[Clinical characteristics of 272 437 patients with different histopathological subtypes of primary esophageal malignant tumors].

Objective: To characterize the histopathological subtypes and their clinicopathological parameters of gender and onset age by common, rare and sparse primary esophageal malignant tumors (PEMT). Methods: A total of 272 437 patients with PEMT were enrolled in this study, and all of the patients were received radical surgery. The clinicopathological information of the patients was obtained from the database established by the State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment from September 1973 to December 2020, which included the clinical treatment, pathological diagnosis and follow-up information of esophagus and gastric cardia cancers. All patients were diagnosed and classified by the criteria of esophageal tumor histopathological diagnosis and classification (2019) of the World Health Organization (WHO). The esophageal tumors, which were not included in the WHO classification, were analyzed separately according to the postoperative pathological diagnosis. The χ2 test was performed by the SPSS 25.0 software on count data, and the test standard α=0.05. Results: A total of 32 histopathological types were identified in the enrolled PEMT patients, of which 10 subtypes were not included in the WHO classification. According to the frequency, PEMT were divided into common (esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, ESCC, accounting for 97.1%), rare (esophageal adenocarcinoma, EAC, accounting for 2.3%) and sparse (mainly esophageal small cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma, etc., accounting for 0.6%). All the common, rare, and sparse types occurred predominantly in male patients, and the gender difference of rare type was most significant (EAC, male∶ female, 2.67∶1), followed with common type (ESCC, male∶ female, 1.78∶1) and sparse type (male∶ female, 1.71∶1). The common type (ESCC) mainly occurred in the middle thoracic segment (65.2%), while the rare type (EAC) mainly occurred in the lower thoracic segment (56.8%). Among the sparse type, malignant melanoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma were both predominantly located in the lower thoracic segment (51.7%, 66.7%), and the others were mainly in the middle thoracic segment. Conclusion: ESCC is the most common type among the 32 histopathological types of PEMT, followed by EAC as the rare type, and esophageal small cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma as the major sparse type, and all of which are mainly occur in male patients. The common type of ESCC mainly occur in the middle thoracic segment, while the rare type of EAC mainly in the lower thoracic segment. The mainly sparse type of malignant melanoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma predominately occur in the lower thoracic segment, and the remaining sparse types mainly occur in the middle thoracic segment.

Long non-coding RNA DILC as a potentially useful biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: LncRNA downregulated in liver cancer stem cells (lnc-DILC) has been implicated as a tumor suppressor in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the clinical significance of lnc-DILC in CRC patients has not been investigated. In this study, we aimed to explore the diagnostic and prognostic value of lnc-DILC in CRC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The expression of lnc-DILC was measured in 174 paired CRC tissues and adjacent normal tissues using Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR). The correlation of lnc-DILC expression with clinicopathological factors was statistically analyzed by the Chi-square test. Besides, overall survival analysis was carried out with the Kaplan-Meier curve with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore the prognostic significance of lnc-DILC expression. RESULTS: We found that lnc-DILC expression was downregulated in CRC tissues compared to their adjacent normal tissues (p<0.01). ROC analyses showed that lnc-DILC levels were reliable in distinguishing patients with CRC from normal colorectal tissues. Then, down-regulation of lnc-DILC was positively associated with aggressive clinical characteristics, including depth of invasion (p=0.018) and advanced TNM stage (p=0.009). Moreover, the Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that overexpression of lnc-DILC was associated with poorer overall survival (p=0.0205) and disease-free survival (p<0.001). Finally, multivariate analyses confirmed that expression of lnc-DILC was an independent prognostic factor in CRC. CONCLUSIONS: Our results firstly suggested that lnc-DILC could be a favorable indicator of prognosis in CRC.

The pharmacokinetics of orally administered fudosteine in healthy Chinese volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics of fudosteine in healthy Chinese volunteers was investigated for the first time after single- and multiple-dose administration. Five male and five female volunteers were enrolled in this study. Each subject received 400 mg fudosteine capsules (the therapeutic dose) on day 1 after overnight fasting for the single-dose study and three times daily oral administration (400 mg) for 5 consecutive days until the sixth morning for the multiple-dose study. Serial blood samples were collected at specified time intervals up to 16 hours following the first and last doses of fudosteine. Plasma harvested from the blood was separated and analyzed for fudosteine levels by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HPLC/ESI/MS) method employing percolumn derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC-Cl). Noncompartmental analysis was used for the calculation of the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to time infinity and the terminal half-life (t1/2) of fudosteine. The pharmacokinetic parameters for single- and multiple-dose administration were estimated as follows: Cmax amounted to 10.13+/-4.39 microg/mL and 11.75+/-6.51 microg/mL, tmax to 0.69+/-0.36 h and 0.53+/-0.12 h and t1/2 to 2.33+/-0.63 h and 2.40+/-0.37 h, respectively. No significant differences were found between single- and multiple-dose oral administration, although gender differences were observed.