Impact of stress hyperglycemia ratio on mortality in patients with critical acute myocardial infarction: insight from american MIMIC-IV and the chinese CIN-II study.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention, stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) is primarily associated with short-term unfavorable outcomes. However, the relationship between SHR and long-term worsen prognosis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) are not fully investigated, especially in those with different ethnicity. This study aimed to clarify the association of SHR with all-cause mortality in critical AMI patients from American and Chinese cohorts. METHODS: Overall 4,337 AMI patients with their first ICU admission from the American Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database (n = 2,166) and Chinese multicenter registry cohort Cardiorenal ImprovemeNt II (CIN-II, n = 2,171) were included in this study. The patients were divided into 4 groups based on quantiles of SHR in both two cohorts. RESULTS: The total mortality was 23.8% (maximum follow-up time: 12.1 years) in American MIMIC-IV and 29.1% (maximum follow-up time: 14.1 years) in Chinese CIN-II. In MIMIC-IV cohort, patients with SHR of quartile 4 had higher risk of 1-year (adjusted hazard radio [aHR] = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.40-2.50) and long-term (aHR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.27-2.09) all-cause mortality than quartile 2 (as reference). Similar results were observed in CIN-II cohort (1-year mortality: aHR = 1.44; 95%CI: 1.03-2.02; long-term mortality: aHR = 1.32; 95%CI: 1.05-1.66). In both two group, restricted cubic splines indicated a J-shaped correlation between SHR and all-cause mortality. In subgroup analysis, SHR was significantly associated with higher 1-year and long-term all-cause mortality among patients without diabetes in both MIMIC-IV and CIN-II cohort. CONCLUSION: Among critical AMI patients, elevated SHR is significantly associated with and 1-year and long-term all-cause mortality, especially in those without diabetes, and the results are consistently in both American and Chinese cohorts.

Timing and Outcome of Endovascular Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effect of intervention timing, from symptom onset to thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), on early and late outcomes in high risk patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD). METHODS: The study retrospectively evaluated 267 uTBAD patients with high risk radiographic features who underwent pre-emptive TEVAR during the acute and subacute periods. Demographics, comorbidities, pre-operative imaging features, peri-procedural details, and follow up outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: Among the 267 pre-emptive TEVARs for high risk uTBAD, 130 were performed in the acute phase (1-14 days); and 137 in the subacute phase (15-90 days), from initial presentation. The mean age was 55.9 ± 11.0 years and 222 (83.1%) were men. The 30 day mortality rate in the acute group was five times higher than that in the subacute group (3.8% vs. 0.7%), although without statistically significant difference (p = .11). No statistically significant difference in 30 day outcomes (aortic rupture, retrograde type A dissection [RTAD], immediate type Ia endoleak, stroke, spinal cord ischaemia, and re-intervention) was noted (p > .05 for each). Of note, aortic rupture, RTAD, and disabling stroke were observed only in the acute group. Multivariable logistic analyses showed that intervention timing was not associated with 30 day outcomes. The median clinical follow up was 48.2 ± 25.9 months (range 1 - 106 months). There were no significant differences in all cause mortality, dissection related death, late intervention, or aortic related late events among timing cohorts (p > .05 for each). Furthermore, aortic remodelling, by analysing the flow status of the false lumen and evaluation of aortic diameters, either at the thoracic aorta level or the abdominal aorta level, was similar between the two groups. Multivariable Cox analyses showed that intervention timing was not associated with late outcomes. CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that TEVAR for high risk uTBAD in the acute phase was associated with a trend toward higher rates of early complications, while the long term outcomes were comparable with those of the subacute phase.

Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic guidance versus fluoroscopic guidance for transvenous temporary cardiac pacemaker implantation during transcatheter aortic valve implantation surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Fluoroscopic guidance is the traditional method for the implantation of transvenous temporary cardiac pacemakers (TVTPs). This study aimed to compare the time, effectiveness, and safety of real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D TEE) with those of fluoroscopy in guiding TVTP implantation. METHODS: The records of patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) guided by real-time 3D TEE or fluoroscopy between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. TVTPs were implanted by anesthesiologists via the right internal jugular vein (IJV) in the real-time 3D TEE-guided group (3D TEE group), and by interventional cardiologists via the femoral vein in the fluoroscopy-guided group (fluoro group). RESULTS: A total of 143 patients (3D TEE-group n=79, and fluoro group n=64) were included. No statistical differences were observed in the baseline characteristics of the two groups. TVTPs were successfully implanted in all of the patients. The needle-to-pace time was significantly shorter in 3D TEE group than in fluoro group (5.2±2.9 vs. 8.5±4.6 min, P<0.001). Further, the incidence of access complications was significantly lower in 3D TEE group than in fluoro group (3.8% vs. 12.5%, P<0.05). One patient in fluoro group who suffered cardiac perforation underwent drainage via pericardiocentesis. No patients in either group died because of TVTP placement. The total complication rates were significantly lower in 3D TEE group than in fluoro group (19.0% vs. 39.1%, P<0.05). No statistically significant differences existed between groups in terms of pacing threshold, the incidence of permanent pacemaker insertion after surgery, the length of postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay, or the duration of postoperative hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time 3D TEE-guided can be used to effectively, quickly, and safely guide TVTP implantation. The procedure can be performed by properly trained anesthesiologists. Therefore, real-time 3D TEE is a suitable option for guiding perioperative TVTP implantation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Simple pre-procedure risk stratification tool for contrast-induced nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: A few simple and pre-procedural risk models have been developed for predicting contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), which allow for early administration of preventative strategies before coronary angiography (CAG). The study aims to develop and validate simple pre-procedure tools for predicting risk of CIN following CAG. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 3,469 consecutive patients undergoing CAG, who were randomly assigned to a development dataset (n=2,313) and a validation dataset (n=1,156). CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine (SCr) ≥0.5 mg/dL from baseline within 72 hours after CAG. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify independent predictors of CIN to develop risk models. The possible predictors included age >75 years, hypotension, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), SCr ≥1.5 mg/dL, and congestive heart failure (CHF). RESULTS: The incidences of CIN were 3.20% and 3.55% in the training and validation dataset respectively. Compared to classical Mehran' and ACEF CIN risk score, the new score across the validation dataset exhibited similar discrimination and predictive ability on CIN (c-statistic: 0.829, 0.832, 0.812 respectively) and in-hospital mortality (c-statistic: 0.909, 0.937, 0.866 respectively) (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The easy-to-use pre-procedural prediction model only containing 5 factors had similar predictive ability on CIN and mortality.

Predictors associated with an increased prevalence of postimplantation syndrome after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection†.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify patients who are at high risk of developing postimplantation syndrome (PIS) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection. METHODS: This retrospective study included 646 patients who underwent TEVAR for type B aortic dissection between January 2010 and December 2015 at the Guangdong General Hospital. PIS was defined as fever (>38°C) and leucocytosis (>12 000 µl-1) without evidence of infection. The PIS rate was calculated, and a multivariable logistic regression model was used to investigate the factors related to PIS. RESULTS: A total of 646 patients (58.8 ± 11.0 years, 87.9% men) were included in the analysis. PIS was diagnosed in 204 (31.6%) patients. Age <60 years [odds ratio (OR) 1.828, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.277-2.619; P < 0.001), hypertension (OR 12.125, 95% CI 4.310-34.111; P < 0.001), >1 stent graft placed (OR 1.862, 95% CI 1.109-3.124; P = 0.011), arch vessel bypass (OR 2.107, 95% CI 1.397-3.176; P = 0.001) and Ankura stent graft placement (OR 1.951, 95% CI 1.298-2.933; P = 0.001) were positively associated with PIS, whereas statin use (OR 0.659, 95% CI 0.460-0.944; P = 0.023) was negatively associated with PIS in the multivariable logistic regression analysis based on a stepwise regression model. CONCLUSIONS: Age <60 years, comorbid hypertension, >1 stent graft placed, arch vessel bypass and Ankura stent graft placement emerged as independent predictors of PIS. Stepwise increases in the prevalence of PIS were found to depend on the number of independent predictors.

Outcomes of Chimney Technique for Preservation of the Left Subclavian Artery in Type B Aortic Dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes of the chimney technique for preservation of the left subclavian artery (LSA) in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of a prospectively maintained database from August 2012 to October 2017. Primary endpoints were 30 day and overall mortality. Secondary endpoints were technical success, type Ia endoleak, chimney stent occlusion, aortic rupture, stroke, spinal cord ischaemia, and re-intervention rate. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients (mean age 54 ± 11 years; 141 men) with TBAD were treated using the chimney technique for LSA revascularisation. Acute, subacute, and chronic TBAD accounted for 64%, 28%, and 8% of cases, respectively. One hundred and six cases (67%) were complicated TBAD. One hundred and fifty-six patients (98%) were treated electively, while three (2%) were treated urgently because of intestinal or lower extremity ischaemia. The 30 day mortality and morbidity rates were 2% (3/159) and 4% (7/159), respectively. The technical success rate was 81% (129/159) and immediate type Ia endoleak occurred in 30 (19%) patients. Three major strokes, two spinal cord ischaemia and one aortic rupture, occurred early on. During a mean follow up of 23 ± 16 months (range 1-65 months), three more patients died: from aortic rupture, cerebral haemorrhage, and rectal cancer, respectively. Chimney stent occlusions were observed in four patients and all these chimney stents were self expanding. During follow up, two major strokes, one late type Ia endoleak and one re-intervention, occurred. According to the Kaplan-Meier curve, the estimated one and three year survival rates were 98.1 ± 1.1% and 94.4 ± 2.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Short and mid-term outcomes in the present study demonstrate that the chimney technique is safe and feasible for preservation of the LSA in patients with TBAD, but the durability of chimney stent needs to be evaluated carefully and immediate type Ia endoleak is a concern.

Outcomes of hybrid procedure for type B aortic dissection with an aberrant right subclavian artery.

OBJECTIVE: To report our single-center experience of the hybrid procedure for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) and the early to midterm outcomes in these patients. METHODS: From December 2011 to February 2016, 16 patients (12 males; median age, 51 years; range, 40-66 years) underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair and extraanatomic bypass hybrid procedure for TBAD with an ARSA in our center. Demographics, coexisting medical conditions, imaging features, operation details, and follow-up outcomes of these patients were collected retrospectively and analyzed. RESULTS: Duration from onset to hybrid procedure ranged from 5 to 57 days, with a median duration of 17 days. The median duration of stay in the intensive care unit and duration of in-hospital stay was 126 hours (range, 14-450 hours) and 21 days (range, 11-31 days), respectively. The overall technique success rate was 100%. No perioperative death, major stroke, or spinal cord ischemia was registered. Immediate type Ia endoleak was detected in three patients (18.8%) and immediate type II endoleak was detected in one patient (6.3%). One access-related complication occurred, which was a femoral artery pseudoaneurysm requiring compression bandage. Brachial plexus injury was observed in two patients (12.5%) with weakness of the upper extremity. The median follow-up was 33 months (range, 11-59 months). During follow-up, a retrograde type A aortic dissection was found in one patient (6.3%) 3 months after procedure. The occlusion of left common carotid artery to left subclavian artery bypasses were confirmed by computed tomography angiography in two patients (12.5%). They were left untreated for no symptoms. Reintervention was required in one patient (6.3%) for persistent type II endoleak by using Amplatzer plugs to seal the origin of the ARSA 20 months after the operation. There was no recorded death or stroke during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Our limited experience demonstrates that a hybrid procedure is a viable and relatively safe treatment strategy for patients with TBAD and an ARSA. A larger series of cases with a longer follow-up is needed to substantiate these results.

Comparison of Different Risk Scores for Predicting Contrast Induced Nephropathy and Outcomes After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Accurate risk stratification for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is important for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We aimed to compare the prognostic value of validated risk scores for CIN. We prospectively enrolled 422 consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI. Mehran; Gao; Chen; age, serum creatinine (SCr), or glomerular filtration rate, and ejection fraction (ACEF or AGEF); and Global Registry for Acute Coronary Events risk scores were calculated for each patient. The prognostic accuracy of the 6 scores for CIN, and in-hospital and 3-year all-cause mortality and major adverse clinical events (MACEs), was assessed using the c-statistic for discrimination and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for calibration. CIN was defined as either CIN-narrow (increase in SCr ≥0.5 mg/dl) or CIN broad (≥0.5 mg/dl and/or a ≥25% increase in baseline SCr). All risk scores had relatively high predictive values for CIN-narrow (c-statistic: 0.746 to 0.873) and performed well for prediction of in-hospital death (0.784 to 0.936), MACEs (0.685 to 0.763), and 3-year all-cause mortality (0.655 to 0.871). The ACEF and AGEF risk scores had better discrimination and calibration for CIN-narrow and in-hospital outcomes. However, all risk score exhibited low predictive accuracy for CIN-broad (0.555 to 0.643) and 3-year MACEs (0.541 to 0.619). In conclusion, risk scores for predicting CIN perform well in stratifying the risk of CIN-narrow, in-hospital death or MACEs, and 3-year all-cause mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI. The ACEF and AGEF risk scores appear to have greater prognostic value.

Safe limits of contrast vary with hydration volume for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy after coronary angiography among patients with a relatively low risk of contrast-induced nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the safe limits of contrast to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) based on hydration data. We aimed to investigate the relative safe maximum contrast volume adjusted for hydration volume in a population with a relatively low risk of CIN. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ratios of contrast volume-to-creatinine clearance (V/CrCl) and hydration volume to body weight (HV/W) were determined in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis based on the maximum Youden index was used to identify the optimal cutoff for V/CrCl in all patients and in HV/W subgroups. Eighty-six of 3273 (2.6%) patients with mean CrCl 71.89±27.02 mL/min developed CIN. Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis indicated that a V/CrCl ratio of 2.44 was a fair discriminator for CIN in all patients (sensitivity, 73.3%; specificity, 70.4%). After adjustment for other confounders, V/CrCl >2.44 continued to be significantly associated with CIN (adjusted odds ratio, 4.12; P<0.001) and the risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.62; P<0.001). The mean HV/W was 12.18±7.40. We divided the patients into 2 groups (HV/W ≤12 and >12 mL/kg). The best cutoff value for V/CrCl was 1.87 (sensitivity, 67.9%; specificity, 64.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.24; P=0.011) in the insufficient hydration subgroup (HV/W, ≤12 mL/kg; CIN, 1.32%) and 2.93 (sensitivity, 69.0%; specificity, 65.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.04; P=0.004) in the sufficient hydration subgroup (HV/W, >12 mL/kg; CIN, 5.00%). CONCLUSIONS: The V/CrCl ratio adjusted for HV/W may be a more reliable predictor of CIN and even long-term outcomes after cardiac catheterization. We also found a higher best cutoff value for V/CrCl to predict CIN in patients with a relatively sufficient hydration status, which may be beneficial during decision-making about contrast dose limits in relatively low-risk patients with different hydration statuses.

[Prophylactic antibiotics: a necessity in totally percutaneous thoracic endovascular aortic repair?].

OBJECTIVE: To study the benefit of prophylactic antibiotics (PA) in totally percutaneous aortic endovascular repair (PEVAR) in the catheterization laboratory for reducing stent-graft infection and postimplantation syndrome (PIS). METHODS: The clinical data were analyzed of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repairs. The patients were divided into non-PA group and PA group according to the use of prophylactic antibiotics before PEVAR. The diagnosis of infection was made by two senior physicians with reference to Hospital Acquired Infection Diagnostic Criteria Assessment released by the Ministry of Health of China. RESULTS: The 95 enrolled patients included 35 with PA and 60 without PA group, who were comparable for baseline characteristics. Infection-related deaths occurred in 1 case in non-PA group and retrograde Stanford type A dissection and death occurred in 1 case in PA group (1.67% vs 2.85%, P=1.00). The PA and non-PA groups showed no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative infection (5% vs 2.86%, P=1.000), hospital stay (9.30±7.21 vs 10.06±5.69, P=0.094), infection-related mortality (1.67% vs 0%, P=1.00), or postoperative fever (70.90% vs 91.43%, P=0.20). The body temperature showed significant variations at different time points after procedure (F=19.831, P<0.001) irrelevant to the use of prophylactic antibiotics (F=0.978, P=0.326). CONCLUSION: The current data do not support the benefit of PA in reducing postoperative infection and PIS in patients undergoing PEVAR, but the patients without PA may have worse clinical outcomes in the event of postoperative infections.

Association of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide with contrast-induced nephropathy and long-term outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and relative preserved left ventricular function.

The aim of the present article was to evaluate the association of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) with contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and long-term outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and relative preserved left ventricular function (LVF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We prospectively enrolled 1203 consecutive patients with CKD and preserved LVF undergoing elective PCI. The primary end point was the development of CIN, defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine (SCr) ≥0.5 mg/dL, from baseline within 48 to 72 hours after contrast medium exposure. CIN incidence varied from 2.2% to 5.2%. Univariate logistic analysis showed that lg-NT-pro-BNP was significantly associated with CIN (odds ratio [OR] = 3.93, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.22-6.97, P < 0.001). Furthermore, lg-NT-pro-BNP remained a significant predictor of CIN (OR = 3.30, 95% CI, 1.57-6.93, P = 0.002), even after adjusting for potential confounding risk factors. These results were confirmed by using other CIN criteria, which were defined as elevations of the SCr by 25% or 0.5 and 0.3 mg/dL from the baseline. The best cutoff value of lg-NT-pro-BNP for detecting CIN was 2.73 pg/mL (537 pg/mL) with 73.1% sensitivity and 70.0% specificity according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (C statistic = 0.754, 95% CI, 0.67-0.84, P < 0.001). In addition, NT-pro-BNP ≥537 pg/mL (2.73 pg/mL, lg-NT-pro-BNP) was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and composite end points during 2.5 years of follow-up. NT-pro-BNP ≥537 pg/mL is independently associated with an increased risk of CIN with different definitions and poor clinical outcomes in patients with CKD and relative preserved LVF undergoing PCI.

Safe contrast volumes for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in elderly patients with relatively normal renal function during percutaneous coronary intervention.

The aim of this study was to evaluate contrast media volume to creatinine clearance (V/CrCl) ratio for predicting contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and to determine a safe V/CrCl cut off value to avoid CIN in elderly patients with relatively normal renal function during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We prospectively enrolled 1020 consecutive elderly patients (age ≥65 years) with relative normal renal function (baseline serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dL) undergoing PCI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify the optimal cut off value of V/CrCl for detecting CIN. The predictive value of V/CrCl for CIN was assessed with a multivariate logistic regression. Thirty-nine patients (3.8%) developed CIN. There was a significant association between a higher V/CrCl ratio and CIN risk (P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis indicated that a V/CrCl ratio of 2.74 was a fair discriminator for CIN (C statistic = 0.68). After adjusting for other known CIN risk factors, V/CrCl ratios >2.74 remained significantly associated with CIN (odds ratio = 3.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-7.09, P = 0.004) and worse long-term mortality (hazard ratio = 1.96, 95% CI 1.14-3.38, P = 0.016). A V/CrCl ratio >2.74 was a significant independent predictor of CIN and was independently associated with long-term mortality in elderly patients with relatively normal renal function.

Outcomes and morphologic changes of immediate type Ia endoleak following endovascular repair of acute type B aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of immediate type Ia endoleaks after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aneurysms has been described in detail. However, this phenomenon is still controversial in TEVAR patients treated for acute type B aortic dissection. METHODS: A single-institution study was conducted in 81 prospectively evaluated patients treated between January 2012 and June 2012 for acute type B aortic dissection. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) images were analyzed using 3-dimensional reconstruction to measure the areas and indices of the true lumen, false lumen, and total aorta in the proximal, middle, and distal descending thoracic aorta. Data were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups of patients, with and without immediate type Ia endoleaks. RESULTS: The average follow-up period was 12 months (range 10-13 months) after the procedure. TEVAR was successfully performed in all patients (mean age 53 years; 86% men). Thirty-six of the 81 patients were diagnosed with complicated type B dissection, including persistent pain (19/36, 52.7%), refractory hypertension (4/36, 11.1%), and end-organ ischemia (13/36, 36.1%). Of all the patients, 37 (45.7%) were diagnosed with immediate type Ia endoleaks. The differences between the 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality rates between the 2 groups were nonsignificant (13.5% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.08; 16.2% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.13). No stroke or paraplegia occurred during the follow-up. Reintervention was performed in 2 patients for delayed type I endoleaks in the group without immediate type Ia endoleaks. Pre- and postoperative CTA images were available for analysis in 54 patients. Among them, 24 patients had type Ia endoleaks. Patients with immediate type Ia endoleaks had a significantly larger preoperative distal false lumen area (498 ± 274 vs. 284 ± 213 mm(2), P = 0.02) and a larger distal aortic area (759 ± 275 vs. 624 ± 185 mm(2), P = 0.03). The 1-year follow-up CTA demonstrated significantly smaller true lumen indices and larger false lumen areas and false lumen indices in the proximal, middle, and distal sections in patients with immediate type Ia endoleaks. Differences in the postoperative morphological changes of the whole descending thoracic aorta were significant between the 2 groups, with the maximum area and the proximal, middle, and distal regions involved. The occurrence of endoleaks and the rates of postoperative false lumen thrombosis throughout the length of stent grafts were not significant at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of immediate type Ia endoleaks following TEVAR in acute type B aortic dissections could seal spontaneously, without additional procedures needed. However, the appearance of such complications could be a risk factor of poorer aortic remodeling. Careful surveillance is recommended more frequently in patients with immediate type Ia endoleaks.

Procalcitonin could be a reliable marker in differential diagnosis of post-implantation syndrome and infection after percutaneous endovascular aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is an emerging treatment modality, which has been rapidly embraced by clinicians treating thoracic aortic disease. However, the clinical manifestations of systemic inflammatory response after TEVAR as post-implantation syndrome (PIS) resemble the perioperative infection. This study aimed to evaluate changes and diagnostic value of procalcitonin (PCT) and other traditional inflammatory markers for infections after TEVAR. METHODS: We conducted a prospective clinical study that enrolled 162 consecutive aortic dissection cases, who underwent TEVAR in our institution between July 2011 and November 2012. The PCT, C-response protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and blood routine examination were monitored before the operation and on days 1, 2, 3 and 5 after the operation. The diagnosis of infection was confirmed by the infection control committee with reference to Hospital Acquired Infection Diagnostic Criteria Assessment, released by the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China. RESULTS: Post endovascular repair of thoracic aorta, PCT changes significantly at different time points (χ(2) = 13.225, P = 0.021), without significant difference between the PIS group and the control group (0.24 ± 0.04 vs.0.26 ± 0.10, P = 0.804). PCT values were significantly higher in the first day after TEVAR than the preoperative levels (0.18 ± 0.03 vs. 0.11 ± 0.02, P < 0.001). Compared with PIS patients, the level of PCT, CRP, White blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil (NEU) in the infection patients elevated significantly (relatively χ(2) = 6.062, P = 0.048; χ(2) = 6.081, P = 0.048; χ(2) = 11.030, P = 0.004; χ(2) = 14.632, P = 0.001). According to the ROC analysis, the PCT levels in the first day after TEVAR (AUC = 0.785, P = 0.012) had better predictive values of infection than WBC, NEU CRP and ESR (AUC = 0.720, P = 0.040; AUC = 0.715, P = 0.045; AUC = 0.663, P = 0.274; AUC = 0.502, P = 0.991). The best predictive index was the changes of PCT between preoperative and postoperative (PCT), which possess AUC as 0.803 (P = 0.014). And PCT = 0.055 could be considered as an infection diagnosis cutoff value with a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity 69.0%. CONCLUSIONS: PCT provides better diagnostic value of infection compared with other inflammatory markers. The potential applications of PCT in differential diagnosis of PIS and infection after percutaneous TEVAR deserve further studies.

[Endovascular repair for patients with DeBakey III aortic dissection].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical therapeutic effects of endovascular repair for patients with DeBakey III aortic dissection. METHODS: From December 2002 to June 2007, endovascular TALENT stent-graft exclusion was performed in 75 (65 males, mean age 54.4 +/- 12.6 years) patients with DeBakey III aortic dissection (1 young woman due to Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, 2 young men due to primary aldosteronism and trauma respectively). All patients were diagnosed by contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) or MRI. Stent-grafts were deployed via femoral artery to exclude the tear of dissection. Aortic angiography was performed immediately after procedure. RESULTS: Eighty-one stent-grafts were installed in 75 patients successfully without operation related dissection. Endoleakage immediately after stent-graft deploying was evidenced in 25 patients and disappeared after stent placements (n = 6) or balloon dilation (n = 19). Two patients died from aortic rupture within 2 days after procedure. Iliac artery was torn in a female patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, this patient developed hemorrhagic shock after stent-graft placement and recovered after anti-shock treatments and iliac artery replacement with synthetic artery. During the follow-up of 1 - 24 months, 2 patients (including the woman with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome) suddenly died half a year after procedure. The remaining patients were alive and well. Repeat CT during follow up showed that reduced lumen size and thrombosis in the false lumen. There was no aortic rupture, endoleak and stent migration during the follow-up period except descending aortic dissection distal of the stent-graft in 1 patient 1 year after procedure and the patient were successfully treated surgically without complication. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair is a safe and effective treatment for patients with DeBakey III aortic dissection, suitable for old patients with high risk of surgery. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome should be considered in young DeBakey III aortic dissection patients without hypertension. Further studies are warranted on endovascular repair therapy for artery complication of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.