Single center experience of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in early Barrett's adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or radical surgical resection are the standard treatment options for patients with early Barrett's adenocarcinoma (EBAC). Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a new endoscopic technique, which allows--in contrast to EMR--endoscopic en-bloc resection of neoplastic lesions greater than 2 cm with complete histological evaluation of the resected specimen. In contrast to Western countries, Barrett's esophagus is less common in Asia indicating the low volume of published data of ESD in EBAC in Japanese series. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to describe the results of ESD in patients with EBAC performed in a German tertiary referral center. METHODS: Between November 2009 and April 2014 ESDs were performed in 22 patients with histologically proven EBAC. Data were given for the en-bloc, the R0, the R0 en-bloc, and the curative resection rate as well as for the complication and the local recurrence rate. RESULTS: ESD was technically possible in all of the 22 patients. 20 of the resected EBAC were mucosal carcinomas, whereas in two patients the tumor showed submucosal invasion. The en-bloc, R0, R0 en-bloc, and curative resection rates were 95.5, 81.8, 81.8 %, and 77.3 %, resp. Complication rate was 27.3 % (perforation n = 1, bleeding n = 2, stenosis n = 3). In case of curative tumor resection, only one local tumor recurrence (5.9 %) occurred after a medium follow-up of 1.6 years. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small number of patients and a relatively short follow-up, the present data underline the value of ESD, especially in case of curative resections in the definite and less invasive therapy of EBAC. Attention should be drawn toward subsquamous extension of EBAC requiring a sufficient safety margin as an obligate condition for curative R0 resections. Due to the required learning curve and the management of potential complications, ESD should be restricted to greater endoscopic centers.

Novel diagnostic and therapeutic techniques for surveillance of dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

The risk for developing dysplasia and colorectal cancer in patients with longstanding inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) involving the colon is well documented. Random biopsies during white-light, standard-definition colonoscopy (33 to 50 biopsies) with or without dye spraying chromoendoscopy has been the recommended strategy in North America to detect dysplastic lesions in IBD. However, there are several limitations to this approach including poor physician adherence, poor sensitivity, increased procedure time and considerable cost. The new generation of high-definition endoscopes with electronic filter technology provide an opportunity to visualize colonic mucosal and vascular patterns in minute detail, and to identify subtle flat, multifocal, polypoid and pseudopolypoid neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions. The application of these new technologies in IBD is slowly being adopted in clinical practice. In addition, the advent of confocal laser endomicroscopy provides an opportunity to explore real-time histology, thus redefining the understanding and characterization of the lesions in IBD. There is emerging evidence that serrated adenomas are also associated with longstanding IBD colitis and may be recognized as another important contributing factor to colorectal cancer development. The circumscribed neoplastic lesions can be treated using endoscopic therapeutic management such as mucosal resection or, especially, endoscopic submucosal dissection. This may replace panproctocolectomy in selected patients. The authors review the potential of these techniques to transform endoscopic diagnosis and therapeutic management of dysplasia in IBD.

[Single centre experience of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in premalignant and malignant gastrointestinal neoplasia]. / Single-Center-Erfahrung mit der Endoskopischen Submukosa-Dissektion (ESD) bei prämalignen und malignen gastrointestinalen Neoplasien.

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of early GI cancers or premalignant neoplasia is becoming increasingly important. In Germany ESD is restricted to larger endoscopic institutions and only a few literature reports are available. The aim of the present study is to describe the results of 46 ESDs conducted in a German endoscopic centre. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between June 2007 and May 2012 46 ESDs in 45 patients (33 men, 12 women, mean age 66.1 years) were performed in the oesophagus (n = 17), stomach (n = 23) and rectum (n = 6). Data were collected for the en-bloc, R0 and R0 en-bloc resection rates as well as for complications, the curative resection and the local recurrence rates. In order to demonstrate a learning curve, results were evaluated for two periods (June 2007 to November 2010 vs. December 2010 to May 2012). RESULTS: ESD was technically possible in 93.5%. En-bloc, R0, R0 en-bloc and curative resection rates were 90.7%, 74.4%, 67.4% and 65.1%, respectively. The complication rate was 13%. In the second period en-bloc and R0 en-bloc resection rates increased from 81% to 100% and, respectively, from 52.4% to 81.8%. After a medium follow-up of 11.4 months, local tumour recurrence occurred in 10%. In cases of curative R0 en bloc resection of malignant tumours no tumour recurrence occurred. DISCUSSION: Despite the small number of patients, the present data underline the value of ESD, especially in cases of R0 en-bloc resections in the therapy for premalignant and early malignant GI tumours. Due to the required learning curve, ESD should be restricted to larger endoscopic centres in Germany.

Esophageal submucosal dissection under steady pressure automatically controlled endoscopy (SPACE): a randomized preclinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: A new overtube system has been developed for steady pressure automatically controlled endoscopy (SPACE) in the gastrointestinal tract. The objectives of this study were to validate the feasibility and safety of SPACE in the esophagus, and to evaluate its potential advantages over conventional (manually insufflating) endoscopy in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: This was a multicenter preclinical trial using acute porcine models (n = 20). In Experiment 1 (feasibility/safety study), SPACE was attempted in the esophagus with continuous monitoring of cardiopulmonary parameters and intraluminal pressures in the downstream bowel. Different insufflation pressures were tested to optimize the insufflation condition. Each session was video-recorded and scored by blinded reviewers. In Experiment 2 (randomized trial), esophageal ESD was attempted using either SPACE or conventional endoscopy, and results were compared. RESULTS: In Experiment 1, SPACE was performed safely without intraluminal pressure elevation in the downstream bowel. According to video review, SPACE provided more stable, reproducible, and rapid visualization than conventional endoscopy. The insufflation pressure was optimized at 14 mmHg for esophageal SPACE. In Experiment 2, ESD was completed in all animals. The ESD time was significantly shorter with SPACE compared with conventional endoscopy (1326 vs. 1616 seconds; P = 0.009). Responses to questionnaires showed that 94 % - 100 % of participants considered SPACE to provide improved exposure and more uniform tissue tension than conventional endoscopy. Other data were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: SPACE is feasible, safe, and potentially effective for complicated endoscopic procedures, such as ESD. SPACE improves and standardizes endoscopic exposure and tissue tension. A clinical study is required to further confirm its safety and clinical effectiveness.

Clinical advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection over endoscopic mucosal resection for early mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: In previous series, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has been used for the treatment of early-stage mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers to preserve patients' quality of life. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) offers potential advantages in comparison to EMR. So the aim of this retrospective study was to assess the utility of ESD compared with EMR for early-stage cancers of the meso- and hypopharynx. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 56 patients with 69 lesions who underwent either EMR or ESD between April 2001 and December 2008. EMR was performed until January 2007, and ESD was performed from February 2007 onward. We evaluated the en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, and treatment-related complications as short-term outcomes. Local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, and disease-related deaths were compared to evaluate long-term outcomes. RESULTS: The en bloc and R0 resection rates were respectively 98 % and 79 % in the ESD group and 37 % and 26 % in the EMR group. There were no cases of treatment-related complications in the EMR group, but postoperative subcutaneous emphysema was observed in two patients in the ESD group. In the EMR group, one patient developed a local recurrence and one developed metastasis to the cervical lymph node and died of primary cancer. CONCLUSIONS: ESD is a useful method of treatment for early mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers and may be superior to EMR.

A phase I study evaluating tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of L-menthol in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Peppermint oil has been shown to relax gastrointestinal smooth muscle. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study, an L-menthol preparation, NPO-11, was assessed for tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Single doses of NPO-11, as high as 320 mg, were well tolerated. NPO-11 was rapidly absorbed, with peak concentrations reached within 1 h after administration. Approximately 70% of the administered L-menthol and its metabolites were excreted in the urine, and this amount fluctuated with no change in the dose. The principal metabolite identified in plasma and urine was menthol glucuronide. The other metabolites include mono- or di-hydroxylated menthol derivatives, most of which are excreted, in part, as glucuronic acid conjugates. The pharmacokinetic data indicated that when NPO-11 is sprayed directly onto the gastric mucosa, it is rapidly metabolized to glucuronic acid conjugates that are excreted in urine. The findings from this study provide new data on the safety and PK of NPO-11 and support further trials.

Comparison of standard endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus an optimized ESD technique for the colon: an animal study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a promising therapeutic technique for en bloc resection of large gastrointestinal tumors. However, this technique has disadvantages such as a long intervention time, complexity of the procedure, and a higher rate of complications. The primary aims of the study were to show the feasibility of ESD in the pig colon and to evaluate a new ESD technique comprising the use of a newly developed hybrid knife for colon procedures combining RF (radiofrequency) application and a distance-dependent water-jet application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ESD was conducted at three different locations in the colon according to the computer-generated randomization list, using either the standard technique (injection needle, flex knife, and hook knife as therapeutic instruments and DRY CUT and SWIFT COAG as RF currents), or the new ESD technique (hybrid knife as the therapeutic instrument combined with the new cutting mode ENDO CUT D) in 12 healthy pigs. The perforation and bleeding rates were documented and statistically analyzed. Intervention time, resected specimen size, thermal and mechanical damage of the resection bed, and number of instrument changes required were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 16 and 18 ESD procedures were performed by the standard and new techniques, respectively. Complete en bloc resection was achieved in all cases. The standard ESD technique showed a perforation rate of 25 % (4/16) whereas the new ESD technique resulted in a 5.5 % perforation rate (1/18) ( P = 0.035); bleeding rates were similar. The new ESD technique was significantly safer compared with the standard ESD technique. CONCLUSIONS: A new ESD technique for the successful en bloc resection in thin-walled regions such as pig colon has been described. This procedure is as effective as the standard procedure but is easier to handle and significantly safer.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Application of the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique, as well as elevation of the larynx in cooperation with an otolaryngologist, under general anesthesia has enabled en-block resection of early mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the safety of ESD and the efficacy of the elevation of the larynx for treatment of early mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 16 lesions in 13 patients who underwent ESD. To provide a sufficient working space, the larynx was elevated under direct laryngoscopy, and a tube was inserted and fixed onto the laryngeal side using the slot on the back of the laryngoscope. RESULTS: The median maximum diameter of the lesions was 12.5 mm (range 2 - 37 mm). The en-block resection rate was 93.8 %. Lateral surgical margins in two patients were difficult to evaluate for technical reasons. The tube could not be removed from four patients on the day of the procedure due to laryngeal edema caused by the local injection. No serious complications were observed. Oral food intake was possible after a mean of 3.3 postoperative days. CONCLUSIONS: With adequate intraoperative and postoperative management, ESD with elevation of the larynx may be very efficient and safe for endoscopic treatment of pharyngeal lesions.

Feasibility of electrocautery snaring as the final step of endoscopic submucosal dissection for stomach epithelial neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a novel endoluminal technique that permits the resection of gastric neoplasms. AIM: To analyse the feasibility of snaring as the final step of ESD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and ninety-nine consecutive gastric neoplasms resected by four ESD experts from January 2004 to May 2007 were investigated. Forty-five (22.6%) were finally resected finally using a snare. Rates of en bloc resection, complete (R0 plus en bloc) resection, mean operation time, and complications were assessed between the snaring and the non-snaring groups. RESULTS: En bloc resection rate was significantly lower and delayed bleeding rate was significantly higher in the snaring group than in the non-snaring group (91.1% [41/45] vs. 100% [154/154], 11.1% [5/45] vs. 1.9% [3/154], respectively), although complete resection rate (86.7% [39/45] vs. 92.9% [143/154]) and mean operation time (70.2 min vs. 75.8 min) were not significantly different between the two groups. Six perforation cases (3 [6.7%] in the snaring group, 3 [1.9%] in the non-snaring group) were observed, but snaring did not lead to perforation in any case. When the subjects were divided into small (< or = 2 cm) and large (> 2 cm) tumours, en bloc resection rate in large tumours was still significantly different between the groups (76.9% [10/13] vs. 100% [67/67]), whereas in small tumours it was no longer significantly different (96.9% [31/32] vs. 100% [87/87]). CONCLUSIONS: Snaring may facilitate successful ESD for smaller tumours, but multiple-piece resection should be taken into account especially for larger tumours.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a widely accepted method for treating gastrointestinal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESD for gastric cancer in patients with liver cirrhosis. A total of 18 gastric cancers were treated by ESD in 15 patients with cirrhosis. The rate of en bloc resection was 88.9% (16/18). En bloc resection with tumor-free lateral/basal margins (R0 resection) was 77.8% (14/18). Three patients had postoperative bleeding and underwent emergency gastroscopy for hemostasis. No recurrence was observed during the median follow-up of 21.4 months, excluding three patients in whom additional endoscopic resection or surgery was carried out. ESD can be safely performed for gastric cancer in patients with cirrhosis, resulting in a high en bloc resection rate.

Successful nonsurgical management of perforation complicating endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasms.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a novel technique used for the treatment of gastrointestinal neoplasia. One of its major limitations, however, is the complication of perforation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included in our study all the cases of perforation that occurred during ESD procedures for gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia between February 2000 and February 2005. Clinical outcomes after perforation were investigated. RESULTS: Perforation was experienced at 27 lesions in 27 patients (four in the esophagus, fourteen in the stomach, seven in the colon, and two in the rectum). Fibrosis under the lesions was confirmed histologically in seven patients (26 %). Immediate closure using endoclips was performed in all patients except for three asymptomatic patients in whom a stomach perforation was first noticed when free air was noticed on a radiograph the morning after the ESD procedure. Air accumulation was detected radiographically in 21 patients (78 %). The mean duration of antibiotic treatment was 6.7 days and the patients were fasted for a mean period of 5.3 days. The mean maximum body temperature was 37.3 degrees C, the mean white blood cell count was 9733/mm3, and the mean C-reactive protein level was 5.0 mg/dl. All the patients were discharged well from the ward after a mean time of 12.1 days after ESD, and no recurrence caused by tumor spread from the perforation occurred in any patient after a median follow-up period of 36 months (range 9 - 52 months). CONCLUSION: Successful nonsurgical management after ESD complicated by perforation is a highly feasible option if intensive conservative treatments are used following immediate endoscopic closure of the perforation.

Correlation of serum pepsinogens and gross appearances combined with histology in early gastric cancer.

The correlation between serum pepsinogen (PG) levels and the gross types was investigated in 128 consecutive patients with early gastric cancer. Although there was no significant difference in age, gender, cancer location, or cancer depth among gross appearances, the distribution of histological type was significantly different between polypoid and depressed cancers: all polypoid cancers except one were intestinal type, whereas nearly a third of depressed cancers were diffuse type. All the patients in whom Helicobacter pylori status was investigated had Helicobacterpylori infection. Combination of gross appearances and histology (polypoid cancer with intestinal type, depressed cancer with intestinal type and depressed cancer with diffuse type) showed a clear difference in distribution of serum PG levels and a ratio between levels of PG I and PG II (I/II ratio). In polypoid cancer with intestinal type, a PG I level and a I/II ratio were significantly lower than those of the others. In depressed cancer with diffuse type, PG I and PG II levels were significantly higher. These findings revealed that backgrounds such as intragastric acidity and extent of gastric atrophy might differ among early gastric cancers with different morphology and histology.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasia: experience with the flex-knife.

Although the standard treatment for gastric neoplasia is still surgical resection, endoscopic resection has been accepted for some of these lesions in an early stage. Among several methods of endoscopic resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection has been developed to remove the lesions in an en bloc fashion regardless of size, shape, coexisting ulcer, and location. However, indication of endoscopic submucosal dissection is strictly confined by two aspects; those are the possibility of nodal metastases and technical difficulty. Nowadays, several knives for endoscopic submucosal dissection are available and each of them has some merits and demerits. We describe how to perform endoscopic submucosal dissection in the stomach by using the flex-knife, a new endoscopic device specifically designed for submucosal dissection, emphasizing its special features from our experience.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal epithelial neoplasia.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The technique of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has recently been developed for en-bloc resection of gastric tumors. For oncological reasons and in order to improve the patients' quality of life, it may be desirable to use the same technique for rectal neoplasia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients with rectal neoplasia who had a preoperative diagnosis of large intraepithelial neoplasias with submucosal fibrosis or located on the rectal folds were enrolled. ESD was carried out with the same technique previously described for the stomach, with some modifications. The efficacy, complications, and follow-up results of the treatment were assessed. RESULTS: The rates of en-bloc resection and en-bloc plus R0 resection were 88.6 % (31 of 35) and 62.9 % (22 of 35), respectively. Hemoglobin levels did not drop by more than 2 g/dl in any of the patients after ESD. None of the patients had to receive blood transfusions or undergo emergency colonoscopy due to bleeding during ESD or hematochezia after ESD. Perforation during ESD occurred in two patients (5.7 %), who were managed with conservative medical treatment after endoscopic closure of the perforation. Excluding three patients in whom additional surgery was carried out, all but one of 32 patients were free of recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 36 months (range 12 - 60 months). The exception was a patient in whom a multiple-piece resection was required; the recurrent (residual) tumor, found 2 months after ESD, was a small adenoma that was again treated endoscopically. CONCLUSIONS: ESD is applicable in the rectum with promising results, but the technique is still at a developmental stage and patients should be informed of the potential risks.

Histopathologic characteristics of gastric ulcers created by endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: We have previously reported that gastric ulcers artificially created by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) would heal within 8 weeks regardless of size and location. The details of the healing process remain unclear, and we aimed to clarify the mechanism by histopathological investigation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 21 post-ESD ulcers were examined histopathologically, using surgically resected specimens from patients who had subsequently undergone gastrectomy due to submucosal invasion and/or lymphovascular infiltration by the tumor. The grade of ulcer, appearance of regenerative mucosa, scar formation, and extent of fibrosis were evaluated. RESULTS: Fibrosis and wall thickening were observed from 2 weeks after ESD, but regenerative mucosa was not observed until 5 weeks. Among 12 patients who underwent gastrectomy later than 8 weeks after ESD, a mucosal defect was still observed in two patients. In these two patients the lesion was associated with severe fibrosis due to previous peptic ulcer or submucosal invasion by the lesion. CONCLUSION: Size reduction in these ulcers occurs by contraction in the early phase, then regenerative mucosa covers the remaining mucosal defect within 8 weeks. If there is fibrosis under the lesion before ESD, there is a possibility that the artificially created ulcer will not heal within 8 weeks.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for tumors of the esophagogastric junction.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The esophagogastric junction (EGJ) has been considered a difficult location for endoscopic treatment of tumors, due to its narrow lumen and sharp angle. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a method of endoscopic resection, capable of removing large tumors in an en bloc fashion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESD for EGJ tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For 30 lesions of EGJ tumors treated by ESD, the size of the lesions and resected specimens, the en bloc resection rate, complications, and local recurrence were assessed. RESULTS: The average maximum diameters of the lesions and resected specimens were 22.4 mm and 40.6 mm respectively. The complete en bloc resection (R0) rate was 97% (29/30). Histological evaluation of the resected specimens revealed five cases of angiolymphatic invasion and five cases of submucosal invasion deeper than 500 microm. Perforation occurred in one case but was safely managed by rotatable clips and administration of antibiotics for 3 days. Local recurrence was not observed in any patient during follow-up (mean 14.6 months, range 6-31 months). CONCLUSIONS: ESD can be safely performed for EGJ tumors, with a high en bloc resection rate. For lesions with no apparent submucosal invasion findings, ESD is a curative and diagnostic treatment option that may be considered before open surgery.

The useful combination of a higher frequency miniprobe and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of T1 esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: There are few published data on the discrimination ability of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) among each subdivision of T1 cancer, and overdiagnosis is an unsolved problem that eventually causes overtreatment. The purpose of this study was to verify whether our treatment strategy incorporating EUS realizes a tailored patient management of T1 esophageal cancer. METHODS: This study comprised 20 esophageal cancer patients undergoing 12- to 20-MHz miniprobes for T staging and a 7.5-MHz dedicated echoendoscope for N staging. Initial therapy constituted endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for endosonographically node-negative, mucosal, or slight submucosal cancers and a primary esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy for deeper cancers. If the ESD specimen revealed no cancer involvement of the muscularis mucosa, the patients entered a follow-up program; otherwise, they were advised to undergo a subsequent esophagectomy and three-field lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: Perfect discrimination accuracy was achieved among T1, T2, and T3 cancers. Whether cancer depth was up to the slight submucosal layer or deeper was correctly differentiated in 12 of 14 T1 cancers (86%). EUS categorized all patients correctly into candidates for either ESD or surgery. The pathological cancer depth of the resected specimens revealed that no patients experienced unnecessary overtreatment. CONCLUSIONS: A higher frequency miniprobe is useful for the detailed evaluation of cancer depth, contributing to decision making for treatment options of T1 esophageal cancer. A miniprobe and echoendoscope in combination with ESD provide an appropriately tailored management plan on an individual basis, avoiding unnecessary treatment or indicating radical surgery.