Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Tipo de estudo
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 78(5): 321-328, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29282733

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nickel and cobalt are important metal allergens, and more knowledge on the levels of exposure to these from everyday contacts is needed. OBJECTIVES: To report the results of a repeat routine surveillance scheme in the Federal Republic of Germany on the release of nickel and cobalt. METHODS: Fifteen laboratories assessed earrings and piercing jewellery items from 12 of the states in 2014, complying with EN 1811:2011 + AC:2012 and using atomic absorption spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry for quantification. Kaplan-Meier analysis for left-censored data was employed to account for measurements below the limit of quantification. RESULTS: Nickel release exceeded 0.35 µg/cm2 per week in 26 of 160 piercing posts (16.2%), and 0.88 µg/cm2 per week in 2.0-5.9% of other parts, that is, the current respective 'pass' thresholds, with no change from the previous 2008 survey. The level of cobalt release was lower than that of nickel release, and also significantly lower than in the previous survey. CONCLUSIONS: The finding of the highest level of nickel release from piercing posts, with their deliberately lower threshold of acceptability, is worrying, as is the largely unchanged overall level of nickel release. A regulation on cobalt release is currently lacking; risk assessment and management based on dose-elicitation data are needed.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/análise , Cobalto/análise , Joias/análise , Níquel/análise , Piercing Corporal , Alemanha , Espectrometria de Massas , Espectrofotometria Atômica
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 64(3): 142-50, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21272019

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nickel contact allergy is still frequent both in patch-tested patients and in the general population. Objectives. To explain this observation by relating clinical epidemiological data with recent chemical analyses of nickel release from costume jewellery. METHODS: (i) The trend of nickel allergy was analysed using data registered between January 1994 and December 2009 in the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology. (ii) In 2008, different parts of items of costume jewellery purchased at random on the German market (n = 609) were analysed for nickel release according to EN 1811:1998 + A1:2008 in five official German laboratories of food and non-food INVESTIGATION. RESULTS: (i) Between 1994 and 2009, nickel allergy decreased in men (18-30 years) and in women (1-17 and 18-30 years); however, after 2000, there was no significant decrease in nickel allergy in the women aged 1-17 years. (ii) Of the post-assemblies, 28.0% exceeded the migration limit of ≥0.2 µg/cm(2) per week, and 5% released ≥26.8 µg/cm(2) per week. In articles with direct and prolonged contact with the skin, 12.8% of decorative parts and 17.1% of clasps exceeded the migration limit. If an adjustment factor was applied, according to the above norm, about half of the items otherwise rejected became acceptable. CONCLUSION: Exposure to nickel-containing products exceeding the (unnecessarily relaxed) permitted limit may explain why nickel contact allergy remains a problem.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Níquel/toxicidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Lactente , Joias/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Níquel/análise , Testes do Emplastro , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA