Predictors of Financial Toxicity in Patients Receiving Concurrent Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy.

Purpose: Financial toxicity (FT) is a significant concern for patients with cancer. We reviewed prospectively collected data to explore associations with FT among patients undergoing concurrent, definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) within a diverse, urban, academic radiation oncology department. Methods and Materials: Patients received CRT in 1 of 3 prospective trials. FT was evaluated before CRT (baseline) and then weekly using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 questionnaire. Patients were classified as experiencing FT if they answered ≥2 on a Likert scale question (1-4 points) asking if they experienced FT. Rate of change of FT was calculated using linear regression; worsening FT was defined as increase ≥1 point per month. χ2, t tests, and logistic regression were used to assess predictors of FT. Results: Among 233 patients, patients attended an average of 9 outpatient and 4 radiology appointments over the 47 days between diagnosis and starting CRT. At baseline, 52% of patients reported experiencing FT. Advanced T stage (odds ratio, 2.47; P = .002) was associated with baseline FT in multivariate analysis. The mean rate of FT change was 0.23 Likert scale points per month. In total, 26% of patients demonstrated worsening FT during CRT. FT at baseline was not associated with worsening FT (P = .98). Hospitalization during treatment was associated with worsening FT (odds ratio, 2.30; P = .019) in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Most patients reported FT before CRT. These results suggest that FT should be assessed (and, potentially, addressed) before starting definitive treatment because it develops early in a patient's cancer journey. Reducing hospitalizations may mitigate worsening FT. Further research is warranted to design interventions to reduce FT and avoid hospitalizations.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Chemoradiation plays a core role in the definitive and preoperative management of esophageal cancer. Remarkable advances in technology now allow for the implementation of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to minimize normal organ damage and to maximize coverage of tumorous targets. While IMRT is commonly accepted in the treatment of prostate and head and neck cancers, there have been clinical and dosimetric studies supporting the use of IMRT in esophagus cancer. In addition, the IMRT technique was recently enhanced by the availability of volumetric intensity modulated arc therapy (VMAT). VMAT may allow for faster delivery of IMRT with the advantage of normal organ protection compared to the stop-and-shoot IMRT, with faster delivery time and reduced monitor units. This review summarizes the use of chemoradiation in esophageal cancer, discusses current dosimetric data and clinical outcomes with the use of IMRT, and reviews IMRT as part of multi-modality treatment in esophageal cancer.

Association of Technetium(99m) MAG-3 renal scintigraphy with change in creatinine clearance following chemoradiation to the abdomen in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Information on differential renal function following abdominal chemoradiation is limited. This study evaluated the association between renal function as measured by biochemical endpoints and scintigraphy and dose volume parameters in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received abdominal chemoradiation between 2002 and 2009 were identified for this study. Technetium(99m) MAG-3 scintigraphy and laboratory data were obtained prior to and after chemoradiation in 6 month intervals. Factors assessed included age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, and dose volume parameters. Renal function was assessed by biochemical endpoints and renal scintigraphy. RESULTS: Significant reductions in relative renal function of the primarily irradiated kidney and creatinine clearance were seen. Split renal function decreased from 49.75% pre-radiation to 47.74% and 41.28% at 6-12 months and >12 months post-radiation (P=0.0184). Creatinine clearance declined from 90.67ml/min pre-radiation to 82.23ml/min and 74.54ml/min at 6-12 months and >12 months post-radiation (P<0.0001). Univariate analysis of patients who had at least one post-radiation renogram showed the percent volumes of the primarily irradiated kidney receiving ≥ 25 Gy (V(25)) and 40 Gy (V(40)) were significantly associated with ≥5% decrease in relative renal function (P=0.0387 and P=0.0438 respectively). CONCLUSION: Decline in split renal function using Technetium(99m) MAG-3 scintigraphy correlates with decrease in creatinine clearance and radiation dose-volume parameters following abdominal chemoradiation. Change in split perfusion can be detected as early as 6 months post-radiation. Scintigraphy may provide early determination and quantification of subclinical renal injury prior to clinical evidence of nephropathy.

Multiple primary tumors in men with breast cancer diagnoses: a SEER database review.

BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) comprises 1% of all breast cancers and less than 1% of cancer cases in men. After a diagnosis of MBC, men are at risk of developing a second primary cancer, particularly a second primary breast cancer. The objective of this study is to analyze the characteristics of the population of men diagnosed with a second malignancy, specifically a second MBC. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 4,873 male patients diagnosed with invasive or in situ breast cancer from 1973 to 2004 were identified and data from patients who developed a second MBC were reviewed. Additional non-breast primary cancer diagnoses were also recorded. RESULTS: A review of 4,966 records corresponding to 4,873 patients revealed 4,462 invasive and 504 in situ breast cancer events. Of the 4,873 patients, 93 (1.9%) were identified with a second MBC. Among the 4,873 patients with MBC, 1,001 (21%) have other non-breast primary cancer diagnoses recorded in the SEER registry. CONCLUSIONS: Although MBC is uncommon, these patients are at risk of a contralateral breast cancer and second primary non-breast cancers. Our findings support that men with breast cancer would benefit from continued long-term surveillance for breast cancer and appropriate screening for non-breast cancers.

Bilateral risk for subsequent breast cancer after lobular carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data.

PURPOSE: Noninvasive lesions involving the lobules of the breast are increasingly diagnosed as incidental microscopic findings at the time of lumpectomy or core-needle biopsy. We investigated the incidence rates of invasive breast cancer (IBC) after a diagnosis of lobular carcinoma-in-situ (LCIS) by using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 4,853) having a diagnosis of primary LCIS in the time period of 1973 to 1998 were identified using the SEER Public Use CD-ROM data. The database was then searched for patients with subsequent primary IBC occurrences (n = 350). The clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with subsequent primary IBCs were compared with the characteristics of patients with primary IBCs attained during the same time period (N = 255,114). RESULTS: The incidence of IBC increased over time from diagnosis of LCIS, with 7.1% +/- 0.5% incidence of IBC at 10 years. IBCs detected after partial mastectomy occurred in either breast (46% ipsilateral and 54% contralateral); however, after mastectomy, most IBCs were contralateral (94.7%). IBCs occurring after LCIS more often represented invasive lobular histology (23.1%) compared with primary IBCs (6.5%). The standardized incidence ratio (the ratio of observed to expected cases) for developing IBC was 2.4 (95% CI, 2.1 to 2.6) adjusted for age and year of diagnosis. CONCLUSION: LCIS is associated with increased risk of subsequent invasive disease, with equal predisposition in either breast. The minimum risk of developing IBC after LCIS is 7.1% at 10 years.

Sarcoma as a second malignancy after treatment for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Second malignant neoplasms may be a consequence of radiotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer. Prior studies evaluating sarcomas as second malignant neoplasms in breast cancer patients have been limited by the numbers of patients and relatively low incidence of sarcoma. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries, we evaluated the influence of radiation therapy on the development of subsequent sarcomas in cases with primary breast cancer. METHODS: Cases with primary invasive breast cancer (n = 274,572) were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Cancer Incidence Public-Use Database (1973-1997). The database was then queried to determine the cases developing subsequent sarcomas (n = 263). Eighty-seven of these cases received radiation therapy, and 176 had no radiation therapy. The cumulative incidence of developing secondary sarcoma and the survival post developing secondary sarcoma were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The occurrence of sarcoma was low, regardless of whether cases received or did not receive radiation therapy: 3.2 per 1,000 (SE [standard error] = 0.4) and 2.3 per 1,000 (SE = 0.2) cumulative incidence at 15 years post diagnosis, respectively (p = 0.001). Of the sarcomas occurring within the field of radiation, angiosarcoma accounted for 56.8%, compared to only 5.7% of angiosarcomas occurring in cases not receiving radiotherapy. The cumulative incidence of angiosarcoma at 15 years post diagnosis was 0.9 per 1,000 for cases receiving radiation (SE = 0.2) and 0.1 per 1,000 for cases not receiving radiation (SE < 0.1). Overall survival was poor for cases of sarcoma after breast cancer (27-35% at 5 years), but not significantly different between patients receiving or not receiving radiation therapy for their primary breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer is associated with an increased risk of subsequent sarcoma, but the magnitude of this risk is small. Angiosarcoma is significantly more prevalent in cases treated with radiotherapy, occurring especially in or adjacent to the radiation field. The small difference in risk of subsequent sarcoma for breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy does not supersede the benefit of radiotherapy.