Cetuximab or Nimotuzumab Versus Cisplatin Concurrent with Radiotherapy for Local-Regionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Meta-analysis

Background: It is unclear whether Cetuximab (CTX) or Nimotuzumab (NTZ) concurrent with radiotherapy delivers equivalent or improved results with fewer toxicities over standard cisplatin (CDDP) concurrent with radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: The strategy involved searching the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Internet Web, Wanfang and Chinese Biomedical databases. Controlled clinical trials that compared concurrent CTX/NTZ with radiotherapy versus CDDP with radiotherapy in local-regionally advanced NPC were included. Results: In all, 1,239 patients in six clinical trials were included in the analysis. The hazard ratios (HRs) between the CTX/NTZ and CDDP groups were 1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-1.64), 1.06 (95% CI 0.50-2.25), 1.04 (95% CI 0.61-1.76), and 1.05 (95% CI 0.73-1.50) for overall survival, local-regional failure-free survival, distant metastasis failure-free survival, and disease-free survival, respectively. Significant differences were found in the incidences of grade 3-4 anaemia [Risk ratio (RR) 0.11 95% CI 0.02-0.58], grade 3-4 neutropenia (RR 0.23 95% CI 0.12- 0.44), grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (RR 0.31 95% CI 0.12- 0.79), and grade 3-4 vomiting (RR 0.04 95% CI 0.00-0.29) in favour of the CTX/NTZ group. However, the patients in the CTX/NTZ group experienced a higher incidence of grade 3-4 skin rash (RR 6.45 95% CI 3.84-10.84). Conclusions: Regarding the efficacy and side effects, the combination of CTX / NTZ and radiotherapy may be an alterative treatment regimen of standard CDDP concurrent with radiotherapy in local-regionally advanced NPC, especially in patients who cannot tolerate or who refuse chemotherapy.

Compliance with National Guidelines on the Treatment of Stage II­IVB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in a Regional Cancer Center of Southern China

Objective: It is unknown whether the treatment provided to patients with stage II-IVB NPC in southern China adheres to the 2015 NCCN guidelines. Consequently, a retrospective analysis was conducted, in order to evaluate the compliance with NCCN guidelines and identify the areas for improvement. Methods: The present study was a retrospective study that included patients with stage II-IVB NPC in southern China during the period 2013 and 2014. The treatment regimens were compared with the 2015 NCCN guidelines in order to identify potential noncompliance regarding the treatment for stage II­IVB NPC. The statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, univariate and/or multivariate analysis using SPSS version 16.0.0. Results: A total of 215 patients, including 166 men (77.21%) and 49 women (22.79%), were involved in the analysis. Although the overall rate of noncompliance with the NCCN recommendations was 23.26%, the noncompliance rate of concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT), induction of chemotherapy (IC) followed by CCRT and CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) was 7.02%, 39.76% and 50.00%, respectively. Univariate analysis indicated that NCCN noncompliance regarding the treatment for stage II-IVB NPC did not exhibit a significant correlation with the parameters age, gender, insurance status, education profile, first clinic department, careers, comorbidities and overall clinical stage, but it indicated a significant association with the therapeutic schedule (P<0.05). The multivariate analysis indicated that the NCCN noncompliance regarding the treatment for stage II­IVB NPC exhibited a statistically significant difference between CCRT and CCRT followed by AC (OR=0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.27, P<0.05 ), although the difference noted between CCRT and IC followed by CCRT was not significantly different (OR=1.71, 95% CI 0.50-5.87,P=0.40). Conclusions: The use of specific therapeutic schedules may affect the noncompliance with NCCN guidelines regarding the treatment for stage II­IVB NPC in southern China, notably with regard to the treatment schedule of CCRT followed by AC.

Significant Efficacy of Additional Concurrent Chemotherapy with Radiotherapy for Postoperative Cervical Cancer with Risk Factors: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whether concurrent chemotherapy treatment is superior to radiotherapy alone as an adjuvant regimen for postoperative cervical carcinoma with risk factors remains controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search strategy was used to examine Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Internet Web, the Chinese Biomedical Database and the Wanfang Database. Article reference lists and scientific meeting abstracts were also screened. Controlled trials comparing concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in postoperative cervical cancer were included. The methodological quality of non-randomized controlled trials was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Randomized controlled studies were evaluated with the Cochrane handbook. A meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: A total of 1,073 patients from 11 clinical trials were analysed, with 582 patients in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group and 491 patients in the radiotherapy group. Hazard ratios (HR) of 0.47 (95% CI 0.31-0.72) and 0.50 (95% CI 0.35-0.72) were observed for overall survival and progression-free survival, indicating a benefit from the additional use of concurrent chemotherapy. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that cervical cancer with high risk factors significantly benefitted from concurrent chemotherapy when examining overall survival (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.67) and progression-free survival (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.70), but patients with intermediate risk factors showed no benefit from concurrent chemotherapy in overall survival (HR 1.72, 95% CI 0.28-10.41) and progression-free survival (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.19-6.14). No significant differences were observed for grade 3-4 anaemia (risk ratio (RR) 3.87, 95% CI 0.69-21.84), grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (RR 3.04, 95% CI 0.88- 10.58), grade 3-4 vomiting or nausea (RR 1.71, 95% CI 0.27-10.96), or grade 3-4 diarrhoea (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.69-2.83). Significant differences were observed for grade 3-4 neutropenia in favour of the radiotherapy group (RR 7.23, 95% CI 3.94-13.26). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves survival in postoperative cervical cancer cases with high risk factors but not in those with intermediate risk factors.

Evaluation of miR-29c, miR-124, miR-135a and miR-148a in predicting lymph node metastasis and tumor stage of gastric cancer.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNA that have diverse functions in different biological process. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive ability of miR-29c, miR-124, miR-135a and miR-148a for lymph node metastasis (LNM) and tumor stage in gastric cancer. The expression of these miRNAs was detected and quantitated in gastric cancer tissues and in adjacent normal tissues from 60 patients by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. CT imaging and clinicopathologic characteristics of these patients were performed. The result of this study was that these miRNAs were down-regulated in gastric cancer tissues; The low expression of miR-124 and miR-135a in LNM group and tumor III-IV stages (P < 0.01) presented the potential correlation with LNM and tumor stage; The two miRNAs were highly correlated with r = 0.730. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that miR-124 had better predictive ability to identify LNM and tumor stage. It could discriminate non-LNM from LNM with 80.0% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity and discriminate tumor Ι-II stages from tumor III-IV stages with 71.9% sensitivity and 75.0% specificity at the best cut-off value of 0.0125. Compared with CT imaging, miR-124 had similar specificity (0.800 versus 0.900, P = 0.508) but higher sensitivity (0.800 versus 0.500, P = 0.022) for lymph node assessment; Combined of miR-124 and CT imaging, The sensitivity and specificity of assessing LNM were raised to 83.3% and 90.0% respectively. Taken together, miR-124 may be a predictor for LNM and tumor stage in gastric cancer.

Effectiveness and safety profile of S-1-based chemotherapy compared with capecitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced gastric and colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

The aim of the present analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety profile of S-1-based chemotherapy (SBCT) versus capecitabine-based chemotherapy (CBCT) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). A meta-analysis was performed, which included eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were identified using RevMan 5.1.0 software. A total of 1,064 patients from 11 RCTs, comprising of 527 patients in the SBCT group and 537 patients in the CBCT group, were included in the analysis. For AGC, the meta-analysis of overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR), 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.85-1.12], time to progression (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.80-1.12) and overall response rate (ORR) [odds ratio (OR), 1.06; 95% CI, 0.72-1.55] of patients in the SBCT group indicated no statistical significance when compared with those in the CBCT group. Furthermore, for ACRC, a pooled analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the SBCT and CBCT groups (OS: HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.61-1.10; progression-free survival: HR, 0.79; 95% CI=0.60-1.04; ORR: OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.91-1.78). The statistically significant differences identified in the overall meta-analysis indicated a low incidence of grade 3-4 hand-foot-syndrome (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.06-0.36) in the SBCT group; however no statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of grade 3-4 anemia, thrombocytopenia, leucopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, stomatitis or nausea/vomiting. The SBCT treatment exhibited similar efficacy and an approximately equivalent safety profile compared with the CBCT treatment and was an alternative to CBCT for patients with AGC or ACRC; however, further investigation is required to provide confirmation.