A case of a recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma extending to the inferior vena cava (IVC) after the primary fertility-sparing surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: A case of Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) invading the great vessels is rare. CASE PRESENTATION: A 34-year-old female who had no past history presented to a previous hospital with abdominal distension. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 15 cm pelvic mass beside the uterus, and only the pelvic mass was removed at the surgery. The tumor was judged to be a LG-ESS. The patient chose to be observed to preserve her fertility, and no adjuvant treatment was undertaken. Two years later, she was referred to our hospital due to recurrence of the pelvic mass. Enhanced computed tomography revealed a large tumor in the vena cava which extended from the left internal iliac vein and which originated from the pelvic tumor. An operation was performed by a multidisciplinary team. Complete resection of the tumor was achieved with a radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, removal of recurrent pelvic masses and the intravascular tumor. We diagnosed a recurrence of LG-ESS. She received a postoperative adjuvant therapy of LG-ESS. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Patients with fertility-sparing treatment had higher recurrence rates. In cases of tumor intravenous extension, we should make every effort to extract the tumor to avoid sudden death. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in treating this rare tumor with intravascular extension. In particular, patients with LG-ESS who receive fertility-sparing surgery should undertake postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy in order to reduce the risk of recurrence, as was in this case.

Rapid reduction of adenomyosis coexisting with leiomyoma volume during treatment with Relugolix.

OBJECTIVE: This study elucidated the efficacy of Relugolix (REL) on the reduction of uterine volume and clinical symptoms for the treatment of adenomyosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who received REL (40 mg for about 20 weeks) and who underwent a hysterectomy for adenomyosis or fibroids. We divided patients into two groups: adenomyosis coexisting with fibroids (Group A) and fibroids only (Group B); the groups were determined by a postoperative pathological examination. The primary end points were the percent reduction in uterine volume, adenomyotic lesion, and the largest fibroid volume at week 16. The secondary end points were the rate of amenorrhea, pelvic pain, and anemia at week 12. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients participated in the current study: 20 in Group A and 36 in Group B. Regarding the largest fibroid volume, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Uterine volume after REL treatment was significantly decreased in Group A (43%), as compared to Group B (27%) (p = .00972), In Group A, adenomyotic lesion was decreased by 61%. Irrespective of the group, adenomyosis showed a significant reduction compared to uterine fibroids (p < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in the mitigation of symptoms (amenorrhea, pelvic pain, and anemia) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: REL is more effective in reducing adenomyotic lesion than uterine fibroids and in relieving symptoms (amenorrhea, pelvic pain, and anemia). It can be expected that REL will also be used as a preoperative treatment for adenomyosis.

Uterine rupture in intramural ectopic pregnancy: A case report.

Intramural pregnancy is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy. It is defined by a gestation within the uterine wall, completely surrounded by myometrium and separated from the uterine cavity and the fallopian tube. We report a rare case of intramural ectopic pregnancy. If a patient has a history of intrauterine surgery or myomectomy, the possibility of intramural pregnancy, although rare, should not be ruled out.

A case of synchronous serous ovarian cancer and uterine serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC) is now considered to represent an early stage of uterine serous carcinoma (USC). It is an intraepithelial lesion but has been reported to cause extrauterine metastases. We report a case of SEIC with serous ovarian carcinoma and lymph node metastasis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 57-year-old post-menopausal woman (gravida 3, para 2, SA1) was referred to our hospital with lower abdominal pain. An ultrasound and MRI showed that the ovary had swollen to 8 cm in size and had a solid lesion. The uterus was normal. The patient underwent exploratory laparoscopy on the suspicion of torsion of the ovarian tumor. Intraoperative findings showed a right ovarian tumor, but no ovarian tumor torsion was observed. A small amount of bloody ascites was found in the Douglas fossa, and bleeding was observed from the tumor itself. A right salpingo-oophorectomy was then performed. Histopathological results revealed a high-grade serous carcinoma. Forty days after the first surgery, we performed a staging laparotomy: a total abdominal hysterectomy, left salpingo-oophorectomy, systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy, and a partial omentectomy. A complete cytoreduction was achieved. In the pathological examination, the invasion of the serous carcinoma was observed in the left ovarian ligament, and lymph node metastasis was found in the paraaortic lymph nodes. Atypical columnar cells formed irregular papillary lesions which had proliferated in the endometrium, and this was diagnosed as SEIC. The final diagnosis was serous ovarian cancer, FIGO stage IIIA1(ii), pT2bN1M0, with SEIC. CONCLUSION: We report a case of SEIC with synchronous serous carcinoma of the adnexa uteri. Both were serous carcinomas and, thus, it was difficult to identify the primary lesion. The distinction between metastatic cancer and two independent primary tumors is important for an accurate diagnosis and tumor staging. Histological diagnostic criteria remain controversial, and further development of a method for differentiating between both diseases is required.

Long-Acting Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonist for Ovarian Hyperstimulation Induced by Tamoxifen for Breast Cancer.

Tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer may induce ovarian cysts and supraphysiological levels of serum estrogen. We report successful management with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist of ovarian hyperstimulation induced by tamoxifen. A 49-year-old woman was operated on for invasive ductal carcinoma of the right breast. She received breast irradiation and adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. After 2 years, she had a cystic ovarian mass, and her serum concentration of estradiol was 1280 pg/mL. She was treated with an injection of 11.25 mg leuprolide acetate, a long-acting LHRH agonist, without abandoning tamoxifen therapy. The levels of estradiol decreased to <10 pg/mL and the cystic mass disappeared 2 months later. Three-month depot treatment with LHRH agonists can be useful for patients receiving tamoxifen for breast cancer who have ovarian cysts and supraphysiological levels of estrogen.

In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer pregnancy was a risk factor for hemorrhagic shock in women with placental polyp.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for hemorrhagic shock in women with placental polyp. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve women (group A) developed hemorrhagic shock (shock index<1.5) and received uterine artery embolization (UAE). The other 25 women (group B) had shock index<1.5 and did not receive UAE. All women underwent transcervical resection (TCR). The risk factors for the development of hemorrhagic shock, including the age, conception mode, numbers of previous abortion, gestational weeks at termination of pregnancy (TOP), blood loss weights at TOP and at TCR, were analyzed. RESULTS: When compared with group B, group A had higher in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) pregnancy rate (58.3 versus 12.0%, p<0.01), number of previous abortion (median 1.58 versus 0.68, p<0.05), gestational weeks at TOP (median 36.5 versus 17.0 weeks, p<0.05), and blood loss weight at TOP (median 2151 versus 40 g, p<0.05). A logistic regression analysis reveled that IVF-ET (OR 41, 95% CI 1.3-1264) and blood loss weight at TOP (1.0025, 1.0006-1.0044) were independent risk factors for hemorrhagic shock. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, IVF-ET pregnancy was found to be a risk factor for the development of hemorrhagic shock in women with placental polyp.