Role of cAMP in Cardiomyocyte Viability: Beneficial or Detrimental?

BACKGROUND: 3', 5'-cyclic AMP (cAMP) regulates numerous cardiac functions. Various hormones and neurotransmitters elevate intracellular cAMP (i[cAMP]) in cardiomyocytes through activating GsPCRs (stimulatory-G-protein-coupled-receptors) and membrane-bound ACs (adenylyl cyclases). Increasing evidence has indicated that stimulating different GsPCRs and ACs exhibits distinct, even opposite effects, on cardiomyocyte viability. However, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. METHODS: We used molecular and pharmacological approaches to investigate how different GsPCR/cAMP signaling differentially regulate cardiomyocyte viability with in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models. RESULTS: For prodeath GsPCRs, we explored ß1AR (beta1-adrenergic receptor) and H2R (histamine-H2-receptor). We found that their prodeath effects were similarly dependent on AC5 activation, ATP release to the extracellular space via PANX1 (pannexin-1) channel, and extracellular ATP (e[ATP])-mediated signaling involving in P2X7R (P2X purinoceptor 7) and CaMKII (Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II). PANX1 phosphorylation at Serine 206 by cAMP-dependent-PKA (protein-kinase-A) promoted PANX1 activation, which was critical in ß1AR- or H2R-induced cardiomyocyte death in vitro and in vivo. ß1AR or H2R was localized proximately to PANX1, which permits ATP release. For prosurvival GsPCRs, we explored adenosine-A2-receptor (A2R), CGRPR (calcitonin-gene-related-peptide-receptor), and RXFP1 (relaxin-family peptide-receptor 1). Their prosurvival effects were dependent on AC6 activation, cAMP efflux via MRP4 (multidrug resistance protein 4), extracellular cAMP metabolism to adenosine (e[cAMP]-to-e[ADO]), and e[ADO]-mediated signaling. A2R, CGRPR, or RXFP1 was localized proximately to MRP4, which enables cAMP efflux. Interestingly, exogenously increasing e[cAMP] levels by membrane-impermeable cAMP protected against cardiomyocyte death in vitro and in ex vivo and in vivo mouse hearts with ischemia-reperfusion injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the functional diversity of different GsPCRs in cardiomyocyte viability could be achieved by their ability to form unique signaling complexes (signalosomes) that determine the fate of cAMP: either stimulate ATP release by activating PKA or directly efflux to be e[cAMP].

Monocyte-derived Dll4 is a novel contributor to persistent systemic inflammation in HIV patients.

Background: In people living with HIV (PLWH) on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), persistent systemic inflammation is a driving force for the progression of comorbidities, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. In this context, monocyte- and macrophage-related inflammation rather than T cell activation is a major cause of chronic inflammation. However, the underlying mechanism of how monocytes cause persistent systemic inflammation in PLWH is elusive. Methods and Results: In vitro, we demonstrated that lipopolysaccharides (LPS) or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), induced a robust increase of Delta-like ligand 4 (Dll4) mRNA and protein expression in human monocytes and Dll4 secretion (extracellular Dll4, exDll4) from monocytes. Enhanced membrane-bound Dll4 (mDll4) expression in monocytes triggered Notch1 activation to promote pro-inflammatory factors expression. Dll4 silencing and inhibition of Nocth1 activation diminished the LPS or TNFα -induced inflammation. exDll4 releases in response to cytokines occurred in monocytes but not endothelial cells or T cells. In clinical specimens, we found that PLWH, both male and female, on cART, showed a significant increase in mDll4 expression, activation of Dll4-Notch1 signaling, and inflammatory markers in monocytes. Although there was no sex effect on mDII4 in PLWH, plasma exDll4 was significantly elevated in males but not females compared to HIV uninfected individuals. Furthermore, exDll4 plasma levels paralleled with monocytes mDll4 in male PLWH. Circulating exDll4 was also positively associated with pro-inflammatory monocytes phenotype and negatively associated with classic monocytes phenotype in male PLWH. Conclusion: Pro-inflammatory stimuli increase Dll4 expression and Dll4-Notch1 signaling activation in monocytes and enhance monocyte proinflammatory phenotype, contributing to persistent systemic inflammation in male and female PLWH. Therefore, monocyte mDll4 could be a potential biomarker and therapeutic target of systemic inflammation. Plasma exDll4 may also play an additional role in systemic inflammation but primarily in men.