Should an Incidental Meckel Diverticulum Be Resected? A Systematic Review.

Background: Meckel Diverticulum [MD), a common congenital anomaly of the gastrointestinal tract, poses a dilemma when incidentally encountered during surgery. Despite historical descriptions and known complications of symptomatic MD, the decision to resect an incidental MD (IMD) lacks clear guidelines. This study aims to assess whether resecting IMDs is justified by synthesizing evidence from studies published between 2000 and 2023. Factors influencing this decision, such as demographic risks, surgical advancements and complications, are systematically examined. Methods and Material: Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this review incorporates 42 eligible studies with data on outcomes of asymptomatic MD management. Studies, both favoring and opposing resection, were analyzed. Results: Considering complications, malignancy potential, and operative safety, the risk-benefit analysis presents a nuanced picture. Some authors propose conditional resection based on specific criteria, emphasizing patient-specific factors. Of 2934 cases analyzed for short- and long-term complications, the morbidity rate was 5.69%. Of 571 cases where mortality data were available, all 5 fatalities were attributed to the primary disease rather than IMD resection. Conclusion: The sporadic, unpredictable presentation of IMD and the variability of both the primary disease and the patient make formulation of definitive guidelines challenging. The non-uniformity of complications reporting underscores the need for standardized categorization. While the balance of evidence leans towards resection of IMDs, this study acknowledges the individualized nature of this decision. Increased safety in surgery and anesthesia, along with better understanding and management of complications favor a judicious preference for resection, while taking into account patient characteristics and the primary disease.

Non-Locatable Internal Opening in Anal Fistula Associated with Acute Abscess and Its Definitive Management by Garg Protocol.

Background: Definitive management of acute fistula-abscess (anal fistulas associated with acute abscess) is gaining popularity against the two-staged approach (early abscess drainage with deferred fistula management). However, locating an internal opening (IO) in acute fistula-abscess can be difficult. A recent protocol (Garg protocol) has been shown to be effective in managing anal fistulas with non-locatable IO. Purpose: To test the efficacy of the Garg protocol in managing acute fistula-abscess with non-locatable IO. Methods: Patients with acute fistula-abscess operated by a definitive procedure were included. A preoperative MRI was done in all patients. Patients in whom the IO was non-locatable after clinical, MRI, and intraoperative examination were managed by the three-step Garg protocol. Garg protocol: 1) Reassessment of MRI; 2) In non-horseshoe fistulas, the IO was assumed to be at the point where the fistula tract reached closest to the sphincter-complex; 3) In horseshoe fistulas, the IO was assumed to be located in the midline (anterior or posterior as per the horseshoe location). Low fistulas were treated by fistulotomy and high fistulas by a sphincter-sparing procedure. The long-term healing rate and change in continence (Vaizey scores) were evaluated. Results: A total of 201 patients with acute fistula-abscess were operated over six years, and 19 were lost to follow-up. A total of 182 patients (154-males) were followed up (median-37 months). The IO was locatable in 133/182 (73.1%) (control group) and was non-locatable in 49/182 (26.9%) (study group). The study group was managed as per the Garg protocol. The age, sex-ratio, and fistula parameters were comparable in both groups. The long-term healing rate was 112/133(84.2%) in the IO-locatable group and 43/49 (87.8%) in the IO-non-locatable group (p=0.64, not-significant). The objective continence scores did not change significantly after surgery in both groups. Conclusion: Acute fistula-abscess with non-locatable IO can be managed successfully by the Garg protocol without any risk of incontinence.

Efficacy of Kegel exercises in preventing incontinence after partial division of internal anal sphincter during anal fistula surgery.

BACKGROUND: The transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS) procedure, performed to treat complex anal fistulas, preserves the external anal sphincter (EAS) but involves partial incision of the internal anal sphincter (IAS). AIM: To ascertain the incidence of incontinence after the division of the IAS as is done in TROPIS and to evaluate whether regular Kegel exercises (KE) in the postoperative period can prevent incontinence due to IAS division. METHODS: Patients operated on for high complex fistulas and having no preoperative continence problem (score = 0) were included in the study. All patients were operated on by the TROPIS procedure and were recommended KE (pelvic contraction exercises) 50 times/day. KE were commenced on the 10th postoperative day and continued for 1 year. Incontinence was evaluated objectively (by modified Vaizey's scores) in the immediate postoperative period (Pre-KE group) and on long-term follow-up (Post-KE group). The incontinence scores in both groups were compared to evaluate the efficacy of KE. RESULTS: Of 102 anal fistula patients operated on between July 2018 and July 2020 were included in this study. There were 90 males, the mean age was 42.3 ± 12.8, and the median follow-up was 30 mo (18-42 mo). Three patients were lost to follow-up. There were 65 recurrent fistulas, 92 had multiple tracts, 42 had associated abscess, 46 had horseshoe fistula and 34 were supralevator fistulas. All were magnetic resonance imaging-documented high fistulas (> 1/3 EAS involved). Overall incontinence occurred in 31% patients (Pre-KE group) with urge and gas incontinence accounting for the majority of cases (28.3%). The mean incontinence scores in the Pre-KE group were 1.19 ± 1.96 (in 31 patients, solid = 0, liquid = 7, gas = 8, urge = 24) and in the Post-KE group were 0.26 ± 0.77 (in 13 patients, solid = 0, liquid = 2, gas = 3, urge = 10) (P = 0.00001, t-test). CONCLUSION: Division of the IAS led to incontinence, mainly urge incontinence, and also to a mild degree of gas and liquid incontinence. However, regular KE led to a significant reduction in incontinence (both in the number of affected patients and the severity of scores in these patients).

Including video and novel parameter-height of penetration of external anal sphincter-in magnetic resonance imaging reporting of anal fistula.

The main purpose of a radiologist's expertise in evaluation of anal fistula magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is to benefit patients by decreasing the incontinence rate and increasing the healing rate. Any loss of vital information during the transfer of this data from the radiologist to the operating surgeon is unwarranted and is best prevented. In this regard, two methods are suggested. First, a short video to be attached with the standardized written report highlighting the vital parameters of the fistula. This would ensure minimum loss of information when it is conveyed from the radiologist to the operating surgeon. Second, inclusion of a new parameter, the amount of external sphincter involvement by the anal fistula. This parameter is usually not included in the MRI report. This can be evaluated as the height of penetration of the external anal sphincter (HOPE) by the fistula. The external anal sphincter plays a pivotal role in maintaining continence. This parameter (HOPE) is distinct from the 'height of internal opening' and assumes immense importance as its knowledge is paramount to prevent damage to the external anal sphincter by the surgeon during surgery.