Are changes in patient-reported outcomes prognostic for diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma survival? Results from the GOYA trial.

In this hypothesis-generating analysis, we examined whether longitudinal changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as symptoms, over time would be prognostic for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who were newly treated with obinutuzumab (G) in combination with CHOP (G-CHOP) or rituximab (R) with CHOP (R-CHOP), in the GOYA Phase 3 trial (NCT01287741). Our results show that from the study baseline to cycle 3 day 1, every 1-point increase (worsening) in fever symptoms was associated with a 41% higher risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; P = 0.01). Every 1-point increase (worsening) in lumps or swelling symptoms was associated with a 27% higher risk of disease progression or death (PFS events) (HR, 1.27; P = 0.01) and a 29% higher risk of death (OS events) (HR, 1.29; P = 0.02). No significant associations were observed between survival and changes in other symptoms, such as itching. Our study suggests that changes in some PROs are related to survival in DLBCL patients.

Real-world impact of patient-reported outcome measurement on overall survival, healthcare use and treatment discontinuation in cancer patients.

Aim: The purpose of this retrospective, population-based, observational cohort analysis was to assess whether routine patient-reported outcomes (PRO) monitoring alone has an impact on real-world overall survival (OS) and hospitalizations among individuals diagnosed with lung, breast or colorectal cancer. The importance of follow-up care in post-PRO data collection was also discussed. Patients & methods: Administrative databases covering 17 cancer centers from Alberta, Canada were queried and individuals ≥18 years old and diagnosed with lung, breast or colorectal cancer from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2019 were included and followed until 31 December 2020. Patients were stratified by whether they received routine PRO monitoring initiated within 120 days of diagnosis and matched 1:1 with use of propensity scores based on baseline characteristics. OS was assessed from the index date to death, and the respective Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated along with hazard ratios from Cox Proportional Hazard Models. Linear and logistic regression models were used to estimate mean differences and odds ratios (OR) respectively for healthcare resource utilization events including cancer physician visits, emergency department visits and outpatient ambulatory care encounters. Results: 4800 patients were included in each matched cohort. There was no statistically significant difference between PRO monitoring and non-monitoring cohorts in OS (HR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.93-1.09; p = 0.836) and treatment discontinuation (OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.85-1.12; p = 0.75). Median OS was 51.5 months for unmonitored cohort (95% CI: 47.5-NA) versus 50.6 months for monitored cohort (95% CI: 47.6-55.7). Compared with PRO-monitored patients, unmonitored patients were associated with lower hospitalization risks (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03-1.22; p = 0.01). However, PRO-monitored patients experienced significantly fewer physician visits in comparison to unmonitored patients (MD = -1.036; 95% CI: -1.288 to -0.784, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our results show that capturing patient-reported symptoms alone reduced the number of physician visits but neither reduced hospitalizations nor improved OS in this real-world cancer population. To drive more meaningful clinical impact, PRO monitoring programs must be met with rigorous follow-up response to the identified symptoms.

Real-World Biomarker Test Utilization and Subsequent Treatment in Patients with Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States, 2011-2021.

INTRODUCTION: Biomarker testing is increasingly crucial for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (eNSCLC). We explored biomarker test utilization and subsequent treatment in eNSCLC patients in the real-world setting. METHODS: Using COTA's oncology database, this retrospective observational study included adult patients ≥ 18 years old diagnosed with eNSCLC (disease stage 0-IIIA) between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2021. Date of first eNSCLC diagnosis was the study index date. We reported testing rates by index year for patients who received any biomarker test within 6 months of eNSCLC diagnosis and by each molecular marker. We also evaluated treatments received among patients receiving the five most common biomarker tests. RESULTS: Among the 1031 eNSCLC patients included in the analysis, 764 (74.1%) received ≥ 1 biomarker test within 6 months of eNSCLC diagnosis. Overall, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; 64%), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK; 60%), programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1; 48%), ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1; 46%), B-Raf proto-oncogene (40%), mesenchymal epithelial transition factor receptor (35%), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (29%), RET proto-oncogene (22%), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (21%), and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (20%) were the 10 most frequently tested biomarkers. The proportion of patients undergoing biomarker testing rose from 55.3% in 2011 to 88.1% in 2021. The most common testing methods were Sanger sequencing for EGFR (244, 37%), FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) for ALK (464, 75%) and ROS1 (357, 76%), immunohistochemical assay for PD-L1 (450, 90%), and next-generation sequencing testing for other biomarkers. Almost all the 763 patients who received the five most common biomarker tests had a test before the initiation of a systemic treatment. CONCLUSION: This study suggests a high biomarker testing rate among patients with eNSCLC in the US, with testing rates for various biomarkers increasing over the past decade, indicating a continuous trend towards the personalization of treatment decisions.

Adherence to guidelines-recommended diagnostic testing was associated with overall survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after rituximab-based treatment: an observational cohort study.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the impact of adherence to guidelines-recommended diagnostic testing on treatment selection and overall survival (OS) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) initiated on rituximab-based first line of treatment (1-LOT). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database, including diagnostic testing information on immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and karyotype analysis that were abstracted from pathology reports or clinical visit notes, where available. The study included patients above 18 years old who were diagnosed with DLBCL between January 2011 and December 2019 and initiated on rituximab-based 1-LOT. Patients were classified into 'non-adherence,' 'partial-adherence' and 'complete-adherence' groups according to the evidence/documentation of a confirmed known result for IHC and molecular profiling tests (FISH and karyotyping) on a selection of the markers prior to the initiation of 1-LOT. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations of adherence to diagnostic testing with 1-LOT between R-CHOP and other rituximab-based regimens. Median OS after the start of rituximab-based 1-LOT was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the risk of all-cause death after initiation of 1-LOT by the degrees of adherence to guidelines-recommended diagnostic testing. RESULTS: In total, 3730 patients with DLBCL who initiated on rituximab-based 1-LOT were included. No association was found between adherence to guidelines-recommended diagnostic testing and treatment selection of 1-LOT for R-CHOP versus other rituximab-based regimens. Patients with a higher degree of adherence to guidelines-recommended diagnostic testing survived longer (median OS at 5.1, 6.9 and 7.1 years for 'non-adherence,' 'partial-adherence' and 'complete-adherence' groups, respectively [log-rank p < 0.001]) and had a decreased mortality risk (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio with 95% confidence intervals at 0.83 [0.70-0.99] for 'partial-adherence' and 0.77 [0.64-0.91] for 'complete-adherence' groups, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients' adherence to guidelines-recommended diagnostic testing were associated with better survival benefit, reinforcing the need for adoption of diagnostic testing guidelines in routine clinical care.

National burden of achondroplasia: an analysis of the National Inpatient and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Samples.

Background: To estimate the cost of US hospital admissions and outpatient surgeries associated with achondroplasia. Materials & methods: Using 2017 data from nationally representative databases, this study identifies hospital admissions and outpatient encounters with an achondroplasia diagnosis. Descriptive measures are reported. Results: There were 1985 achondroplasia admissions nationwide. The most frequent admissions were neonatal care (33.7%) in children and musculoskeletal (22.7%) in adults. Average hospital length of stay was 6.8 days, 2.2 days longer than the US mean. Total mean inpatient costs were US$19,959, $7789 greater than the US mean. In the outpatient setting, children 5-14 years accounted for 56.9% of procedures. Conclusion: Achondroplasia is a serious condition with a wide range of lifelong complications frequently requiring hospitalization and surgical intervention.