Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol ; 40(3): 247-253, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31677617

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) is characterized by the triad of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp, asthma, and aspirin (ASA) or NSAID hypersensitivity. Previous study of NERD has rarely been reported in Asian population. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of aspirin desensitization (ASAD) in Thai NERD. METHODS: This retrospective chart review included patients with a suggestive history of NERD with or without ASAD from the Adult Allergy Clinic of Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) during January 2008 to December 2018. RESULTS: Ten NERD patients were recruited. The median age of onset was 30 years. Comorbid atopic diseases were found in 4 patients. Asthma control level was step 3 of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline or greater in all patients. Five patients had reactions to more than one NSAIDs. Ibuprofen was the most common culprit agent. Reactions frequently involved the respiratory and cutaneous systems. Four patients underwent ASAD followed by ingestion of ASA 300-600 mg daily. One patient discontinued ASA after taking ASA 600 mg daily for 3 months due to severe gastrointestinal side effect. The remaining three patients successfully continued ASA 300 mg daily as maintenance to control sino-nasal inflammation and to prevent recurrence of nasal polyp. None of the 4 patients required sinus surgery revision. CONCLUSIONS: NERD is a difficult-to-treat disease with unique clinical characteristics. ASAD followed by a maintenance dose of ASA 300 mg daily was found to be effective and well-tolerated in most patients.


Assuntos
Asma , Pólipos Nasais , Transtornos Respiratórios , Sinusite , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Humanos , Pólipos Nasais/diagnóstico , Pólipos Nasais/epidemiologia , Pólipos Nasais/terapia , Transtornos Respiratórios/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sinusite/diagnóstico , Sinusite/epidemiologia , Sinusite/terapia , Tailândia/epidemiologia
2.
Heliyon ; 7(11): e08401, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34841110

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Perioperative anaphylaxis is a severe immediate hypersensitivity reaction to drugs administered in immediate temporal association to surgical procedures. The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology recommends allergologic tests be performed within the golden period of between 1 and 4 months after the date of the event to avoid false negatives. Nonetheless, many obstacles prevent patients from receiving diagnostic tests within the recommended time frame. CASE PRESENTATION: A 39-year-old male with congenital glaucoma had a history of multiple episodes of perioperative anaphylaxis since the age of 1 year including generalized urticaria, bronchospasm, cyanosis, and hypotension. Because the sequence of events was unclear due to incomplete documentation of operations and the destruction of medical records, the allergists tested different perioperative drugs on the patient. Although the first test results were all negative, repeated tests at 6 weeks were positive for morphine and ketamine. We identified more than one causative drug at the second round of skin tests. Using recommended skin test concentrations, negative skin tests in 5 control subjects could support the validity of the second test. The patient underwent sinus surgery in the next 3 months after the second skin test using propofol, midazolam, sevoflurane, chlorhexidine, and cefazolin without any anaphylactic reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated skin tests after negative results of the first tests may identify the causative drugs, thus providing optimal patient safety, and should be considered under the physician's discretion together with consideration of the severity of the allergic symptoms, time interval from last reactions, and the patient's consent.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA