Examining the impact of multilevel upper airway surgery on the obstructive sleep apnoea endotypes and their utility in predicting surgical outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Upper airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is an alternative treatment for patients who are intolerant of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). However, upper airway surgery has variable treatment efficacy with no reliable predictors of response. While we now know that there are several endotypes contributing to OSA (i.e., upper airway collapsibility, airway muscle response/compensation, respiratory arousal threshold and loop gain), no study to date has examined: (i) how upper airway surgery affects all four OSA endotypes, (ii) whether knowledge of baseline OSA endotypes predicts response to surgery and (iii) whether there are any differences when OSA endotypes are measured using the CPAP dial-down or clinical polysomnographic (PSG) methods. METHODS: We prospectively studied 23 OSA patients before and ≥3 months after multilevel upper airway surgery. Participants underwent clinical and research PSG to measure OSA severity (apnoea-hypopnoea index [AHI]) and endotypes (measured in supine non-rapid eye movement [NREM]). Values are presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). RESULTS: Surgery reduced the AHITotal (38.7 [23.4 to 79.2] vs. 22.0 [13.3 to 53.5] events/h; p = 0.009). There were no significant changes in OSA endotypes, however, large but variable improvements in collapsibility were observed (CPAP dial-down method: ∆1.9 ± 4.9 L/min, p = 0.09, n = 21; PSG method: ∆3.4 [-2.8 to 49.0]%Veupnoea , p = 0.06, n = 20). Improvement in collapsibility strongly correlated with improvement in AHI (%∆AHISupineNREM vs. ∆collapsibility: p < 0.005; R2  = 0.46-0.48). None of the baseline OSA endotypes predicted response to surgery. CONCLUSION: Surgery unpredictably alters upper airway collapsibility but does not alter the non-anatomical endotypes. There are no baseline predictors of response to surgery.

A randomized controlled trial of oxygen therapy for patients who do not respond to upper airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine whether patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who fail to respond to upper airway surgery may be successfully treated with supplemental oxygen and whether we could identify baseline physiologic endotypes (ie, collapsibility, loop gain, arousal threshold, and muscle compensation) that predict response to oxygen therapy. METHODS: We conducted a single night, randomized double-blinded cross over trial in which patients with OSA who failed to respond to upper airway surgery were treated on separate nights with oxygen therapy (4 L/min) or placebo (medical air). Effect of oxygen/air on OSA on key polysomnography outcomes were assessed: apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), AHI without desaturation (ie, flow-based AHI), arousal index, and morning blood pressure. OSA endotypes were estimated from the polysomnography signals to determine whether baseline OSA physiology could be used to predict response to oxygen therapy. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in AHI and flow-based AHI on oxygen vs placebo (flow-based AHI: 42.4 ± 21.5 vs 30.5 ± 17.1 events/h, P = .008). Arousal index was also reduced on oxygen vs placebo (41.1 ± 19.5 vs 33.0 ± 15.3 events/h, P = .006). There was no significant difference in morning blood pressure between oxygen and placebo. Although 7 of 20 individuals experienced a 50% reduction or greater in flow-based AHI on oxygen (responders), there was no difference in the baseline OSA endotypes (or clinical characteristics) between responders and nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that a proportion of patients who fail to respond to upper airway surgery for OSA respond acutely to treatment with supplemental oxygen. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; Name: Oxygen therapy for treating patients with residual obstructive sleep apnea following upper airway surgery; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=373566; Identifier: ACTRN12617001361392.

Obstructive sleep apnoea predicted by the STOP-BANG questionnaire is not associated with higher rates of post-operative complications among a high-risk surgical cohort.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to establish if obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) predicted by the STOP-BANG questionnaire would be associated with higher rates of post-operative cardiac, respiratory or neurological complications among a selected high-risk population with established major comorbidities undergoing major surgery. We hypothesise that a cohort selected for major comorbidities will show a higher post-operative complication rate that may power any potential association with co-existent OSA and identify an important target group for OSA screening and treatment pathways in preparation for major surgery. METHODS: Patients attending a high-risk preadmission clinic prior to major surgery from May 2015 to November 2015 were prospectively screened for OSA using the STOP-BANG questionnaire. Patients with treated OSA were excluded. Patient data and complications were attained from the pre-admission clinic and subsequent inpatient medical record at discharge. RESULTS: Three-hundred-and-ten patients were included in the study (age 68.6 ± 13.1 years, body mass index [BMI] 30.6 ± 7.4 kg/m2; 52.9% female). Sixty-four patients (20.6%) experienced 82 post-operative complications. Seventy-five percent of the cohort had a STOP-BANG ≥ 3. There was no association between the STOP-BANG score (unadjusted and adjusted for comorbidity) with the development of post-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS: OSA predicted by the STOP-BANG score was not associated with higher rates of post-operative complications in patients with major comorbidities undergoing high-risk surgery. As the findings from this cohort contrast with other observational studies, more definitive studies are required to establish a causative link between OSA and post-operative complications and determine whether treating OSA reduces this complication rate.

Effect of Hypopnea Scoring Criteria on Noninvasive Assessment of Loop Gain and Surgical Outcome Prediction.

Rationale: Unstable ventilatory control (high loop gain) is a causal factor in the development of obstructive sleep apnea. Methods for quantifying loop gain using polysomnography have been developed that predict favorable responses to upper airway surgery. However, this method is reliant on respiratory event scoring and hence may be affected by hypopnea scoring criteria.Objectives: To determine to what extent differences in hypopnea scoring influence loop gain measurement.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 46 polysomnograms before and after upper airway surgery. Polysomnograms were rescored according to three different American Academy of Sleep Medicine hypopnea definitions (2007Alternative, 2012Recommended, and 2012Acceptable criteria). Loop gain and apnea-hypopnea indexes (AHIs) were compared between criteria using linear regression and Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA). Responders to surgery were classified by a 50% or greater reduction in AHI and AHIpostsurgery less than 10 events per hour. Responders were determined separately for each American Academy of Sleep Medicine criterion. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis predicting surgical outcome was performed for each loop gain measurement derived from each criterion.Results: A near-perfect agreement was found between loop gains derived using the 2007Alternative and 2012Recommended criteria (r2 = 0.99; bias = -0.003; LOA, -0.016 to 0.010). Greater variability was found for 2012Acceptable compared to the 2007Alternative (r2 = 0.70; bias = -0.015; LOA, -0.099 to 0.070) and 2012Recommended (r2 = 0.69; bias = +0.018; LOA, -0.068 to 0.104) criteria. Both 2007Alternative and 2012Recommended loop gains significantly predicted surgical response with similar areas under the curve (AUCs; 2007Alternative AUC = 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.97]; 2012Recommended AUC = 0.84 [95% CI, 0.71-0.97]). 2012Acceptable loop gains were a poor predictor of surgical response (AUC = 0.62 [95% CI, 0.43-0.80]).Conclusions: Loop gain measured noninvasively by polysomnography can be influenced by respiratory event scoring. We recommend caution when using the 2012Acceptable criteria with this method, because such findings may not be directly generalizable to other loop gain values derived from other scoring criteria.

The effect of surgical weight loss on obstructive sleep apnoea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This review aimed to examine the relationship between surgical weight loss and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity (i.e., apnoea-hypopnoea index [AHI]), and how this relationship is altered by the various respiratory events scoring (RES) criteria used to derive the AHI. A systematic search of the literature was performed up to December 2017. Before-and-after studies were considered due to a paucity of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) available to be reviewed in isolation. Primary outcomes included pre- and post-surgery AHI and body mass index (BMI). Secondary outcomes included sleep study type and RES criteria. Meta-analysis was undertaken where possible. Overall, surgical weight loss resulted in reduction of BMI and AHI, however, OSA persisted at follow-up in the majority of subjects. There was high between-study heterogeneity which was largely attributable to baseline AHI and duration of follow-up when analysed using meta-regression. There was insufficient data to evaluate the impact of different RES criteria on OSA severity. Therefore, more RCTs are needed to verify these findings given the high degree of heterogeneity and future studies are strongly encouraged to report the RES criteria used to enable fair and uniform comparisons of the impact of any intervention on OSA severity.