Cigarette Smoking Status, Cigarette Exposure, and Duration of Abstinence Predicting Incident Dementia and Death: A Multistate Model Approach.

BACKGROUND: To fully characterize the risk for dementia associated with cigarette smoking, studies must consider competing risks that hinder the observation of dementia or modify the chance that dementia occurs (i.e., death). Extant research examining the competing risks fails to account for the occurrence of death following dementia, limiting our understanding of the relation between smoking and dementia. OBJECTIVE: Examine the impact of smoking status, lifetime smoking exposure, and duration of abstinence on incident dementia, death following dementia, and death without dementia. METHODS: Multi-state models estimated hazard ratios (HR) for 95% confidence interval (CI) of 10,681 cognitively healthy adults for transition from baseline to dementia, baseline to death, and dementia to death based on smoking status, lifetime cigarette exposure, and abstinence duration. RESULTS: Compared to never smokers, current smokers had increased risk of dementia (HR = 1.66; 95% CI 1.18- 2.32; p = 0.004), and death from baseline (HR = 2.98; 95% CI 2.24- 3.98; p < 0.001) and incident dementia (HR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.08- 3.27; p = 0.03). Pack years increased risk of death from baseline (HR = 1.01; 95% CI 1.00- 1.01; p < 0.001), but not dementia risk (HR = 1.00; 95% CI 1.00- 1.00; p = 0.78) or death following dementia (HR = 1.01; 95% CI 1.00- 1.01; p = 0.05). Recent quitters (quit < 10 years), compared to never smokers, had increased risk of death after baseline (HR = 2.31; 95% CI 1.55- 3.43; p < 0.001), but not dementia (HR = 1.17; 95% CI 0.73- 1.88; p = 0.52) or death following dementia (HR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.42- 2.41; p = 0.99). CONCLUSION: Current smoking increases the risk for dementia and death, but dementia is better attributed to smoking recency than lifetime exposure. Smoking cessation at any age might reduce these risks for cognitively healthy individuals.

Association of Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Cerebral Perfusion in Whites and African Americans.

BACKGROUND: Midlife cardiovascular risk factors increase risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Despite disproportionately high cardiovascular disease and dementia rates, African Americans are under-represented in studies of AD risk and research-based guidance on targeting vascular risk factors is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated relationships between specific cardiovascular risk factors and cerebral perfusion in White and African American adults enriched for AD risk. METHODS: Participants included 397 cognitively unimpaired White (n = 330) and African American (n = 67) adults enrolled in the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center who underwent pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling MRI. Multiple linear regression models examined independent relationships between cardiovascular risk factors and mean cerebral perfusion. Subsequent interaction and stratified models assessed the role for APOE genotype and race. RESULTS: When risk factor p-values were FDR-adjusted, diastolic blood pressure was significantly associated with mean perfusion. Tobacco use, triglycerides, waist-to-hip ratio, and a composite risk score were not associated with perfusion. Without FDR adjustment, a relationship was also observed between perfusion and obesity, cholesterol, and fasting glucose. Neither APOE genotype nor race moderated relationships between risk factors and perfusion. CONCLUSION: Higher diastolic blood pressure predicted lower perfusion more strongly than other cardiovascular risk factors. This relationship did not vary by racial group or genetic risk for AD, although the African American sample had greater vascular risk burden and lower perfusion rates. Our findings highlight the need to prioritize inclusion of underrepresented groups in neuroimaging studies and to continue exploring the link between modifiable risk factors, cerebrovascular health, and AD risk in underrepresented populations.

A group-based brief intervention for surgery patients with high-risk substance use.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the feasibility and efficacy of a psychosocial intervention to address high-risk substance use in patients scheduled for elective surgery. METHOD: A group-format intervention, based on motivational interviewing principles, was provided prior to elective surgery to 107 participants with at-risk substance use, identified using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test - Condensed (AUDIT-C) and self-report of illicit drug use. Patient satisfaction was assessed with an anonymous survey. Within-subject comparisons of substance use at baseline and at a postoperative follow-up evaluation were conducted. A control group of 67 surgery patients reporting high-risk substance use completed baseline assessments and received usual care. Medical outcomes and measures of utilization were compared between groups. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction with the brief intervention was high. A paired t test comparing average pre- and post-AUDIT-C scores showed significant reduction in substance use postsurgery (t = 9.94, P = .000), and participants reported intention to maintain reduced substance use levels. Between-group analyses revealed no significant differences in medical complications or utilization. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that a group-based intervention for substance use disorder can be implemented as part of preoperative care and may contribute to decreased substance use prior to and following surgery. Further work is needed to identify methods to reduce adverse medical outcomes in surgical patients.