To trust or not to trust: evaluating the reliability and safety of AI responses to laryngeal cancer queries.

PURPOSE: As online health information-seeking surges, concerns mount over the quality and safety of accessible content, potentially leading to patient harm through misinformation. On one hand, the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare could prevent it; on the other hand, questions raise regarding the quality and safety of the medical information provided. As laryngeal cancer is a prevalent head and neck malignancy, this study aims to evaluate the utility and safety of three large language models (LLMs) as sources of patient information about laryngeal cancer. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using three LLMs (ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4.0, and Bard). A questionnaire comprising 36 inquiries about laryngeal cancer was categorised into diagnosis (11 questions), treatment (9 questions), novelties and upcoming treatments (4 questions), controversies (8 questions), and sources of information (4 questions). The population of reviewers consisted of 3 groups, including ENT specialists, junior physicians, and non-medicals, who graded the responses. Each physician evaluated each question twice for each model, while non-medicals only once. Everyone was blinded to the model type, and the question order was shuffled. Outcome evaluations were based on a safety score (1-3) and a Global Quality Score (GQS, 1-5). Results were compared between LLMs. The study included iterative assessments and statistical validations. RESULTS: Analysis revealed that ChatGPT 3.5 scored highest in both safety (mean: 2.70) and GQS (mean: 3.95). ChatGPT 4.0 and Bard had lower safety scores of 2.56 and 2.42, respectively, with corresponding quality scores of 3.65 and 3.38. Inter-rater reliability was consistent, with less than 3% discrepancy. About 4.2% of responses fell into the lowest safety category (1), particularly in the novelty category. Non-medical reviewers' quality assessments correlated moderately (r = 0.67) with response length. CONCLUSIONS: LLMs can be valuable resources for patients seeking information on laryngeal cancer. ChatGPT 3.5 provided the most reliable and safe responses among the models evaluated.

Delayed Hearing Recovery After Transverse Temporal Bone Fracture with Otic Capsule violation - Case Report and Literature Review.

We present a patient who suffered a temporal bone fracture (TBF) encompassing the bony labyrinth. Sensorineural hearing loss was confirmed with an unfavorable prognosis for recovery. Thirteen years later, there is regression of the hearing loss.

Management of frontal sinus fractures requiring surgical intervention: An analysis of a case series.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Isolated frontal bone fractures constitute 5-15% of traumatic facial fractures cases, with frontal sinus fractures categorized into anterior wall, posterior wall, or complex fractures. The approach is tailored to fracture type and bone fragment displacement. This paper presents the summary of surgical management in patients with isolated and complex fractures of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus.</br> <b><br>Material and Methods:</b> Five patients with different frontal sinus fractures were treated surgically. The same management protocol - diagnosis and surgical intervention was implemented in all cases The retrospective analysis included fracture assessment, surgical approach, and long-term outcomes evaluation.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> The most common cause of fractures was falls, while two complex fractures involved the anterior and posterior walls. External approach, bone fragment removal, endoscopy, and external stabilization were employed in all cases. One patent required delayed revision surgery due to retaining metallic foreign body. Follow-up radiological examinations showed proper healing and cosmetic outcomes were satisfactory in all of the cases.</br> <b><br>Conclusion:</b> Surgical management of isolated fractures of the frontal sinus anterior wall, involving bone fragment removal, realignment, and endoscopy, yielded satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes without internal or external stabilization. Long-term monitoring and symptom assessment are crucial, especially in cases with penetrating injuries and foreign body risk.</br>.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea as the First Symptom of Metastatic Prostate Adenocarcinoma.

The most common cause of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhoea is damage to the skull base with a dura mater's rupture due to an accident or an iatrogenic injury. This applies to over 96% of cases. Other possibilities that can lead to CSF leakage are neoplasms of the nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, and nasopharynx. Although prostate cancer spreads to bones, cranial metastases to paranasal sinuses are extremely rare. We present a case of an 83-year-old patient with CSF leakage due to infiltrating metastatic prostate cancer. Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea turned out to be the first symptom of prostate cancer metastasis. Diagnostic and treatment strategies are presented in the discussion.