Management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies at an academic referral center: A case series.

OBJECTIVES: To describe treatment and outcomes of patients with confirmed cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) at a tertiary referral center. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed a deidentified family planning clinical database for patients seen by our subspecialty service for CSEP from January 2017 through December 2021 in this case series. We extracted referral information, final diagnosis, management, and outcome measures including estimated blood loss, secondary procedures, and treatment complications. RESULTS: Of 57 cases referred for suspected CSEPs, 23 (40%) had confirmed diagnoses; one additional case was diagnosed during clinic evaluation for early pregnancy loss. Most (n = 50 [88%]) referrals occurred in the last 2 years of the 5-year study period. Of 24 confirmed CSEP cases, eight were pregnancy losses at the time of diagnosis. Fourteen cases were ≤50 days gestation or gestational size (7 [50%] pregnancy losses) and 10 >50 days gestation (range 39-66 days). We treated all 14 patients ≤50 days primarily with suction aspiration under ultrasound guidance in an operating room with no complications and estimated blood loss of 14 ± 10 mL. Of the 10 patients>50 days (maximum 66 days), seven were managed with primary aspiration of which five were uncomplicated. We treated one patient (57 days) had primary intrauterine double-catheter balloon with immediate hemorrhage requiring uterine artery embolization followed by an uncomplicated suction aspiration. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with confirmed CSEPs at 50 days or less gestation or gestational size can likely be primarily treated with suction aspiration with low risk for significant adverse outcomes. Treatment success and complications are directly related to gestational age at treatment. IMPLICATIONS: Ultrasound-guided suction aspiration monotherapy should be considered for primary CSEP treatment up to 50 days and, with continued experience, may be reasonable beyond 50 days gestation. Invasive treatments or those that require multiple days and visits, such as methotrexate or balloon catheters, are not necessary for early CSEPs.

Postoperative Opioid Prescribing and Consumption after Hysterectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine opioid prescribing and consumption patterns after hysterectomy and identify factors associated with postoperative opioid consumption. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Single university medical center. PATIENTS: Women undergoing hysterectomy for benign, nonobstetric indications. INTERVENTIONS: Participant preoperative and surgical characteristics were obtained through chart review and patient report of baseline pain score. During the third postoperative week, participants completed a telephone interview, including a direct count of remaining opioid pills and assessment of satisfaction with pain management. We assessed factors associated with opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME) using a linear regression model. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 129 participants, 113 (88%) completed the postoperative survey after hysterectomy: 16 vaginal, 43 robotic-assisted, 42 conventional laparoscopic, and 12 abdominal hysterectomies. The median amount of opioid prescribed was 150 OME (interquartile range [IQR] 113-200), while the median amount consumed was 75 (IQR 10-135), reflecting an average consumption of about 50% of the prescription. Opioid prescription size was associated with consumption; for every additional oral morphine equivalent prescribed, on average, an additional 0.5 was consumed (p <.001). If the indication for hysterectomy was related to pain, participants consumed 25.3 additional OME (p = .04). The amount of opioid prescribed was inversely correlated with pain management satisfaction; every additional point on a 1 through 5 Likert scale of increasing satisfaction was associated with 44 fewer OME prescribed (standard error 9 OME, p <.001). For the 1464 total unused pills among the 104 participants with leftover opioids, only 20% reported an Food and Drug Administration -compliant opioid disposal plan. CONCLUSION: Gynecologic surgeons can respond to the opioid epidemic by reducing excess opioid pills after hysterectomy by providing both the smallest effective prescription size and concrete resources for safe opioid disposal. These actions may contribute to a reduction in opioid use disorder cases or overdose deaths.