RESUMO
Chronic enteropathy associated with the SLCO2A1 gene (CEAS) is a complex gastroenterological condition characterized by multiple ulcers in the small intestine with chronic bleeding and protein loss. This review explores the potential mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of CEAS, focusing on the role of SLCO2A1-encoded prostaglandin transporter OATP2A1 and its impact on prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels. Studies have suggested that elevated PGE2 levels contribute to mucosal damage, inflammation, and disruption of the intestinal barrier. The effects of PGE2 on macrophage activation and Maxi-Cl channel functionality, as well as its interaction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs play crucial roles in the progression of CEAS. Understanding the balance between its protective and pro-inflammatory effects and the complex interactions within the gastrointestinal tract can shed light on potential therapeutic targets for CEAS and guide the development of novel, targeted therapies.
Assuntos
Dinoprostona , Mucosa Intestinal , Transportadores de Ânions Orgânicos , Humanos , Transportadores de Ânions Orgânicos/genética , Transportadores de Ânions Orgânicos/metabolismo , Mucosa Intestinal/patologia , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Doença Crônica , Dinoprostona/metabolismo , Intestino Delgado/patologia , Intestino Delgado/metabolismo , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Enteropatias/genética , Enteropatias/patologia , Animais , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/genética , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Úlcera/genética , Úlcera/patologiaRESUMO
Background: Recent studies have linked atopic dermatitis (AD) to colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Their causality and potential molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Methods: We performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the causality between AD and CRC. Summary statistic data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) analysis was used to identify CRC-related causal genes. Transcriptome analyses and immunohistochemical methods were applied to investigate the shared gene signature and potential mechanisms that contribute to the pathogenesis of both AD and CRC. A predictive analysis was performed to examine the shared gene signature associated with immunotherapy response in CRC. Results: MR analysis indicated a causal association between AD and a decreased risk of CRC. SMR analysis uncovered TET2 as a CRC-related causal gene, showing an inverse relationship with the risk of CRC. Transcriptome analyses identified TET2 as a shared gene signature between AD and CRC. Decreased TET2 expression is associated with impaired demethylation and worse prognosis in CRC patients. We observed ten pathways related to the inflammatory response and immune regulation that may be shared mechanisms underlying both AD and CRC. These findings were validated through single-cell analysis. TET2 shows promise as a powerful predictive biomarker for cancer prognosis and immunotherapy response in CRC. Conclusion: There is a causal association between AD and a decreased risk of CRC. AD may influence the occurrence of CRC by modulating immune and inflammatory responses. TET2 could serve as a potential biomarker for prognosis and may be considered a novel therapeutic target for methylation and immune-related interventions.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Though the survival benefit of primary tumor operation for patients with signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach is known, the specific characteristics of those patients who would profit from the operation are yet to be determined. To this end, a predictive model was developed to identify the conjecture that the survival profit from primary tumor operation would only be obtained by patients. METHOD: The clinical data of the patients with signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, and then divided into operation and no-operation groups based on whether the patients underwent the primary tumor operation. To remove the confounding factors, propensity score matching was employed, and it was hypothesized that the patients who had been operated on and lived a longer life than the median cancer-specific survival time of those who hadn't must have profited from the surgery. To discuss the independent factors of cancer-specific survival time in the beneficial group and the non-beneficial group, the Cox model was used, and based on the various vital predictive factors, a nomogram was drawn using logistic regression. RESULT: The number of eligible patients was 12,484, with 43.9% (5483) of them having received surgery. After employing propensity score matching, the cancer-specific survival time of the operation group was found to be apparently longer (median: 21 vs. 5 months; p < 0.001) than the no-operation group. In the operation group, 4757 (86.7%) of the patients lived longer than five months (beneficial group). The six indexes (beneficial and non-beneficial group) included gender, age, Tumor Node Metastasis stage, histologic type, differentiation grade, and tumor position, and were used as predictors to draw the nomogram. The nomogram was used to divide the patients who had taken operations into two groups: the beneficial operation group and the non-beneficial operation group. The beneficial operation group, it was found, survived longer than the non-beneficial operation group (median cancer-specific survival time: 28 vs. 3 months, p < 0.001). Moreover, there was we could tell little difference in survival between the two groups (median cancer-specific survival time: 3 vs. 5 months). CONCLUSIONS: The predictive model created to select suitable candidates for surgical treatment from patients with signet ring carcinoma of the stomach could be adopted to identify certain patients benefiting from the primary tumor operation.