RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Description of procedural outcomes using contemporary techniques that apply specialized coronary guidewires, microcatheters, and guide catheter extensions designed for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous revascularization is limited. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm study was conducted to evaluate procedural and in-hospital outcomes among 150 patients undergoing attempted CTO revascularization utilizing specialized guidewires, microcatheters and guide extensions. The primary endpoint was defined as successful guidewire recanalization and absence of in-hospital cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or repeat target lesion revascularization (major adverse cardiac events, MACE). RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes was 32.7%; prior MI, 48.0%; and previous bypass surgery, 32.7%. Average (mean ± standard deviation) CTO length was 46.9 ± 20.5 mm, and mean J-CTO score was 1.9 ± 0.9. Combined radial and femoral arterial access was performed in 50.0% of cases. Device utilization included: support microcatheter, 100%; guide catheter extension, 64.0%; and mean number of study guidewires/procedure was 4.8 ± 2.6. Overall, procedural success was achieved in 75.3% of patients. The rate of successful guidewire recanalization was 94.7%, and in-hospital MACE was 19.3%. Achievement of TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow was observed in 93.3% of patients. Crossing strategies included antegrade (54.0%), retrograde (1.3%) and combined antegrade/retrograde techniques (44.7%). Clinically significant perforation resulting in hemodynamic instability and/or requiring intervention occurred in 16 (10.7%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: In a multicenter, prospective registration study, favorable procedural success was achieved despite high lesion complexity using antegrade and retrograde guidewire maneuvers and with acceptable safety, yet with comparably higher risk than conventional non-CTO PCI.
Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Catéteres , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/etiologia , Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess in-hospital and long-term outcomes of retrograde compared with antegrade-only percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion (CTO PCI). BACKGROUND: Procedural and clinical outcomes following retrograde compared with antegrade-only CTO PCI remain unknown. METHODS: Using the core-lab adjudicated OPEN-CTO registry, we compared the outcomes of retrograde to antegrade-only CTO PCI. Primary endpoints included were in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction [MI], emergency cardiac surgery, or clinically significant perforation) and MACCE at 1-year (all-cause death, MI, stroke, target lesion revascularization, or target vessel reocclusion). RESULTS: Among 885 single CTO procedures from the OPEN-CTO registry, 454 were retrograde and 431 were antegrade-only. Lesion complexity was higher (J-CTO score: 2.7 vs. 1.9; p < .001) and technical success lower (82.4 vs. 94.2%; p < .001) in retrograde compared with antegrade-only procedures. All-cause death was higher in the retrograde group in-hospital (2 vs. 0%; p = .003), but not at 1-year (4.9 vs. 3.3%; p = .29). Compared with antegrade-only procedures, in-hospital MACCE rates (composite of all-cause death, stroke, MI, emergency cardiac surgery, and clinically significant perforation) were higher in the retrograde group (10.8 vs. 3.3%; p < .001) and at 1-year (19.5 vs. 13.9%; p = .03). In sensitivity analyses landmarked at discharge, there was no difference in MACCE rates at 1 year following retrograde versus antegrade-only CTO PCI. Improvements in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Quality of Life scores at 1-year were similar between the retrograde and antegrade-only groups (29.9 vs 30.4; p = .58). CONCLUSIONS: In the OPEN-CTO registry, retrograde CTO procedures were associated with higher rates of in-hospital MACCE compared with antegrade-only; however, post-discharge outcomes, including quality of life improvements, were similar between technical modalities.
Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Assistência ao Convalescente , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Humanos , Alta do Paciente , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the use of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) for retrograde crossing during chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The use of SVGs for retrograde crossing during CTO PCI has received limited study. METHODS: A total of 1,615 retrograde CTO PCIs performed between 2012 and 2019 at 25 centers were examined. Clinical, angiographic, and technical characteristics and procedural outcomes were compared among retrograde cases via SVGs (SVG group) versus other collateral vessels (non-SVG group). RESULTS: Retrograde CTO PCI via SVGs was performed in 189 cases (12%). Patients in the SVG group were older (mean age 70 ± 9 years vs. 64 ± 10 years; p < 0.01) and had higher rates of prior myocardial infarction (62% vs. 51%; p < 0.01) and prior PCI (81% vs. 70%; p < 0.01). They were more likely to have moderate or severe calcification (81% vs. 65%; p < 0.01) and moderate or severe tortuosity (53% vs. 44%; p = 0.02) and had similar J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) scores (3.2 ± 1.0 vs. 3.1 ± 1.1; p = 0.13) but higher PROGRESS-CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) scores (4.7 ± 1.7 vs. 3.1 ± 1.1; p < 0.01). Technical (85% vs. 78%; p = 0.04) and procedural (81% vs. 74%; p = 0.04) success rates were higher in the SVG group, with no difference in in-hospital major adverse events (6.4% vs. 4.4%; p = 0.22). Contrast volume was lower in the SVG group (225 ml [173 to 325 ml] vs. 292 ml [202 to 400 ml]; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Use of SVGs for retrograde crossing is associated with higher rates of technical and procedural success and similar rates of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events compared with retrograde CTO PCI via other collateral vessels.
Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Veia Safena/transplante , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Circulação Colateral , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Circulação Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Veia Safena/diagnóstico por imagem , Veia Safena/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução VascularRESUMO
BACKGROUND: During chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), sometimes non-CTO lesions are also treated. METHODS: We compared the clinical and procedural characteristics and outcomes of CTO PCIs with and without concomitant treatment of a non-CTO lesion in a contemporary multicenter CTO registry. RESULTS: Of the 3598 CTO PCIs performed at 21 centers between 2012 and 2018, 814 (23%) also included PCI of at least one non-CTO lesion. Patients in whom non-CTO lesions were treated were older (65⯱â¯10 vs. 64⯱â¯10â¯years, pâ¯=â¯0.03), more likely to present with an acute coronary syndrome (32% vs. 23%, pâ¯<â¯0.01), and less likely to undergo PCI of a right coronary artery (RCA) CTO (46% vs. 58%, pâ¯<â¯0.01). The most common non-CTO lesion location was the left anterior descending artery (31%), followed by the circumflex (29%) and the RCA (25%).Combined non-CTO and CTO-PCI procedures had similar technical (88% vs. 87%, pâ¯=â¯0.33) and procedural (85% vs. 85%, pâ¯=â¯0.74) success and major in-hospital complication rates (3.4% vs. 2.7%, pâ¯=â¯0.23), but had longer procedure duration (131 [88, 201] vs. 117 [75, 179] minutes, pâ¯<â¯0.01), higher patient air kerma radiation dose (3.0 [1.9, 4.8] vs. 2.8 [1.5, 4.6] Gray, pâ¯<â¯0.01) and larger contrast volume (300 [220, 380] vs. 250 [180, 350] ml, pâ¯<â¯0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Combined CTO PCI with PCI of non-CTO lesions is associated with similar success and major in-hospital complication rates compared with cases in which only CTOs were treated, but requires longer procedure duration and higher radiation dose and contrast volume.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Oclusão Coronária , Vasos Coronários , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/etiologia , Doença Aguda , Fatores Etários , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico , Oclusão Coronária/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Coronários/patologia , Vasos Coronários/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Doses de Radiação , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We examined the procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusions (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the clinical, angiographic characteristics and outcomes of 3486 CTO interventions performed in patients with (n=1101) and without (n=2317) prior CABG at 21 centers. Prior CABG patients (32% of total cohort) were older (67±9 versus 63±10 years; P<0.001) and had more comorbidities and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (50% [40-58] versus 55% [45-60]; P<0.001). The CTO target vessel in prior CABG patients was the right coronary artery (56%), circumflex (26%), and left anterior descending artery (17%). The mean J-CTO (2.9±1.2 versus 2.2±1.3; P<0.001) and PROGRESS-CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention; 1.5±1.1 versus 1.2±1.0; P<0.001) score was higher in prior CABG patients. Retrograde (53% versus 30%, P<0.001) and antegrade dissection reentry (35% versus 28%; P<0.001) techniques were used more frequently in prior CABG patients. Prior CABG patients had lower technical (84% versus 89%; P<0.001) and procedural (82% versus 87%, P<0.001) success, but similar incidence of in-hospital major complications (3.1% versus 2.5%; P=0.287). In-hospital mortality (1% versus 0.4%; P=0.016) and coronary perforation (7.1% versus 3.1%; P<0.001) occurred more frequently in prior CABG patients, however, CABG patients had a lower incidence of pericardial tamponade (0.1% versus 1.0%; P=0.002) and pericardiocentesis (0% versus 1.3%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a large multicenter CTO percutaneous coronary interventions registry, prior CABG patients had lower success rate but similar overall risk for complications, although mortality was higher and the incidence of tamponade was lower. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02061436.
Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/mortalidade , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Federação Russa , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
There is limited data on the use of atherectomy during chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We compared the clinical and procedural characteristics and outcomes of CTO PCIs performed with or without atherectomy in a contemporary multicenter CTO PCI registry. Between 2012 and 2018, 3,607 CTO PCIs were performed at 21 participating centers. Atherectomy was used in 117 (3.2%) cases: rotational atherectomy in 105 cases, orbital atherectomy in 8, and both in 4 cases. Patients in whom atherectomy was used, were older (68 ± 8 vs 64 ± 10 years, p <0.0001) and had higher Japan-chronic total occlusion score (3.0 ± 1.2 vs 2.4 ± 1.3, p <0.0001). CTO PCI cases in which atherectomy was used had similar technical (91% vs 87%, pâ¯=â¯0.240) and procedural (90% vs 85%, pâ¯=â¯0.159) success and in-hospital major adverse cardiac event (4% vs 3%, pâ¯=â¯0.382) rates. However, atherectomy cases were associated with higher rates of donor vessel injury (4% vs 1%, pâ¯=â¯0.031), tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis (2.6% vs 0.4%, pâ¯=â¯0.012) and more often required use of a left ventricular assist device (9% vs 5%, pâ¯=â¯0.031). Atherectomy cases were associated with longer procedural duration (196 [141, 247] vs 119 [76, 180] minutes, p <0.0001), and higher patient air kerma radiation dose (3.6 [2.5, 5.6] vs 2.8 [1.6, 4.7] Gray, pâ¯=â¯0.001). In conclusion, atherectomy is currently performed in approximately 3% of CTO PCI cases and is associated with similar technical and procedural success and overall major adverse cardiac event rates, but higher risk for donor vessel injury and tamponade.
Assuntos
Aterectomia/métodos , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Vasos Coronários/cirurgia , Sistema de Registros , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the frequency and outcomes of radial access for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Radial access improves the safety of PCI, but its role in CTO PCI remains controversial. METHODS: We compared the clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics of 3,790 CTO interventions performed between 2012 and 2018 via radial-only access (RA) (n = 747) radial-femoral access (RFA) (n = 844) and femoral-only access (n = 2,199) access at 23 centers in the United States, Europe, and Russia. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 65 ± 10 years, and 85% were men. Transradial access (RA and RFA) was used in 42% of CTO interventions and significantly increased over time from 11% in 2012 to 67% in 2018 (p < 0.001). RA patients were younger (age 62 ± 10 years vs. 64 ± 10 years and 65 ± 10 years; p < 0.001), less likely to have undergone prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (18% vs. 39% and 35%; p < 0.001), and less likely to have undergone prior PCI (60% vs. 63% and 66%; p = 0.005) compared with those who underwent RFA and femoral-only access PCI. RA CTO PCI lesions had lower J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) (2.1 ± 1.4 vs. 2.6 ± 1.3 and 2.5 ± 1.3; p < 0.001) and PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) complication (2.3 ± 1.9 vs. 3.2 ± 2.0 and 3.2 ± 1.9; p < 0.001) scores. The mean sheath size was significantly smaller in the RA group (6.6 ± 0.7 vs. 7.0 ± 0.6 and 7.3 ± 0.8; p < 0.0001), although it increased with lesion complexity. Antegrade dissection re-entry (20% vs. 33% and 32%; p < 0.001) was less commonly used with RA, whereas use of retrograde techniques was highest with RFA (47%). The overall rates of technical success (89% vs. 88% vs. 86%; p = 0.061), procedural success (86% vs. 85% vs. 85%; p = 0.528), and in-hospital major complication (2.47% vs. 3.40% vs. 2.18%; p = 0.830) were similar in all 3 groups, whereas major bleeding was lower in the RA group (0.55% vs. 1.94% and 0.88%; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Transradial access is increasingly being used for CTO PCI and is associated with similar technical and procedural success and lower major bleeding rates compared with femoral-only access interventions. (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention [PROGRESS CTO]; NCT02061436).
Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Artéria Femoral , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Artéria Radial , Idoso , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/mortalidade , Doença Crônica , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/mortalidade , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Punções , Artéria Radial/diagnóstico por imagem , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Federação Russa , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The effect of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on in-hospital outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has received limited study. METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of CKD and its impact on CTO-PCI outcomes in 1979 patients who underwent 2040 procedures between 2012 and 2017 at 18 centers. CKD was defined as preprocedural estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m². RESULTS: Compared with patients without CKD (n = 1444; 73%), patients with CKD (n = 535; 27%) had more comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, prior myocardial infarction, PCI, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and stroke), and more severe calcification and proximal vessel tortuosity. Patients with and without CKD had similar technical success rates (84% vs 86%; P=.49) and procedural success rates (83% vs 84%; P=.44). Patients with CKD had higher in-hospital mortality rate (1.9% vs 0.3%; P<.001) and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate (4.3% vs 2.2%; P<.01). In-hospital mortality and MACE rates increased with decreasing eGFR levels (P=.03). In multivariate analysis, an independent association was observed between CKD and in-hospital mortality (adjusted odd ratio, 4.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-16.0; P=.02), but not overall MACE (adjusted odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.7; P=.28). CONCLUSIONS: CKD is common among patients undergoing CTO-PCI. High success rates can be achieved in patients with decreased glomerular filtration rate, but CKD may be associated with higher in-hospital mortality.
Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Pacientes Internados , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Sistema de Registros , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Idoso , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/complicações , Oclusão Coronária/mortalidade , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Federação Russa/epidemiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
The frequency and outcomes of patients who underwent chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of more than one CTO during the same procedure have received limited study. We compared the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of patients who underwent treatment of single versus >1 CTOs during the same procedure in 20 centers from the United States, Europe, and Russia. A total of 2,955 patients were included: mean age was 65 ± 10 years and 85% were men with high prevalence of previous myocardial infarction (46%), and previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery (33%). More than one CTO lesions were attempted during the same procedure in 58 patients (2.0%) and 70% of them were located in different major epicardial arteries. Compared with patients who underwent PCI of a single CTO, those who underwent PCI of >1 CTOs during the same procedure had similar J-CTO (2.4 ± 1.3 vs 2.5 ± 1.3, pâ¯=â¯0.579) and Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (1.5 ± 1.2 vs 1.3 ± 1.0 pâ¯=â¯0.147) scores. The multi-CTO PCI group had similar technical success (86% vs 87%, pâ¯=â¯0.633), but higher risk of in-hospital major complications (10.3% vs 2.7%, pâ¯=â¯0.005), and consequently numerically lower procedural success (79% vs 85%, pâ¯=â¯0.197). The multi-CTO PCI group had higher in-hospital mortality (5.2% vs 0.5%, pâ¯=â¯0.005) and stroke (5.2%vs 0.2%, p <0.001), longer procedure duration (162 [117 to 242] vs 122 [80 to 186] minutes, p <0.001) and higher radiation dose (3.6 [2.1 to 6.4] vs 2.9 [1.7 to 4.7] Gray, pâ¯=â¯0.033). In conclusion, staged revascularization may be the preferred approach in patients with >1 CTO lesions requiring revascularization, as treatment during a single procedure was associated with higher risk for periprocedural complications.
Assuntos
Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico , Oclusão Coronária/mortalidade , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Federação Russa/epidemiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the techniques and outcomes of hybrid chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a diverse group of patients and operators on 2 continents. BACKGROUND: CTO PCI has been evolving with constant improvement of equipment and techniques. METHODS: Contemporary outcomes of CTO PCI were examined by analyzing the clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics of 3,122 CTO interventions performed in 3,055 patients at 20 centers in the United States, Europe, and Russia. RESULTS: The mean age was 65 ± 10 years, and 85% of the patients were men, with high prevalence of diabetes (43%), prior myocardial infarction (46%), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (33%), and prior PCI (65%). The CTO target vessels were the right coronary artery (55%), left anterior descending coronary artery (24%), and left circumflex coronary artery (20%). The mean J-CTO (Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusion Registry of Japan) and PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) scores were 2.4 ± 1.3 and 1.3 ± 1.0, respectively. The overall technical and procedural success rate was 87% and 85%, respectively, and the rate of in-hospital major complications was 3.0%. The final successful crossing strategy was antegrade wire escalation in 52.0%, retrograde in 27.1%, and antegrade dissection re-entry in 20.9%; >1 crossing strategy was required in 40.9%. Median contrast volume, air kerma radiation dose, and procedure and fluoroscopy time were 270 ml (interquartile range: 200 to 360 ml), 2.9 Gy (interquartile range: 1.7 to 4.7 Gy), 123 min (interquartile range: 81 to 188 min) and 47 min (interquartile range: 29 to 77 min), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CTO PCI is currently being performed with high success and acceptable complication rates among various experienced centers in the United States, Europe, and Russia. (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention [PROGRESS CTO]; NCT02061436).
Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Prevalência , Radiografia Intervencionista , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Coronary perforation is a potential complication of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We analyzed 2,097 CTO PCIs performed in 2,049 patients from 2012 to 2017. Patient age was 65 ± 10 years, 85% were men, and 36% had prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Technical and procedural success were 88% and 87%, respectively. A major periprocedural adverse cardiovascular event occurred in 2.6%. Coronary perforation occurred in 85 patients (4.1%); The frequency of Ellis class 1, 2, and 3 perforations was 21%, 26%, and 52%, respectively. Perforation occurred more frequently in older patients and those with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery (61% vs 35%, p < 0.001). Cases with perforation were angiographically more complex (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan score 3.0 ± 1.2 vs 2.5 ± 1.3, p < 0.001). Twelve patients (14%) with perforation experienced tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis. Patient age, previous PCI, right coronary artery target CTO, blunt or no stump, use of antegrade dissection re-entry, and the retrograde approach were associated with perforation. Adjusted odds ratio for periprocedural major periprocedural adverse cardiovascular events among patients with perforation was 15.04 (95% confidence interval 7.35 to 30.18). In conclusion, perforation occurs relatively infrequently in contemporary CTO PCI performed by experienced operators and is associated with baseline patient characteristics and angiographic complexity necessitating use of advanced crossing techniques. In most cases, perforations do not result in tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis, but they are associated with reduced technical and procedural success, higher periprocedural major adverse events, and reduced procedural efficiency.
Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Vasos Coronários/lesões , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/epidemiologia , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco , Ruptura , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/terapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the effect of age and sex on procedural outcomes and efficiency of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and outcomes of 1675 CTO-PCIs performed in 1644 patients between 2012 and 2016 at 15 United States centers. RESULTS: Mean age was 65.3 ± 10 years and 1408 (86%) were men. Overall technical and procedural success rates were 88% and 87%, respectively. Increasing age was associated with more comorbidities (dyslipidemia, hypertension, prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, prior stroke, peripheral arterial disease, and chronic lung disease) and more lesion calcification. As compared with the reference age of <65 years, age >75 years was independently associated with technical failure (odds ratio [OR], 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-4.28). Increasing age was also independently associated with the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.10-9.23 for 65-75 years and OR, 5.71; 95% CI, 1.89-19.60 for >75 years). Compared with men, women (n = 236; 14%) were older (66.8 ± 11.1 years vs 65.0 ± 9.8 years; P=.02), but had similar clinical characteristics and lower J-CTO scores (2.3 ± 1.3 vs 2.5 ± 1.2; P=.02). Although crude technical success rate was higher in women compared with men (92% vs 87%; P=.04), multivariable analysis did not show independent association between sex and technical failure (OR, men/women, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.86-3.50) or MACE (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.25-1.73). CONCLUSIONS: Older age, but not sex, is associated with lower technical success and higher in-hospital complication rate for CTO-PCI. CTO-PCI is relatively infrequently attempted in women, despite high technical success and acceptable complication rates.
Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária/epidemiologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico , Oclusão Coronária/etiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the impact of proximal cap ambiguity on procedural techniques and outcomes for coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and outcomes of 1021 CTO-PCIs performed between 2012 and 2015 at 11 United States centers. RESULTS: Proximal cap ambiguity was present in 31% of target lesions and was associated with increased clinical and angiographic complexity (prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery: 43% vs 33%; P=.01; moderate/severe calcification 66% vs 51%; P<.001) and lower technical success (85% vs 93%; P<.001) and procedural success (84% vs 91%; P=.01), but similar incidence of major adverse cardiac events (3.2% vs 2.9%; P=.77). A retrograde approach was more commonly utilized among cases with proximal cap ambiguity (68% vs 33%; P<.001), and was more likely to be the initial (39% vs 13%; P<.001) and successful approach (42% vs 20%; P<.001). Proximal cap ambiguity was associated with increased use of intravascular ultrasound (49% vs 36%; P=.01) and contrast (281 mL vs 250 mL; P<.001), higher air kerma radiation dose (4.0 Gy vs 3.0 Gy; P<.001), and longer procedure time (161 min vs 119 min; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Proximal cap ambiguity is present in one-third of CTO-PCI target lesions and is associated with lower success rates, higher utilization of the retrograde approach, and lower procedural efficiency, but no significant difference in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events.
Assuntos
Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária , Vasos Coronários , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Angiografia Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico , Oclusão Coronária/epidemiologia , Oclusão Coronária/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Coronários/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Administration of a large amount of contrast volume during chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may lead to contrast-induced nephropathy. METHODS: We examined the association of clinical, angiographic and procedural variables with contrast volume administered during 1330 CTO-PCI procedures performed at 12 experienced United States centers. RESULTS: Technical and procedural success was 90% and 88%, respectively, and mean contrast volume was 289 ± 138 mL. Approximately 33% of patients received >320 mL of contrast (high contrast utilization group). On univariable analysis, male gender (P=.01), smoking (P=.01), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (P=.04), moderate or severe calcification (P=.01), moderate or severe tortuosity (P=.04), proximal cap ambiguity (P=.01), distal cap at a bifurcation (P<.001), side branch at the proximal cap (P<.001), blunt/no stump (P=.01), occlusion length (P<.001), higher J-CTO score (P=.02), use of antegrade dissection and reentry or retrograde approach (P<.001), ad hoc CTO-PCI (P=.04), dual arterial access (P<.001), and 8 Fr guide catheters (P<.001) were associated with higher contrast volume; conversely, diabetes mellitus (P=.01) and in-stent restenosis (P=.01) were associated with lower contrast volume. On multivariable analysis, moderate/severe calcification (P=.04), distal cap at a bifurcation (P<.001), ad hoc CTO-PCI (P<.001), dual arterial access (P=.01), 8 Fr guide catheters (P=.02), and use of antegrade dissection/reentry or the retrograde approach (P<.001) were independently associated with higher contrast use, whereas diabetes (P=.02), larger target vessel diameter (P=.03), and presence of "interventional" collaterals (P<.001) were associated with lower contrast utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Several baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics are associated with higher contrast volume administration during CTO-PCI.
Assuntos
Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Nefropatias , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Idoso , Angiografia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/métodos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Nefropatias/diagnóstico , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Nefropatias/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We sought to examine the efficacy and safety of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention using the retrograde approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the outcomes of the retrograde versus antegrade-only approach to chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention among 1301 procedures performed at 11 experienced US centers between 2012 and 2015. The mean age was 65.5±10 years, and 84% of the patients were men with a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus (45%) and previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery (34%). Overall technical and procedural success rates were 90% and 89%, respectively, and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 31 patients (2.4%). The retrograde approach was used in 539 cases (41%), either as the initial strategy (46%) or after a failed antegrade attempt (54%). When compared with antegrade-only cases, retrograde cases were significantly more complex, both clinically (previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery prevalence, 48% versus 24%; P<0.001) and angiographically (mean Japan-chronic total occlusion score, 3.1±1.0 versus 2.1±1.2; P<0.001) and had lower technical success (85% versus 94%; P<0.001) and higher major adverse cardiovascular events (4.3% versus 1.1%; P<0.001) rates. On multivariable analysis, the presence of suitable collaterals, no smoking, no previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and left anterior descending artery target vessel were independently associated with technical success using the retrograde approach. CONCLUSIONS: The retrograde approach is commonly used in contemporary chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention, especially among more challenging lesions and patients. Although associated with lower success and higher major adverse cardiovascular event rates in comparison to antegrade-only crossing, retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention remains critical for achieving overall high success rates.
Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Idoso , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Seleção de Pacientes , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The performance of the Japan-chronic total occlusion (J-CTO) score in predicting success and efficiency of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention has received limited study. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the records of 650 consecutive patients who underwent CTO percutaneous coronary intervention between 2011 and 2014 at 6 experienced centers in the United States. Six hundred and fifty-seven lesions were classified as easy (J-CTO=0), intermediate (J-CTO=1), difficult (J-CTO=2), and very difficult (J-CTO≥3). The impact of the J-CTO score on technical success and procedure time was evaluated with univariable logistic and linear regression, respectively. The performance of the logistic regression model was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic and receiver operator characteristic curves. Antegrade wiring techniques were used more frequently in easy lesions (97%) than very difficult lesions (58%), whereas the retrograde approach became more frequent with increased lesion difficulty (41% for very difficult lesions versus 13% for easy lesions). The logistic regression model for technical success demonstrated satisfactory calibration and discrimination (P for Hosmer-Lemeshow =0.743 and area under curve =0.705). The J-CTO score was associated with a 2-fold increase in the odds of technical failure (odds ratio 2.04, 95% confidence interval 1.52-2.80, P<0.001). Procedure time increased by ≈20 minutes for every 1-point increase of the J-CTO score (regression coefficient 22.33, 95% confidence interval 17.45-27.22, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: J-CTO score was strongly associated with final success and efficiency in this study, supporting its expanded use in CTO interventions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02061436.
Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária/classificação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Idoso , Feminino , Previsões , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prioritizing and combining all available crossing techniques was developed to optimize procedural efficacy, efficiency, and safety, but there is limited published data on its outcomes. METHODS: We examined the procedural techniques and outcomes of 1036 consecutive CTO PCIs performed using a hybrid approach between 2012 and 2015 at 11 US centers. RESULTS: Mean age was 65 ± 10 years and 86% of the patients were men, with a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus (43%) and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (34%). Most target CTOs were located in the right coronary artery (59%), followed by the left anterior descending artery (23%) and the circumflex (19%). Dual injection was used in 71%. Technical success was achieved in 91% and a major procedural complication occurred in 1.7% of cases. The final successful crossing technique was antegrade wire escalation in 46%, antegrade dissection/re-entry in 26%, and retrograde in 28%. The initial crossing strategy was successful in 58% of the lesions, whereas 39% required an additional approach. Overall, antegrade wire escalation was used in 71%, antegrade dissection/re-entry in 36%, and the retrograde approach in 42% of procedures. Median contrast volume, fluoroscopy time, and air kerma radiation dose were 260 (200-360) ml, 44 (27-72) min, and 3.4 (2.0-5.4) Gray, respectively. CONCLUSION: Application of a hybrid approach to CTO crossing resulted in high success and low complication rates across a varied group of operators and hospital practice structures, supporting its expanding use in CTO PCI.
Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Idoso , Oclusão Coronária/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the efficacy and safety of 3 novel devices to recanalize coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs). BACKGROUND: Successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of CTOs improves clinical outcome in appropriately selected patients. CTO PCI success, however, remains suboptimal. METHODS: A new crossing catheter and re-entry system was evaluated in a prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial of CTO lesions refractory to standard PCI techniques. The primary efficacy endpoint was the frequency of true lumen guidewire placement distal to the CTO (technical success). RESULTS: Enrollment included 147 patients with 150 CTOs. The mean lesion length was 41 ± 17 mm. A crossing catheter crossed 56 lesions into the distal true lumen, and a re-entry catheter facilitated tapered-wire cannulation of the distal lumen in 59 CTOs initially crossed subintimally (77% technical success). Success in the first 75 CTOs was 67%, rising to 87% in the last 75 CTOs. Mean fluoroscopy and procedure times were 45 ± 16 min and 90 ± 12 min, respectively, each significantly shorter than in historical controls (p < 0.0001 for both). Coronary perforation occurred in 14 cases (9.3%), requiring treatment in 3 cases (prolonged balloon inflation, with additional coil embolization in 1 case). No tamponade or hemodynamic instability occurred. Six patients had periprocedural non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. No emergency surgery, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or cardiac reintervention occurred. Two deaths occurred within 30 days, neither as a direct result of the procedure. The 30-day major adverse cardiac event rate was 4.8%. CONCLUSIONS: In CTOs failing standard techniques, use of a new crossing and re-entry system results in a high success rate without increasing complications.
Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/instrumentação , Catéteres , Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Idoso , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/mortalidade , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/mortalidade , Stents Farmacológicos , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Retratamento , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Primary ventricular fibrillation (VF) during an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) occurs with a high incidence and mortality rate with or without thrombolysis. The incidence varies from 2% to 19% depending on the definition of "primary." Primary VF in this study refers to fibrillation occurring in the absence of shock or pulmonary edema. Mortality rate, when primary VF occurs, is 2 to 4 times greater than when it does not. Prevention of VF has been impeded by the publication of the 1996 recommendations of the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology against the use of prophylactic lidocaine based on meta-analysis studies implying toxicity. This observational study of 4,254 patients with AMI reports the incidence and mortality rates of primary VF over 32 years. Of the 4,254 patients, 4,150 received prophylactic lidocaine, and 104 patients did not receive prophylactic lidocaine due to the 1996 guidelines, after which administration of prophylactic lidocaine was governed by physician choice. The incidence of primary VF was 0.5% among the 4,150 who received prophylactic lidocaine and 10% among the 104 who did not (p <0.0001). Among the 4,150 receiving prophylactic lidocaine, sinoatrial block occurred in 0.5% and complete infranodal atrial ventricular block occurred in 0.2%, all secondary to the site of infarction (concurrent serum lidocaine levels were < 4 microg/ml). Asystole was an agonal rhythm in 4%; these patients had been off lidocaine for 48 hours. Mortality rates were 10.5% in patients without primary VF and 25% in patients with VF (p <0.001). Thus, prophylactic lidocaine markedly decreased the incidence of VF in 4,150 patients with AMI to 0.5% compared with trials before and after thrombolysis (2% to 19%) and with the 104 patients in this study who did not receive prophylactic lidocaine (10%). No lidocaine-induced sinoatrial or atrial ventricular block or asystole occurred.