The Importance of Pelvic Obliquity in Assessing Spinal Coronal Alignment: Normative Values, Demographic, and Radiographic Correlations.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: In a geographically diverse population of asymptomatic volunteers, we sought to report the incidence of pelvic obliquity (PO), establish normative values of PO across patient factors, and assess the correlation of PO with radiographic parameters. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PO is defined as the misalignment of the pelvis and can be assessed through several anatomic landmarks. Significant PO, whether caused by leg-length discrepancy or not, can lead to coronal malalignment which causes severe pain and disability. Significant emphasis has been placed on achieving appropriate sagittal alignment in recent decades; however, a greater understanding of coronal alignment is needed, and PO is a crucial aspect of evaluating the coronal plane in adult spinal deformity patients. METHODS: Asymptomatic adult volunteers, ages 18-80 years, enrolled patients from 5 countries (France, Japan, Singapore, Tunisia, and the United States) in the "multiethnic alignment normative study" cohort (IRB 201812144). The included volunteers had no known spinal disorder(s), no significant neck or back pain (Visual Analog Scale: ≤2; Oswestry Disability Index: ≤20), and no abnormal alignment (Cobb ≤20°). PO was measured in the frontal plane as the distance between the highest points of each acetabulum, calculated along the vertical axis in millimeters (mm). The incidence of PO was defined as PO ≥10 mm. Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Pearson correlation, and linear regression were used. RESULTS: A total of 467 patients were included, and PO values by age, sex, body mass index, and country were provided. The overall incidence of PO ≥10 mm was 4.3%, and a nonsignificant trend toward increased PO with age was seen ( P = 0.077). No significant differences were seen in PO between sex, ethnicity, or body mass index groups. No significant correlation existed between PO and other commonly used coronal radiographic measurements. CONCLUSION: PO ≥10 mm occurred in 4.3% of asymptomatic volunteers. Despite the importance of recognizing PO in preventing coronal malalignment, PO did not seem to be associated with other radiographic and demographic information, which underscores the importance of intentionally assessing for any PO before surgery. These results in an asymptomatic population provide a foundation for studying PO in patients with spinal pathology.

Trends in surgical management of spinal metastases in a Singaporean tertiary referral center: a 17-year retrospective review.

Introduction: Surgical treatment is increasingly the treatment of choice in cancer patients with epidural spinal cord compression and spinal instability. There has also been an evolution in surgical treatment with the advent of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques and separation surgery. This paper aims to investigate the changes in epidemiology, surgical technique, outcomes and complications in the last 17 years in a tertiary referral center in Singapore. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 383 patients with surgically treated spinal metastases treated between January 2005 to January 2022. Patients were divided into 3 groups, patients treated between 2005 - 2010, 2011-2016, and 2017- 2021. Demographic, oncological, surgical, patient outcome and survival data were collected. Statistical analysis with univariate analysis was performed to compare the groups. Results: There was an increase in surgical treatment (87 vs 105 vs 191). Lung, Breast and prostate cancer were the most common tumor types respectively. There was a significant increase in MIS(p<0.001) and Separation surgery (p<0.001). There was also a significant decrease in mean blood loss (1061ml vs 664 ml vs 594ml) (p<0.001) and total transfusion (562ml vs 349ml vs 239ml) (p<0.001). Group 3 patients were more likely to have improved or normal neurology (p=<0.001) and independent ambulatory status(p=0.012). There was no significant change in overall survival. Conclusion: There has been a significant change in our surgical practice with decreased blood loss, transfusion and improved neurological and functional outcomes. Patients should be managed in a multidisciplinary manner and surgical treatment should be recommended when indicated.

Morphological description of sagittal lumbar spinal alignment using curve magnitude, span, and apex-the multiethnic alignment normative study (MEANS).

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Current definition of lumbar lordosis uses the L1-S1 angle. Prevailing classification of sagittal spinal morphology, derived from a young adult population, classifies the spine into four subtypes defined by their sacral slope (SS) and curve morphology. PURPOSE: To describe physiological sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine across age groups using three main parameters that dictate the lumbar curve: angular magnitude, span, and apex. STUDY DESIGN: A large, multicenter, cross-sectional radiographic comparison study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Four hundred sixty-eight healthy, asymptomatic subjects aged 18 to 80 years from five countries (184 males, 284 females; 98 France, 119 Japan, 79 Singapore, 80 Tunisia, 92 USA, mean age 40.61±14.99 years). OUTCOME MEASURES: Sagittal lumbar profile subtypes clustered based on lumbar curve angular magnitude (ie, Cobb angle of the lumbar lordosis), span, and apex, and described by sagittal radiographic parameters. METHODS: Subjects underwent whole-body low-dose EOS stereoradiographs. Comparisons between conventional L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (cLL) and true lumbar lordosis (tLL, defined by the inflection-S1 angle) were conducted. Using the K-means clustering algorithm, lumbar curve angular magnitude, span and apex were used to classify sagittal spinal morphology into subtypes, stratified across age groups. Further univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare radiographic parameters across subtypes, and identify predictors for the lumbar curve's angular magnitude, span and apex. RESULTS: Mean cLL was -57.27±11.37°, and tLL was -62.62±10.76°. Using tLL, instead of cLL, to describe sagittal spinal morphology, we found significant differences in terms of angular magnitude of the lumbar curve, the median thoracolumbar inflection vertebral level and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch Multivariate analysis found a larger SS, more positive T9 tilt, and more kyphotic T4-T12 predictive for a more lordotic tLL, while a larger overhang distance predicted for a less lordotic tLL (p-values<.001). In addition, a larger T9 tilt, less lordotic L1-L5 and smaller PT were predictors of a more caudal thoracolumbar inflection and lumbar apical vertebral levels (p-values<.001). Sagittal lumbar profiles of subjects age<30 years, 30≤age<60 years and age≥60 years, could be classified into 4, 6, and 3 subtypes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal lumbar profile subtypes vary across age groups, with more homogenous morphologies at the extremes of ages. Improved understanding of the morphological evolution of sagittal spinal profiles with age in asymptomatic individuals will help guide future individualized surgical treatment.

Variation in Lumbar Shape and Lordosis in a Large Asymptomatic Population: A MEANS Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between lumbar shape and sagittal parameters. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Understanding the lumbar shape is vital for deformity surgery. Normative sagittal parameters and spine shape remain unstudied in large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohorts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional cohort of 468 asymptomatic volunteers between 18 and 80 years was enrolled across 5 countries. Demographic data and radiographic parameters such as pelvic incidence (PI) were collected. Pearson correlation test and linear regression were used to find the relationship between lumbar lordosis (LL) and other parameters. One-way analysis of variance and Welch 2-sample t test were performed to compare lumbar shape across such categories as PI and lumbar apex followed by post hoc Bonferroni correction if needed. RESULTS: PI was moderately correlated with proximal lumbar lordosis (pLL) ( r = -0.54) and weakly correlated with distal lumbar lordosis (dLL) ( r = -0.16). Thoracic kyphosis (T1-T12) was moderately correlated with pLL ( r = -0.35) and dLL ( r = -0.29). dLL was moderately correlated with LL ( r = 0.64). 2.6% (12/468) of subjects had lumbar apex at L2, 40.2% (188/468) at L3, 56.6% at L4 (265/468), and 0.6% (3/468) at other levels. Mean PI was different between volunteers with the apex at L3 and L4. A lower mean PI was associated with the apex at L4 (49.0°), whereas a higher mean PI was associated with the apex at L3 (55.8°). The mean PI-LL mismatch for volunteers was -5.4° with a range from -35° to 39.7°. PI-LL mismatch increased from a mean of -10.1° in volunteers with low PI to a mean of 2.2° in volunteers with high PI. Age was not correlated with LL ( P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic adult volunteers, pLL showed a moderate correlation with PI and increased with PI, whereas dLL showed a weak correlation. The lumbar apex migrated proximally with increasing PI. Segmental lordosis and apex position instead of solely global lordosis should be emphasized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

A Risk Quantification Reference Table for Progressed Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: An Exact Case Matched Outcomes Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Exact Matched case-control study. OBJECTIVES: Surgical treatment delay in AIS due to family preferences is common. This study aims to quantify the increase in risks as the Cobb angle increases and provide a Quantifiable Risk Reference Table that can be utilized for counseling. METHODOLOGY: AIS patients were divided into 3 groups: Group A: Cobb angle 50-60°, Group 61-70°, and Group CFinal ≥80°. Each patient in Group CFinal who had curve progression were then traced-back-in-time (TBIT) to review the clinical data at earlier presentations at 50-60° (C1), and 61-70° (C2). Patient demographics, radiological, operative, and outcomes data were compared between Group A vs C1 and Group B vs Group C2. RESULTS: A total of 614 AIS surgeries were reviewed. Utilizing the EM technique, a total of 302 AIS patients were recruited. There were 147, 111, 31, and 32 patients matched in Groups A, B, C1, and C2, respectively. C2 Final patients had 34% curve pattern change, 23.2% higher incidence of requiring two surgeries, and 17.3% increase in complications. There was a statistically significant increase of 2.4 spinal levels fused, 12% increase in implant density, 35% increase in operative time, 97% increase in intra-operative blood loss, 10% loss of scoliosis correction, 40% longer hospitalization stay, and 36% increase in costs for patients who had curve progression. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to use a homogenously matched AIS cohort to provide a Quantifiable Risk Reference Table. The Risk Table provides essential knowledge for treating physicians when counseling AIS patients.

The T4-L1-Hip Axis: Defining a Normal Sagittal Spinal Alignment.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional cohort. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe sagittal plane alignment and balance in a multinational cohort of nondegenerated, asymptomatic adults. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Current sagittal alignment targets were developed using correlations between radiographic and quality-of-life measures in spinal deformity patients, rather than disease-free samples leading to relatively poor accounting for variance within a population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sagittal balance was defined using vertebral body tilt and spinopelvic alignment was defined as the vertebral pelvic angles from C2 to L5 (vertebral pelvic angle=vertebral tilt+pelvic tilt). Associations with pelvic incidence (PI) were assessed using linear regression. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate a normal L1-S1 lordosis, adjusting for PI and the L1 pelvic angle (L1PA). Correlation between the L1 and T4 pelvic angles was assessed to define a normal thoracic alignment conditioned on lumbar alignment. RESULTS: Among 320 volunteers from 4 continents, median age was 37% and 60% were female. C2 tilt was independent of PI with minimal variation. PI was inadequate for estimating a normal lumbar lordosis (L1-S1, r2 =0.3), but was strongly associated with the lumbar pelvic angles (L1PA, r2 =0.58). Defining lumbar lordosis as a function of PI and L1PA resulted in high explained variance ( R2 =0.74) and the T4 pelvic angle had near perfect correlation with the L1PA ( r =0.9). CONCLUSIONS: We defined normal sagittal balance and spinopelvic alignment in a disease-free international volunteer cohort. Four parameters are either fixed or directly modifiable in surgery and can define a normal thoracic and lumbar alignment: the L1-S1 lordosis defined as a function of PI and the L1PA; and the T4 pelvic angle is nearly equivalent to the L1PA, aligning the T4-L1-hip axis.

ProDisc-C versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the surgical treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: two-year outcomes of Asian prospective randomized controlled multicentre study.

PURPOSE: Our study aimed to evaluate non-inferiority of ProDisc-C to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in terms of clinical outcomes and incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) at 24-months post-surgery in Asian patients with symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD). METHODS: This multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial was initiated after ethics committee approval at nine centres (China/Hong Kong/Korea/Singapore/Taiwan). Patients with single-level SCDD involving C3-C7-vertebral segments were randomized (2:1) into: group-A treated with ProDisc-C and group-B with ACDF. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 6-weeks, 3/6/12/18/24-months post-surgery and annually thereafter till 84-months. Primary endpoint was overall success at 24-months, defined as composite of: (1) ≥ 20% improvement in neck disability index (NDI); (2) maintained/improved neurologic parameters; (3) no implant removal/revision/re-operation at index level; and (4) no adverse/severe/life-threatening events. RESULTS: Of 120 patients (80ProDisc-C,40ACDF), 76 and 37 were treated as per protocol (PP). Overall success (PP) was 76.5% in group-A and 81.8% in group-B at 24-months (p = 0.12), indicating no clear non-inferiority of ProDisc-C to ACDF. Secondary outcomes improved for both groups with no significant inter-group differences. Occurrence of ASD was higher in group-B with no significant between-group differences. Range of motion (ROM) was sustained with ProDisc-C but lost with ACDF at 24-months. CONCLUSION: Cervical TDR with ProDisc-C is feasible, safe, and effective for treatment of SCDD in Asians. No clear non-inferiority was demonstrated between ProDisc-C and ACDF. However, patients treated with ProDisc-C demonstrated significant improvement in NDI, neurologic success, pain scores, and 36-item-short-form survey, along with ROM preservation at 24-months. Enrolment difficulties resulted in inability to achieve pre-planned sample size to prove non-inferiority. Future Asian-focused, large-scale studies are needed to establish unbiased efficacy of ProDisc-C to ACDF.

The lateral entry point S2 alar-iliac (L-S2AI) screw: a preoperative computed tomography analysis of adult spinal deformity patients.

PURPOSE: To radiographically compare lateral entry point S2-alar-iliac (L-S2AI) screw with conventional S2AI (C-S2AI) and conventional iliac screw (CIS) lengths and trajectories. METHODS: Twenty-five preoperative CT scans of consecutive patients undergoing adult spinal deformity realignment surgery over a random 2-year period were analysed. Maximum in-bone length, caudal and lateral trajectories of CIS, C-S2AI, and L-S2AI screws were measured and compared using One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc tests. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of high screw length discrepancy between C-S2AI and L-S2AI. RESULTS: Potential screw length was longest for CIS, followed by L-S2AI, then C-S2AI (114.5 ± 8.3 mm vs 101.4 ± 9.6 mm vs 80.6 ± 5.9 mm, respectively) in all patients (p < 0.001). Actual screw lengths found both CIS and L-S2AI to be longer than C-S2AI (95.3 ± 8.5 mm and 93.4 ± 7.5 mm vs 82.1 ± 7.3 mm; p = 0.008 and 0.003). Potential lateral angulation was smallest for CIS, followed by L-S2AI, then C-S2AI (21.9 ± 7.0° vs 31.9 ± 7.1° vs 40.9 ± 6.7°, respectively) in all patients (p < 0.001). L-S2AI and C-S2AI had the same caudal angulation (24.9 ± 6.8°), which was smaller than CIS (30.8 ± 5.8°) in all patients (p < 0.001). Univariate, but not multivariate analysis, revealed that lumbar lordosis > 40° (OR 7.2, p = 0.041), diagnosis of degenerative spondylolisthesis (OR 10.5, p = 0.017), and > 7 instrumented levels (OR 2.6, p = 0.049) were significantly associated with high screw discrepancies. CONCLUSION: The L-S2AI screw combines advantages of CIS and C-S2AI screws, which includes increased screw length, reduced lateral angulation, a low-profile screw head, ease of connection to proximal hardware, and the biomechanical advantage of a quadcortical purchase.

Cervical Inclination Angle: Normative Values in an Adult Multiethnic Asymptomatic Population.

OBJECTIVE: The role of the craniocervical complex in spinal sagittal alignment has rarely been analyzed but it may play a fundamental role in postoperative mechanical complications. The aim of the study is to analyze the normative value of the cervical inclination angle (CIA) in an adult asymptomatic multiethnic population. METHODS: Standing full-spine EOS of adult asymptomatic volunteers from 5 different countries were analyzed. The CIA was analyzed globally and then in each decade of life. Different ethnicities were compared. Comparisons between different groups was performed using a t-test and statistical significance was considered with a p-value < 0.05. RESULTS: EOS of 468 volunteers were analyzed. The global mean CIA was 80.2° with a maximum difference of 9° between T1 and T12 (p < 0.001). The CIA remains constant until 60 years old then decreases significantly passing from a mean value before 20 years old of 82.25° to 73.65° after 70 years old. A statistically significant difference was found between the Arabics and other ethnicities with the formers having an inferior CIA: this was related to a mean older age (p < 0.05) and higher body mass index (p < 0.05) in the Arabics. CONCLUSION: The CIA remains constant until 60 years old and then reduces slightly but never under 70°. This angle is helpful to evaluate the lever arm at the upper instrumented vertebra after an adult spinal deformity surgery and could predict the occurrence of a proximal junctional kyphosis when its value is lower than normal. Further clinical studies must confirm this theory.

Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score Is Predictive of Perioperative Adverse Events in Operatively Treated Thoracic and Lumbar Fractures.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of patients with surgically treated thoracolumbar fractures. PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe the incidence of adverse events (AEs) after surgical stabilization of thoracolumbar spine injuries and to identify predictive factors for the occurrence of AEs. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Thoracolumbar spine fractures are frequently present in patients with blunt trauma and are associated with significant morbidity. AEs can occur due to the initial spinal injury or secondary to surgical treatment. There is a lack of emphasis in the literature on the AEs that can occur after operative management of thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 199 patients with surgically treated thoracolumbar fractures operated between January 2007 and January 2018. The potential risk factors for the development of AEs as well as the development of common complications were evaluated by univariate analysis, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors predictive of the above. RESULTS: The overall rate of AEs was 46.7%; 83 patients (41.7%) had nonsurgical AEs, whereas 24 (12.1%) had surgical adverse events. The most common AEs were urinary tract infections in 43 patients (21.6%), and hospital-acquired pneumonia in 21 patients (10.6%). On multivariate logistic regression, a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) score of 8-10 (odds ratio [OR], 6.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33-17.51), the presence of polytrauma (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.17-5.99), and undergoing open surgery (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.09-4.88) were significant risk factors for AEs. The absence of neurological deficit was associated with a lower rate of AEs (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the presence of polytrauma, preoperative American Spinal Injury Association score, and TLICS score are predictive of AEs in patients with surgically treated thoracolumbar fractures. The results might also suggest a role for minimally invasive surgical methods in reducing AEs in these patients.

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells with low dose bone morphogenetic protein 2 enhances scaffold-based spinal fusion in a porcine model.

High doses bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) have resulted in a series of complications in spinal fusion. We previously established a polyelectrolyte complex (PEC) carrier system that reduces the therapeutic dose of BMP-2 in both rodent and porcine spinal fusion models. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and low dose BMP-2 delivered by PEC for bone regeneration in a porcine model of anterior lumbar interbody spinal fusion (ALIF) application. Six Yorkshire pigs underwent a tri-segmental (L2/L3; L3/L4; L4/L5) ALIF in four groups, namely: (a) BMSCs + 25 µg BMP-2/PEC (n = 9), (b) 25 µg BMP-2/PEC (n = 3), (c) BMSCs (n = 3), and (d) 50 µg BMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge (n = 3). Fusion outcomes were evaluated by radiography, biomechanical testing, and histological analysis after 12 weeks. Mean radiographic scores at 12 weeks were 2.7, 2.0, 1.0, and 1.0 for Groups 1 to 4, respectively. µ-CT scanning, biomechanical evaluation, and histological analysis demonstrated solid fusion and successful bone regeneration in Group 1. In contrast, Group 2 showed inferior quality and slow rate of fusion, and Groups 3 and 4 failed to fuse any of the interbody spaces. There was no obvious evidence of seroma formation, implant rejection, or any other complications in all groups. The results suggest that the combination of BMSCs and low dose BMP-2/PEC could further lower down the effective dose of the BMP-2 and be used as a bone graft substitute in the large animal ALIF model.

Selective Thoracic Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques with Minimum 5-year Follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective review of outcomes among three surgical techniques in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis (T-AIS) with a follow-up of at least 5 years. OBJECTIVE: To investigate how outcomes compare in video-assisted anterior thoracic instrumentation (VATS), all hooks/hook-pedicle screw hybrid instrumentation (HHF), and all pedicle screw instrumentation (PSF) techniques for T-AIS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies comparing outcomes for anterior versus posterior fusion for T-AIS are few and with short follow-up. METHODS: Three groups of patients with T-AIS who underwent thoracic fusion were included in this study: 98 patients with mean curve of 49.0°â€Š±â€Š9.5° underwent VATS (Group 1); 44 patients with mean curve of 51.1°â€Š±â€Š7.4° underwent HHF (Group 2); and 47 patients with mean curve of 47.6°â€Š±â€Š9.9° underwent PSF (Group 3). Radiological outcomes were compared at preoperative, and up to 5 years. Surgical outcomes were noted until latest follow-up. RESULTS: Group 1 had less blood loss, less fusion levels, longer surgical time, and longer hospital stay compared with the other groups (P < 0.01). Groups 1 and 3 were comparable in all time periods with 78.8% and 78.2% immediate curve correction, and 72.9% and 72.1% at 5 years, respectively. Group 2 had lower correction in all time periods (P < 0.0001). Thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis decreased in Group 3, but improved in both Groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.0001). Group 1 had more respiratory complications. The posterior groups had more deep wound infections. Two patients in Group 1 and one patient in Group 2 required revision surgery for implant-related complications. Reoperations for deep wound infections were noted only in the posterior groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first report comparing 5 year outcomes between anterior and posterior surgery for T-AIS. All three surgical methods resulted in significant and durable scoliosis correction; however, curve correction using HHF was inferior to both VATS and PSF with the latter two groups achieving similar coronal correction. However, VATS involved fewer segments, kyphosis improvement, and no deep wound infection, whereas PSF has less surgical time, shorter hospital stays, and no revision surgery from implant-related complications.Level of Evidence: 3.

Understanding the Pathophysiology of L5-S1 Loss of Lordosis and Retrolisthesis: An EOS Study of Lumbopelvic Movement Between Standing and Slump Sitting Postures.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the pathophysiology of L5-S1 loss of lordosis and retrolisthesis by comparing 2 commonly assumed physiological weight-bearing postures. METHODS: This was a prospective comparative study of whole-body standing and slump sitting EOS radiographs in clinic patients presenting with back pain or lower limb radicular pain. Patients with prior spinal intervention, malignancy, trauma, inflammatory diseases, transitional lumbosacral vertebra, pregnancy, and L5-S1 retrolisthesis or spondylolisthesis from nondegenerative causes were excluded. C7 sagittal vertical axis, global cervical angle, global thoracic angle, global lumbar angle, thoracolumbar angle, T1-slope, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, L5-S1 angle, L5-S1 vertebral translation, L5-S1 disc height, and presence of L4-5 vertebral translation were measured. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of L5-S1 lordosis loss and retrolisthesis. RESULTS: L5-S1 loss of lumbar lordosis (7.02 ± 9.90°, P < 0.001), retrolisthesis (0.07 ± 0.411 cm, P < 0.001), and loss of disc height (0.10 ± 0.23 cm, P < 0.001) occurred when changing from standing to slump sitting along with other sagittal profile changes (P < 0.001). Taller L5-S1 disc height (odds ratio [OR] 2.57, P = 0.04), larger lumbar range-of-motion change (OR 3.82, P = 0.012), lower sacral slope on sitting (OR 2.50, P = 0.043), and presence of L4-5 spondylolisthesis (OR 2.75, P = 0.032) were predictive of larger L5-S1 lordosis loss (>7°) on multivariate analysis, while larger lumbar range-of-motion change (OR 2.21, P = 0.050) and presence of L4-5 spondylolisthesis (OR 3.08, P = 0.023) were predictive of greater L5-S1 retrolisthesis (>0.07 cm). CONCLUSIONS: Degenerative L5-S1 loss of lordosis and retrolisthesis likely result from long-standing lower lumbar spine bending forces against the posterior ligamentous complex with slump sitting, predisposed by a negatively sloped sacrum and increased lumbar flexibility.

Making a Traditional Spine Surgery Clinic Telemedicine-Ready in the "New Normal" of Coronavirus Disease 2019.

STUDY DESIGN: An original article describing a comprehensive methodology for making a traditional spine surgery clinic telemedicineready in terms of logistical considerations and workflow. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to promote the use of telemedicine via videoconferencing to reduce human exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and reduce the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission at outpatient clinics. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The COVID-19 pandemic is the biggest healthcare crisis in the 21st century. Until a vaccine is developed or herd immunity against SARS-CoV-2 is achieved, social distancing to avoid crowding is an important strategy to reduce disease transmission and resurgence. Telemedicine has already been applied in the field of orthopedics with encouraging results. METHODS: We reviewed the evidence behind telemedicine and described our clinical protocol, patient selection criteria, and workflow for telemedicine. We discussed a simple methodology to convert pre-existing traditional clinic resources into telemedicine tools, along with future challenges. RESULTS: Our methodology was successfully and easily applied in our clinical practice, with a streamlined workflow allowing our spine surgery service to implement telemedicine as a consultation modality in line with the national recommendations of social distancing. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine was well incorporated into our outpatient practice using the above workflow. We believe that the use of telemedicine via videoconferencing can become part of the new normal and a safe strategy for healthcare systems as both a medical and an economic countermeasure against COVID-19.

Risk factors for surgical complications in the management of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a progressive, debilitating disease most commonly affecting the cervical spine. When compared to other degenerative pathologies, OPLL procedures carry a significantly higher risk of complications owing to increased case complexity and technical difficulties. Most previous studies have focused on functional outcomes and few have reported on risk factors for postoperative complications in OPLL patients. PURPOSE: To identify clinical and radiological risk factors of surgical complications following treatment for cervical OPLL STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred thirty-one patients with cervical myelopathy secondary to OPLL who underwent surgical decompression with complete 2-year follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical and medical postoperative complications were analyzed. Revision surgery rates and mortality rates were recorded. METHODS: Clinical, surgical, and radiological characteristics were collected for each patient. Complications within 30 days were identified. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify risk factors for surgical complications. RESULTS: There were 39 (29.8%) surgical complications in the cohort, which included C5 palsy (7.6%), dural tear (3.1%), surgical site infection (3.1%), and epidural hematoma (1.5%). 2-year revision and mortality rates were 4.6% and 2.3%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that blood loss ≥750mL (OR 3.42, p=0.028), operative duration ≥5.5 hours (OR 3.16, p=0.008), hill-type OPLL (OR 3.08, p=0.011), K-line (-) OPLL (OR 5.39, p<0.001), and presence of a double-layer sign (OR 3.79, p=0.002) were significant risk factors. In multivariate analysis, only hill-type OPLL (OR 2.61, p=0.048) and K-line (-) OPLL (OR 2.98, p=0.031) were found to be significant. Patients with both hill-type and K-line (-) OPLL had a 3.5 times risk of developing surgical complications (p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with OPLL have a higher risk of perioperative surgical complications if they had a hill-shaped OPLL and K-line (-) OPLL on preoperative imaging studies. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to link hill-type and K-line (-) OPLL morphology as risk factors for perioperative surgical complications.

Fulcrum to Generate Maximum Extension of the Spine and Hip-Proposing A New Strategy using EOS Imaging for Patient-specific Assessment of Degenerated Lumbar Spines.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, radiographic comparative study conducted in a single academic institution. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare fulcrum extension with conventional extension imaging to determine maximum "hip lordosis" (HL), an important novel patient-specific parameter in spinal realignment surgery, as well as understand the extension capabilities of the lower lumbar spine, which together, are key contributors to whole-body balancing. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent literature recognizes the hip as an important contributor to whole-body lordosis beyond a compensator for spinal imbalance. METHODS: Patients >45 years' old with mechanical low back pain due to degenerative spinal conditions were included and grouped based on the imaging performed-fulcrum or conventional extension. All imaging was performed using EOS under standardized instructions and visual aids. Radiographic parameters include global lumbar angle (GLA), inflexion-S1 (Inf-S1) angle, segmental lumbar angles, pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), femoral alignment angle (FAA), HL and spinocoxa angle (SCA). Unpaired t test was used to compare between radiographic parameters. RESULTS: One hundred patients (40 males and 60 females, mean age 63.0 years) underwent either fulcrum or conventional extension EOS® imaging. Both groups had comparable baseline radiographic parameters. Fulcrum extension gave a larger mean GLA (-60.7° vs. -48.5°, P = 0.001), Inf-S1 angle (-58.8° vs. -48.8°, P = 0.003), SCA (-36.5° vs. -24.8°, P < 0.001), L4/5 and L5/S1 lordosis (-20.7° vs. -17.7°, P = 0.041, and -22.3° vs. -17.1°, P = 0.018, respectively), compared to conventional extension. PI, SS, PT, FAA, and HL were similar between both extension postures. CONCLUSION: Fulcrum extension, compared to conventional extension, is better at generating lordosis in the lower lumbar spine, thus improving preoperative assessment of stiffness or instability of the lumbar spine. Both extension methods were equally effective at determining the patient-specific maximum HL to assess the flexibility and compensation occurring at the hip, potentially guiding surgical management of patients with degenerative spines.Level of Evidence: 3.

A novel hospital capacity versus clinical justification triage score (CCTS) for prioritization of spinal surgeries in the "new normal state" of the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: During the Coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak, while healthcare systems and hospitals are diverting their resources to combat the pandemic, patients who require spinal surgeries continue to accumulate. The aim of this study is to describe a novel hospital capacity versus clinical justification triage score (CCTS) to prioritize patients who require surgery during the "new normal state" of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODOLOGY: A consensus study using the Delphi technique was carried out among clinicians from the Orthopaedic Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Anaesthesia departments. Three rounds of consensus were carried out via survey and Webinar discussions. RESULTS: A 50-points score system consisting of 4 domains with 4 subdomains was formed. The CCTS were categorized into the hospital capacity, patient factors, disease severity, and surgery complexity domains. A score between 30 and 50 points indicated that the proposed operation should proceed without delay. A score of less than 20 indicates that the proposed operation should be postponed. A score between 20 and 29 indicates that the surgery falls within a grey area where further discussion should be undertaken to make a joint justification for approval of surgery. CONCLUSION: This study is a proof of concept for the novel CCTS scoring system to prioritize surgeries to meet the rapidly changing demands of the COVID-19 pandemic. It offers a simple and objective method to stratify patients who require surgery and allows these complex and difficult decisions to be unbiased and made transparently among surgeons and hospital administrators.

Analysis of unplanned hospital readmissions up to 2-years after metastatic spine tumour surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate rates, causes, and risk factors of unplanned hospital readmissions (UHR) within 30 days, 90 days, 1 year and 2 years after metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS) to augment multi-disciplinary treatment planning and improve patient education. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 272-patients who underwent MSTS between 2005 and 2016. Hospital records were utilised to obtain demographics, oncological, procedural details, and postoperative outcomes. All UHR within 2 years were reviewed. Primary outcomes were rates, causes, and risk factors of UHR. Risk factors for UHR were evaluated utilising multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-day, 90 day, 1 year, and 2 year UHR-rates after MSTS were 17.2%, 31.1%, 46.2%, and 52.7%, respectively. Lung cancer primaries had the highest UHR-events (24.7%) whilst renal/thyroid displayed the least (6.6%). Disease-related causes (16.2%) were the most common reason for readmissions across all timeframes, followed by respiratory (13.7%) and progression of metastatic spine disease (12.7%). Urological conditions accounted for majority of readmissions within 30-days; disease-related causes, symptomatic spinal metastases, and respiratory conditions represented the most common causes at 30-90 days, 90 days-1 year, and 1-2 years, respectively. An ECOG >1 (p = 0.057), CCI >7 (p = 0.01), and primary lung tumour (p = 0.02) significantly increased UHR-risk on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Seventy-four percent of patients had at least one UHR within 2 years of MSTS and majority were secondary to disease-related causes. Majority of first UHR occurred between 30 and 90 days post-surgery. Local disease progression and overall disease progression account for the highest UHR-events at 90 days-1 year and 1-2 year timeframes, respectively. We define UHR in specific timeframes, thus enabling better surveillance and reducing unnecessary morbidity.

Lumbar Adding-on of the Thoracic Spine After Selective Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Lenke Types 1 and 2 Patients: A Critical Appraisal.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors that predict lumbar curve adding-on in patients who had selective thoracic fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Selective thoracic fusion offers deformity correction of Lenke 1 and 2 thoracic curves and maintains lumbar range of movement. However, some patients may develop postoperative lumbar adding-on. METHODS: This study included patients 18 years or younger that underwent spinal instrumentation for Lenke 1 and 2 curves. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were included (147 females, 14 males). The mean age was 14.0 ±â€Š2.1 years: 103 patients were Lenke 1, and 58 patients were Lenke 2 curves. Ninety-seven patients underwent posterior approach surgery, whereas 64 via anterior approach. In the posterior approach group, 79(81.4%) patients underwent selective fusion. Ten patients (6.2%) had lumbar curve adding-on, with nine females and one male. There were seven Lenke 1 and three Lenke 2 patients. All 10 patients were lumbar modifier (a), with 5 hypokyphotic patients. Selective fusion was done in nine patients. Lumbar adding-on was seen most commonly between 6 months to 1 year postoperative period (five patients). Two patients had adding-on because of incorrect distal fusion level, six were due to 1A-R curve, one due to the inadvertent fusion from the excessive long rod at the subjacent level. In multivariate analysis, hypokyphotic patients were at higher risk of lumbar adding-on (odds ratio = 9.2). Patients with Risser classification 0, 1, 2, 3 were also at higher risk of lumbar adding-on (odds ratio =6.1). CONCLUSION: The incidence of lumbar curve adding-on was 6.2%. Patients who were hypokyphotic and skeletally immature are nine times and six times more likely to have lumbar adding-on, respectively. This article examines adding-on in patients who had either anterior or posterior approach scoliosis surgeries, with follow-up stretching up to 10 years. This offers the rare opportunity to examine the natural history of the adding-on phenomenon.Level of Evidence: 3.

Symptomatic Construct Failure after Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and presentation of symptomatic failures (SFs) after metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS). To identify the associated risk factors. To categorize SFs based on the management in these patients. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Few studies have reported on the incidence (1.9%-16%) and risk factors of SF after MSTS. It is unclear whether all SFs, occurring in MSTS-patients, result in revision surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on 288 patients (246 for final analysis) who underwent MSTS between 2005-2015. Data collected were demographics and peri/postoperative clinical and radiological features. Early and late radiological SF were defined as presentation before and after 3 months from index surgery, respectively. Univariate and multivariate models of competing risk regression analysis were designed to determine the risk factors for SF with death as a competing event. RESULTS: We observed 14 SFs (5.7%) in 246 patients; 10 (4.1%) underwent revision surgery. Median survival was 13.4 months. The mean age was 58.8 years (range, 21-87 years); 48.4% were women. The median time to failure was 5 months (range, 1-60 months). Patients with SF were categorized into three groups: (1) SF when the primary implant was revised (n=5, 35.7%); (2) peri-construct progression of disease requiring extension (n=5, 35.7%); and (3) SFs that did not warrant revision (n=4, 28.5%). Four patients (28.5%) presented with early failure. SF commonly occurred at the implant-bone interface (9/14) and all patients had a spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) >7. Thirteen patients (92.8%) who developed failure had fixation spanning junctional regions. Multivariate competing risk regression showed that preoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score was a significant risk factor for implant failure (adjusted sub-hazard ratio, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-30.07; p<0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of SF (5.7%) was low in patients undergoing MSTS although these patients did not undergo spinal fusion. Preoperative ambulators involved a 7 times higher risk of failure than non-ambulators. Preoperative SINS >7 and fixations spanning junctional regions were associated with SF. Majority of construct failures occurred at the implant-bone interface.