ESMO Congress 2021: highlights from the EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer group's perspective.

There has been no major change of practice in gastrointestinal oncology at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) symposium 2021, but confirmation that immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy has become standard of care in several indications. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Gastrointestinal Track Cancer Group has selected important phase II and III trials presented during the symposium across all gastrointestinal cancers as well as early reports on new drugs or new combinations that may change practice in the future.

Long-course preoperative chemoradiation versus 5 × 5 Gy and consolidation chemotherapy for clinical T4 and fixed clinical T3 rectal cancer: long-term results of the randomized Polish II study.

BACKGROUND: This trial evaluated whether preoperative short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) were superior to chemoradiation in rectal cancers with clinical (c)T4 or fixed cT3. Previously, we reported early results showing no differences in the radical surgery rate (primary end point). In the short-course/CCT group, we observed lower acute toxicity of preoperative treatment and better overall survival (OS). We updated results to determine whether the benefit in OS was sustained and to evaluate late complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cT4 or fixed cT3 rectal cancer were randomized either to preoperative 5 × 5 Gy and three cycles of FOLFOX4 or to chemoradiation (50.4 Gy with bolus 5-Fu, leucovorin and oxaliplatin). RESULTS: Patients (N = 515) were eligible for analysis, 261 in the short-course/CCT group and 254 in the chemoradiation group. The median follow-up was 7.0 years. The difference in OS was insignificant [hazard ratio (HR) 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-1.15; P = 0.38). However, the difference in early OS favouring short-course/CCT previously reported was observed again, being 9% at 3 years (95% CI 0.5% to 17%). This difference disappeared later; at 8 years OS was 49% in both groups. There was no difference in disease-free survival (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.75-1.19; P = 0.65) at 8 years 43% versus 41% in the short-course/CCT group versus the chemoradiation group, respectively. The corresponding values for cumulative incidences of local failure and distant metastases did not differ and were HR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.70-1.23, P = 0.60, 35% versus 32% and HR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.68-1.23, P = 0.54, 36% versus 34%, respectively. The rate of late complications was similar (P = 0.66), grade 3+ being 11% versus 9% in the short-course/CCT group versus the chemoradiation group, respectively. CONCLUSION: The superiority of preoperative short-course/CCT over chemoradiation was not demonstrated. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: The trial is registered as ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00833131.

Impact of pelvic bone marrow irradiation on the hematological toxicity of subsequent chemotherapy in rectal cancer.

Preoperative radio(chemo)therapy in rectal cancer may irreversibly damage pelvic bone marrow (PBM) and impair the tolerance of subsequent chemotherapy. The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between the irradiated volume of PBM and the toxicity of subsequent 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, leucovorin (FOLFOX-4) in rectal cancer. We included consecutive rectal cancer patients who received FOLFOX-4 postoperatively or due to cancer relapse. The PBM was divided into iliac (IM), lumbosacral (LSM), and lower pelvic (LPM) marrow. We assessed mean dose, and percentage of volume receiving 10%-90% (V10%-V90%) of the prescribed dose for PBM, IM, LSM, and LPM. Generalized linear model for repeated measures (GLM) was used to test an influence of dose-volumes distribution on toxicities grade 2 or higher (TOX2) and grade 3 or higher (TOX3). The two-sided t-test was used to evaluate the difference in mean dose, mean V20%, and mean V40% between patients who experienced TOX2 or TOX3 and those who did not. 39 patients met eligibility criteria. Because of the low occurrence of TOX3 (n=3), related analyses were abandoned. We found no influence of dose-volume distribution on TOX2 in GLM and no significant differences in mean dose, mean V20%, and mean V40% for PBM, IBM, LSM, and LPM between patients who experienced TOX2 and those who did not. To conclude, no relationship between doses received by PBM in preoperative radio(chemo)therapy in rectal cancer and hematological tolerance of subsequent FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy was found.

Phase III, randomised trial of avelumab versus physician's choice of chemotherapy as third-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: primary analysis of JAVELIN Gastric 300.

Background: There currently are no internationally recognised treatment guidelines for patients with advanced gastric cancer/gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) in whom two prior lines of therapy have failed. The randomised, phase III JAVELIN Gastric 300 trial compared avelumab versus physician's choice of chemotherapy as third-line therapy in patients with advanced GC/GEJC. Patients and methods: Patients with unresectable, recurrent, locally advanced, or metastatic GC/GEJC were recruited at 147 sites globally. All patients were randomised to receive either avelumab 10 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks or physician's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 or irinotecan 150 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15, each of a 4-week treatment cycle); patients ineligible for chemotherapy received best supportive care. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Results: A total of 371 patients were randomised. The trial did not meet its primary end point of improving OS {median, 4.6 versus 5.0 months; hazard ratio (HR)=1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-1.4]; P = 0.81} or the secondary end points of PFS [median, 1.4 versus 2.7 months; HR=1.73 (95% CI 1.4-2.2); P > 0.99] or ORR (2.2% versus 4.3%) in the avelumab versus chemotherapy arms, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 90 patients (48.9%) and 131 patients (74.0%) in the avelumab and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 17 patients (9.2%) in the avelumab arm and in 56 patients (31.6%) in the chemotherapy arm. Conclusions: Treatment of patients with GC/GEJC with single-agent avelumab in the third-line setting did not result in an improvement in OS or PFS compared with chemotherapy. Avelumab showed a more manageable safety profile than chemotherapy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02625623.

Does the addition of oxaliplatin to preoperative chemoradiation benefit cT4 or fixed cT3 rectal cancer treatment? A subgroup analysis from a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Whether there is any benefit derived from adding oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based preoperative chemoradiation is currently unknown in cases of advanced cT3 or cT4 tumours. Our aim was to evaluate this issue by analysing a randomized trial, which compared two schedules of preoperative treatment (chemoradiation vs. 5 × 5 Gy with 3 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy) for cT4 or fixed cT3 rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Delivery of oxaliplatin was mandatory to the first part of the study. For the second part, its delivery in both treatment-assigned groups was left to the discretion of the local investigator. We analysed a subgroup of 272 patients (136 in the oxaliplatin group and 136 in the fluorouracil-only group) from institutions that had omitted oxaliplatin in the second part of the study. RESULTS: Circumferential resection margin negative (CRM-) status rate was 68% in the oxaliplatin group and 70% in the fluorouracil-only group, p = 0.72. The pathological complete response rate (pCR) was correspondingly 14% vs. 7%, p = 0.10. Following multivariable analysis, when comparing the CRM- status in the oxaliplatin group to the fluorouracil-only group, the odds ratio was 0.79 (95 CI 0.35-1.74), p = 0.54; there being no interaction between concomitant chemoradiation and 5 × 5 Gy with consolidation chemotherapy; pinteraction = 0.073. For pCR, the corresponding results were 0.47 (95 CI 0.19-1.16), p = 0.10, pinteraction = 0.84. CONCLUSION: No benefit was found of adding oxaliplatin in terms of CRM nor pCR rates for either concomitant or sequential settings in preoperative radiochemotherapy for very advanced rectal cancer.

Long-course oxaliplatin-based preoperative chemoradiation versus 5 × 5 Gy and consolidation chemotherapy for cT4 or fixed cT3 rectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in local control are required when using preoperative chemoradiation for cT4 or advanced cT3 rectal cancer. There is therefore a need to explore more effective schedules. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with fixed cT3 or cT4 cancer were randomized either to 5 × 5 Gy and three cycles of FOLFOX4 (group A) or to 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions combined with two 5-day cycles of bolus 5-Fu 325 mg/m(2)/day and leucovorin 20 mg/m(2)/day during the first and fifth week of irradiation along with five infusions of oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) once weekly (group B). The protocol was amended in 2012 to allow oxaliplatin to be then foregone in both groups. RESULTS: Of 541 entered patients, 515 were eligible for analysis; 261 in group A and 254 in group B. Preoperative treatment acute toxicity was lower in group A than group B, P = 0.006; any toxicity being, respectively, 75% versus 83%, grade III-IV 23% versus 21% and toxic deaths 1% versus 3%. R0 resection rates (primary end point) and pathological complete response rates in groups A and B were, respectively, 77% versus 71%, P = 0.07, and 16% versus 12%, P = 0.17. The median follow-up was 35 months. At 3 years, the rates of overall survival and disease-free survival in groups A and B were, respectively, 73% versus 65%, P = 0.046, and 53% versus 52%, P = 0.85, together with the cumulative incidence of local failure and distant metastases being, respectively, 22% versus 21%, P = 0.82, and 30% versus 27%, P = 0.26. Postoperative and late complications rates in group A and group B were, respectively, 29% versus 25%, P = 0.18, and 20% versus 22%, P = 0.54. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed in local efficacy between 5 × 5 Gy with consolidation chemotherapy and long-course chemoradiation. Nevertheless, an improved overall survival and lower acute toxicity favours the 5 × 5 Gy schedule with consolidation chemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: The trial is registered as ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00833131.

Watch and wait policy after preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer; management of residual lesions that appear clinically benign.

BACKGROUND: During an ongoing phase II observational study on watch and wait policy in rectal cancer, a substantial number of patients presented residual lesion after radiotherapy with a clinical benign appearance. This article aims to discuss the clinical significance of such findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Main entry criteria were age ≥70 years and small tumour (≤5 cm and ≤60% of circumferential involvement) located in the low rectum. Patients received chemoradiation (50 Gy, 2 Gy per fraction concomitantly with a 5-Fu bolus and leucovorin) or 5 × 5 Gy if considered unfit for chemotherapy. Patients with clinical complete response (cCR) were observed. Those with persistent tumours underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery [TEM] if the baseline tumour was ≤3 cm and cN0 or total mesorectal excision. RESULTS: The watch and wait procedure was used in 11 out of the total 35 patients (31%) with a cCR; 17 patients (49%) with residual tumours that appeared clinically malignant were referred for TEM or abdominal surgery. In the remaining seven (20%), the residual tumour clinically appeared benign. Of these, there were two invasive cancers, four high-grade dysplasias and one low-grade dysplasia. The five patients with dysplasia, underwent local lesion resection without recurrence within a median of 11 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of lesions that appeared clinically benign after radio(chemo)therapy were also benign on pathological examination. Thus, local excision of such lesions should be considered.

Prognostic value of microRNA expression in operable non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: About 50% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients develop distant metastases following pulmonary resection. Currently, there are no reliable factors allowing for individual selection of high-risk patients for adjuvant systemic therapies. METHODS: We assessed by quantitative reverse transcription PCR microRNA (miRNA) expression in 273 stage I-IIIA NSCLC samples. Expression of 677 miRNAs was evaluated in fresh-frozen tumour samples in the training cohort of 50 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients who underwent curative surgery. Of those, 20 patients developed distant metastases, and 30 were free of recurrence for >4 years. In the second step, miRNAs with highest predictive value for distant relapse were re-evaluated in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material in an independent group of 134 stage I-IIIA SCC patients. Additionally, the same miRNAs were investigated in 89 lung adenocarcinoma (AC) patients and in normal lung parenchyma (NLP). RESULTS: In the training cohort of SCC, six miRNAs were differently expressed in the non-recurrent vs recurrent groups and correlated with distant recurrence-free survival, however none reached the level of significance after correction for multiple testing. Of these six miRNAs, miR-662, -192 and -192* were confirmed as prognostic in the independent SCC cohort. Expression of miR-128, -10b, -502-3p and -192 differed between SCC and AC, and miR-128 and -192 - between NLP and NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS: We identified three new miRNAs predictive of distant relapse in operable SCC. Future miRNA studies should account for differences between NSCLC subtypes.

Palliative radiotherapy and chemotherapy instead of surgery in symptomatic rectal cancer with synchronous unresectable metastases: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: In stage IV rectal cancer, palliative surgery is often carried out upfront. This study investigated whether the surgery can be avoided. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with symptomatic primary rectal adenocarcinoma and synchronous distant metastases deemed to be unresectable received 5 × 5 Gy irradiation and then oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Before treatment, 38% of patients had a near-obstructing lesion. The palliative effect was evaluated by questionnaires completed by the patients. RESULTS: The median follow-up for living patients was 26 months (range 19-34). The median overall survival was 11.5 months. Eight patients (20%) required surgery during the course of their disease: seven patients required stoma creation and one had local excision. Thirty percent of patients had a complete resolution of pelvic symptoms during the whole course of the disease, and 35% had significant improvement. In the subgroup with a near-obstructing lesion, 23% of patients required stoma creation. In all patients, the probability of requiring palliative surgery at 2 years was 17.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13% to 22%), and the probability of sustained good palliative effect after radiotherapy and chemotherapy was 67% (95% CI 58% to 76%). CONCLUSION: Short-course radiotherapy and chemotherapy allowed most patients to avoid surgery, even those with a near-obstructing lesion. CLINICALTRIALS: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: number NCT01157806.

The DIRC1 gene at chromosome 2q33 spans a familial RCC-associated t(2;3)(q33;q21) chromosome translocation.

A reciprocal, balanced, constitutional chromosome translocation, t(2;3)(q33;q21), which is associated with familial clear cell renal cancer, has been described and the genomic regions surrounding the 2q and 3q breakpoints have been characterized. Based on the genomic map of the 2q break, EST AI468595 was positioned near the 2q33 translocation and the full-length gene and cDNA were isolated. This 57-kb gene, designated the DIRC1 gene, was disrupted between exons 1 and 2 by the familial translocation. The 1.5-kb mRNA encodes an 11-kDa predicted protein of 104 amino acids. Low-level expression of DIRC1 was detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction amplification in adult placenta, testis, ovary, and prostate and in fetal kidney, spleen, and skeletal muscle. A GFP-Dirc1 fusion protein was expressed in vitro and a polyclonal anti-Dircl peptide serum was prepared. A panel of cancer and cancer-derived cell line DNAs was examined for DIRC1 mutations, but only a rare polymorphism was observed. Two familial tumors showed loss of the derivative 3 chromosome, as observed in a Dutch kindred with t(2;3)associated renal cancers. Mutations in the second DIRC1 allele were not detected. Further studies will be required to determine if disruption of the DIRC1 gene contributed to development of the associated familial clear cell renal cancers.