Increase in body temperature in pediatric patients after costal cartilage harvest in microtia reconstruction: A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Previous evidence has clearly shown that maintaining normothermia in children undergoing surgery is difficult and is associated with adverse outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to retrospectively analyze the changes in body temperature over time in 2 different types of microtia reconstruction surgeries, namely, embedding, and elevation surgeries. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent microtia reconstruction (embedding and elevation) between July 2012 and February 2015 (n = 38). The changes in body temperature between the 2 types of surgeries were compared. RESULTS: During microtia reconstruction, the body temperature in the embedding surgery group was significantly higher than that in the elevation surgery group from 1 hour after the start of surgery to 1 day after the surgery (P < .001). Time, group, and time-group interaction were associated with an increase in body temperature (P < .001) but not the warming method. CONCLUSION: We found an increase in body temperature in patients with microtia who underwent embedding surgery (autologous costal cartilage harvest surgery), and this was related to the type of surgery and not to the warming method. Therefore, further research is warranted to determine the cause of the increase in body temperature during this surgery.

Postoperative propofol bolus treatment did not affect recovery time in patients with emergence agitation after sevoflurane anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery: Prospective nonrandomized case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of emergence agitation (EA) after sevoflurane anesthesia is high, especially in pediatric strabismus surgery. However, research thus far has focused on the pharmacological prophylaxis of EA and administering drugs to pediatric patients without EA is problematic. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of propofol after sevoflurane anesthesia affects recovery time in patients with EA. METHODS: After obtaining informed written consent, 113 children (aged 2-12 years) with the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I or II who underwent strabismus surgery were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups; upon arrival at the postanesthetic care unit (PACU), patients who had EA (pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium [PAED] scale score ≥14) were treated with 1.0 mg/kg 1% propofol (group P: n = 30). Patients who did not have EA (PAED scale score <14, group C: n = 83) were taken care of in the PACU without propofol administration. RESULTS: There was no difference in the PAED scale scores between the 2 groups from 10 minutes to discharge from the PACU (P > .05). There was no difference in PACU stay time between the 2 groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that propofol administration for intense EA alleviated EA symptoms and prevented an increase in the duration of PACU stay due to EA in children undergoing strabismus surgery under sevoflurane anesthesia.