Mindfulness in the Clinic Waiting Room May Decrease Pain: Results from Three Pilot Randomized Controlled Trials.

Introduction: Mindfulness interventions can improve a broad range of patient outcomes, but traditional mindfulness-based interventions are time and resource intensive. Emerging evidence indicates brief, single-session mindfulness interventions can also improve patient outcomes, and brief mindfulness interventions can be embedded into medical care pathways with minimal disruption. However, the direct impact of a brief mindfulness intervention on patients' pain while waiting in the clinic waiting room remains unexamined. Objective: A series of three, pilot, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted to examine the impact of a brief, audio-recorded, mindfulness intervention on patients' pain in the clinic waiting room. Method: Study 1 examined an 8-min mindfulness recording delivered before a provider visit; Study 2 examined a 5-min mindfulness recording after a provider visit; and Study 3 examined a 4-min mindfulness recording before a provider visit. Time- and attention-matched control conditions were used in each study. Studies 1 and 2 were conducted in an academic cancer hospital. Study 3 was conducted at a walk-in orthopedic clinic. Pain intensity was measured in each of the three studies. Anxiety and depression symptoms were measured in Studies 2 and 3. Pain unpleasantness was measured in Study 3. Results: A brief (i.e., 4- to 8-min), audio-recorded mindfulness intervention decreased patients' pain intensity in the clinic waiting room, whether delivered before (Study 1 Cohen's d=1.01, Study 3 Cohen's d=0.39) or after (Study 2 Cohen's d=0.89) a provider visit. Mindfulness had a significant effect on anxiety symptoms in both studies in which it was measured. No effect on depression symptoms was observed. Conclusions: Results from these three pilot RCTs indicate brief, audio-recorded, mindfulness interventions may be capable of quickly decreasing clinical symptoms. As such, embedding brief, audio-recorded, mindfulness interventions in clinic waiting rooms may have the potential to improve patient outcomes. The continued investigation of this intervention approach is needed. Clinical Trial Registrations: NCT04477278 and NCT06099964.

Simultaneous Bilateral Quadriceps Tendon Rupture Secondary to Parathyroid Carcinoma: A Case Report.

Simultaneous bilateral quadriceps tendon ruptures are a rare occurrence commonly associated with a traumatic event or systemic disease. A 31-year-old man presented with simultaneous bilateral quadriceps tendon ruptures with associated hyperparathyroidism secondary to parathyroid carcinoma. The injury occurred after the patient attempted to lift a small wooden log from the ground. We discussed the multidisciplinary management of this patient resulting in bilateral quadriceps tendon repairs, tumor resection, and oncological and endocrinological restoration. Clinical follow-up is reported at 15 years after surgery. Parathyroid carcinoma is an extremely rare cancer and rarely the cause of hyperparathyroidism. The systemic effects of the tumor eventually lead to the rupturing of both quadriceps tendons. Orthopaedic physicians must remain vigilant in identifying the root cause of injuries that are atypical in nature.

Test Performance and Test-Retest Reliability of the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening and King-Devick Test in Adolescent Athletes During a Competitive Sport Season.

BACKGROUND: The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) and King-Devick (K-D) test are tools designed to assess ocular or vestibular function after a sport-related concussion. PURPOSE: To determine the test-retest reliability and rate of false-positive results of the VOMS and K-D test in a healthy athlete sample. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Forty-five healthy high school student-athletes (mean age, 16.11 ± 1.43 years) completed self-reported demographics and medical history and were administered the VOMS and K-D test during rest on day 1 (baseline). The VOMS and K-D test were administered again once during rest (prepractice) and once within 5 minutes of removal from sport practice on day 2 (removal). The Borg rating of perceived exertion scale was administered at removal. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to determine test-retest reliability on the K-D test and the average near point of convergence (NPC) distance on the VOMS. Level of agreement was used to examine VOMS symptom provocation over the 3 administration times. Multivariate base rates were used to determine the rate of false-positive results when simultaneously considering multiple clinical cutoffs. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability of total time on the K-D test (0.91 [95% CI, 0.86-0.95]) and NPC distance (0.91 [95% CI, 0.85-0.95]) was high across the 3 administration times. Level of agreement ranged from 48.9% to 88.9% across all 3 times for the VOMS items. Using established clinical cutoffs, false-positive results occurred in 2% of the sample using the VOMS at removal and 36% using the K-D test. CONCLUSION: The VOMS displayed a false-positive rate of 2% in this high school student-athlete cohort. The K-D test's false-positive rate was 36% while maintaining a high level of test-retest reliability (0.91). Results from this study support future investigation of VOMS administration in an acutely injured high school athletic sample. Going forward, the VOMS may be more stable than other neurological and symptom report screening measures and less vulnerable to false-positive results than the K-D test.