Prevention and Management of Osteoradionecrosis in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy: ISOO-MASCC-ASCO Guideline.

PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based recommendations for prevention and management of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jaw secondary to head and neck radiation therapy in patients with cancer. METHODS: The International Society of Oral Oncology-Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (ISOO-MASCC) and ASCO convened a multidisciplinary Expert Panel to evaluate the evidence and formulate recommendations. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies, published between January 1, 2009, and December 1, 2023. The guideline also incorporated systematic reviews conducted by ISOO-MASCC, which included studies published from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 2008. RESULTS: A total of 1,539 publications were initially identified. There were 487 duplicate publications, resulting in 1,052 studies screened by abstract, 104 screened by full text, and 80 included for systematic review evaluation. RECOMMENDATIONS: Due to limitations of available evidence, the guideline relied on informal consensus for some recommendations. Recommendations that were deemed evidence-based with strong evidence by the Expert Panel were those pertaining to best practices in prevention of ORN and surgical management. No recommendation was possible for the utilization of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin or photobiomodulation for prevention of ORN. The use of hyperbaric oxygen in prevention and management of ORN remains largely unjustified, with limited evidence to support its practice.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.

Internal and external generalizability of temporal dose-response relationships for xerostomia following IMRT for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To study internal and external generalizability of temporal dose-response relationships for xerostomia after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer, and to investigate potential amendments of the QUANTEC guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Objective xerostomia was assessed in 121 patients (nCohort1=55; nCohort2=66) treated to 70Gy@2Gy in 2006-2015. Univariate and multivariate analyses (UVA, MVA with 1000 bootstrap populations) were conducted in Cohort1, and generalizability of the best-performing MVA model was investigated in Cohort2 (performance: AUC, p-values, and Hosmer-Lemeshow p-values (pHL)). Ultimately and for clinical guidance, minimum mean dose thresholds to the contralateral and the ipsilateral parotid glands (Dmeancontra, Dmeanipsi) were estimated from the generated dose-response curves. RESULTS: The observed xerostomia rate was 38%/47% (3months) and 19%/23% (11-12months) in Cohort1/Cohort2. Risk of xerostomia at 3months increased for higher Dmeancontra and Dmeanipsi (Cohort1: 0.17·Dmeancontra+0.11·Dmeanipsi-8.13; AUC=0.90±0.05; p=0.0002±0.002; pHL=0.22±0.23; Cohort2: AUC=0.81; p<0.0001; pHL=0.27). The identified minimum Dmeancontra thresholds were lower than in the QUANTEC guidelines (Cohort1/Cohort2: Dmeancontra=12/19Gy; Dmeancontra, Dmeanipsi=16, 25/20, 26Gy). CONCLUSIONS: Increased Dmeancontra and Dmeanipsi explain short-term xerostomia following IMRT. Our results also suggest decreasing Dmeancontra to below 20Gy, while keeping Dmeanipsi to around 25Gy. Long-term xerostomia was less frequent, and no dose-response relationship was established for this follow-up time.

Toxicity and outcomes in combined modality treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: cisplatin versus cetuximab.

AIMS: The standard of care for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent cisplatin (CIS). Patients with renal or cardiac dysfunction, hearing loss or poor performance status (PS) may receive RT and cetuximab (CET) at our institution. This study compares treatment toxicities and outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients treated with curative intent RT and concurrent CIS (100 mg/m 2 Day 1, 22, 43) or CET (400 mg/m 2 Day -7, 250 mg/m 2 weekly during RT) between August 2007 and July 2010 were reviewed and toxicity and outcomes analyzed. RESULTS: Among 349 subjects (262 RT-CIS, 87 RT-CET) characteristics were similar except in age, head and neck subsite and RT fractionation. RT-CIS required more dose reductions, delays, and unplanned admissions and received less intended systemic therapy (ST). Weight loss and gastrostomy-tube use were similar. RT-CIS caused more nausea/vomiting, while RT-CET was associated with more dermatitis and acneiform rash. With mean follow-up of 20 months and 16 months, RT-CIS subjects experienced improved 1-year locoregional control (LRC) (90% vs. 72%, P < 0.01), disease-free survival (DFS) (83% vs. 67%, P < 0.01) and overall survival (OS) (90% vs. 80%, P = 0.04). On multivariate analysis type of ST was associated with LRC and DFS, but not OS. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with locally advanced HNSCC, CIS and CET were associated with different toxicity profiles. RT-CIS was associated with improved LRC and DFS, but similar OS compared to RT-CET.

Treatment outcomes of locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer: a comparison between combined modality radio-chemotherapy and two variants of single modality altered fractionation radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes in patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer treated with radio-chemotherapy (RT-CT), accelerated fractionation radiotherapy (AccRT), or hypofractionated radiotherapy (HypoRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Subjects were 321 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed oropharyngeal cancer, Stage III or IVA/B, treated between January 2001 and December 2005 at the BC Cancer Agency with RT-CT (n = 157), AccRT (n = 57), or HypoRT (n = 107). Outcomes examined were disease-specific survival (DSS), locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), rate of G-tube use, and rate of hospitalization for acute complications. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 3.4 years. Three-year Kaplan-Meier DSS with RT-CT, AccRT, and HypoRT were 80%, 81%, and 74%, respectively (p = 0.219). Cox regression analysis identified treatment modality as a significant factor affecting DSS (p = 0.038). Compared with RT-CT, the hazard ratio (HR) for DSS was 1.0 with AccRT and 2.0 with HypoRT (p = 0.021). Kaplan-Meier pairwise comparisons found no significant difference in LRC and OS between RT-CT and AccRT. HypoRT was associated with significantly lower LRC (p = 0.005) and OS (p = 0.008) compared with RT-CT. There were significant differences in the rates of G-tube use (p < 0.001) and of hospitalization (p = 0.036) among the three treatment groups, with the most frequent rates observed in the RT-CT group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer, AccRT conferred DSS, LRC, and OS comparable to that of RT-CT. Patients treated with RT-CT experienced higher rates of treatment-related acute toxicities. HypoRT was associated with the least favorable outcomes.