Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 18(3): 327-31, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18465710

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To describe and compare long-term (> or = 36 months) effects of patients with 86 primary pterygia treated with bare sclera extirpation (BSE) followed by Beta-RT or by sham irradiation. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study. After BSE of their pterygium, patients were randomized to either Beta-RT or sham irradiation. In the case of Beta-RT, within 24 hours after the operation, a 90Sr eye applicator was used to deliver 2500 cGy to the sclera surface at a dose rate of between 200 and 250 cGy/min. Sham irradiation was given using the same type of applicator without the 90Sr layer. After treatment, both a masked ophthalmologist and a radiation oncologist performed follow-up examinations. These were continued until either a relapse occurred or at least 36 months had elapsed. RESULTS: Adequate follow-up was available of 86 pterygia in 81 patients, treated between February 1998 and September 2002. Fifty-two (60%) patients were male. The mean age of the patients was 50 years (range: 24-77). After a follow-up of at least 36 months (mean: 40 months, SD:13.9 months), 5 out of 44 eyes (11%) treated with Beta-RT showed a recurrence versus 32 out of 42 eyes (76%) treated with sham-RT (after a mean follow-up of 22 months) (p<0.001). In the Beta-RT group, 80% were satisfied with the cosmetic result, whereas in the sham group this percentage was 41% (p<0.001). In the Beta-RT group, no scar or a white scar could be detected in 86% of the treated eyes, versus in 24% of the sham irradiated eyes (p<0.001). A change of keratometry (Javal) was seen in 5 patients (12%) following Beta-RT compared to 16 (38%) after sham irradiation (p=0.002). Complications were few: a granuloma was seen in three patients after sham irradiation, mild limitation of abduction in two Beta-RT patients versus in five after sham irradiation, and mild scleromalacia in one Beta-RT patient. CONCLUSIONS: Bare sclera extirpation of a pterygium without adjuvant treatment has an unacceptably high recurrence rate and therefore should be considered obsolete. Bare sclera extirpation of a primary pterygium followed by a single-dose Beta-RT is a simple, effective, and safe treatment with lasting results and very few complications.


Assuntos
Pterígio/radioterapia , Pterígio/cirurgia , Esclera/cirurgia , Radioisótopos de Estrôncio/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 149(17): 924-8, 2005 Apr 23.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15884405

RESUMO

Members of the Dutch working group on soft tissue tumours developed an up-to-standard evidence-based multidisciplinary clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis of soft tissue tumours and the treatment and follow-up of soft tissue sarcomas, in cooperation with the Dutch Association of Comprehensive Cancer Centres and the Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement. A soft tissue sarcoma is defined as every non-epithelial tumour that does not originate in haematopoietic or lymphatic system, central nervous system or bone. The guideline lists 'alarm signals' to raise awareness of malignancy and recommends consulting a multidisciplinary team. Non-invasive imaging has to be completed before proceeding to any invasive (diagnostic) procedure or assessment of dissemination. Aspiration cytology can be useful for differentiating between sarcoma and other malignancies. A definite diagnosis is obtained by means of image-guided needle biopsy. Tumours will be classified according to the World Health Organization and graded according to the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. Surgical excision with a tumour free margin of 2 cm is the core of therapy, taking into account vital structures when necessary. In case of small superficial tumours (diameter < or = 3 cm) excision biopsy may be justified. Radiotherapy is almost always necessary and certainly indicated when wide margins are impossible even after re-resection. In the case of primary metastatic disease, an individual decision should be taken after multi-disciplinary consultation concerning the possibility of curative or palliative treatment. Neither neo-adjuvant nor adjuvant chemotherapy is standard. Chemotherapy may be useful in metastatic disease. The guideline advises referring patients who are eligible for chemotherapy to a centre and that they should be included in a study protocol.


Assuntos
Sarcoma/diagnóstico , Sarcoma/terapia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/terapia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico , Países Baixos , Sarcoma/patologia , Sociedades Médicas , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/patologia
3.
Int J Hyperthermia ; 11(2): 173-86, 1995.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7790733

RESUMO

Between August 1989 and July 1992 a total of 22 patients (64 treatments) with inoperable or recurrent deep seated pelvic tumours were treated with regional hyperthermia and radiotherapy. The 70 Mhz Coaxial TEM applicator with its characteristic open waterbolus was used as heating device. The main objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and temperature data. The results showed that the major treatment limiting factors were insufficient power and systemic stress. Local pain was observed in only 10% of all treatments. Most of the treatments resulted in elevated systemic temperatures with the overall mean maximum oesophagus temperature reaching 38.9 +/- 0.7 degrees C, however, in only 6% of these treatments this was found to be treatment limiting. From the measured data the following intratumoral temperatures were calculated: T90 = 39.9 +/- 1.0 degrees C; T50 = 40.7 +/- 1.0 degrees C; T10 = 41.4 +/- 1.0 degrees C. In addition, the overall mean average normal tissue temperatures were determined: Trectum = 40.8 +/- 0.7 degrees C; Tvagina = 41.3 +/- 0.9 degrees C; Turethra = 40.8 +/- 0.9 degrees C. The temperatures in normal tissue were frequently higher than in tumour, indicating that a large volume was heated. The open waterbolus allows strong cooling, but the strategy was changed during the study: higher systemic temperatures were allowed to improve the pelvic temperatures. This pilot study proved that the open waterbolus is clinically a success, because it offers patient comfort and SAR-steering by patient repositioning, and that regional hyperthermia with the Coaxial TEM is feasible.


Assuntos
Hipertermia Induzida/instrumentação , Neoplasias Pélvicas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertermia Induzida/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pélvicas/radioterapia , Temperatura
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA