Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Orthop Surg ; 2024 Jun 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38946014

RESUMO

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFs) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) present a significant clinical challenge due to their increasing incidence with an aging population and evolving surgical practices. Historically, classifications were primarily based on anatomical fracture location, the stability of the implant, and bone quality surrounding the implant. We critically analyzed 25 classification systems, highlighting the emergence and adaptations of key systems such as the Vancouver classification system (VCS) and the Unified classification system (UCS), which are lauded for their simplicity and effectiveness yet require further refinement. VCS, developed in 1995, categorizes fractures based on the site, implant stability, and bone quality, and remains widely used due to its robust applicability across different clinical settings. Introduced in 2014, UCS expands the VCS to encompass all periprosthetic fractures with additional fracture types, aiming for a universal application. Despite their widespread adoption, these systems exhibit shortcomings, including the incomplete inclusion of all PPFF types and the imprecise assessment of implant stability and surrounding bone loss. These gaps can result in misclassification and suboptimal treatment outcomes. This paper suggests the necessity for ongoing improvements in classification systems to include emerging fracture types and refined diagnostic criteria, ensuring that they remain relevant to contemporary orthopedic practices and continue to facilitate the precise tailoring of treatment to patient-specific circumstances. This comprehensive historical review serves as a foundation for future innovations in classification systems, ultimately aiming to standardize PPFF treatment and improve patient prognosis.

2.
Zhen Ci Yan Jiu ; 49(6): 604-610, 2024 Jun 25.
Artigo em Inglês, Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38897804

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy in adjuvant treatment of residual symptoms after percutaneous cervical disc nucleoplasty (PCDN) for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). METHODS: A total of 70 CSR patients were divided into treatment group and control group according to random number table, with 35 cases in each group. Patients in the control group received PCDN, while patients in the treatment group further received ultrasound-guided acupotomy, which was performed once every 5 to 7 days for a total of 4 to 6 times (adjusted according to the condition of patients). The visual analog score (VAS), neck dysfunction index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association cervical spondylosis scale (JOA score), and Tanaka Yasuhisa 20-point scale were adopted in the assessment before PCDN and 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after PCDN. The clinical efficacy, postoperative adverse reactions and complications of the 2 groups were evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with those before PCDN, the VAS score and NDI score of the 2 groups were decreased (P<0.05), JOA score and Tanaka Yasuhisa 20-point score were increased (P<0.05) at 1 day and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Compared with same group 1 day after surgery, the VAS score and NDI score of the treatment group were decreased (P<0.05), while JOA score and Tanaka Yasuhisa 20-point score were increased (P<0.05) at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Compared with the control group at the same time points, the VAS score and NDI score of the treatment group were decreased (P<0.05), while JOA score and Tanaka Yasuhisa 20-point score were increased (P<0.05) at 1, 3 and 6 months after operation. The effective rate and excellent rate of the treatment group 1, 3 and 6 months after PCDN were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Follow-up to 1 year after surgery, no significant postoperative adverse reactions and complications were found in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided acupotomy can significantly improve the residual symptoms after PCDN for CSR patients, and the clinical efficacy is significantly better than that of PCDN alone, and this therapy is safe and reliable.


Assuntos
Terapia por Acupuntura , Vértebras Cervicais , Radiculopatia , Espondilose , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Espondilose/cirurgia , Espondilose/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilose/terapia , Adulto , Radiculopatia/cirurgia , Radiculopatia/terapia , Radiculopatia/diagnóstico por imagem , Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso , Discotomia Percutânea/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
3.
Orthop Surg ; 15(7): 1772-1780, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37254248

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The isolated second metacarpal base fracture-dislocations in adults are rare, and the traditional main treatments include closed reduction with the plaster or splint and open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF). However, closed reduction with the plaster or splint is not solid enough and ORIF can damage the surrounding important tissues. The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical outcomes of closed reduction and external fixation (CREF) for the treatment of isolated second metacarpal base fracture-dislocations. METHODS: Ten patients who suffered isolated second metacarpal base fracture-dislocations between January 1, 2010, and February 1, 2020, were reviewed. All of the patients were treated by CREF. Radiographs and computed tomography scans were performed regularly after the operation. The grip and pinch strength, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, American Society for Surgery of the Hand total active movement (TAM) and total active flexion (TAF) scores, Cooney score, Sollerman hand function test (SHFT) score, QuickDASH score, and range of motion of the index finger were recorded at the last follow-up visit to evaluate functional recovery; the injured and healthy hands were compared and we also recorded postoperative complications. The paired samples t-test was used to compare the healthy and injured sides. RESULTS: The patients were followed up for a median of 29.50 ± 4.2 months. There were no significant differences in the grip strength, pinch strength, angle of proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) flexion, or angle of distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) flexion between the injured and healthy sides at the final follow-up visit (all p > 0.05). The mean TAM (268.20 ± 4.21) and TAF scores (270.60 ± 4.17) on injured side were significantly lower than those on healthy side (all p < 0.05). The mean Cooney score (93.50 ± 7.47) and SHFT score (78.50 ± 1.08) on injured side were lower, while the mean QuickDASH score (7.05 ± 3.11) on injured side was higher than those on healthy side (all p < 0.05). The mean VAS pain score was 0.50 ± 0.53 on injured side. There were no significant postoperative complications except for traumatic arthritis in one patient without obvious clinical symptoms. CONCLUSION: CREF achieves the satisfactory curative effect, and the patients obtain the good functional recovery without significant postoperative complications. CREF is a safe and effective treatment for isolated second metacarpal base fracture-dislocations with satisfactory clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Fratura-Luxação , Luxações Articulares , Ossos Metacarpais , Adulto , Humanos , Ossos Metacarpais/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fixadores Externos , Resultado do Tratamento , Luxações Articulares/cirurgia , Dor , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular
4.
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue ; 25(5): 294-7, 2013 May.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23663581

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To survey the risk factors for early death of patients with acute severe traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data of consecutive patients with acute severe traumatic cervical spinal cord injury admitted from January 1st 1994 to October 1st 2012 were made. The patients died within 30 days or not were allocated for death group or survival group. The risk factors for early death were analyzed through univariate analysis and logistic analysis. RESULTS: Among 1093 patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury, 352 patients with severe injury were included, and the early death rate was 14.49% (51/352). The leading causes of spinal cord injury were vehicle accidents (153 cases) and falls (117 cases). The main causes of early death were respiratory failure (16 cases), multiple organ failure (MOF, 14 cases) and gastrointestinal bleeding (11 cases). Combining the results of univariate and logistic analysis, it was found that high acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II(APACHEII) score [>15, odds ratio (OR)=11.595, P=0.000], high damage level (OR=3.519, P=0.032), hyponatremia (OR=6.316, P=0.000), neurogenic shock (OR=6.209, P=0.000), pulmonary infection (OR=14.627, P=0.000) and tracheostomy (OR=8.983, P=0.000) were risk factors for early death of patients with acute severe traumatic cervical spinal cord injury, however, the impact of gender, age, surgery, fracture and dislocation, high central fever, and administration of steroids on early death of patients with acute severe traumatic cervical spinal cord injury were uncertain. CONCLUSION: The factors reflecting disease severity and occurrence of related complications were more important in predicting the early death among patients with acute severe traumatic cervical spinal cord injury, while the influence of age, surgical manipulation etc. were minor factors.


Assuntos
Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/mortalidade , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Causas de Morte , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos , Insuficiência Respiratória , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA