Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue ; 27(9): 793-797, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34914254

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the application of a simplified technique for reconstruction of vesicourethral support (RVUS) in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). METHODS: From January 2017 to August 2019, 122 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent extraperitoneal LRP, 65 with RVUS (the RVUS group) and 57 without RVUS (the non-RVUS group). We compared the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, rate of pelvic lymph node dissection, neurovascular bundle sparing, incidence of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage (UVAUL), postoperative urinary continence, postoperative hospital stay, intraperitoneal drainage tube removal time, and urethral catheter removal time between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, rate of pelvic lymph node dissection, neurovascular bundle sparing, or urethral catheter removal time (P > 0.05). The incidence rate of UVAUL was lower in the non-RVUS than in the RVUS group (8.8% vs 0%, P < 0.05), and so were the rates of postoperative urinary continence immediate after (0% vs 32.3%, P < 0.05) and at 1 month (38.6% vs 56.9%, P < 0.05), 3 months (59.6% vs 80%, P < 0.05), 6 months (78.9% vs 84.6%, P > 0.05) and 12 months after catheter removal (87.7% vs 92.3%, P > 0.05). The postoperative hospital stay was dramatically longer in the non-RVUS than in the RVUS group (ï¼»9.1 ± 4.3ï¼½ vs ï¼»6.7 ± 1.8ï¼½ d, P < 0.01) and so was the intraperitoneal drainage tube removal time (ï¼»6.9 ± 4.5ï¼½ vs ï¼»4.8 ± 1.5ï¼½ d, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The simplified technique for reconstruction of vesicourethral support in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy improves early urinary continence, especially immediate continence, decreases the incidence rate of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage, and shortens the intraperitoneal drainage tube removal time and postoperative hospital stay.?


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Prostatectomia , Humanos , Masculino
2.
Int J Urol ; 26(6): 624-629, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30861595

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To develop a predictive model for the oncological outcomes of clear cell renal cell carcinoma in a Chinese population. METHODS: A retrospective study of 1108 patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma who underwent nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy between January 2006 and December 2013 was carried out. Recurrence-free survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Differences between the groups were compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to test associations between features and outcomes. The discriminative ability of the models was validated using Harrell's concordance index and bootstrapping. RESULTS: Overall, 942 patients who met the inclusion criteria had been followed. The median follow-up period was 72 months (range 1-143 months). Multivariate analysis showed that age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, preoperative platelet count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, tumor size, 2010 tumor stage (pT3 and pT4) and Fuhrman nuclear grade were independent risk factors affecting recurrence-free survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients (P < 0.05). These factors were assigned to develop a new model. The patients were divided into three groups based on the risk of recurrence. The difference among the prognoses of patients in the three groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The concordance index for our new model and that for Leibovich's 2018 model were 0.791 and 0.750, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the new model has a higher concordance index than does Leibovich's 2018 model of clear cell renal cell carcinoma in the Asian population, with no added pain for patients. This new model might be an appropriate risk stratification tool for clinical work.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Contagem de Linfócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Nefrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Contagem de Plaquetas , Período Pós-Operatório , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA