Cost-Effectiveness of Denosumab for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a progressive skeletal disease associated with an increased risk of bone fracture. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of denosumab for osteoporotic fracture prevention compared to bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and zoledronate) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene) in a cohort of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: A Markov model was used to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of denosumab versus comparators. The model had a cycle length of 6 months and was run from the age of 68 years to individual patients' lifetime or the age of 100 years. The health states considered in the model were well, hip fracture, vertebral fracture, wrist fracture, other osteoporotic fracture, post-hip fracture, post-vertebral fracture, and death. Recent local data were used as inputs for the model parameters. A discount rate of 4.5% was applied to both costs and outcomes. RESULTS: From the perspective of the healthcare system, denosumab was cost-effective or cost-saving compared to all comparators, considering one unit of Korea's gross domestic product per capita, USA dollar (USD) 34,870. Denosumab was cost-saving compared to ibandronate (oral) and raloxifene. Compared to alendronate, denosumab was cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD 767.10 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The ICER of denosumab vs. ibandronate IV, risedronate, and zoledronate was USD 685.63, USD 1,469.71, USD 4,668.53 per QALY, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this analysis suggest that denosumab is a cost-effective therapeutic option for preventing fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in South Korea.

Zoledronic acid and skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastatic cancer or multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Investigations of ZA effectiveness using large, real-world databases are rare. We examined whether zoledronic acid (ZA) decreased the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) among patients with bone metastases (BMs) from breast cancer (BC) or prostate cancer (PC), or multiple myeloma (MM) in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance database. Our cohort included patients diagnosed with BM after BC or PC, or MM between 2004 and 2015. SRE was defined as having a record of pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation, or surgery to bone. The incidence of multiple SREs was calculated according to SRE history. We calculated the incidence rate ratio (IRR) to examine the relative difference in the risk of SREs of ZA users compared to those of ZA non-user. RESULTS: Among 111,679 patients, diagnosed with BM and one of the three cancer types, 5608 were included in the analysis after propensity score matching. A decreased risk of SREs was observed for the ZA use in patients with history of SRE in BC [IRR = 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.66-0.83], PC (IRR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.73-1.02), and MM (IRR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.59-0.93). For patients without SRE history, ZA use was not associated with decreased risks of SREs, but rather increased the risks (BC: IRR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.87-2.05; PC: IRR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.54-1.80; MM: IRR = 1.92, 95% CI 1.57-2.34). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the ZA use was associated with a decreased risk of SRE for patients with SRE history. However, no preventive effects of ZA were observed for patients without history.

Incidence of skeletal-related events in patients with breast or prostate cancer-induced bone metastasis or multiple myeloma: A 12-year longitudinal nationwide healthcare database study.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the incidence of skeletal-related events (SRE) among patients with breast cancer (BC)- or prostate cancer (PC)-induced bone metastasis or multiple myeloma (MM) based on a population-based, 12-year healthcare database. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with bone metastasis from BC or PC or with MM between 2004 and 2015 were included. SRE was defined as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation, or surgery to bone. Patients were followed-up from the initial diagnosis of bone metastasis (for those with BC or PC) or MM until SRE occurrence. To estimate multiple SREs, we applied a 21-day time window to ensure that subsequent SREs occurred independently from the previous event. We calculated the incidence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), stratified according to the previous SRE history. RESULTS: Our cohort included 53,231 patients, including 23,811 with BC, 19,170 with PC, and 10,250 with MM. The incidence of multiple SREs in the 21-day time window was 1.03 (95% CI = 1.01-1.05) in patients with previous SRE history and 0.19 (95% CI = 0.19-0.20) in those without. The cumulative SRE incidences were 47%, 31.4%, and 38.0% in BC, PC, and MM patients. CONCLUSION: The incidences of multiple SREs in BC- or PC-induced bone metastasis or MM in this 12-year South Korean cohort were slightly higher than those in European countries. Our study provided real-world evidence that patients with BC- or PC-induced bone metastasis or MM are at high risk of SRE.