Clinical Outcomes of Tirzepatide or GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.

Importance: Despite its demonstrated benefits in improving cardiovascular risk profiles, the association of tirzepatide with mortality and cardiovascular and kidney outcomes compared with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) remains unknown. Objective: To investigate the association of tirzepatide with mortality and adverse cardiovascular and kidney outcomes compared with GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used US Collaborative Network of TriNetX data collected on individuals with type 2 diabetes aged 18 years or older initiating tirzepatide or GLP-1 RA between June 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023; without stage 5 chronic kidney disease or kidney failure at baseline; and without myocardial infarction or ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 60 days of drug initiation. Exposures: Treatment with tirzepatide compared with GLP-1 RA. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), the composite of MACEs and all-cause mortality, kidney events, acute kidney injury, and major adverse kidney events. All outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: There were 14 834 patients treated with tirzepatide (mean [SD] age, 55.4 [11.8] years; 8444 [56.9%] female) and 125 474 treated with GLP-1 RA (mean [SD] age, 58.1 [13.3] years; 67 474 [53.8%] female). After a median (IQR) follow-up of 10.5 (5.2-15.7) months, 95 patients (0.6%) in the tirzepatide group and 166 (1.1%) in the GLP-1 RA group died. Tirzepatide treatment was associated with lower hazards of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.75), MACEs (AHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.91), the composite of MACEs and all-cause mortality (AHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84), kidney events (AHR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73), acute kidney injury (AHR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.88), and major adverse kidney events (AHR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.67). Treatment with tirzepatide was associated with greater decreases in glycated hemoglobin (treatment difference, -0.34 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.24 percentage points) and body weight (treatment difference, -2.9 kg, 95% CI, -4.8 to -1.1 kg) compared with GLP-1 RA. An interaction test for subgroup analysis revealed consistent results stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate, glycated hemoglobin level, body mass index, comedications, and comorbidities. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, treatment with tirzepatide was associated with lower hazards of all-cause mortality, adverse cardiovascular events, acute kidney injury, and adverse kidney events compared with GLP-1 RA in patients with type 2 diabetes. These findings support the integration of tirzepatide into therapeutic strategies for this population.

Mortality and cardiovascular events in diabetes mellitus patients at dialysis initiation treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RAs) have demonstrated efficacy in improving mortality and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. However, the impact of GLP-1RAs therapy on cardiorenal outcomes of diabetic patients at the commencement of dialysis remains unexplored. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the long-term benefits of GLP-1RAs in type 2 diabetic patients at dialysis commencement. METHODS: A cohort of type 2 diabetic patients initializing dialysis was identified from the TriNetX global database. Patients treated with GLP-1RAs and those treated with long-acting insulin (LAI) were matched by propensity score. We focused on all-cause mortality, four-point major adverse cardiovascular events (4p-MACE), and major adverse kidney events (MAKE). RESULTS: Among 82,041 type 2 diabetic patients initializing dialysis, 2.1% (n = 1685) patients were GLP-1RAs users (mean ages 59.3 years; 55.4% male). 1682 patients were included in the propensity-matched group, treated either with GLP-1RAs or LAI. The main causes of acute dialysis in this study were ischemic heart disease (17.2%), followed by heart failure (13.6%) and sepsis (6.5%). Following a median follow-up of 1.4 years, GLP-1RAs uses at dialysis commencement was associated with a reduced risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63, p < 0.001), 4p-MACE (HR = 0.65, p < 0.001), and MAKE (HR = 0.75, p < 0.001). This association was particularly notable in long-acting GLP-1RAs users, with higher BMI, lower HbA1c, and those with eGFR > 15 ml/min/1.73m2. GLP-1RAs' new use at dialysis commencement was significantly associated with a lower risk of MACE (p = 0.047) and MAKE (p = 0.004). Additionally, GLP-1RAs use among those who could discontinue from acute dialysis or long-term RAs users was associated with a lower risk of mortality, 4p-MACE, and MAKE. CONCLUSION: Given to the limitations of this observational study, use of GLP-1RAs at the onset of dialysis was associated with a decreased risk of MACE, MAKE, and all-cause mortality. These findings show the lack of harm associated with the use of GLP-1RAs in diabetic patients at the initiation of acute dialysis.

Evaluations of secondary hypertension and laboratory data in the elderly population.

Secondary hypertension in the elderly poses many challenges and requires a comprehensive diagnostic and management approach. This review explores the prevalence, diagnostic strategies, and treatment modalities for secondary hypertension in elderly patients, focusing on etiologies including primary aldosteronism, renal vascular disease, renal parenchymal disease, obstructive sleep apnea, thyroid disorders, Cushing's syndrome, pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, and drug-induced hypertension. Key considerations include age-related changes in physiology and atypical presentations of underlying conditions necessitating thorough screening with a combination of clinical evaluation, laboratory tests, and imaging studies. Collaboration among healthcare providers is essential to ensure a timely diagnosis and personalized management tailored to the unique needs of elderly patients. Further research is needed to address knowledge gaps and optimize clinical strategies for managing secondary hypertension in this population.

Comparison of different medical treatments for primary hyperaldosteronism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: The effectiveness and side effects between different medical treatments in patients with primary hyperaldosteronism have not been systematically studied. Objective: To analyze the efficacy between different mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) inhibitors in a network meta-analysis (NMA) framework, while also evaluating adverse events. Design: Systematic review and NMA. Data sources and methods: The systematic review and NMA was reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, and Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adult patients with primary hyperaldosteronism until 23 June 2023. Studies that compared the efficacy and side effects of different medical treatments of primary hyperaldosteronism were included. The primary outcomes included the effect on blood pressure, serum potassium, and major adverse cardiovascular events. The secondary outcomes were adverse events related to MRAs (hyperkalemia and gynecomastia). Frequentist NMA and pairwise meta-analysis were conducted. Results: A total of 5 RCTs comprising 392 participants were included. Eplerenone, esaxerenone, and amiloride were compared to spironolactone and demonstrated comparable effect on the reduction of systolic blood pressure. In comparison to spironolactone, eplerenone exhibited a less pronounced effect on reducing diastolic blood pressure [-4.63 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI): -8.87 to -0.40 mmHg] and correcting serum potassium (-0.2 mg/dL; 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.03 mg/dL). Spironolactone presented a higher risk of gynecomastia compared with eplerenone (relative risk: 4.69; 95% CI: 3.58-6.14). Conclusion: The present NMA indicated that the blood pressure reduction and potassium-correcting effects of the three MRAs may demonstrate marginal differences, with confidence levels in the evidence being very low. Therefore, further research is needed to explore the efficacy of these MRAs, especially regarding their impact on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. Trial registration: PROSPERO (CRD: 42023446811).

Precision Oncology in Breast Cancer Surgery.

Outcomes for patients with breast cancer have improved over time due to increased screening and the availability of more effective therapies. It is important to recognize that breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that requires treatment based on molecular characteristics. Early endpoints such as pathologic complete response correlate with event-free survival, allowing the opportunity to consider de-escalation of certain cancer treatments to avoid overtreatment. This article discusses clinical trials of tailoring treatment (eg, I-SPY2) and screening (eg, WISDOM) to individual patients based on their unique risk features.

Kidney function predicts new-onset cardiorenal events and mortality in primary aldosteronism: approach of the 2021 race-free eGFR equation.

Individuals with primary aldosteronism (PA) exhibit glomerular hyperfiltration, which may conceal underlying kidney damage. This observational cohort study enrolled 760 coronary artery disease-naive patients diagnosed with PA between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2018 (male, 45%; mean age, 52.3 ± 11.9 years). The baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the 2021 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, which includes serum creatinine and cystatin C but omits the race variable. During a mean follow-up of 5.8 ± 3.2 years, new-onset composite cardiovascular events (total death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization procedure) occurred at a crude incidence rate of 10.9 per 1,000 person-years. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that baseline eGFR was independently associated with composite cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]). Penalized splines smoothing in multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that the risk of composite cardiovascular events increased negatively and linearly when patients had a baseline eGFR less than 85 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients with baseline eGFR <85 mL/min/1.73 m2 were independently associated with higher risks of composite cardiovascular events (HR, 2.39 [95% CI, 1.16-4.93]), all-cause mortality (HR, 4.63 [95% CI, 1.59-13.46]), and adverse kidney events (sub-distribution HR, 5.96 [95% CI, 3.69-9.62], with mortality as a competing risk). Our data support baseline eGFR as a predictor for new-onset adverse cardiorenal events and emphasizes the importance of the early detection of kidney function impairment in hypertensive patients with PA. We also firstly validate the 2021 race-free CKD-EPI eGFR equation in Asian patents with PA. Even with the glomerular hyperfiltration phenomenon, baseline eGFR in patients with primary aldosteronism is associated with subsequent cardiorenal outcomes. The results also firstly point to the validity of the 2021 race-free CKD-EPI eGFR equation in healthcare and clinical decision-making.

Who needs to be screened for primary aldosteronism?

The prevalence of patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) is about 5%-15% in hypertensive patients, and it is common cause of secondary hypertension in clinical practice. Two major causes of PA are noted, namely bilateral adrenal hyperplasia and aldosterone-producing adenoma, and the general diagnosis is based on three steps: (1) screening, (2) confirmatory testing, and (3) subtype differentiation (Figure 1). The recommendation for screening patients is at an increased risk of PA, here we focus on which patients should be screened for PA, not only according to well-established guidelines but for potential patients with PA. We recommend screening for 1) patients with resistant or persistent hypertension, 2) hypertensive patients with hypokalemia (spontaneous or drug-induced), 3) young hypertensive patients (age <40 years), and 4) all hypertensive patients with a history of PA in first-degree relatives. Moreover, we suggest screening for 1) hypertensive patients themselves or first-degree relatives with early target organ damage, such as stroke and other diseases, 2) all hypertensive patients with a concurrent adrenal incidentaloma, 3) hypertensive patients with obstructive sleep apnea, 4) hypertensive patients with atrial fibrillation unexplained by structural heart defects and/or other conditions resulting in the arrhythmia, 5) hypertensive patients with anxiety and other psychosomatic symptoms, and 6) hypertensive patients without other comorbidities to maintain cost-effectiveness.

Perioperative genetic testing and time to surgery in patients with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Time to treatment has been identified as a quality metric, with longer time to treatment associated with poorer outcomes. Genetic evaluation is an integral part of treatment counseling for patients with breast cancer. With expanding indications for genetic testing and consideration of expansion of genetic testing to all patients with a personal history of breast cancer, this study aims to evaluate the effect of genetic evaluation on the time interval from initial surgical visit to surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing upfront surgery for stage 0-3 breast cancer from June 2022 to December 2022. Patient demographics, treatment characteristics, National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for genetic testing, and results were obtained. RESULTS: The study included 492 patients (489 females). Eighty-one (16.2%) were ≤50 years of age at diagnosis. In total, 281 patients (57.1%) met National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for genetic testing and 199 consulted with a genetic counselor (72.4%). Seventy-six patients (27.6%) not meeting National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria pursued genetic counseling. In total, 218 patients (79.3%) referred for genetic counseling completed testing. Mean turnaround time to genetic testing result was 11 days (range, 6-66 days). Twenty-six patients (11.9%) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. Twenty-four of these patients met National Comprehensive Cancer Network testing criteria (92.3%) and 2 did not (7.7%). The time to treatment for patients undergoing genetic testing was 33 vs 34 days in those without testing (P = .45). Three patients (11.5%) with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants altered their initial surgical plan due to their genetic testing results. Seven patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant results returning postoperatively did not undergo additional surgery. CONCLUSION: Hereditary breast cancer evaluation and genetic testing did not appear to delay time to treatment for patients with breast cancer in our study cohort.

Reversal of arterial stiffness in medically and surgically treated unilateral primary aldosteronism.

OBJECTIVE: Hyperaldosteronism has adverse effects on cardiovascular structure and function. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the gold standard for patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism. For unilateral primary aldosteronism patients unable or unwilling to undergo surgery, the effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) on the reversibility of arterial stiffness and other clinical data remain unclear. We aimed to compare the reversibility of arterial stiffness using pulse wave velocity (PWV) and other clinical parameters between surgically and medically treated unilateral primary aldosteronism patients. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 306 unilateral primary aldosteronism patients, of whom 247 received adrenalectomy and 59 received medical treatment with MRAs. Detailed medical history, basic biochemistry and PWV data were collected in both groups before treatment and 1 year after treatment. After propensity score matching (PSM) for age, sex, SBP and DBPs, 149 patients receiving adrenalectomy and 54 patients receiving MRAs were included for further analysis. RESULTS: After PSM, the patients receiving adrenalectomy had a greater reduction in blood pressure, increase in serum potassium, and change in PWV (ΔPWV, -53 ±â€Š113 vs. -10 ±â€Š140 cm/s, P  = 0.028) than those receiving MRAs 1 year after treatment. Multivariable regression analysis further identified that surgery (compared with MRA treatment), baseline PWV, baseline DBP, the change in DBP and the use of diuretics were independently correlated with ΔPWV. CONCLUSION: Adrenalectomy is superior to MRA treatment with regards to vascular remodeling when treating unilateral primary aldosteronism patients.

Association of Dip in eGFR With Clinical Outcomes in Unilateral Primary Aldosteronism Patients After Adrenalectomy.

CONTEXT: Primary aldosteronism (PA) leads to kidney function deterioration after treatment, but the effects of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) dip following adrenalectomy and its long-term implications are unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine eGFR dip in patients with unilateral PA (uPA) after adrenalectomy and clarify their long-term prognosis. METHODS: This multicenter prospective population-based cohort study, enrolled patients with uPA who underwent adrenalectomy. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on their eGFR dip ratio. Outcomes investigated included mortality, cardiovascular composite events, and major adverse kidney events (MAKEs). RESULTS: Among 445 enrolled patients, those with an eGFR dip ratio worse than -30% (n = 74, 16.6%) were older, had higher blood pressure, higher aldosterone concentration, and lower serum potassium levels. During 5.0 ± 3.6 years of follow-up, 2.9% died, 14.6% had cardiovascular composite events, and 17.3% had MAKEs. The group with eGFR dip worse than -30% had a higher risk of MAKEs (P < .001), but no significant differences in mortality (P = .295) or new-onset cardiovascular composite outcomes (P = .373) were found. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with an eGFR dip ratio worse than -30% were significantly associated with older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.04), preoperative eGFR (OR, 1.02), hypokalemia (OR, 0.45), preoperative systolic blood pressure (OR, 1.03), and plasma aldosterone concentration (OR, 0.99). CONCLUSION: Within 5 years post adrenalectomy, 17.3% of patients had reduced kidney function. Notably, individuals with an eGFR dip ratio worse than -30% faced higher MAKE risks, underscoring the need to monitor kidney function in PA patients after surgery.

Strategies for subtyping primary aldosteronism.

Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is a crucial method for the lateralization of primary aldosteronism (PA). It is advised to halt the use of the patient's antihypertensive medications and correct hypokalemia prior to undergoing AVS. Hospitals equipped to conduct AVS should establish their own diagnostic criteria based on current guidelines. If the patient's antihypertensive medications cannot be discontinued, AVS can be performed as long as the serum renin level is suppressed. The Task Force of Taiwan PA recommends using a combination of adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation, quick cortisol assay, and C-arm cone-beam computed tomography to maximize the success of AVS and minimize errors by using the simultaneous sampling technique. If AVS is not successful, an NP-59 (131 I-6-ß-iodomethyl-19-norcholesterol) scan can be used as an alternative method to lateralize PA. We depicted the details of the lateralization procedures (mainly AVS, and alternatively NP-59) and their tips and tricks for confirmed PA patients who would consider to undergo surgical treatment (unilateral adrenalectomy) if the subtyping shows unilateral disease.

Levels of nasal nitric oxide and nitric oxide synthase expression in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.

KEY POINTS: CRSwNP patients had decreased nNO and increased SNOT-22, endoscopy, and CT scores. CRSwNP patients exhibited decreased nNO despite elevated iNOS and eNOS mRNA expression. The mechanism behind lowered nNO in CRSwNP may not be related to NOS expression.

Treatment of primary aldosteronism: Clinical practice guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Aldosteronism.

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of secondary hypertension and one of the few medical diseases that can be cured by surgery. Excessive aldosterone secretion is highly associated with cardiovascular complications. Many studies have shown that patients with unilateral PA treated with surgery have better survival, cardiovascular, clinical, and biochemical outcomes than those who receive medical treatment. Consequently, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the gold standard for treating unilateral PA. Surgical methods should be individualized according to the patient's tumor size, body shape, surgical history, wound considerations, and surgeon's experience. Surgery can be performed through a transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach, and via a single-port or multi-port laparoscopic approach. However, total or partial adrenalectomy remains controversial in treating unilateral PA. Partial excision will not completely eradicate the disease and is prone to recurrence. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists should be considered for patients with bilateral PA or patients who cannot undergo surgery. There are also emerging alternative interventions, including radiofrequency ablation and transarterial adrenal ablation, for which data on long-term outcomes are currently lacking. The Task Force of Taiwan Society of Aldosteronism developed these clinical practice guidelines with the aim of providing medical professionals with more updated information on the treatment of PA and improving the quality of care.

Influence of autonomous cortisol secretion in patients with primary aldosteronism: subtype analysis and postoperative outcome.

Context: Autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) has a relatively high prevalence in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA). There is still a lack of relevant studies to analyze the influence of ACS on diagnosing and managing PA. Objective: To evaluate the influence of ACS on image-adrenal venous sampling (AVS) correlation and the postoperative results. Methods: This was a retrospective study using the Taiwan Primary Aldosteronism Investigation database from July 2017 to April 2020, with 327 PA patients enrolled. A total of 246 patients were included in the image-AVS analysis. Patients who had undergone unilateral adrenalectomy and a 12-month follow-up were included in the postoperative analysis. Results: Sixty-five patients (26.4%) had ACS. The image-AVS discordance rate was higher in the ACS group compared to the non-ACS group (75.4% (n = 49) vs 56.4% (n = 102); odds ratio (OR) = 2.37 (CI: 1.26-4.48); P = 0.007). The complete biochemical success rate was higher in the non-ACS group than that in the ACS group (98.1% (n = 51) vs 64.3% (n = 9); OR = 28.333 (CI: 2.954-271.779); P = 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, ACS was the only factor associated with lower biochemical success (OR = 0.035 (CI: 0.004-0.339), P = 0.004). Conclusion: PA patients with ACS have higher image-AVS discordance rate and worse biochemical outcomes after surgery. ACS was the only negative predictor of postoperative biochemical outcomes. Further studies and novel biomarkers for AVS are crucial for obtaining better postoperative outcomes in PA patients with ACS.

Catheter Directed Thrombectomy and Other Deep Venous Interventions in Cancer Patients.

Treating cancer patients with deep venous thrombosis/venous thromboembolism (DVT/VTE) can be challenging as patients are frequently unable to receive the standard therapy of anticoagulation due to the increased risk of bleeding complications seen in this population. Similarly, the hesitation of interventionalists to use thrombolytic agents due to bleeding risks limits percutaneous intervention options as well. Further, outcome data and guidelines do not exist for oncologic patients and often treatment is tailored to patient-specific factors after multidisciplinary discussion. This article reviews specific factors to consider when planning percutaneous treatment of cancer patients with DVT/VTE, focusing on the iliocaval system.

A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Pre-test Genetic Counseling Using an Artificial Intelligence Automated Chatbot and Traditional In-person Genetic Counseling in Women Newly Diagnosed with Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Alternative service delivery models are critically needed to address the increasing demand for genetics services and limited supply of genetics experts available to provide pre-test counseling. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial of women with stage 0-III breast cancer not meeting National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic testing. Patients were randomized to pre-test counseling with a Chatbot or a certified genetic counselor (GC). Participants completed a questionnaire assessing their knowledge of breast cancer genetics and a survey assessing satisfaction with their decision regarding pre-test counseling. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were enrolled and 37 were randomized to genetic counseling with an automated Chatbot or a GC; 19 were randomized to Chatbot and 18 to traditional genetic counseling, and 13 (38.2%) had a family member with breast cancer but did not meet NCCN criteria. All patients opted to undergo genetic testing. Testing revealed six pathogenic variants in five patients (13.5%): CHEK2 (n = 2), MSH3 (n = 1), MUTYH (n = 1), and BRCA1 and HOXB13 (n = 1). No patients had a delay in time-to-treatment due to genetic testing turnaround time, nor did any patients undergo additional risk reducing surgery. There was no significant difference in median knowledge score between Chatbot and traditional counseling (11 vs. 12, p = 0.09) or in median patient satisfaction score (30 vs. 30, p = 0.19). CONCLUSION: Satisfaction and comprehension in patients with breast cancer undergoing pre-test genetic counseling using an automated Chatbot is comparable to in-person genetic testing. Utilization of this technology can offer improved access to care and a much-needed alternative for pre-test counseling.

Identifying KCNJ5 Mutation in Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma Patients With Baseline Characteristics Using Machine Learning Technology.

Background: Primary aldosteronism is characterized by inappropriate aldosterone production, and unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (uPA) is a common type of PA. KCNJ5 mutation is a protective factor in uPA; however, there is no preoperative approach to detect KCNJ5 mutation in patients with uPA. Objectives: This study aimed to provide a personalized surgical recommendation that enables more confidence in advising patients to pursue surgical treatment. Methods: We enrolled 328 patients with uPA harboring KCNJ5 mutations (n = 158) or not (n = 170) who had undergone adrenalectomy. Eighty-seven features were collected, including demographics, various blood and urine test results, and clinical comorbidities. We designed 2 versions of the prediction model: one for institutes with complete blood tests (full version), and the other for institutes that may not be equipped with comprehensive testing facilities (condensed version). Results: The results show that in the full version, the Light Gradient Boosting Machine outperformed other classifiers, achieving area under the curve and accuracy values of 0.905 and 0.864, respectively. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine also showed excellent performance in the condensed version, achieving area under the curve and accuracy values of 0.867 and 0.803, respectively. Conclusions: We simplified the preoperative diagnosis of KCNJ5 mutations successfully using machine learning. The proposed lightweight tool that requires only baseline characteristics and blood/urine test results can be widely applied and can aid personalized prediction during preoperative counseling for patients with uPA.

Aldosterone-producing adenoma is associated with urolithiasis in primary aldosteronism.

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is associated with urolithiasis as it causes hypercalciuria and hypocitraturia. However, the influence of different subtypes of PA on urinary stone formation remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and the burden of urolithiasis in patients with PA. In the present study, we enrolled 312 patients with PA from a prospectively maintained database, of whom 179 had APA. Clinical, biochemical, and imaging data (including the presence, volume, and density of urinary stones on abdominal computed tomography) were compared between groups, with employment of propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to balance possible confounding factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the acute renal colic event during follow-up. After PSM for age, sex, serum calcium, phosphate, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and uric acid, the APA and non-APA groups had 106 patients each. Patients with APA had higher serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) (79.1 ± 45.0 vs 56.1 ± 30.3, P < 0.001) and a higher prevalence of urolithiasis (27.4% vs 12.3%, P = 0.006) than non-APA patients. During follow-up, a higher incidence of acute renal colic events was noted in the APA group than the non-APA group (P = 0.011); this association remained significant (P = 0.038) after adjustment for age and sex in Cox-regression analysis. Our data suggest that APA is associated with a heavier burden of urolithiasis and higher incidence of renal colic events compared to the non-APA subtype of PA.