A Survey Regarding the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs of Graduates of Cancer Rehabilitation Fellowship Program.

Currently there are limited options for physiatrists to further subspecialize in cancer rehabilitation. Since 2007, few cancer rehabilitation fellowship programs have been started. There is currently absolutely no information about such training programs and their graduates. This study is the first to survey a small number of graduates from two cancer rehabilitation fellowship programs. The purpose of this study was to report characteristics, attitudes, and beliefs of cancer rehabilitation fellowship graduates. Graduates of cancer rehabilitation fellowship programs from 2008 through 2015 responded to a 26-question survey. Information collected included exposure to cancer rehabilitation prior to fellowship training, usefulness of fellowship training program, information about current practice, and suggested areas of improvement. The setting of the study is online survey. Participants were graduates of two cancer rehabilitation fellowship programs from 2008 through 2015. Participants were contacted via email about completion of an online survey and information was collected anonymously. Primary outcome measure was satisfaction of respondents with their fellowship training program in meeting the rehabilitation needs of their cancer patients. Sixteen responses, with a response rate of 89%, were recorded. Sixty-three percent of the respondents had exposure to cancer rehabilitation prior to post-graduate year 3 (PGY-3). Majority of graduates had practice involving at least 50% of care to cancer patients. Fifty percent indicated that their position was specifically created after their job interview. Career development was one of the major areas of suggested improvement in training. Graduates of cancer rehabilitation fellowship programs strongly value their training. Majority of the graduates were able to continue their career into jobs that were primarily cancer rehabilitation related. Further work needs to be done to define this subspecialty further and incorporate building practice as part of this training.

Characteristics of Cancer Rehabilitation Fellowship Training Programs in the USA.

Cancer rehabilitation is emerging as a specialized field within Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The purpose of this systemic review is to summarize the various cancer rehabilitation fellowship programs in the USA and the scope of training in this discipline. Currently, four institutions offer such a training program. All of the fellowship directors were contacted about characteristics of their programs. The oldest program has been in existence since 2007. All of these programs are 1 year in duration and have between one and two fellowship positions annually. There have been total of 29 graduates as of July 2017. With regard to cancer rehabilitation care delivery model, all four centers reported inpatient consult teams and outpatient rehabilitation. Outpatient experience included electrodiagnosis, botulin toxin, and ultrasound-guided injections. Three of the four programs also reported the presence of an acute inpatient cancer rehabilitation service. A number of clinical rotations are available at each of the four programs with considerable variation. Comprehensive educational efforts are present in all programs with varying expectations for research.

Patient-Reported Usefulness of Acute Cancer Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Cancer survivors often have unmet needs, and cancer rehabilitation is becoming an integral part of the continuum of care. Understanding the needs and satisfaction of patients undergoing cancer rehabilitation is important for the development of effective programs. OBJECTIVE: To determine the overall perception of acute inpatient cancer rehabilitation usefulness. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Acute inpatient cancer rehabilitation unit at a National Cancer Institute (NCI) Comprehensive Cancer Center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted to the acute inpatient cancer rehabilitation unit from September 2014 to July 2015 were approached, and 200 patients enrolled with completed surveys. METHODS: Patients meeting study criteria were asked to complete a survey about their perception of the rehabilitation received; their attitudes and beliefs on their condition, treatment, functional independence; and their attitudes and beliefs on obtaining health information and psychosocial issues. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, FIM efficiency, and results from an anonymous survey with a 22-item Likert-type scale at the end of patients' rehabilitation stay were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 327 patients admitted, 239 patients (73%) were approached, and 200 patients (84%) were enrolled with completed surveys. Patients agreed or strongly agreed that rehabilitation helped with improving physical function (n = 193, 97%), regaining physical independence (n = 181, 91%), and preparing to deal with self-care tasks (n = 183, 94%). Patients agreed that rehabilitation improved hope (n = 187, 94%), mood (n = 176, 84%), anxiety (n = 180, 90%), and spirituality (n = 182, 94%). FIM score improvements (from admission to discharge) and FIM efficiency (change in FIM score / length of stay) were significant in all functional domains. Overall, respondents believed that their rehabilitation stay was extremely good (n = 128, 64%) or very good (n = 60, 30%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients perceived their rehabilitation stay as beneficial in multiple respects. Significant improvements in FIM measurements were also found. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The effects of a brief relaxation program on symptom distress and heart rate variability in cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a 15-minute, one-time guided relaxation program for cancer patients could improve symptom distress as measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). In addition, we were interested in characterizing the changes of the autonomic nervous system, as demonstrated by heart rate variability (HRV) high-frequency (HF) spectral analysis, before and after this relaxation program. DESIGN: Nonrandomized pilot study. SETTING: Comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: Twenty cancer patients underwent a 15-minute relaxation program. The ESAS and a 5-minute HRV recording were completed before and after the relaxation program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The differences between the pre- and post-summed ESAS score and HRV values were compared by a paired t-test. RESULTS: The summed ESAS scores were significantly lower after the relaxation program (P<.01), with an average 31% decrease in total score. However, no differences were found in HRV HF power. There was no correlation between the change in HRV HF and change in symptom distress, as measured by ESAS. CONCLUSIONS: A brief guided relaxation program can significantly improve symptoms as measured by ESAS. More research is required to understand the effects of relaxation on HF HRV power.

Comparison of functional outcomes in low- and high-grade astrocytoma rehabilitation inpatients.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inpatient rehabilitation outcomes between patients with low- and high-grade astrocytoma. DESIGN: A retrospective review of medical records for patients admitted from September 1, 1996, to June 30, 2008, to the inpatient rehabilitation unit at a tertiary care cancer center. A high-grade (21 of 443 patients) and low-grade astrocytoma (21 of 24 patients) group were matched on three of five criteria in the order of importance: area of brain involvement (divided into left cerebral, right cerebral, midline and/or bilateral cerebral, and infratentorial), single vs. multiple intracranial neurosurgical procedures, age (within 10 yrs), period of rehabilitation admission (within 3 yrs), and sex. Descriptive statistics were used to compare demographic data and scores in four categories (total, activities of daily living, mobility, and cognition) from the patients' functional independence measure assessment. RESULTS: No significant (P > 0.05) differences were found in demographics or efficiency between the two groups. The high-grade group had significantly (P < 0.05) higher total gain and longer stay in inpatient rehabilitation (mean +/- standard deviation, 21.7 +/- 10.1 vs. 13.0 +/- 9.3 and 13 +/- 7.1 day vs. 9 +/- 6.2 days, respectively) than did the low-grade astrocytoma group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients with low-grade astrocytoma, patients with high-grade astrocytoma had higher total functional independence measure gain but also longer lengths of stay. Functional independence measure efficiencies were comparable between the two groups. Our results parallel those of previous rehabilitation outcome studies comparing patients with brain tumors with patients with brain injuries of other etiologies. Larger matched studies are needed for this patient population.