Prognostic impact of the radiological infiltrative feature of primary renal tumor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Recent studies suggest that the radiological infiltrative feature (r-IF) of renal tumors is strongly correlated with poor oncologic outcomes in locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study investigated the prognostic impact of r-IF of primary renal tumors in metastatic RCC (mRCC) in comparison with International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk model. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 91 patients with previously untreated mRCC. Dynamic computed tomography of the primary renal tumor was reviewed to assess r-IF, defined as a focally/extensively ill-defined tumor interface with normal renal parenchyma. RESULTS: The median age was 67 years, and 69 patients (76%) were men. Prior nephrectomy was performed in 47 patients (52%). The median size of the primary renal tumor was 6.7 cm, and 50 patients (55%) presented with cT3-4 stage. Overall, 25 (28%)/52 (57%)/14 (15%) patients were classified into IMDC favorable/intermediate/poor-risk groups, respectively. An image review identified r-IFs in the primary renal tumor in 40 patients (44%). The incidences of r-IFs were 28%/46%/64% in IMDC favorable/intermediate/poor-risk groups, respectively. During a median follow-up of 2.6 years, 31 patients (34%) died of RCC. On multivariable analysis, r-IF and IMDC intermediate-poor risks were independently associated with poor cancer-specific survival (CSS). Two-year CSS were 64%/87% in patients with/without r-IF, respectively. C-index was improved from 0.73 to 0.81 by adding r-IF to the IMDC risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: R-IF of the primary renal tumor was an independent risk factor for poor CSS in patients with mRCC, which may improve the prognostic accuracy when combined with the IMDC risk model.

Succinate dehydrogenase-deficient malignant paraganglioma complicated by succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinoma.

Introduction: SDH Gene mutation is known to be a common cause of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma and renal cell carcinoma. Here, we report a case of succinate dehydrogenase B-deficient paraganglioma, which has a high risk of metastasis and recurrence, complicated by succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinoma, which is rare and accounts for approximately 0.1% of all renal cell carcinomas. Case presentation: A 50-year-old man underwent en bloc resection of a retroperitoneal tumor and the right kidney for retroperitoneal paraganglioma and right renal tumor. Both tumors showed negative expressions of succinate dehydrogenase B in immunostaining. The patient was diagnosed with succinate dehydrogenase-deficient paraganglioma and succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinoma. Seventeen months later, retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy revealed lymph node metastasis of the paraganglioma. Deletion of the SDHB gene was revealed by genome sequencing of the lymph node. Conclusion: This is the first reported case of synchronously diagnosed succinate dehydrogenase-deficient paraganglioma and succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinoma.