year 1, 433 patients (94.3%) completed year 2. DAS28-defined remission, LDAS, ACR and physical function were sustained through year 2 in the original abatacept+methotrexate group, with 55.2% in remission at 2 years. Upon introduction of abatacept in the methotrexate-alone group, additional patients achieved DAS28-defined remission (44.5% vs 26.9%), LDAS (60.4% vs 43.2%) and improved ACR 70 (49.8% vs 31.7%) for year 2 versus year 1. Less radiographic progression was observed at 2 years in the original abatacept+methotrexate group than the methotrexate-alone group (change in TS 0.84 vs 1.75, p<0.001). No new safety issues were seen. Similar rates of serious adverse events, serious infections and autoimmune events were observed in years 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The AGREE trial was the first to examine the impact of T-cell co-stimulation modulation with abatacept in patients with early erosive RA. Early treatment with abatacept+methotrexate resulted in greater sustainable clinical, functional and radiographic benefits than methotrexate alone, with acceptable safety and tolerability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00122382.

[Non-TNF biologicals in the therapeutic strategy for rheumatoid arthritis]. / Nicht-TNF-Biologika in der Therapiestrategie bei rheumatoider Arthritis.

The spectrum of agents available for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has become more diversified: In addition to TNF-blocking agents, Abatacept, Rituximab and Tocilizumab have now become available for the treatment of RA. All three agents were approved for patients with insufficient response/intolerability to TNF-blockers; Tozilizumab and Abatacept have also been approved for TNF-naive patients with insufficient response to Methorexate.The present article clarifies the efficacy of these three substances in the treatment algorithm of RA. Current data do not suggest differences in general; therefore, individual considerations may result in patient-specific decisions as to which drug should be used after insufficient response to a TNF-blocking agent or Methotrexate. Possible arguments are discussed.

[Gerontorheumatology. Aspects of diagnosis, course and therapy of inflammatory rheumatic disease in advanced age]. / Gerontorheumatologie: Besonderheiten der Diagnostik, des Verlaufs und der Therapie entzündlich-rheumatischer Erkrankungen im höheren Lebensalter.

Gerontorheumatology deals with the particular features of onset, course and treatment of rheumatic diseases in patients of advanced age. The initial diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic disease after the age of 60 is hindered by the frequency of non-specific general disease symptoms. The most important gerontorheumatological diseases include rheumatoid arthritis first occurring at advanced age ("late onset rheumatoid arthritis", LORA), rheumatic polymyalgia and giant cell arteritis. Important differential diagnoses in older rheumatology patients are RS3PE syndrome, polyarticular chondrocalcinosis and paraneoplastic rheumatic syndrome. In principle, all specific basic therapeutics, immunosuppressants and biologics can be used for the therapy of these diseases. However, careful dose selection is particularly necessary in the initial phase, taking age-specific limitations in organ function and metabolism into consideration; moreover, close-meshed tolerance tests should be carried out.

Clinical efficacy and safety of abatacept in methotrexate-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and poor prognostic factors.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of abatacept in methotrexate-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and poor prognostic factors. METHODS: In this double-blind, phase IIIb study, patients with RA for 2 years or less were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive abatacept (approximately 10 mg/kg) plus methotrexate, or placebo plus methotrexate. Patients were methotrexate-naive and seropositive for rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated protein (CCP) type 2 or both and had radiographic evidence of joint erosions. The co-primary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28)-defined remission (C-reactive protein) and joint damage progression (Genant-modified Sharp total score; TS) at year 1. Safety was monitored throughout. RESULTS: At baseline, patients had a mean DAS28 of 6.3, a mean TS of 7.1 and mean disease duration of 6.5 months; 96.5% and 89.0% of patients were RF or anti-CCP2 seropositive, respectively. At year 1, a significantly greater proportion of abatacept plus methotrexate-treated patients achieved remission (41.4% vs 23.3%; p<0.001) and there was significantly less radiographic progression (mean change in TS 0.63 vs 1.06; p = 0.040) versus methotrexate alone. Over 1 year, the frequency of adverse events (84.8% vs 83.4%), serious adverse events (7.8% vs 7.9%), serious infections (2.0% vs 2.0%), autoimmune disorders (2.3% vs 2.0%) and malignancies (0.4% vs 0%) was comparable for abatacept plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone. CONCLUSIONS: In a methotrexate-naive population with early RA and poor prognostic factors, the combination of abatacept and methotrexate provided significantly better clinical and radiographic efficacy compared with methotrexate alone and had a comparable, favourable safety profile.

Combination treatment with infliximab and leflunomide in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: safety and efficacy in an open-label clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with infliximab and leflunomide in adults with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite leflunomide therapy. METHODS: Adult patients with active RA who had received leflunomide for at least 16 weeks were eligible for this 30-week, open-label trial. All patients received ongoing oral leflunomide (20 mg/day) and 3 mg/kg infliximab administered IV at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with adverse events that led to patient withdrawal and were at least possibly related to treatment. Descriptive evaluations of efficacy and other safety assessments were performed. RESULTS: Twelve out of 70 patients (17.1%; upper 90% CI 24.5%) withdrew due to treatment-related adverse events. Adverse events were reported in 69 of 72 patients (95.8%); the most common were nasopharyngitis, diarrhea, and pruritus. Serious adverse events occurred in 16 out of 72 patients (22.2%). Significant improvements were observed in efficacy assessments, including Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and pain. At end point, 19.4% of the patients showed a good improvement in DAS28 score and 46.3% had a moderate improvement. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50, and 70 responses were achieved by 47.1%, 21.4%, and 12.9% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of infliximab and leflunomide neither increased the rate of toxicities nor resulted in unexpected adverse events. Treatment-related withdrawals occurred at an acceptable frequency. Patients experienced clinically significant improvements. Treatment with infliximab plus leflunomide benefits the majority of patients, but monitoring of adverse events is required.

[Current therapeutic strategy for rheumatoid arthritis]. / Aktuelle Therapiestrategien bei rheumatoider Arthritis. Entzündung rasch beherrschen ist entscheidend für die Prognose.

The success of the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis depends primarily on early diagnosis. In most cases, basic therapy begins with methotrexate. Depending on the stage and course of the disease (radiographically detected early erosion and/or progression), basic immunosuppressive therapy can be combined or supplemented with cytokine antagonists. Furthermore, for specific indications, several alternative active substances (DMARD monotherapies) are available. Today the goal of therapy is always remission.

[Continuing education as an instrument of medical quality management]. / Fortbildung als Instrument im ärztlichen Qualitätsmanagement.

A rheumatologic educational program for general practitioners (GPs), based on andragogic principles, has been developed by the study group for Continuing Education and Quality Control of the Association of Cooperative Centers of Rheumatology in the DGRh. The educational program has been tested and evaluated by a study group supported by the German Ministry of Health (FB 2-43346-8/63) as an possible tool for quality assurance in rheumatology. Evaluation was carried out in 2 audit circles each of the KV Hessen and KV Lower Saxony. In the 4 audit circles 39 GPs and 3 trained rheumatologists, acting as "experts", participated. Using didactic materials provided by the study group, the topic "shoulder-neck pain" was discussed in all 4 audit circles. Questionnaires and case records according to the topic were used as evaluation tools. The evaluation was supported scientifically by the Scientific Institute of the German Medical Association (WIAD). Of patients with shoulder-neck pain (1193 pre- and 958 post-education) 2151 records were documented by the participating GPs for the evaluation of outcome in respect of changes of diagnostic and therapeutic attitude. Additionally pre- and postintervention, 10 MC questions related to the topic were used to measure changes in specific knowledge, and at the end of the audit circles participants were asked by questionnaire for acceptance of the educational program. An index of acceptance of 9.6 points (best: 7.0 points, worst: 31.0 points) indicating an excellent acceptance of the educational program by the participating GPs was recorded. The increase in specific knowledge amounted to about 30% in all 4 audit circles. Changes in diagnostic and therapeutic attitudes showed a better specification within the spectrum of diagnoses, a reduction of expensive and not indicated diagnostic procedures (e.g., CT), as well as a reduction in the use of non-adequate therapeutic modalities (e.g., massage, fango, unguenta, and gels) in favor of physiotherapy and mobilisation or local and systemic use of corticosteroids. The results of the evaluation project demonstrate that interactive learning in small groups (audit circles) based on andragogic principles can contribute to a better quality of care of patients with rheumatic diseases. The innovative concept seems to be a well-accepted alternative to formal lectures in postgraduate medical education.

Classification of Sneddon's syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The combination of generalized broken ("racemose") livedo and cerebrovascular accidents is referred to as "Sneddon's syndrome". Although several pathogenetic factors have been suggested the aetiology of Sneddon's syndrome is unknown. Furthermore, considerable variability of patient characteristics gives rise to the question whether "Sneddon's syndrome" denotes a homogeneous disease entity at all. We hypothesized that the diagnosis "Sneddon's syndrome" can be broken down into different subgroups according to possible aetiologic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with the combination of generalized broken livedo and cerebrovascular accidents were evaluated by clinical examination, routine diagnostic procedures, MRI of the brain, echocardiography, vascular ultrasound, immunologic and haemostaseologic testing. Patient groups were formed, depending on (1) whether or not an additional feature with a possibly aetiologic role for Sneddon's syndrome was present, and (2) which kind of feature it was. RESULTS: In 16 out of 32 patients, diagnostic features with an implication for the pathogenesis of Sneddon's syndrome could be identified. An autoimmune disorder was diagnosed in six patients. A thrombophilic state was detected in six patients. Three patients had preexisting atherosclerosis. One patient suffered from an embolizing atrial myxoma. Extent and kind of cerebral pathology differed between patient groups as did the kind of cardiac involvement. CONCLUSION: Sneddon's syndrome is not a homogeneous disease entity. Patients should be classified as "primary Sneddon's syndrome" if no aetiologic factor can be detected. On clinical grounds, this from differs from several varieties of "secondary Sneddon's syndrome" which occurs mainly as part of an autoimmune disorder or in a thrombophilic state.

Sensitivities of PCR, MicroTrak, ChlamydiaEIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2 for purified Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in urine, peripheral blood, peripheral blood leukocytes, and synovial fluid.

Routine microbiological diagnosis of Chlamydia-induced reactive arthritis is based mainly on the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis with urogenital swabs or in urine. Because chlamydial antigen, rRNA, and DNA are present in low quantities in the inflamed joint, highly sensitive assays are needed to detect C. trachomatis not only at the primary site of infection but also in peripheral blood and peripheral blood leukocytes, which are suspected carriers for dissemination, and in synovial fluid. To evaluate possible tools for this purpose, the sensitivities of PCR, MicroTrak, Chlamydia EIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2 for the detection of defined numbers of purified C. trachomatis elementary bodies (EB) in urine, peripheral blood, peripheral blood leukocytes, and synovial fluid were determined. In urine, PCR detected 2, MicroTrak and ChlamydiaEIA detected 2 x 10(3), and PACE 2 and IDEIA detected 2 x 10(4) EB per ml. In peripheral blood, only PCR and MicroTrak detected C. trachomatis, with detection limits of 100 and 2 x 10(7) EB per ml, respectively. For peripheral blood leukocytes, the detection limits were 2 EB per ml for PCR and 2 x 10(4) EB per ml for MicroTrak, ChlamydiaEIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2. In synovial fluid, PCR detected 200, MicroTrak and IDEIA detected 2 x 10(5), and PACE 2 detected 10(6) EB per ml. ChlamydiaEIA was unable to detect 2 x 10(6) EB per ml in synovial fluid. In summary, PCR was found to be the most sensitive method. The sensitivities of the other methods tested were at least 1,000 times lower than that of PCR. PCR should therefore be considered a most promising tool for routine diagnosis of Chlamydia-induced arthritis.

Lyme disease in a 74-year-old forest owner with symptoms of dermatomyositis.

We describe a 73-year-old forest owner with widespread erythema, myalgia, and proximal muscle weakness. The clinical signs and the results of electromyography, magnetic resonance imaging, and a muscle biopsy were consistent with dermatomyositis. However, serology was positive for Borrelia burgdorferi. More importantly, B burgdorferi DNA was detected in skin by polymerase chain reaction techniques, and spirochete-like organisms were detected in the muscle by silver staining. Lyme disease with muscle involvement can mimic or trigger dermatomyositis and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of dermatomyositis.

[Is there a correlation between tubal occlusions in chronic salpingitis and urogenital chlamydia infections?]. / Gibt es einen Zusammenhang zwischen Tubenverschlüssen bei chronischer Salpingitis und urogenitalen Chlamydieninfektionen?

A prospective study was performed to analyse the relationship between urogenital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and occlusions of the fallopian tubes with histologically confirmed chronic salpingitis and salpingitis isthmica nodosa. 110 infertile patients were tested for C. trachomatis infection. 23 patients with tubal occlusions and histologically confirmed chronic salpingitis (group 1) and eight patients with salpingitis isthmica nodosa (group 2) were compared to 13 patients with tubal occlusions after tuboligation (group 3), and to 66 patients with patent fallopian tubes as demonstrated by laparoscopy or hysterosalpingography (group 4). The prevalence of infections of the endocervix or urethra and the presence of Chlamydia in urine was low in all four groups. However, in groups 1 and 2, the median Chlamydia IgG and IgA serum antibody titres were significantly higher (p < or = 0.0002) than in groups 3 and 4. This result illustrates the association between urogenital infections with Chlamydia and tubal occlusions with histologically documented chronic salpingitis and salpingitis isthmica nodosa.

Complicated Cogan's syndrome with aortic insufficiency and coronary stenosis.

We describe a case of Cogan's syndrome in a 19-year-old woman with tinnitus, deafness, interstitial keratitis, and complicating aortic insufficiency and coronary stenosis. Serological testing revealed IgG and IgA antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis. In spite of very high antibody titers there was no direct evidence for C. trachomatis in her urogenital smears or in biopsies of her aortic adventitia, and therefore these findings are of uncertain significance. Reconstruction of the aortic valve and bypass surgery for an ostial stenosis of the left coronary artery were necessary. Ten months after starting cyclosporine treatment her course was stable and cochlear implant surgery was successfully performed.