RESUMO
A 75-y-old Chinese female patient diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastasis suffered severe nausea and vomiting, and these symptoms were contraindications for CyberKnife treatment. Neither mannitol, nor dexamethasone, relieved the symptoms. However, after the patient received a single dose of bevacizumab (200 mg, 2.9 mg/kg), the patient's symptoms were significantly relieved. The patient subsequently completed a successful CyberKnife treatment. In addition, the patient received an oral treatment of gefitinib. At 15 months post treatment, the patient's brain tumor was controlled. Thus, administration of bevacizumab at a low dose (2.9 mg/kg) may significantly alleviate peri-tumoral brain edema and its symptoms, thereby facilitating radiosurgery treatment.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Edema Encefálico/tratamento farmacológico , Encéfalo/cirurgia , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/farmacologia , Bevacizumab/farmacologia , Edema Encefálico/patologia , Edema Encefálico/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Everolimus has been used in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. This study reports that treatment with everolimus alone induced severe pulmonary injury in a patient with systemic metastatic breast cancer. A 58-yearold woman with systemic metastatic breast cancer was treated with everolimus alone for 4 weeks and developed severe cough and dyspnea. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest showed a progressive lung tumor accompanied by bilateral pulmonary homogeneous ground-glass opacity, especially in the inferior lobe of the left lung. Laboratory examinations revealed a high frequency of monocytes, higher levels of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and C-reactive protein as well as mild hypoxemia and hypocarbia. However, she had no evidence of infection with mycoplasma pneumoniae, chlamydia, pneumocystis, tuberculosis, influenza A virus, and was negative for serum galactomannan (GM) antigen assay. She was suspected to have drug-induced interstitial pneumonia. Everolimus treatment was stopped, and treated with methylprednisolone and empiric antibiotic therapy for 7 days. She received further corticosteroid treatment and felt much better, accompanied by clearance of lung inflammation; she was discharged from hospital. Our experience suggests that treatment with everolimus alone may cause severe pulmonary injury and should be considered carefully in cases of patients with systemic metastatic breast cancer.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Everolimo/efeitos adversos , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/induzido quimicamente , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/tratamento farmacológico , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Patients with recurrent triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) currently have no established treatment option other than chemotherapy. However, long-term chemotherapy is often difficult due to adverse effects. A previous study documented a 10%-30% response rate of progestins in oestrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of medroxyprogesterone/megestrol acetate (MPA/MA) in patients with recurrent TNBC. METHODS: This retrospective observational analysis included 51 patients with recurrent TNBC; 17 were treated with MPA/MA and 34 underwent chemotherapy. The two groups were matched at a 1:2 ratio according to age, metastatic sites, and salvage treatment lines. Efficacy was compared using the χ2 and rank-sum tests. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the two groups were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The two groups were well balanced in terms of age, disease-free survival, number of metastases, and salvage therapy lines. Clinical benefit rates in the MPA/MA and chemotherapy groups were 52.94% and 73.53%, respectively (χ2 test, p = 0.208), and median PFS was comparable between groups (log-rank test, p = 0.135). Median PFS of 1st-6th-line salvage treatments was shorter in the MPA/MA group than in the chemotherapy group (log-rank test, p = 0.036), but median PFS of ≥7th-line salvage treatments was comparable (log-rank test, p = 0.139). Eight patients discontinued chemotherapy due to adverse effects, and one patient withdrew from MPA treatment because of weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: Progestins (MPA/MA) are an alternative treatment option for multi-treated recurrent TNBC.