Intraoperative Use of Vasopressors Is Safe in Head and Neck Free Tissue Transfer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to identify whether intraoperative use of vasoactive medications increases the risk of free flap failure or complications through a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched for studies published through January 2015. English publications that met the following criteria were included: (1) adult patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction; (2) comparison of patients with and without intraoperative vasopressor administration; and (3) documentation of flap failure rate and/or flap complications. The primary outcome was the incidence of flap failure. The secondary outcome was the incidence of overall flap complications. Meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled odds ratios (ORs) of the effect of intraoperative use of vasopressors on flap failure and complication rates. RESULTS: Four cohort studies met inclusion criteria. All studies were of high methodological quality with an average Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score of 18.75 (range 16-23). A total of 933 patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the incidence of flap failure (2.9 vs. 3.6%; OR, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-1.99; p = 0.48) or incidence of flap complications (16.8 vs. 18.6%; OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.60-1.42; p = 0.71). CONCLUSION: Based on the current evidence, intraoperative use of vasopressors has no impact on the incidence of flap failure or flap complications.

Efficacy and Safety of Povidone-Iodine Irrigation in Reducing the Risk of Capsular Contracture in Aesthetic Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Capsular contracture is common and distressing after aesthetic breast augmentation. The precise cause of capsular contracture is not well established. This systematic review investigates current available evidence regarding perioperative povidone-iodine irrigation safety and efficacy in reducing capsular contracture. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for publications through December of 2014. Studies with the following criteria were included: (1) primary breast augmentation with implants; (2) perioperative povidone-iodine use; and (3) documentation of capsular contracture. Our primary outcome was incidence of Baker class III/IV capsular contracture. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed independently. Trials were meta-analyzed to obtain a pooled odds ratio describing the effect of povidone-iodine irrigation on Baker class III/IV capsular contracture. RESULTS: Nine studies with a total of 5153 patients undergoing aesthetic breast augmentation with implants were included. Only three comparative studies achieved high methodologic quality. The meta-analysis included four studies, with 1191 patients receiving povidone-iodine irrigation and 595 patients receiving saline irrigation. The meta-analysis favored povidone-iodine irrigation for decreasing Baker class III/IV capsular contracture (2.7 percent versus 8.9 percent; OR, 0.30; 95 percent CI, 0.18 to 0.50; p < 0.00001; I = 0 percent). The reported implant rupture rates for both saline implants and silicone implants were less than 1 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative povidone-iodine irrigation reduces Baker class III/IV capsular contracture and is not associated with implant rupture. Low methodologic quality of included studies limits recommendations for perioperative povidone-iodine irrigation as the standard of practice. Additional high-quality trials are warranted to corroborate the findings of this meta-analysis. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Mastectomy Weight and Tissue Expander Volume Predict Necrosis and Increased Costs Associated with Breast Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Impaired vascular perfusion in tissue expander (TE) breast reconstruction leads to mastectomy skin necrosis. We investigated factors and costs associated with skin necrosis in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. METHODS: Retrospective review of 169 women with immediate TE placement following mastectomy between May 1, 2009 and May 31, 2013 was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Logistic regression analysis on individual variables was performed to determine the effects of tissue expander fill volume and mastectomy specimen weight on skin necrosis. Billing data was obtained to determine the financial burden associated with necrosis. RESULTS: This study included 253 breast reconstructions with immediate TE placement from 169 women. Skin necrosis occurred in 20 flaps for 15 patients (8.9%). Patients with hypertension had 8 times higher odds of skin necrosis [odd ratio (OR), 8.10, P < 0.001]. Patients with TE intraoperative fill volumes >300 cm(3) had 10 times higher odds of skin necrosis (OR, 10.66, P =0.010). Volumes >400 cm(3) had 15 times higher odds of skin necrosis (OR, 15.56, P = 0.002). Mastectomy specimen weight was correlated with skin necrosis. Specimens >500 g had 10 times higher odds of necrosis and specimens >1000 g had 18 times higher odds of necrosis (OR, 10.03 and OR, 18.43; P =0.003 and P <0.001, respectively). Mastectomy skin necrosis was associated with a 50% increased inpatient charge. CONCLUSION: Mastectomy flap necrosis is associated with HTN, larger TE volumes and mastectomy specimen weights, resulting in increased inpatient charges. Conservative TE volumes should be considered for patients with hypertension and larger mastectomy specimens.

Do adjunctive flap-monitoring technologies impact clinical decision making? An analysis of microsurgeon preferences and behavior by body region.

BACKGROUND: Multiple perfusion assessment technologies exist to identify compromised microvascular free flaps. The effectiveness, operability, and cost of each technology vary. The authors investigated surgeon preference and clinical behavior with several perfusion assessment technologies. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to members of the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery concerning perceptions and frequency of use of several technologies in varied clinical situations. Demographic information was also collected. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated using multinomial logistic regression accounting for clustering of similar practices within institutions/regions. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 157 of 389 participants (40.4 percent response rate). Handheld Doppler was the most commonly preferred free flap-monitoring technology (56.1 percent), followed by implantable Doppler (22.9 percent) and cutaneous tissue oximetry (16.6 percent). Surgeons were significantly more likely to opt for immediate take-back to the operating room when presented with a concerning tissue oximetry readout compared with a concerning handheld Doppler signal (OR, 2.82; p < 0.01), whereas other technologies did not significantly alter postoperative management more than simple handheld Doppler. Clinical decision making did not significantly differ by demographics, training, or practice setup. CONCLUSIONS: Although most surgeons still prefer to use standard handheld Doppler for free flap assessment, respondents were significantly more likely to opt for immediate return to the operating room for a concerning tissue oximetry reading than an abnormal Doppler signal. This suggests that tissue oximetry may have the greatest impact on clinical decision making in the postoperative period.