RESUMO
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a predictive combined model for metastasis in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) by integrating multimodal data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, the clinical and imaging data (CT and ultrasound) of patients with ccRCC confirmed by pathology from three tertiary hospitals in different regions were collected from January 2013 to January 2023. We developed three models, including a clinical model, a radiomics model, and a combined model. The performance of the model was determined based on its discriminative power and clinical utility. The evaluation indicators included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and decision curve analysis (DCA) curve. RESULTS: A total of 251 patients were evaluated. Patients (n = 166) from Shandong University Qilu Hospital (Jinan) were divided into the training cohort, of which 50 patients developed metastases; patients (n = 37) from Shandong University Qilu Hospital (Qingdao) were used as internal testing, of which 15 patients developed metastases; patients (n = 48) from Changzhou Second People's Hospital were used as external testing, of which 13 patients developed metastases. In the training set, the combined model showed the highest performance (AUC, 0.924) in predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM), while the clinical and radiomics models both had AUCs of 0.845 and 0.870, respectively. In the internal testing, the combined model had the highest performance (AUC, 0.877) for predicting LNM, while the AUCs of the clinical and radiomics models were 0.726 and 0.836, respectively. In the external testing, the combined model had the highest performance (AUC, 0.849) for predicting LNM, while the AUCs of the clinical and radiomics models were 0.708 and 0.804, respectively. The DCA curve showed that the combined model had a significant prediction probability in predicting the risk of LNM in ccRCC patients compared with the clinical model or the radiomics model. CONCLUSION: The combined model was superior to the clinical and radiomics models in predicting LNM in ccRCC patients.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Aprendizado de Máquina , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Imagem Multimodal/métodos , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Medição de Risco , Adulto , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To develop and test an optimal machine learning model based on the enhanced computed tomography (CT) to preoperatively predict pathological grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 53 pathologically confirmed cases of ccRCC was performed and 25 consecutive ccRCC cases were selected as a prospective testing set. All patients underwent routine preoperative abdominal CT plain and enhanced scans. Renal tumor lesions were segmented on arterial phase images and 396 radiomics features were extracted. In the training set, seven discrimination classifiers for high- and low-grade ccRCCs were constructed based on seven different machine learning models, respectively, and their performance and stability for predicting ccRCC grades were evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and cross-validation. Prediction accuracy and area under ROC curve were used as evaluation indices. Finally, the diagnostic efficacy of the optimal model was verified in the testing set. RESULTS: The accuracies and AUC values achieved by support vector machine with radial basis function kernel (svmRadial), random forest and naïve Bayesian models were 0.860±0.158 and 0.919±0.118, 0.840±0.160 and 0.915±0.138, 0.839±0.147 and 0.921±0.133, respectively, which showed high predictive performance, whereas K-nearest neighborhood model yielded lower accuracy of 0.720±0.188 and lower AUC value of 0.810±0.150. Additionally, svmRadial had smallest relative standard deviation (RSD, 0.13 for AUC, 0.17 for accuracy), which indicates higher stability. CONCLUSION: svmRadial performs best in predicting pathological grades of ccRCC using radiomics features computed from the preoperative CT images, and thus may have high clinical potential in guiding preoperative decision.