NUP98::NSD1 and FLT3/ITD co-expression is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in pediatric AML patients.

OBJECTIVE: Patients who carry NUP98::NSD1 or FLT3/ITD mutations are reported to have poor prognosis. Previous studies have confidently reported that the poor outcome in younger AML patients is owning to dual NUP98::NSD1 and FLT3/ITD positivity, with a high overlap for those two genetic lesions. In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of the presence of both NUP98::NSD1 and FLT3/ITD in pediatric AML patients. METHODS: We screened a large cohort of 885 pediatric cases from the COG-National Cancer Institute (NCI) TARGET AML cohort and found 57 AML patients with NUP98 rearrangements. RESULTS: The frequency of NUP98 gene fusion was 10.8% in 529 patients. NUP98::NSD1 fusion was the most common NUP98 rearrangement, with a frequency of 59.6%(34 of 57). NUP98::NSD1 -positive patients who carried FLT3/ITD mutations had a decreased CR1 or CR2 rate than those patients carried FLT3/ITD mutation alone (P = 0.0001). Moreover, patients harboring both NUP98::NSD1 fusion and FLT3/ITD mutation exhibited inferior event-free survival (EFS, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.004) than patients who were dual negative for these two genetic lesions. The presence of only NUP98::NSD1 fusion had no significant impact on EFS or OS. We also found that cases with high FLT3/ITD AR levels ( > = 0.5) with or without NUP98::NSD1 had inferior prognosis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of both NUP98::NSD1 and FLT3/ITD was an independent prognostic factors for EFS (hazard ratio: 3.2, P = 0.001) in patients with pediatric AML. However, there was no obvious correlation with OS (hazard ratio: 1.3, P = 0.618). Stem cell transplantation did not improve the survival rate of cases with NUP98 fusion or NUP98::NSD1 AML in terms of EFS or OS. CONCLUSION: Presence of both NUP98::NSD1 and FLT3/ITD was found to be an independent factor for dismal prognosis in pediatric AML patients. Notably, lack of FLT3/ITD mutations in NUP98::NSD1 -positive patients did not retain its prognostic value.

Panel reactive antibody in thalassemic serum inhibits proliferation and differentiation of cord blood CD34+ cells in vitro.

Thalassemic children are at a high risk of graft rejection in cord blood transplantation. To investigate this possible mechanism, the authors evaluated the effect of panel reactive antibody on the growth of CD34(+) cells in vitro. On semisolid medium, CD34(+) cells derived from cord blood were incubated with thalassemic serum, and colony-forming units were counted after 10 days of culture. After incubation with serum-specific panel reactive antibody, profound decreases were found in the numbers of CFU-GM, CFU-GEMM and BFU-E compared with controls. The results indicated that serum-specific panel reactive antibody might have an apparent inhibition effect on proliferation and differentiation of cord blood CD34(+) cells.

[Effect of the serum panel reactive antibody on proliferation and differentiation of cord blood CD34+ cells in vitro].

OBJECTIVE: The low rate of engraftment in children with beta-thalassemia has seriously restricted the popularity of the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Panel reactive antibody (PRA) has been regarded as one of the important factors for the success of kidney transplantation. Poly-transfusion before transplantation is associated with the production of PRA. Also PRA is produced in the children with beta-thalassemia major who need poly-transfusion for life. PRA might be one of factors inducing the low rate of engraftment in children with beta-thalassemia. This study focused on observing the effect of PRA on the proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis and necrosis of cord blood CD34(+) cells in vitro by incubating the cord blood CD34(+) cells with serum containing PRA. METHOD: Seven samples of cord blood were collected and the HLA typing for every sample was done. Seven sera positive for PRA and seven negative sera were selected respectively. Mononuclear cells (MNCs) were obtained by Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation. CD34(+) cells were isolated from MNCs by positive selection using an immunomagnetic separation (CD34(+) progenitor cell isolation kit and auto-MACS). The CD34(+) cells of umbilical cord blood were incubated with the serum and complement in the following groups: A (absence of serum), B (presence of PRA positive serum), C (presence of PRA positive serum and complement), D (presence of complement), and E (presence of PRA negative serum). After incubation the samples were centrifuged and the supernatant was collected for LDH detection. At the same time the CD34(+) cells were harvested for assessing the expression of Annexin V and CD95 of the CD34(+) cells by flow cytometry and also for the detection of the DNA synthesis by (3)H-TaR incorporation. Meanwhile the cells were inoculated into the methylcellulose cultural system. The proliferation and hematopoietic potential of the CD34(+) cell of cord blood by the colony formation assay were detected on the day 10. RESULT: The concentration of LDH in group A was (20.71 +/- 2.81) U/L, which was significantly lower than that in group B (64.28 +/- 5.12) U/L and group C (84.29 +/- 4.99) U/L. The concentration of LDH in group B was significantly lower than that in group C, while there were no significant differences in the concentration of LDH among groups A, D and E (P > 0.05). The cpm in group A was (22 629 +/- 3288), which was significantly higher than that in group B (4598 +/- 2178) and group C (1626 +/- 1192). And the cpm in group B was significantly higher than that in group C. There were no significant differences in the cpm among groups A, D and E (P > 0.05). On day 10 of culture, the total colonies, granulocyte-macrophage colony forming unit (CFU-GM), mixed colony forming unit (CFU-GEMM) and erythroid burst colony forming unit (BFU-E) in group A were significantly higher than that in group B and C. The total colonies, CFU-GM and CFU-GEMM in group B were significantly higher than those in group C. No significant differences were found in the total colonies, CFU-GM, CFU-GEMM and BFU-E among groups A, D and E (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the CD95 and Annexin V expression among all the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: PRA could impair the membrane, decrease the DNA synthesis, and inhibit the colony formation of CD34(+) cord blood cells, which could be strengthened by the presence of the complement at the given concentration in our study. PRA had no significant influence on the apoptosis of CD34(+) cells in vitro.