Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Med Sci ; 41(4): 782-787, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34403104

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Combined surgical and endovascular treatment for vascular disorders has become prevalent in recent years. However, reports on one-session hybrid surgery for arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are relatively rare. The safety and efficiency of combined treatment for brain AVMs were analyzed in biplanar hybrid operating room (OR) at one stage. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 20 patients with AVMs undergoing combined surgical and endovascular treatment from October 2015 to June 2018. The data for resection rate, microcatheter adhesion, surgical position and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Total resection or near-total resection was achieved in all cases. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were under combined endovascular and surgical procedures, and 7 experienced surgery with intraoperative digital subtraction angiography. Sitting position was applied in 3 of them; 2 niduses in cerebellum, and 1 in parietal lobe. Compared with admission modified Rankin Scale (mRS) in all patients, postoperative 12-month mRS showed a significant decline. Besides, 3 patients experienced microcatheter adhesion after endovascular embolization, thereafter underwent surgical adhesion removal while nidus resection was done. CONCLUSION: Combined endovascular and surgical modality in a hybrid OR at one stage provides a safe strategy for the treatment of AVMs. The biplanar hybrid neurointerventional suite is endowed with unconstrained operating angle which enables combined endovascular and surgical treatment in sitting position. It also reduces the risk of microcatheter adhesion, which enables interventional radiologists to perform aggressively.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/cirurgia , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/cirurgia , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Encéfalo/irrigação sanguínea , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Terapia Combinada , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Microcirurgia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Salas Cirúrgicas , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci ; 35(1): 105-110, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25673202

RESUMO

Central neurocytomas (CNs), initially asymptomatic, sometimes become huge before detection. We described and analyzed the clinical, radiological, operational and outcome data of 13 cases of huge intraventricular CNs, and discussed the treatment strategies in this study. All huge CNs (n=13) in our study were located in bilateral lateral ventricle with diameter ≥5.0 cm and had a broad-based attachment to at least one side of the ventricle wall. All patients received craniotomy to remove the tumor through transcallosal or transcortical approach and CNs were of typical histologic and immunohistochemical features. Adjuvant therapies including conventional radiation therapy (RT) or gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) were also performed postoperatively. Transcallosal and transcortical approaches were used in 8 and 5 patients, respectively. Two patients died within one month after operation and 3 patients with gross total resection (GTR) were additionally given a decompressive craniectomy (DC) and/or ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) as the salvage therapy. Six patients received GTR(+RT) and 7 patients received subtotal resection (STR)(+GKRS). Eight patients suffered serious complications such as hydrocephalus, paralysis and seizure after operation, and patients who underwent GTR showed worse functional outcome [less Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) scores] than those having STR(+GKRS) during the follow-up period. The clinical outcome of huge CNs seemed not to be favorable as that described in previous reports. Surgical resection for huge CNs should be meticulously considered to guarantee the maximum safety. Better results were achieved in STR(+GKRS) compared with GTR(+RT) for huge CNs, suggesting that STR(+GKRS) may be a better treatment choice. The recurrent or residual tumor can be treated with GKRS effectively.


Assuntos
Neurocitoma/terapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Radioterapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA