Brain metastases in Asian HER2-positive breast cancer patients: anti-HER2 treatments and their impact on survival.

BACKGROUND: In Asia, large-scale studies on anti-HER2 treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases are limited. We studied the treatment patterns of these patients in Asia to evaluate the impact of anti-HER2 treatment on the time to occurrence of brain metastases (TTBM) and survival after brain metastasis (BM). METHODS: A retrospective study of HER2-positive breast cancer patients diagnosed with BM between January 2006 and December 2008 in six Asian countries was conducted. Demographics, tumour characteristics, treatment details, and events dates were collected from medical records. RESULTS: Data from 280 patients were analysed. Before BM, 63% received anti-HER2 treatment. These patients had significantly longer TTBM than those without anti-HER2 treatment (median 33 vs 19 months; P<0.002). After BM, 93% received radiotherapy, 57% received chemotherapy, and 41% received anti-HER2 treatment (trastuzumab and/or lapatinib). Use of both anti-HER2 agents, primarily sequentially, after BM demonstrated the longest survival after BM and was associated with a significant survival benefit over no anti-HER2 treatment (median 26 vs 6 months; hazard ratio 0.37; 95% CI 0.19-0.72). CONCLUSION: Anti-HER2 treatment before BM was associated with longer TTBM. Anti-HER2 treatment after BM was associated with a survival benefit, especially when both trastuzumab and lapatinib were utilised.

Use of imatinib mesylate in gastrointestinal stromal tumours: Pan-Birmingham Cancer Network experience.

AIMS: Imatinib mesylate, a selective tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor of KIT and PDGFRalpha, is currently licensed for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), which are KIT positive. Partial response rates in 65% of patients and stable disease in 20% of patients are typically seen. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and toxicity of an unselected cohort of patients treated with imatinib mesylate and to compare these results with published data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective audit of the use of imatinib mesylate in GISTs within the Pan-Birmingham Cancer Network was carried out. In total, 39 patients were identified, the first commenced imatinib mesylate in September 2001. RESULTS: The most common primary tumour sites were small intestine (19 [49%]) and stomach (12 [31%]). Initial curative resection was carried out in 21 (54%), palliative resection in three (8%) and 15 (38%) were unresectable. Of those who had curative resection, the median time to recurrence was 13 months (range 2-276). Common sites of metastases were liver (19 [49%]) and peritoneum (12 [31%]). At 24 months 70% remained on imatinib. A partial response was reported in 23 (59%), stable disease in seven (18%) and disease progression in four (10%). Five patients (13%) have yet to be reassessed at 3 months. Imatinib was well tolerated with minor side-effects; peri-orbital oedema (nine [23%]), skin rash (four [10%]), minor gastrointestinal bleed (one [3%]). No significant toxicity was documented in 18 (46%). CONCLUSIONS: The response rates achieved in this unselected cohort of patients are consistent with published data. The duration of tumour control is good, with most patients responding to imatinib mesylate for more than 2 years. Side-effects are mild and acceptable.

Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: an updated analysis of factors affecting pathological response.

AIMS: With the aim of improving locoregional control, the use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer has increased. A pathological complete response (pCR) is often used as a surrogate marker for the efficacy of different CRT schedules. By analysing factors affecting pCR, this analysis aims to guide the development of future trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Searches of Medline, EMBASE and the electronic American Society of Clinical Oncology abstract databases were carried out to identify prospective phase II and phase III trials using preoperative CRT to treat rectal cancer. Trials were eligible for inclusion if they defined: the CRT drugs, the radiation dose and the pCR rate. Phase I patients were excluded from the analysis. A multivariate analysis examined the effect of the above variables on the pCR rate and in addition the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the type of publication (peer reviewed vs abstract), the year of publication and whether the cancers were stated to be inoperable, fixed or threatening the circumferential resection margin were included. The method of analysis used was weighted linear modelling of the pCR rate. RESULTS: Sixty-four phase II and seven phase III trials were identified including a total of 4732 patients. Statistically significant factors associated with pCR were the use of two drugs, the method of fluoropyrimidine administration (with continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil being the most effective) and a higher radiotherapy dose. Although the use of two drugs was associated with a higher rate of pCR, no single schedule seemed to be more effective. None of the other factors analysed significantly influenced pCR. CONCLUSIONS: A higher rate of pCR is seen in studies using two drugs, infusional 5-fluorouracil and a radiotherapy dose of 45 Gy and above.