Probable Change of Sleep Parameters after Resection and Reconstruction Surgeries in Patients with Oral Cavity or Oropharyngeal Cancers.

In patients of oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers, resection of the tumor and reconstruction of the defect may reduce the framework, add a bulky flap, alter the tissue flexibility, and contribute to postoperative obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Postoperative OSA and the potential consequences may decrease the survival rate and reduce patients' quality of life. It is unclear whether the surgery is associated with postoperative OSA. Here, we compared the polysomnographies (PSGs) before and after the surgery in 15 patients of oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancers (out of 68 patients of head and neck cancers) without a chemo- or radio-therapy. Each patient received the second PSG before the start of any indicated adjuvant therapy to prevent its interference. There were 14 men and 1 woman, with a mean age and a standard deviation (SD, same in the following) of 56.2 ± 12.8 years. There were 6 tongue cancers, 5 buccal cancers, 2 tonsil cancer, 1 lower gum cancer, and 1 trigone cancer. The results show that the surgery changed sleep parameters insignificantly in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), mean oxyhemoglobin saturation of pulse oximetry (SpO2), minimum SpO2, mean desaturation, and desaturation index but increased mean heart rate in the patients with free flaps. These results hint that the effect of surgery on developing OSA was small in this sample, with a longer plate or a larger framework for a bulkier free flap. It needs future studies with a large sample size to generalize this first observation.

Choice of flap affects fistula rate after salvage laryngopharyngectomy.

Due to the significant morbidity and mortality associated with pharyngocutaneous fistula in pharyngoesophageal reconstruction following cancer resection, the purpose of this retrospective study is to examine the selection of tubed skin flaps that impact anastomotic integrity. The flaps evaluated included radial forearm flap versus anterolateral thigh flap, and fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh flap versus chimeric anterolateral thigh flap. The outcome of interest is the incidence of pharyngocutaneous fistula. The radial forearm group had a significantly higher rate of fistula than the anterolateral thigh group (56.6% vs. 30.2%, p = 0.03). No significant difference in the incidence of fistula was demonstrated between fasciocutaneous and chimeric anterolateral thigh flap (36.8% vs. 25%, p = 0.51). The anastomotic integrity in pharyngoesopharyngeal reconstruction is affected by choice of skin flaps. Anterolateral thigh flap appears to be a viable option for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. The more technical demand of the anterolateral thigh flap must be weighed against an easily harvested radial forearm flap.

Is distal fibular fracture an absolute contraindication to free fibular flap harvesting? A review of evidence in the literature and illustration by a successful case.

Despite the advantages of a fibula flap, many surgeons would often be hesitant in its use in patients with a history of distal fibular fracture. The chief concern is the potential vascular damage sustained during the injury. From our experience, however, we noticed that the blood supply of various components of a fibula flap rarely relies on its distal part alone. Avoiding the use of this flap may unnecessarily forgo the optimal reconstructive option in many patients. Free fibula flap was harvested from a 41-year-old man who had a history of left fibula fracture 10 years before surgery. The fracture was treated with open reduction with internal fixation. The plate was removed 1 year after the trauma surgery. We used this fractured and healed fibula to reconstruct the intraoral and mandibular defect after tumor extirpation. The harvesting process was straight-forward and the flap survived uneventfully. On the basis of our experience and current evidence in the literature, we believe that a history of previous fibular fracture should not be considered as an absolute contraindication for free fibular flap harvesting. With a good knowledge of the lower limb anatomy and appropriate patient selection, the fibular flap can still be a safe option that incurs no additional risk.

Influence of diabetes mellitus on postoperative complications and failure in head and neck free flap reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether diabetic patients have an increased rate of postoperative complications compared to nondiabetic patients after head and neck free flap reconstruction. A systematic review of PubMed Database between 1966 and 2012 was performed. RevMan 5.0 was used for meta-analysis. A retrospective medical chart review of 7890 patients to identify those who had a failed microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck region at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital was also carried out. The result revealed that patients with diabetes mellitus have a 1.76 increased risk of complications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11-2.79) with minimal heterogeneity (I( 2) = 22%; p = .28). The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients with failed free flaps for head and neck reconstruction is 15%. The incidence of diabetes mellitus in these patients with failed free flaps is 2.3 times higher than in the general population.