Characteristics of Chinese breast cancer patients with double heterozygosity for BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline pathogenic variants.

PURPOSE: Despite of very rare, breast cancer patients with double heterozygosity (DH) variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have been identified in other ethnic groups and seem to be associated with distinctive phenotypes. However, little is known about the frequency and clinical characteristics of Chinese breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 DH variants. METHODS: Four hundred and eleven unrelated patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PVs) were identified in a large series of unselected breast cancer patients. Another two siblings with metachronous bilateral breast cancer were referred for genetic counseling, after which BRCA1/2 DH variants were detected. RESULTS: Four unrelated breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 DH were identified in the cohort of 411 patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs, the frequency of BRCA1/2 DH was 0.97%. In total, six BRCA1/2 DH patients from five families were found in this study. In two families, the hereditary pattern of DH was speculated to have originated from both sides of the family. BRCA1/2 DH patients were more likely to have a family history of breast cancer than patients with a BRCA1 (100% vs. 29.2%, P = 0.004) or BRCA2 (100% vs. 29.6%, P = 0.004) single PV. BRCA1/2 DH patients were more likely to be triple-negative breast tumors than patients with single BRCA2 PVs (66.7% vs. 14.1%, P = 0.020), which was comparable to the findings in patients with single BRCA1 PVs (66.7% vs. 56.9%, P = 1.00). CONCLUSION: Chinese patients with BRCA1/2 DH exhibit a high percentage of family history of breast cancer. The tumor pathological features of BRCA1/2 DH carriers are similar to those of BRCA1 PV carriers.

Phase III study of HR-positive/HER2-negative/lymph node-positive breast cancer non-responsive to primary chemotherapy: a randomized trial.

There are few studies focus on post-neoadjuvant treatment in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-)/lymph node-positive (LN+) breast cancer, a multi-center, open-label, randomized, controlled phase III trial was conducted to evaluate pathological response-guided non-cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HR+/HER2-/LN+ breast cancer who were non-responsive to primary chemotherapy. Patients received four cycles of non-cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy (ET), or ET alone. Forty patients responsive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and with Miller and Payne G4 or G5 and LN- status were assigned to the observation group. Distant disease-free survival was the primary endpoint. The final intention-to-treat analysis comprised 379 patients. After a median follow-up period of 72.4 months, the 5-year distant disease-free survival was 92% and 90% in the chemotherapy plus ET and ET-alone groups, respectively. Comparatively, the observation group showed a trend towards better distant disease-free survival. For patients non-responsive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant non-cross-resistant chemotherapy did not significantly improve distant disease-free survival compared to ET alone.

Cancer risk in relatives of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers in a large series of unselected patients with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The spectrum and risk of cancer in relatives of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers in the Chinese population have not been established. METHODS: A family history of cancer in 9903 unselected breast cancer patients was retrospectively analyzed. BRCA1/2 status was determined for all patients and relative risks (RRs) were calculated to evaluate cancer risk in relatives of the patients. RESULTS: The incidences of breast cancer in female relatives of BRCA1 carriers, BRCA2 carriers, and non-carriers were 33.0%, 32.2%, and 7.7%, respectively. The corresponding incidences of ovarian cancer were 11.5%, 2.4%, and 0.5%, respectively. The incidences of pancreatic cancer in male relatives of BRCA1 carriers, BRCA2 carriers, and non-carriers were 1.4%, 2.7%, and 0.6%, respectively. The corresponding incidences of prostate cancer were 1.0%, 2.1%, and 0.4%, respectively. The risks of breast and ovarian cancers in female relatives of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers were significantly higher than female relatives of non-carriers (BRCA1: RR = 4.29, P < 0.001 and RR = 21.95, P < 0.001; BRCA2: RR = 4.19, P < 0.001 and RR = 4.65, P < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, higher risks of pancreatic and prostate cancers were noted in male relatives of BRCA2 carriers than non-carriers (RR = 4.34, P = 0.001 and RR = 4.86, P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Female relatives of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers are at increased risk for breast and ovarian cancers, and male relatives of BRCA2 carriers are at increased risk for pancreatic and prostate cancers.

Impact of multifocal or multicentric disease on local recurrence and survival in breast cancer patients with or without BRCA1/2 variants.

PURPOSE: Multifocal or multicentric (MFMC) breast cancer is mainly focused on breast cancer patients with unknown BRCA status, the incidence and clinical relevance of MFMC disease in BRCA1/2 carriers is less explored to date. Our study was to investigate the incidence of MFMC disease in BRCA1/2 carriers and whether MFMC disease influences local recurrence and clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 479 breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 variants and 1437 age-matched noncarriers were enrolled and patients received either breast-conserving therapy (BCT) or mastectomy with or without radiotherapy. RESULTS: The rates of MFMC disease in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, and noncarriers were 33.0% (61 of 185), 37.4% (110 of 294), and 31.2% (449 of 1437), respectively. MFMC disease in BRCA2 carriers was significantly higher than that in noncarriers (P = 0.039). After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, among patients treated with BCT, BRCA2 carriers with MFMC disease experienced a significantly higher rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) than those with unifocal disease (16.7% vs 4.1%, P = 0.044). Moreover, BRCA2 carriers with MFMC disease had a significantly worse RFS (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.65 [95% CI 1.40-9.52]; P = 0.008), DRFS (unadjusted HR, 3.07 [95% CI 1.07-8.80]; P = 0.037), and OS (unadjusted HR, 4.96 [95% CI 1.18-20.02]; P = 0.029) than those with unifocal disease when treated with BCT. CONCLUSION: MFMC breast cancer is more common in BRCA2 carriers, and BRCA2 carriers with MFMC disease treated with BCT exhibit a higher rate of IBTR and may have a poor survival.

Low Expression of PALB2 is Associated With Poor Survival in Chinese Women With Primary Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: PALB2 plays a crucial role in genome stability and the DNA repair process, and its mutation is associated with a moderate to high risk of breast cancer. However, the status and prognostic role of PALB2 expression in breast cancer are still unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The expression level of PALB2 mRNA was evaluated by using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in core biopsy samples from 563 primary breast cancer tissues. RESULTS: In the entire cohort, low expression of PALB2 mRNA was significantly associated with poor survival (low vs. intermediate: DFS, adjusted HR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.21-2.65, P = .003; DDFS, adjusted HR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.34-3.20, P = .001; DSS, adjusted HR = 2.59, 95% CI = 1.45-4.64, P = .001; OS, adjusted HR = 2.77, 95% CI = 1.56-4.92, P = .001; low vs. high: DFS, adjusted HR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.06-2.35, P = .026; DDFS, adjusted HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.08-2.55, P = .020; DSS, adjusted HR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.00-3.03, P = .048; OS, adjusted HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 0.95-2.67, P = .08). Notably, among hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative subtype, patients with low PALB2 expression also had significantly worse outcomes (low vs. intermediate: DFS, adjusted HR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.32-4.13, P = .004; DDFS, adjusted HR = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.47-5.27, P < .001; DSS, adjusted HR = 3.08, 95% CI = 1.27-7.43, P = .013; OS, adjusted HR = 3.15, 95% CI = 1.32-7.50, P = .010; low vs. high: DFS, adjusted HR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.04-3.28, P = .04; DDFS, adjusted HR = 1.82, 95% CI = 0.99-3.36, P = .05; DSS, adjusted HR = 2.06, 95% CI = 0.87-4.86, P = .10; OS, adjusted HR = 1.54, 95% CI = 0.71-3.33, P = .28). CONCLUSION: Breast cancer patients with low expression of mRNA have a poor survival, suggesting that patients with PALB2 low expression may be the potential beneficiaries for PARP inhibitors therapy.

BRCA-CRisk: A Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for BRCA Carriers.

PURPOSE: The absolute cumulative risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) for patients with BRCA1/2 variants is unknown. The purpose of this study was to develop a CBC risk prediction model for assessing CBC risk for BRCA1/2 carriers. METHODS: The primary cohort of 491 patients with BRCA1/2 variants was derived from a large series of unselected patients with breast cancer. A nomogram was established on the basis of the results of a multivariate Cox regression analysis from this cohort. This model, named BRCA-CRisk, was further validated by an independent cohort of 205 patients with BRCA1/2 variants. Discrimination and calibration of the model were assessed. RESULTS: In the primary cohort of 491 patients, 66 developed contralateral breast cancer after a median follow-up of 7.0 years. Four variables were significantly associated with risk of CBC and were incorporated in the establishment of the BRCA-CRisk prediction model: younger age at first breast cancer (with continuous variable, P = .002), positive first-degree family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95% CI, 1.16 to 3.08; P = .011), variant located near the 3' region of BRCA (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.23 to 3.30; P = .006), and endocrine therapy (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.88; P = .013). The area under the time-dependent curves for the 5- and 10-year cumulative risks of CBC were 0.775 and 0.702, respectively. The model was well validated in the independent cohort of 205 BRCA1/2 carriers, with area under the curves of 0.750 and 0.691 for 5 and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: BRCA-CRisk model provides a useful tool for assessing the absolute cumulative risk of CBC for BRCA1/2 carriers and may help carriers and clinicians optimally select risk-reducing strategies on the basis of individual CBC risk.

CUEDC2 Drives ß-Catenin Nuclear Translocation and Promotes Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis.

Hyperactivation of Wnt signaling is crucial in tumor formation. Fully elucidating the molecular details of how the cancer-specific Wnt signaling pathway is activated or contributes to tumorigenesis will help in determining future treatment strategies. Here, we aimed to explore the contribution of CUEDC2, a novel CUE-domain-containing protein, to the activation of Wnt signaling and the tumorigenesis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and to determine the underlying mechanisms. TNBC patient samples and disease-free survival (DFS) data were used to determine the association between CUEDC2 and TNBC progression. The effects of CUEDC2 on TNBC were examined in TNBC cells in vitro and in subcutaneous xenograft tumors in vivo. Gene knockdown, immunoprecipitation plus liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, pull-down, co-immunoprecipitation, localized surface plasmon resonance, and nuclear translocation analysis were used to uncover the mechanisms of CUEDC2 in regulating Wnt signaling and TNBC development. CUEDC2 is sufficient to maintain the hyperactivation of Wnt signaling required for TNBC tumorigenesis. The contribution of CUEDC2 plays a major role in determining the outcome of oncogenic Wnt signaling both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, the CUE domain in CUEDC2 directly bound to the ARM (7-9) domain in ß-catenin, promoted ß-catenin nuclear translocation and enhanced the expression of ß-catenin targeted genes. More importantly, an 11-amino-acid competitive peptide targeting the CUE domain in CUEDC2 blocked the interactions of CUEDC2 and ß-catenin and abrogated the malignant phenotype of TNBC cells in vitro and in vivo. We observed that TNBC patients who exhibited higher levels of CUEDC2 showed marked hyperactivation of the Wnt signaling pathway and poor clinical outcomes, highlighting the clinical relevance of our findings. CUEDC2 promotes TNBC tumor growth by enhancing Wnt signaling through directly binding to ß-catenin and accelerating its nuclear translocation. Targeting the interactions of CUEDC2 and ß-catenin may be a valuable strategy for combating TNBC.

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants in 8627 unselected patients with breast cancer: stratification of age at diagnosis, family history and molecular subtype.

PURPOSE: Comprehensively analyzing the prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in a large cohort of unselected Chinese patients with breast cancer has great clinical importance. METHODS: Germline pathogenic variants in full-length BRCA1/2 genes were determined through next-generation sequencing and/or Sanger sequencing assays in 8627 unselected Chinese patients with breast cancer who were treated at the Breast Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital. The prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs was further stratified by age at diagnosis, family history of cancer and molecular subtype. RESULTS: We found that the overall prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs was 6.0% in the entire cohort, 2.4% in BRCA1 and 3.7% in BRCA2. The prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs in patients with early-onset breast cancer (age at diagnosis ≤ 40 years) was significantly higher than that in patients over the age of 40 (9.7% vs. 5.1%). The prevalence rates of BRCA1/2 PVs in patients with a family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer were 19.5%, 39.0%, 11.1%, and 12.8%, respectively. Moreover, the number of relatives affected by breast cancer was associated with a higher prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs. Molecular subtypes were associated with the prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs. Patients with the triple-negative phenotype had the highest prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs (13.3%) among the three molecular groups, followed by the HR + and HER2- group (5.9%), and the lowest was in the HER2 + group (2.5%). CONCLUSION: Our study provides the most comprehensive information to date on the prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs in unselected Chinese patients with breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for strongly hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative early breast cancer: results of a prospective multi-center study.

PURPOSE: For estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) has been shown to be as effective as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We evaluated the prognostic significance of Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI). METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, controlled trial that enrolled postmenopausal early-stage strongly ER-positive (≥ 50%) and HER2-negative breast cancer patients. All patients were given 4-month NET before surgery. The primary objective was to investigate the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients who had PEPI 0-1 or pathological complete response (pCR) without chemotherapy. Patients who had PEPI 0-1 or pCR were recommended to receive adjuvant endocrine therapy only and patients had PEPI ≥ 2 may receive adjuvant chemotherapy at the discretion of the treating physician. RESULTS: A total of 410 patients were included and 352 patients constituted the per-protocol population. Overall, 9 patients (2.5%) had pCR (ypT0/is ypN0), 128 patients (36.4%) had PEPI = 0, and 56 patients (15.9%) had PEPI = 1. After a median follow-up of 60 months (4-104 months), patients who had PEPI 0-1 or pCR showed an improved 5-year RFS [99.5% (95% CI 98.5-99.9%) for PEPI 0-1 or pCR group vs. 93.7% (95% CI 89.6-97.8%) for PEPI ≥ 2 group, P = 0.028]. No survival difference was detected between patients received adjuvant chemotherapy vs. no chemotherapy among PEPI ≥ 2 cases. CONCLUSION: PEPI 0-1 or pCR may be used to define a group of ER-positive and HER2-negative postmenopausal early breast cancer patients with low relapse risk for whom adjuvant chemotherapy can be safely withheld. Studies on the identification and alternative treatment options for endocrine-resistant tumors are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01613560.

Ovarian cancer risk of Chinese women with BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants.

Estimating the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer in Chinese women with BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants (PVs) is of great importance for the clinical management of BRCA1/2 carriers. This cohort study recruited 9903 unselected Chinese breast cancer patients whose BRCA1/2 status was determined. Of these, 3984 probands completed family history questionnaires, which investigated the health status of their relatives, including 11,997 female first-degree relatives. The ovarian cancer risk of BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic carriers was estimated using the ovarian cancer history of proband first-degree female relatives via the Kin-cohort method. Of the 3984 probands, 126 (3.2%) carried BRCA1 PVs, and 183 (4.6%) carried BRCA2 PVs. The estimated cumulative risks of ovarian cancer by age 70 were 15.3% (95% CI 8.4-18.6%) for BRCA1 carriers, 5.5% (95% CI 2.0-10.2%) for BRCA2 carriers, and 0.4% (95% CI 0.3-0.7%) for noncarriers. The cumulative risks of ovarian cancer were very low before the age of 40 for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers and were an increase up to age 45. The cumulative ovarian cancer risk of BRCA1 carriers was approximately three times higher than that of BRCA2 carriers, and BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers had 38- and 14-fold higher risks than non-BRCA carriers, respectively. The findings indicate that Chinese women with BRCA1/2 PVs have high risks of ovarian cancer in their lifetime, especially BRCA1 carriers. These results are useful for devising optimal strategies to reduce ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2 carriers.

Risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and contralateral breast cancer in patients with and without TP53 variant in a large series of breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The association between breast cancer patients with a TP53 pathogenic variant and risk of local recurrence and contralateral breast cancer remains largely unknown. METHODS: The study population of 11093 patients was derived from two cohorts at the Breast Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital in China from November 2003, to March 2018. TP53 germline variants were determined for all patients. RESULTS: In the study, forty-one (0.37%) carried a TP53 germline pathogenic variant, and 11052 were non-carriers (99.63%). Nineteen TP53 carriers (46.3%) and 4173 non-carriers (37.8%) were treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT), while the remaining were treated with mastectomy. After a median follow-up of 6.7 years, the rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in TP53 carriers was significantly higher than that in non-carriers when treated with BCT (21.1% vs 3.8%, P = 0.006). No difference in the rate of IBTR was found between TP53 carriers and non-carriers when treated with mastectomy (0.0% vs 2.6%, P = 1.0). Furthermore, the rate of IBTR in TP53 carriers treated with BCT was significantly higher than that in those treated with mastectomy (21.1% vs 0.0%, P = 0.038). The 10-year cumulative risk of contralateral breast cancer in TP53 carriers was significantly higher than that in non-carriers (17.9% vs 3.6%, hazard ratio (HR) = 7.0, 95% CI: 3.3-14.9, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with TP53 variants have a high risk of IBTR when treated with BCT, and exhibit a very high risk of contralateral breast cancer. TP53 carriers may not be suitable for BCT and prophylactic contralateral mastectomy might be considered.

The risk variant rs11836367 contributes to breast cancer onset and metastasis by attenuating Wnt signaling via regulating NTN4 expression.

Most genome-wide association study (GWAS)-identified breast cancer-associated causal variants remain uncharacterized. To provide a framework of understanding GWAS-identified variants to function, we performed a comprehensive study of noncoding regulatory variants at the NTN4 locus (12q22) and NTN4 gene in breast cancer etiology. We find that rs11836367 is the more likely causal variant, disrupting enhancer activity in both enhancer reporter assays and endogenous genome editing experiments. The protective T allele of rs11837367 increases the binding of GATA3 to the distal enhancer and up-regulates NTN4 expression. In addition, we demonstrate that loss of NTN4 gene in mice leads to tumor earlier onset, progression, and metastasis. We discover that NTN4, as a tumor suppressor, can attenuate the Wnt signaling pathway by directly binding to Wnt ligands. Our findings bridge the gaps among breast cancer-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms, transcriptional regulation of NTN4, and breast cancer biology, which provides previously unidentified insights into breast cancer prediction and prevention.

Clinical relevance of pathogenic germline variants in mismatch repair genes in Chinese breast cancer patients.

The prevalence and clinical relevance of pathogenic germline variants in MMR genes have not been investigated in large series of breast cancers. In this study, we screened the germline variants in MMR genes in 8085 consecutive Chinese breast cancer patients, and investigated the MMR/PD-L1 protein expression and tumor mutation burden (TMB) of breast tumors from MMR variant carriers. We found that 15 of 8085 patients (0.19%) carried a pathogenic germline variant in MMR genes. Compared with non-carriers, MMR variant carriers might have worse recurrence-free survival (unadjusted hazard ratios [HR] = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.12-6.49, P = 0.027) and distant recurrence-free survival (unadjusted HR = 3.24, 95% CI: 1.45-7.22, P = 0.004). More importantly, some of the breast cancers from MMR carriers displayed MMR protein loss (5/13), TMB-high (2/10), and PD-L1 positive expression (9/13). This study showed that MMR variant carriers were rare in breast cancer. They might have worse survival and part of them might benefit from immunotherapy.

Predictors of sentinel lymph node metastasis in Chinese women with clinical T1-T2 N0 breast cancer and a normal axillary ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: The clinicopathological predictors of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in clinical T1-T2 N0 (cT1-T2 N0) patients with a normal axillary ultrasound (AUS) are unclear. PURPOSE: To assess the association between clinicopathological characteristics of a primary tumor and SLN metastasis in cT1-T2 N0 patients with a normal AUS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with cT1-T2 N0 invasive breast cancer and who obtained normal AUS results between October 2016 and September 2018 in a single hospital were included. Clinicopathological data were collected to explore the predictors of SLN metastasis using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: SLN metastasis occurred in 26 patients (18.4%) among 141 AUS-normal patients, of which 24 cases (17.0%) had one or two nodal involvements. In the univariate analysis, tumor location, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were significantly associated with SLN metastasis (P < 0.05). The multivariate analysis showed that tumor location in the upper outer quadrant (odds ratio [OR] = 4.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.63-12.37; P = 0.004), positive PR status (OR = 13.35, 95% CI = 1.60-111.39; P = 0.017), and positive LVI (OR = 8.66, 95% CI = 2.20-34.18; P = 0.002) were independent high-risk factors for SLN metastasis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the regression model was 0.787 (95% CI = 0.694-0.881; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tumor location in the upper outer quadrant, positive PR, and LVI status were found to be significantly high-risk factors for SLN metastasis among cT1-T2 N0 breast cancer patients with a normal AUS result.

Association between 15 known or potential breast cancer susceptibility genes and breast cancer risks in Chinese women.

OBJECTIVE: There are many hereditary breast cancer patients in China, and multigene panel testing has been a new paradigm of genetic testing for these patients and their relatives. However, the magnitude of breast cancer risks related to multiple breast cancer susceptibility genes are largely unknown in Chinese women. METHODS: We screened pathogenic variants in 15 established or potential breast cancer susceptibility genes from 8,067 consecutive Chinese female breast cancer patients and 13,129 Chinese cancer-free female controls. These breast cancer patients were unselected for age at diagnosis or family history. RESULTS: We found that pathogenic variants in TP53 [odds ratio (OR): 16.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.2-55.2]; BRCA2 (OR: 10.4, 95% CI: 7.6-14.2); BRCA1 (OR: 9.7, 95% CI: 6.3-14.8); and PALB2 (OR: 5.2, 95% CI: 3.0-8.8) were associated with a high risk of breast cancer. ATM, BARD1, CHEK2, and RAD51D were associated with a moderate risk of breast cancer with ORs ranging from 2-fold to 4-fold. In contrast, pathogenic variants of NBN, RAD50, BRIP1, and RAD51C were not associated with increased risk of breast cancer in Chinese women. The pathogenic variants of PTEN, CDH1, and STK11 were very rare, so they had a limited contribution to Chinese breast cancer. Patients with pathogenic variants of TP53, BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 more often had early-onset breast cancer, bilateral breast cancer, and a family history of breast cancer and/or any cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided breast cancer risk assessment data for multiple genes in Chinese women, which is useful for genetic testing and clinical management of Chinese hereditary breast cancer.

Impact of dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic response and survival for HER2-positive breast cancer patients who receive trastuzumab.

To compare outcomes in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer who received either dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with trastuzumab or standard-interval chemotherapy with trastuzumab. Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who received NAC, including epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with trastuzumab were included. Patients were divided into either the dose-dense or standard-interval group. We compared pathologic complete remission (pCR), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), event-free survival (EFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between the two groups. Two hundred (49.6%) patients received dose-dense NAC, and 203 (50.4%) received standard-interval NAC. The pCR rate was 38.4% in the dose-dense group and 29.2% in the standard-interval group (P = 0.052). In patients with lymph node (LN) metastases, the LN pCR rate was 70.9% in the dose-dense group and 56.5% in the standard-interval group (P = 0.037). After a median follow-up of 54.6 months, dose-dense chemotherapy presented an improvement on DDFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-1.28, EFS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.24-1.21), and BCSS (HR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.11-1.51), but the difference was not significant. Compared with standard-interval chemotherapy, dose-dense chemotherapy resulted in a superior 5-year DDFS (100% vs. 75.3%, P = 0.017) and 5-year EFS (96.9% vs. 78.3%, P = 0.022) in patients younger than 40 years. HER2-positive patients can achieve a higher LN pCR rate with dose-dense NAC than with standard-interval NAC with trastuzumab. Better survival may also be achieved with dose-dense chemotherapy with trastuzumab than with standard-interval chemotherapy with trastuzumab among young patients (age ≤ 40 years).

Comparison of Survival After Breast-Conserving Therapy vs Mastectomy Among Patients With or Without the BRCA1/2 Variant in a Large Series of Unselected Chinese Patients With Breast Cancer.

Importance: Whether patients with breast cancer who carry a BRCA1/2 variant can safely undergo breast-conserving therapy (BCT) remains controversial. Objective: To compare survival rates after BCT vs mastectomy in BRCA1/2 variant carriers and noncarriers in a large series of unselected patients with breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, a large consecutive series of 8396 unselected patients with primary breast cancer underwent either BCT, mastectomy with radiotherapy, or mastectomy alone from October 1, 2003, to May 31, 2015, at the Breast Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital in China. All patients were assessed for BRCA1/2 germline variant status. Statistical analysis was performed from May 1 to September 30, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Results: Of these 8396 Chinese patients (8378 women [99.8% women]; mean [SD] age, 50.8 [11.4] years; 187 BRCA1 carriers, 304 BRCA2 carriers, and 7905 noncarriers), 3135 (37.3%) received BCT, 1511 (18.0%) received mastectomy with radiotherapy, and 3750 (44.7%) received mastectomy alone. After a median follow-up of 7.5 years (range, 0.3-16.6 years), both BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant carriers treated with BCT had similar rates of survival compared with those treated with mastectomy with radiotherapy (BCSS: hazard ratio [HR] for BRCA1, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.16-2.10]; P = .41; HR for BRCA2, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.15-1.41]; P = .17; OS: HR for BRCA1, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.18-2.12]; P = .44; HR for BRCA2, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.26-1.96]; P = .52) or mastectomy alone (BCSS: HR for BRCA1, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.22-2.20]; P = .54; HR for BRCA2, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.18-1.93]; P = .39; OS: HR for BRCA1, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.27-2.21]; P = .63; HR for BRCA2, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.22-1.73]; P = .37) after adjusting for clinicopathologic factors and adjuvant therapy. For noncarriers, patients receiving BCT had significantly better survival than those receiving mastectomy with radiotherapy (BCSS: HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.36-0.57]; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.37-0.58]; P < .001) or mastectomy alone (BCSS: HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.57-0.89]; P = .003; OS: HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.58-0.87]; P < .001) in multivariable analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that BRCA1/2 variant carriers treated with BCT have survival rates at least comparable to those treated with mastectomy with radiotherapy or mastectomy alone and that BCT could be an option for BRCA1/2 variant carriers when the tumor is clinically appropriate for BCT.