RESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The use of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 has been linked to renal injury in critically ill patients, but its impact on surgical patients remains uncertain. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: This study was conducted at one tertiary care hospital in China. PATIENTS: We evaluated the records of 51,926 Chinese adults who underwent noncardiac surgery from 2013 to 2022. Patients given a combination of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and crystalloids were propensity-matched at a 1: 1 ratio of baseline characteristics to patients given only crystalloids (11,725 pairs). INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients were divided into those given a combination of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and crystalloid during surgery and a reference crystalloid group consisting of patients who were not given any colloid. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the incidence of acute kidney injury. Secondarily, acute kidney injury stage, need for renal replacement therapy, intensive care unit transfer rate, and duration of postoperative hospitalization were considered. MAIN RESULTS: After matching, hydroxyethyl starch use [8.5 (IQR: 7.5-10.0) mL/kg] did not increase the incidence of acute kidney injury compared with that in the crystalloid group [2.0 vs. 2.2%, OR: 0.90 (0.74-1.08), P = 0.25]. Nor did hydroxyethyl starch use worsen acute kidney injury stage [OR 0.90 (0.75-1.08), P = 0.26]. No significant differences between the fluid groups were observed in renal replacement therapy [OR 0.60 (0.41-0.90), P = 0.02)] or intensive care unit transfers [OR 1.02 (0.95-1.09), P = 0.53] after Bonferroni correction. Even in a subset of patients at high risk of renal injury, hydroxyethyl starch use was not associated with worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 use was not significantly associated with a greater incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury compared to receiving crystalloid solutions only.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Soluções Cristaloides , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Pontuação de Propensão , Humanos , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/efeitos adversos , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , China/epidemiologia , Soluções Cristaloides/administração & dosagem , Soluções Cristaloides/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Incidência , Substitutos do Plasma/efeitos adversos , Substitutos do Plasma/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Terapia de Substituição Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The arm circumference is a feasible and reliable indicator in evaluating the nutritional status of children. However, its application in general adults has yet to be thoroughly investigated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between mid-upper arm circumferences (MUACs) and mortality in general adults. METHODS: The nationally representative cohort from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2018) was analyzed with mortality information obtained through linkage to the National Death Index. The baseline MUACs were collected as exposure. Survey-weighted Cox proportional hazard regressions were performed to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidential intervals (CIs) of mortality risk for individuals with different MUACs. Restricted cubic spline analyses were performed to examine the nonlinear association of MUAC with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. RESULTS: A total of 52,159 participants were included in this study. During a median follow-up time of 117 months, 7157 deaths were documented, with leading causes of cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and respiratory disease. Individuals in the first quartile (Q1) of MUAC tended to have higher all-cause mortality risk than the rest after full adjustment. Similarly, CVD mortality risk in Q1 was higher than that in the second quartile (Q2) and the third quartile (Q3); respiratory mortality risk in Q1 was higher than in Q2. MUAC was non-linearly associated with all-cause mortality and CVD mortality. Individuals in Q1 MUAC (≤ 29.3) tended to have higher all-cause mortality risk, with HRs (95% CIs) estimated to be 0.76 (0.67-0.87) for Q2 (29.4, 32.5), 0.69 (0.59-0.81) for Q3 (32.6, 36.0), and 0.59 (0.46-0.75) for Q4 (≥ 36.1) after adjustment of demographic, lifestyle, and comorbidity covariates. Similarly, compared with Q1, HRs (95% CIs) for CVD mortality were estimated to be 0.73 (0.58-0.93) for Q2 and 0.57 (0.43-0.47) for Q3; HRs (95% CIs) for respiratory mortality was estimated to be 0.57 (95% CI, 0.37-0.87) for Q2 with other differences not significant. CONCLUSION: The MUAC was inversely associated with long-term mortality in general adults in the United States and may serve as a valuable measurement in adult health evaluations.