Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Orthop ; 48(5): 1171-1178, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38443715

RESUMO

PURPOSE: After cemented total hip arthroplasty, the risk of periprosthetic fracture (PPF) of taper-slip stems is higher than that of composite-beam stems. We aimed to assess the conditions resulting in PPFs of taper-slip stems using a falling weight. METHODS: Taper-slip stems were fixed to five types of simulated bone models using bone cement, and the fractures were evaluated by dropping stainless-steel weights from a predetermined height onto the heads. The periprosthetic fracture height in 50% of the bone models (PPFH50) was calculated using the staircase method. RESULTS: For the fixation with 0° of flexion, the values for PPFH50 were 61 ± 11, 60 ± 13, above 110, 108 ± 49, and 78 ± 12 cm for the cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy, stainless steel alloy (SUS), titanium alloy (Ti), smooth surface, and thick cement mantle models, respectively; for the fixation with 10° of flexion (considering flexure), the PPFH50 values were 77 ± 5, 85 ± 9, 90 ± 2, 89 ± 5, and 81 ± 11 cm, respectively. The fracture rates of the polished-surface stems were 78.6 and 35.7% at the proximal and distal sites, respectively (p < 0.05); the fracture rates of the smooth-surface stems were 14.2 and 100%, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The impact tests demonstrated that the conditions that were less likely to cause PPFs were use of Ti, a smooth surface, a thick cement mantle, and probably, use of SUS.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Fraturas do Fêmur , Prótese de Quadril , Fraturas Periprotéticas , Humanos , Fraturas Periprotéticas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Periprotéticas/etiologia , Fraturas Periprotéticas/cirurgia , Prótese de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Cimentos Ósseos , Desenho de Prótese , Ligas , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia
2.
Trauma Case Rep ; 22: 100214, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31294071

RESUMO

In general, internal plate fixation is mainly performed in order to reduce multiple facial bone fractures and rarely uses an external fixator. Although it would be ideal to successfully achieve or preserve the occlusal relationship of the upper and lower jaws, it is difficult to successfully manage multiple bone fragments in order to use them to achieve internal fixation, especially when treating a severely comminuted facial fracture. In addition, it is also important to prevent the onset of severe infection after sub-periosteal dissection, due to the presence of avascular bony fragments and an internal fixation implant which thus represents a foreign body. In order to treat extensive comminuted fracture without internal plate fixation, we performed external fixation using an Ilizarov-type external fixator. The Ilizarov-type external fixator is characterized by a few circular external structures and threaded rods. This device can be modified for use in the field of orthopedic surgery to correct three-dimensional deformities caused by fragile complicated fractures and bone defects. The advantages of the Ilizarov-type external fixator for treating panfacial fractures include a low invasiveness, utility in various fracture situations, easy adjustment of threaded rods, and a low potential cost. We herein report the first case of a severe panfacial fracture that was successfully treated using an Ilizarov-type external fixator.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA