Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ Open ; 10(9): e035346, 2020 09 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32948544

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Most of the patients who received arthroscopic knee surgery will suffer moderate to severe pain, which can delay the rehabilitation process and increase the risk of postoperative complications. Therefore, seeking a safe and effective postoperative analgesia is necessary for promoting the application of arthroscopic surgery. This protocol aims to detail a planned systematic review and meta-analysis on the comparative efficacy and safety of single-dose intra-articular injection of analgesics for pain relief after knee arthroscopy. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library will be searched from inception to 1 June 2020 to retrieve randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the commonly used single-dose intra-articular analgesics (ie, morphine; bupivacaine (including levobupivacaine); ropivacaine and magnesium alone or in combination) with placebo or between each other for postoperative pain relief among patients who had received knee arthroscopy. The primary outcome is pain intensity at 2-hour and 24-hour postoperatively; the secondary outcomes include side effects (eg, knee effusion, nausea, vomiting and flushing), the number of patients requiring supplementary analgesia and the time to first analgesic request. The methodological quality of the included RCTs will be assessed based on the Cochrane risk of bias table. The Bayesian network meta-analysis will be conducted using WinBUGS V.1.4.3. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Since no private or confidential patient data will be contained in the reporting, approval from an ethics committee is not required. Our study raises no ethical issue, and the results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019130876.


Assuntos
Artroscopia , Dor Pós-Operatória , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides , Bupivacaína , Humanos , Metanálise como Assunto , Morfina , Metanálise em Rede , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Arthroscopy ; 33(6): 1248-1259.e4, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28302427

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate the associations of medial tibial plateau slope (MTPS), lateral tibial plateau slope (LTPS), and coronal tibial plateau slope (CTPS) with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury both in the general population and in different gender subgroups. METHODS: PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched through from inception to August 31, 2016. Observational studies reporting associations of MTPS/LTPS/CTPS with ACL injury were retrieved for analysis. Either a fixed- or random-effects model was used to calculate the overall standardized mean difference (SMD). Reviews, meeting abstracts, cadaver or animal studies, and other studies without disclosing full text were excluded in this study. RESULTS: A total of 29 studies were included. Subjects with ACL injury exhibited a significant increase in MTPS (SMD: 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18, 0.49]; P < .0001) and LTPS (SMD: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.30, 0.68]; P < .00001), but not in the CTPS (SMD: 0.09 [95% CI: -0.10, 0.27]; P = .36), compared with controls. Meanwhile, significant differences in MTPS and LTPS were observed in the male subgroup (SMD: 0.41 [95% CI: 0.20, 0.62]; P = .0001 and SMD: 0.55 [95% CI: 0.26, 0.85]; P = .0002, respectively) but not in the female (SMD: 0.31 [95% CI: -0.02, 0.64]; P = .06 and SMD: 0.26 [95% CI: -0.04, 0.56]; P = .09, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis showed that the increases in MTPS and LTPS were overall risk factors of ACL injury. However, these slopes would only be considered as "at risk" for males, but not for females. In addition, it was also proved that CTPS was not a risk factor of ACL injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, meta-analysis of Level II and III studies.


Assuntos
Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/patologia , Tíbia/patologia , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagem , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Tíbia/cirurgia
3.
Rheumatol Int ; 37(1): 131-136, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27704161

RESUMO

The aim of the study was to estimate the cross-sectional association between cigarette smoking and the prevalence of hyperuricemia (HU) in the middle-aged and elderly males and females. A total of 3415 males and 2932 females were included in this study. HU was defined as SUA≥ 416 mmol/L for males and ≥360 mmol/L for females. The smoking status was classified into four categories based on daily smoking habit: (1) 0/day; (2) 1-10/day; (3) 11-20/day; and (4) >20/day. Multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to examine the aforementioned association. The prevalence of HU in the male and female sample was 25.0 and 10.0 %, respectively. In male subjects, the prevalence of HU in smokers (22.8 %) was significantly lower than that in non-smokers (26.5 %) (p = 0.016). Meanwhile, with adjustment for potential confounding factors, the prevalence of HU in smokers was still lower (OR = 0.83, 95 % CI 0.70-0.98, P = 0.033). Furthermore, a significantly inverse association between smoking status and HU was observed in the multivariable model. The multivariable-adjusted OR (95 % CI) for HU in the second, third and fourth category of smoking status was 0.84 (95 % CI 0.66-1.06), 0.90 (95 % CI 0.69-1.18) and 0.76 (95 % CI 0.58-0.99), respectively, compared with that in the first category. A clear trend (P for trend was 0.036) was observed. However, there was no significant association between cigarette smoking and HU in female subjects (P for trend was 0.739). This study indicated an inverse association between cigarette smoking and the prevalence of HU in the middle-aged and elderly male population, independent of some major confounding factors. The findings of this study expect further prospective studies to confirm the causal relationship.


Assuntos
Hiperuricemia/epidemiologia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperuricemia/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversos
4.
Sci Rep ; 6: 38024, 2016 11 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27901095

RESUMO

To examine the analgesic effect and safety of single-dose intra-articular (IA) magnesium (Mg) after arthroscopic surgery. Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched through in January 2016. Eight RCTs and eight experimental studies were included. The IA Mg exhibited a significantly lower pain score when compared with placebo (MD, -0.41, 95% CI, -0.78 to -0.05, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference between Mg and bupivacaine in terms of pain relief and the time to first analgesic request. Furthermore, statistically significant differences both in pain score (MD, -0.62, 95% CI, -0.81 to -0.42, p < 0.00001) and time to first analgesic request (MD, 6.25, 95% CI, 5.22 to 7.29, p < 0.00001) were observed between Mg plus bupivacaine and bupivacaine alone. There was no statistically significant difference among the various groups with respect to adverse reactions. Most of the included in vitro studies reported the chondrocyte protective effect of Mg supplementation. There were also two in vivo studies showing the cartilage protective effect of IA Mg. The single-dose IA Mg following arthroscopic surgery was effective in pain relief without increasing adverse reactions, and it could also enhance the analgesic effect of bupivacaine. In addition, Mg seemed to possess the cartilage or chondrocyte protective effect based on experimental studies.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Artroscopia , Bupivacaína/uso terapêutico , Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Masculino
5.
PLoS One ; 10(10): e0140512, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26474401

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a single-dose intra-articular morphine plus bupivacaine versus morphine alone in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing a combination of morphine and bupivacaine with morphine alone injected intra-articularly in the management of pain after knee arthrocopic surgery were retrieved (up to August 10, 2014) from MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and Embase databases. The weighted mean difference (WMD), relative risk (RR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using RevMan statistical software. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials were included. Statistically significant differences were observed with regard to the VAS values during the immediate period (0-2h) (WMD -1.16; 95% CI -2.01 to -0.31; p = 0.007) and the time to first request for rescue analgesia (WMD = 2.05; 95% CI 0.19 to 3.92; p = 0.03). However, there was no significant difference in the VAS pain score during the early period (2-6h) (WMD -0.36; 95% CI -1.13 to 0.41; p = 0.35), the late period (6-48h) (WMD 0.11; 95% CI -0.40 to 0.63; p = 0.67), and the number of patients requiring supplementary analgesia (RR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.05; p = 0.10). In addition, systematic review showed that intra-articular morphine plus bupivacaine would not increase the incidence of adverse effects compared with morphine alone. CONCLUSION: The present study suggested that the administration of single-dose intra-articular morphine plus bupivacaine provided better pain relief during the immediate period (0-2h), and lengthened the time interval before the first request for analgesic rescue without increasing the short-term side effects when compared with morphine alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, meta-analysis of Level I studies.


Assuntos
Artroscopia/efeitos adversos , Bupivacaína/farmacologia , Articulação do Joelho , Joelho/cirurgia , Morfina/farmacologia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Bupivacaína/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Morfina/efeitos adversos , Manejo da Dor/efeitos adversos
6.
BMJ Open ; 5(6): e006815, 2015 06 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26078306

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-dose intra-articular bupivacaine plus morphine after knee arthroscopic surgery. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: A comprehensive literature search, using Medline (1966-2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase databases, was conducted to identify randomised placebo-controlled trials that used a combination of single-dose intra-articular bupivacaine and morphine for postoperative pain relief. RESULTS: 12 articles were included in this meta-analysis. The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of the bupivacaine plus morphine group were significantly lower than those of the placebo group (weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.75; 95% CI -2.16 to -1.33; p<0.001). The VAS scores at the last follow-up time point (last VAS scores) of the bupivacaine plus morphine group were also significantly lower than those of the placebo group (WMD -1.46; 95% CI -1.63 to -1.29; p<0.001). The number of patients requiring supplementary analgesia was also significantly reduced (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.93; p=0.02), while there was no significant difference in the time to first analgesic request (WMD 3.46; 95% CI -1.81 to 8.72; p=0.20) or short-term side effects (RR 1.67; 95% CI 0.65 to 4.26; p=0.29). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of single-dose intra-articular bupivacaine plus morphine after knee arthroscopic surgery is effective for pain relief, and its short-term side effects remain similar to saline placebo.


Assuntos
Artroscopia/efeitos adversos , Bupivacaína/uso terapêutico , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Joelho/cirurgia , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Dor Musculoesquelética/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Analgesia/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Joelho/patologia , Articulação do Joelho/patologia , Dor Musculoesquelética/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Rheumatol Int ; 35(7): 1211-7, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25588371

RESUMO

The purpose of this paper was to estimate the cross-sectional association between cigarette smoking and radiographic knee Osteoarthritis (OA) in Chinese population. A total of 3,789 subjects (1,796 females and 1,993 males) participated in this study. A subject was diagnosed with radiographic knee OA if Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade ≥2 in at least one leg. The smoking status was classified into four levels based on the daily smoking habit: (1) 0/day; (2) 1-10/day; (3) 11-20/day; and (4) >20/day. Linear trend and multivariable logistic regression were conducted for statistical analysis. The prevalence of radiographic knee OA was 28.4 % among the subjects of this study. An inverse association was observed between cigarette smoking and radiographic knee OA in the linear trend test. Such association remained valid after adjusting the factors of age, gender, body mass index, betel quilt chewing status, physical activity, alcohol drinking status, mean total energy intake and educational level in the multivariable logistic regression. This study suggested a negative association between cigarette smoking and radiographic knee OA in the Chinese population. The findings of this study need to be confirmed by further prospective research.


Assuntos
Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoartrite do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Povo Asiático , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , China/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Osteoartrite do Joelho/etnologia , Prevalência , Radiografia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/etnologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA