Reliability of a Novel Classification System for Thoracic Disc Herniations.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the reliability of a proposed novel classification system for thoracic disc herniations (TDHs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: TDHs are complex entities varying substantially in many factors, including size, location, and calcification. To date, no comprehensive system exists to categorize these lesions. METHODS: Our proposed system classifies 5 types of TDHs using anatomic and clinical characteristics, with subtypes for calcification. Type 0 herniations are small (≤40% of spinal canal) TDHs without significant spinal cord or nerve root effacement; type 1 are small and paracentral; type 2 are small and central; type 3 are giant (>40% of spinal canal) and paracentral; and type 4 are giant and central. Patients with types 1 to 4 TDHs have correlative clinical and radiographic evidence of spinal cord compression. Twenty-one US spine surgeons with substantial TDH experience rated 10 illustrative cases to determine the system's reliability. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were determined using the Fleiss kappa coefficient. Surgeons were also surveyed to obtain consensus on surgical approaches for the various TDH types. RESULTS: High agreement was found for the classification system, with 80% (range 62% to 95%) overall agreement and high interrater and intrarater reliability (kappa 0.604 [moderate to substantial agreement] and kappa 0.630 [substantial agreement], respectively). All surgeons reported nonoperative management of type 0 TDHs. For type 1 TDHs, most respondents (71%) preferred posterior approaches. For type 2 TDHs, responses were roughly equivalent for anterolateral and posterior options. For types 3 and 4 TDHs, most respondents (72% and 68%, respectively) preferred anterolateral approaches. CONCLUSIONS: This novel classification system can be used to reliably categorize TDHs, standardize description, and potentially guide the selection of surgical approach. Validation of this system with regard to treatment and clinical outcomes represents a line of future study.

Use of global sagittal flexibility to predict proximal junctional kyphosis after spinal deformity surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Sagittal alignment is an important predictor of functional outcomes after surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). A rigid spinal column may create a large lever arm that may impact the rate of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) after ASD surgery. In this study, the authors sought to determine whether relatively low preoperative global spinal flexibility (i.e., rigid spine) predicts increased incidence of PJK at 1 year after ASD surgery. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed long-segment thoracolumbar fusions with pelvic fixation performed at a single tertiary care center between October 2015 and September 2020 in patients with a minimum of 1-year radiographic and clinical follow-up. Two cohorts were established on the basis of the optimal value for spinal flexibility, as defined by the absolute difference between the preoperative standing and supine C7 sagittal vertical axes, which the authors termed global sagittal flexibility (GSF). Demographic information, radiographs, various associated complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis using GSF to predict an increase in the proximal junctional sagittal Cobb angle (PJCA) greater than or equal to 10° at 1-year follow-up provided an area under the curve of 0.64 and identified an optimal GSF threshold value of 3.7 cm. Patients with GSF > 3.7 cm were considered globally flexible (48 patients), and those with GSF ≤ 3.7 cm were classified as rigid (37 patients). Rigid patients were noted to have a significantly higher risk of ΔPJCA ≥ 10° at 1-year follow-up (51.4% vs 29.3%, p = 0.049). No changes in the reoperation rates or PROMs based on GSF were observed in the 1- or 2-year postoperative window. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these retrospective data, preoperative global spinal rigidity portends an independently elevated risk for the development of PJK after ASD surgery. No differences in other complication rates or PROMs data were observed between groups. Data collection was limited to a 2-year postoperative window; therefore, longer follow-up is required to further elucidate the relationship between rigidity and reoperation rates. Based on these retrospective data, flexibility may influence the outcomes of patients with ASD.

A computer vision approach to identifying the manufacturer of posterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems.

OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of the manufacturer of the previously implanted pedicle screw systems prior to revision spinal surgery may facilitate faster and safer surgery. Often, this information is unavailable because patients are referred by other centers or because of missing information in the patients' records. Recently, machine learning and computer vision have gained wider use in clinical applications. The authors propose a computer vision approach to classify posterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems. METHODS: Lateral and anteroposterior (AP) radiographs obtained in patients undergoing posterior thoracolumbar pedicle screw implantation for any indication at the authors' institution (2015-2021) were obtained. DICOM images were cropped to include both the pedicle screws and rods. Images were labeled with the manufacturer according to the operative record. Multiple feature detection methods were tested (SURF, MESR, and Minimum Eigenvalues); however, the bag-of-visual-words technique with KAZE feature detection was ultimately used to construct a computer vision support vector machine (SVM) classifier for lateral, AP, and fused lateral and AP images. Accuracy was tested using an 80%/20% training/testing pseudorandom split over 100 iterations. Using a reader study, the authors compared the model performance with the current practice of surgeons and manufacturer representatives identifying spinal hardware by visual inspection. RESULTS: Among the three image types, 355 lateral, 379 AP, and 338 fused radiographs were obtained. The five pedicle screw implants included in this study were the Globus Medical Creo, Medtronic Solera, NuVasive Reline, Stryker Xia, and DePuy Expedium. When the two most common manufacturers used at the authors' institution were binarily classified (Globus Medical and Medtronic), the accuracy rates for lateral, AP, and fused images were 93.15% ± 4.06%, 88.98% ± 4.08%, and 91.08% ± 5.30%, respectively. Classification accuracy decreased by approximately 10% with each additional manufacturer added. The multilevel five-way classification accuracy rates for lateral, AP, and fused images were 64.27% ± 5.13%, 60.95% ± 5.52%, and 65.90% ± 5.14%, respectively. In the reader study, the model performed five-way classification on 100 test images with 79% accuracy in 14 seconds, compared with an average of 44% accuracy in 20 minutes for two surgeons and three manufacturer representatives. CONCLUSIONS: The authors developed a KAZE feature detector with an SVM classifier that successfully identified posterior thoracolumbar hardware at five-level classification. The model performed more accurately and efficiently than the method currently used in clinical practice. The relative computational simplicity of this model, from input to output, may facilitate future prospective studies in the clinical setting.

Back Pain: Differential Diagnosis and Management.

Back pain is a common condition affecting millions of individuals each year. A biopsychosocial approach to back pain provides the best clinical framework. A detailed history and physical examination with a thorough workup are required to exclude emergent or nonoperative etiologies of back pain. The treatment of back pain first uses conventional therapies including lifestyle modifications, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy. If these options have been exhausted and pain persists for greater than 6 weeks, imaging and a specialist referral may be indicated.

Safe dissection and complication avoidance for L1-2 interbody placement via a lateral access approach.

The lateral access approach for L1-2 interbody placement or other levels at or near the thoracolumbar junction may be difficult without proper knowledge and visualization of anatomy. Specifically, understanding where the fibers of the diaphragm travel and avoiding injury to the diaphragm are paramount. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2022.3.FOCVID2221.

Surgical anatomy of minimally invasive lateral approaches to the thoracolumbar junction.

OBJECTIVE: The thoracolumbar (TL) junction spanning T11 to L2 is difficult to access because of the convergence of multiple anatomical structures and tissue planes. Earlier studies have described different approaches and anatomical structures relevant to the TL junction. This anatomical study aims to build a conceptual framework for selecting and executing a minimally invasive lateral approach to the spine for interbody fusion at any level of the TL junction with appropriate adjustments for local anatomical variations. METHODS: The authors reviewed anatomical dissections from 9 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens as well as clinical case examples to denote key anatomical relationships and considerations for approach selection. RESULTS: The retroperitoneal and retropleural spaces reside within the same extracoelomic cavity and are separated from each other by the lateral attachments of the diaphragm to the rib and the L1 transverse process. If the lateral diaphragmatic attachments are dissected and the diaphragm is retracted anteriorly, the retroperitoneal and retropleural spaces will be in direct continuity, allowing full access to the TL junction. The T12-L2 disc spaces can be reached by a conventional lateral retroperitoneal exposure with the rostral displacement of the 11th and 12th ribs. With caudally displaced ribs, or to expose T12-L1 disc spaces, the diaphragm can be freed from its lateral attachments to perform a retrodiaphragmatic approach. The T11-12 disc space can be accessed purely through a retropleural approach without significant mobilization of the diaphragm. CONCLUSIONS: The entirety of the TL junction can be accessed through a minimally invasive extracoelomic approach, with or without manipulation of the diaphragm. Approach selection is determined by the region of interest, degree of diaphragmatic mobilization required, and rib anatomy.

Surgical Management of Postradiation, Dropped Head Spinal Deformity in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Dropped head syndrome is a morbid condition that affects daily functionality, causing pain and dysphagia and respiratory compromise. Reported causes of dropped head syndrome include neuromuscular disorders, iatrogenic from cervical spine surgery, and idiopathic and postradiation for head and neck cancers. Management of this spinal disorder remains challenging, as the complication rates are high. We present our series of 7 patients who underwent surgical correction of dropped head syndrome, all resulting from radiation for head and neck cancers. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 7 patients who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2019 for dropped head syndrome secondary to postradiation cervical spine deformity. Clinical variables were obtained from medical records. Radiographic parameters pre- and postsurgery including T1 slope, sagittal vertical axis, and C2-C7 cervical lordosis were examined. RESULTS: Seven patients were included in the study, with an average age 69 years. Two patients underwent traction preoperatively. Five patients had posterior fixation and fusion only and 2 patients had a combined anterior and posterior fixation and fusion. Overall, there was improvement in average pre/postoperative sagittal vertical axis (6.96 cm to 3.04 cm), T1 slope (33.61° to 24.34°), and C2-C7 lordosis (-21.65° to -0.03°). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical correction of postradiation dropped head spinal deformity involving anterior and posterior fixation with osteotomies provides improvement in functional and radiographic outcomes as shown in our series. These cases are technically challenging and have a high rate of perioperative complications. Approaches must be tailored to the patient with attention to their specific surgical and radiation history.

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes and Recurrence Rates of Cystic and Solid Vestibular Schwannomas.

Objective Cystic vestibular schwannomas (CVSs) are anecdotally believed to have worse clinical and tumor-control outcomes than solid vestibular schwannomas (SVSs); however, no data have been reported to support this belief. In this study, we characterize the clinical outcomes of patients with CVSs versus those with SVSs. Design This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Setting This study is set at single high-volume neurosurgical institute. Participants We queried a database for details on all patients diagnosed with vestibular schwannomas between January 2009 and January 2014. Main Outcome Measures Records were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses to study the differences in clinical outcomes and tumor progression or recurrence. Results Of a total of 112 tumors, 24% ( n = 27) were CVSs and 76% ( n = 85) were SVSs. Univariate analysis identified the extent of resection, Koos grade, and tumor diameter as significant predictors of recurrence ( p ≤ 0.005). However, tumor diameter was the only significant predictor of recurrence in the multivariate analysis ( p = 0.007). Cystic change was not a predictor of recurrence in the univariate or multivariate analysis ( p ≥ 0.40). Postoperative facial nerve and hearing outcomes were similar for both CVSs and SVSs ( p ≥ 0.47). Conclusion Postoperative facial nerve outcome, hearing, tumor progression, and recurrence are similar for patients with CVSs and SVSs. As CVS growth patterns and responses to radiation are unpredictable, we favor microsurgical resection over radiosurgery as the initial treatment. Our data do not support the commonly held belief that cystic tumors behave more aggressively than solid tumors or are associated with increased postoperative facial nerve deficits.

The Historical Role of the Plastic Surgeon in Spine Reconstruction.

Wound complications occur in up to 19% of patients undergoing complex spine surgery. The role of the plastic surgeon in complex and redo spine surgery is important and evolving. Classically, plastic surgeons have been involved in the management of patients who develop wound complications following surgery. This involves reconstruction of posterior trunk defects with locoregional fasciocutaneous, muscle, and free tissue transfers. There has also been an increasing role for plastic surgeons to become involved in prophylactic closures of complex and/or redo spine surgeries for high-risk populations. Identification of patients with comorbidities and likelihood for multiple reoperations who are prophylactically treated with complex closure with or without local muscle flaps could significantly decrease the postoperative wound complications.

Failure in Cervical Spinal Fusion and Current Management Modalities.

Failed fusion in the cervical spine is a multifactorial problem stemming from a combination of patient and surgical factors. Patient-related risk factors such as steroid use, poor bone quality, and smoking can be optimized preoperatively. Age, prior radiation, prior surgery, and underlying genetics are nonmodifiable patient-centered risk factors. Surgical risks for failed fusion include the number of segments fused, anterior versus posterior approach for fusion, the type of bone graft, and the instrumentation utilized. Many symptomatic cases of failed fusion (pseudarthrosis) result in pain, neurological deficits, or loosened hardware necessitating a revision surgery consisting of extending the prior construct and utilizing additional allografts or autografts to augment the fusion. Given the relatively mobile nature of the cervical spine, pseudoarthrosis (either known or anticipated) must be recognized by the spine surgeon, and steps should be considered to optimize the likelihood of future fusion. This consists of both performing a rigid fixation and using appropriate bone graft to enhance the environment for arthrodesis. Vascularized bone grafts are a useful tool to augment fusion and provide added structural stability in cases at high risk of pseudoarthrosis.

Failures in Thoracic Spinal Fusions and Their Management.

Instrumented fixation and fusion of the thoracic spine present distinct challenges and complications including pseudarthrosis and junctional kyphosis. When complications arise, morbidity to the patient can be significant, involving neurologic injury, failure of instrumentation constructs, as well as iatrogenic spinal deformity. Causes of fusion failure are multifactorial, and incompletely understood. Most likely, a diverse set of biomechanical and biologic factors are at the heart of failures. Revision surgery for thoracic fusion failures is complex and often requires revision or extension of instrumentation, and frequently necessitates complex soft tissue manipulation to manage index level injury or to augment the changes of fusion.

Vascularized Scapular Bone Grafting: Indications, Techniques, Clinical Outcomes, and Alternatives.

Spinal fusion can be challenging to obtain in patients with complex spinal pathology. Medial scapular vascularized bone grafts (S-VBGs) are a novel approach to supplement cervicothoracic arthrodesis in patients at high risk of failed spinal fusion. In this article, we discuss the benefits of using VBGs compared with both nonvascularized bone grafts and free vascularized bone flaps and the surgical technique, feasibility, and limitations specific to the S-VBG.

Vascularized Bone Grafts in Spinal Reconstruction: An Overview of Nomenclature and Indications.

Several vascularized bone grafts (VBGs) have been introduced for reconstruction and augmenting fusion of the spine. The expanding use of VBGs in the field of spinoplastic reconstruction, however, has highlighted the need to clarify the nomenclature for bony reconstruction as well as establish the position of VBGs on the bony reconstructive algorithm. In the current literature, the terms "flap" and "graft" are often applied inconsistently when describing vascularized bone transfer. Such inconsistency creates barriers in communication between physicians, confusion in interpreting the existing studies, and difficulty in comparing surgical techniques. VBGs are defined as bone segments transferred on their corresponding muscular attachments without a named major feeding vessel. The bone is directly vascularized by the muscle attachments and unnamed periosteal feeding vessels. VBGs are best positioned as a separate entity in the bony reconstruction algorithm between nonvascularized bone grafts (N-VBGs) and bone flaps. VBGs offer numerous advantages as they supply fully vascularized bone to the recipient site without the microsurgical techniques or pedicle dissection required for raising bone flaps. Multiple VBGs have been introduced in recent years to optimize these benefits for spinoplastic reconstruction.

Failure in Lumbar Spinal Fusion and Current Management Modalities.

Lumbar spinal fusion is a commonly performed procedure to stabilize the spine, and the frequency with which this operation is performed is increasing. Multiple factors are involved in achieving successful arthrodesis. Systemic factors include patient medical comorbidities-such as rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis-and smoking status. Surgical site factors include choice of bone graft material, number of fusion levels, location of fusion bed, adequate preparation of fusion site, and biomechanical properties of the fusion construct. Rates of successful fusion can vary from 65 to 100%, depending on the aforementioned factors. Diagnosis of pseudoarthrosis is confirmed by imaging studies, often a combination of static and dynamic radiographs and computed tomography. Once pseudoarthrosis is identified, patient factors should be optimized whenever possible and a surgical plan implemented to provide the best chance of successful revision arthrodesis with the least amount of surgical risk.

Predictors of indirect neural decompression in minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

OBJECTIVE: An advantage of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgery is the indirect decompression of the neural elements that occurs because of the resulting disc height restoration, spinal realignment, and ligamentotaxis. The degree to which indirect decompression occurs varies; no method exists for effectively predicting which patients will respond. In this study, the authors identify preoperative predictive factors of indirect decompression of the central canal. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected consecutive patients at a single institution who were treated with LLIF without direct decompression. Preoperative and postoperative MRI was used to grade central canal stenosis, and 3D volumetric reconstructions were used to measure changes in the central canal area (CCA). Multivariate regression was used to identify predictive variables correlated with radiographic increases in the CCA and clinically successful improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) leg pain scores. RESULTS: One hundred seven levels were treated in 73 patients (mean age 68 years). The CCA increased 54% from a mean of 0.96 cm2 to a mean of 1.49 cm2 (p < 0.001). Increases in anterior disc height (74%), posterior disc height (81%), right (25%) and left (22%) foraminal heights, and right (12%) and left (15%) foraminal widths, and reduction of spondylolisthesis (67%) (all p < 0.001) were noted. Multivariate evaluation of predictive variables identified that preoperative spondylolisthesis (p < 0.001), reduced posterior disc height (p = 0.004), and lower body mass index (p = 0.042) were independently associated with radiographic increase in the CCA. Thirty-two patients were treated at a single level and had moderate or severe central stenosis preoperatively. Significant improvements in Oswestry Disability Index and VAS back and leg pain scores were seen in these patients (all p < 0.05). Twenty-five (78%) patients achieved the minimum clinically important difference in VAS leg pain scores, with only 2 (6%) patients requiring direct decompression postoperatively due to persistent symptoms and stenosis. Only increased anterior disc height was predictive of clinical failure to achieve the minimum clinically important difference. CONCLUSIONS: LLIF successfully achieves indirect decompression of the CCA, even in patients with substantial central stenosis. Low body mass index, preoperative spondylolisthesis, and disc height collapse appear to be most predictive of successful indirect decompression. Patients with preserved disc height but severe preoperative stenosis are at higher risk of failure to improve clinically.

Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement With Direct Visualization of Pedicle Borders: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Pedicle screws provide superior fixation of the subaxial cervical spine to other techniques. However, a high degree of accuracy is required for safe placement given the proximity of pedicles to critical neurovascular structures. A variety of techniques are described to maximize accuracy, including freehand, fluoroscopy-guided, and neuronavigation-based methods. We present a technique for the placement of pedicle screws in the subaxial cervical spine using direct visualization of the pedicle in a patient who required an occipito-cervical fusion construct in the setting of a C2 chordoma. A laminotomy or laminectomy is performed laterally to allow for visualization of the medial, superior, and inferior walls of the pedicle. The entry point for screw placement is determined based on pedicle anatomy and is typically 1 to 2 mm lateral to the midpoint of the lateral mass, just below the base of the superior articulating process. Screw trajectory is determined by visualizing the pedicle borders and is aimed at the junction of the medial pedicle wall, with the posterior vertebral body down the pedicle axis. Tactile feedback (loss of resistance) is used to assess for a breach while drilling. The cannulation is then tapped, and the screw is placed in a standard fashion. Direct visualization of pedicle anatomy can be a useful adjunct to guide the safe placement of subaxial pedicle screws when superior fixation is required or when normal anatomy is distorted. The technique may be combined with fluoroscopic or navigation-based techniques to provide real-time anatomic guidance during screw placement. The patient provided informed, written consent for this procedure before surgery. Used with permission from Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.

Vascularized Bone Grafts for Spinal Fusion-Part 4: The Scapula.

BACKGROUND: Solid arthrodesis is the long-term goal of most spinal reconstruction surgeries. A multitube of biologics as well as autograft is commonly used to augment the bony fusion. Medial scapular vascularized bone grafts (S-VBGs) are a novel approach to supplement cervicothoracic arthrodesis in patients at high risk for failed fusion. OBJECTIVE: To discuss the benefits of using a vascularized scapular graft, pedicled to the rhomboid minor, compared to both nonvascularized bone grafts and free vascularized bone grafts, as well as the surgical technique, feasibility, and nuances of the surgical experience with an S-VBG. METHODS: The anatomic feasibility of this procedure has been established in cadaver studies. This technical note details the operative steps and presents the first surgery in which a vascularized scapular graft was used to supplement cervicothoracic arthrodesis. RESULTS: A single patient with complex cervical deformity was successfully treated with this novel arthrodesis approach. CONCLUSION: Vascularized scapula grafts, pedicled on the rhomboid minor, provides both structural support and a source of vascularized autograft to a cervicothoracic arthrodesis. It leverages the benefits of a free-flap bone with less operative time and morbidity.

Single-position prone lateral approach: cadaveric feasibility study and early clinical experience.

OBJECTIVE: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a useful minimally invasive technique for achieving anterior interbody fusion and preserving or restoring lumbar lordosis. However, achieving circumferential fusion via posterior instrumentation after an LLIF can be challenging, requiring either repositioning the patient or placing pedicle screws in the lateral position. Here, the authors explore an alternative single-position approach: LLIF in the prone lateral (PL) position. METHODS: A cadaveric feasibility study was performed using 2 human cadaveric specimens. A retrospective 2-center early clinical series was performed for patients who had undergone a minimally invasive lateral procedure in the prone position between August 2019 and March 2020. Case duration, retractor time, electrophysiological thresholds, implant size, screw accuracy, and complications were recorded. Early postoperative radiographic outcomes were reported. RESULTS: A PL LLIF was successfully performed in 2 cadavers without causing injury to a vessel or the bowel. No intraoperative subsidence was observed. In the clinical series, 12 patients underwent attempted PL surgery, although 1 case was converted to standard lateral positioning. Thus, 11 patients successfully underwent PL LLIF (89%) across 14 levels: L2-3 (2 of 14 [14%]), L3-4 (6 of 14 [43%]), and L4-5 (6 of 14 [43%]). For the 11 PL patients, the mean (± SD) age was 61 ± 16 years, mean BMI was 25.8 ± 4.8, and mean retractor time per level was 15 ± 6 minutes with the longest retractor time at L2-3 and the shortest at L4-5. No intraoperative subsidence was noted on routine postoperative imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Performing single-position lateral transpsoas interbody fusion with the patient prone is anatomically feasible, and in an early clinical experience, it appeared safe and reproducible. Prone positioning for a lateral approach presents an exciting opportunity for streamlining surgical access to the lumbar spine and facilitating more efficient surgical solutions with potential clinical and economic advantages.

Multistage Hybrid Approach to Management of Significant Sagittal Malalignment: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches for the correction of adult spinal deformity have gained popularity in the past decade. MIS approaches can result in decreased hospitalization times and decreased morbidity. However, compared to open techniques, MIS approaches are challenging in the setting of fixed sagittal deformity and strategic surgical staging. Combined MIS and miniopen techniques are described as "hybrid" techniques. We report on the surgical approach for a fixed sagittal deformity using both MIS and miniopen techniques, specifically a miniopen pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and an anterior column release (ACR). The patient gave written informed consent for surgical treatment; institutional review board approval was not required. The patient first underwent the placement of percutaneous modular pedicle screws from T12 to the pelvis as well as a mini-PSO across the previously fused L5 vertebral body, with the placement of a temporary rod. The following day, the patient underwent lateral transpsoas interbody fusion and ACR at L2/3; a percutaneous rod was then passed from T12 to the pelvis for segmental fixation. The patient recovered well and was discharged home without complication 6 d after the initial day of surgery. The combined use of surgical staging and traditional open techniques in a selective, minimalistic fashion and adherence to minimally invasive principles provide for a powerful set of surgical techniques that capitalize on less invasive approaches to deformity management. Used with permission from Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.